Youth and Marketing
Smoking Issues 3 Key Areas: Taxes, Social Acceptability, Restrictions
Abstract
Examines smoking issues in three key areas: taxes, social acceptability, and restrictions. Discusses impact of taxes and pricing on cigarette sales. Analyzes how smoking acceptance has declined, how more smokers are affected by laws, and how future will impact. Mentions youth (16+) opinion on social acceptability of smoking. Analyzes price leverage and production cost. Outlines psychological impact of smoking restrictions, smoker/non-smoker differences in mindset. Discusses how smokers tend to retain young adult outlook on life; warns against marketing to non-smoker mindset.
Fields
- Notes
Original document code was 1003.
- Company
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
- Minor Subject
- Advertising and Marketing -research
- Advertising and Marketing -strategy
- Smoker -profile
- Smoking -incidence
- Smoking -laws
- Advertising and Marketing -strategy
- Major Subject
- Advertising and Marketing
- Smoker
Document Images
SMOKING ISSUES
3 KEY AREAS: TAXES
SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY
. RESTRICTIONS
4w,

,
,~ s 4`:. . - . . , .
'SMOKING'"`ISSUES"
~ . BACKGROUND';'
NrrCs jrGA f2 j:TE,:. S-
` ~
AL
,
TAXES ON CIGARETES HAVE MORE THAN DOUBLED SINCE THE MID'6O0S
EVEN IF,THE,FET.NERE;'..TQ BE RETURNED FROM 161 TO H1,.-THE AVERAGE`
. ,.. ,:. .. . . . . ;
. . . . y ;q . . . . . . .
SMOKER WOULD STILL PAY NEARLY 24E PER PACK IN STATE
EXCISE TAXES
~ -. ~ra~~ T~
C I ~'ARE~TE'f AX~`P'ER?'~P'R
ift[i 1WINTEO AM 900 TAXDIA ATATi1 rliM li4OM
AND FEDERAL
..
v::
.a.
.!
. r!
,gu!
.a
..rr
,..rs.
+fl.s
..a..4~a.flalafaf
:
,w-...sl..wl:./a!!!lwr.!!f!!rf
~ ..:..............l.........*......
:..:......laaala!!l.....l......f......f
...........w..!!l..rl............l.......
"!!!rlfR!!a!l!!!!.!!!1!!!!!r!!.la.!!!f!!f!rlf/f
'laflfla.la.a.aalal.!!.!a!a!.laa!!lall..lfaal.R~
i!!!.lar.!!la..l......!!a.!!f!!!.!la.r.!!r
. _
~l.llrll!l.1.ll.lr.l1!!!!..!!!!!a!!f1!!!!!!!l..r.
......aa.Na/alrarir!!ia .!!!!!al.rr.!!!!l..ar+
lT~raJl.a!!!falllrf!!a!f!!!.!!!..l.~,:y
a
.aua.a..a.aaa .u.a.aua...ara ,
ll!!f.!!r!al~,la.afa!!.a!!!1P":.t..
la!!.a!!!f.l.a!!Ialallll!!. , . . .- . . . . :"J .
!la..u ..r...l..l....!-
r.aar.l...!!!ffl.rwt . ~'. ,~.
.l.rsaas..a~...r.!...r- r , .
asaarr!.
.
s a s s . - . -
0
®
STATL Ayp
f!n[IMl
pi1t1CAS Tlr TAX UA03c! r?loam
ALTHOUGH TAXES MAY ROUTINELY DEPRESS DEMAND, THEIR MAJOR MARKETING
IMPACT RESULTS FROM THEIR SUDDEN CHANGES, AT THE STATE, LOCAL AND
NATIONAL LEVEL. THESE SUDDEN SHIFTS HAVE INDUSTRY MIDE IMPACT,
~
0
BUT ALSO DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT BRANDS WHICH HAVE MORE, OR p~.
LESS, PR1Ce~SENSITIVE$tFRAMCHIY
SES-
W
m
m
..
f

..:
SMQWG'
ISSIfES
: 5 a_~#w~~rrw~w!L`tsi~.
TOTAL 16+ ` ' , , " 42
SMOKERS 18+ 75
-s
x z~v`i~w~
3~1'
'r! ai
y-;h t ri;:t ~s
ACCORDING TO.YANKELOVICH, ONLY 36X°OF.AMFRiCANS OVER THE`AGF. OF-16"
ENJOYMENT. ABOUT HALF AGREED 10 YEARS AGO
FEEL IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO SMOKE CIGARETTES, L~'10i?ERATION, FOR
X AGREE 48 45 43 42 41 36
EVEN AMONG SMOKERS, MORE THAN 1-OUT'OF'3 HAVE COME TO FEEL THAT
SMOK I NG I S NOT AC,f4 PTAALF .
<
64
THESE ATTITUDES APPEAR IN LEGISLATION,, AS, SMOKijNG,,
R[S?RI.CTIONS~---
,-

L
' 1i. .., ~ ..
?f%~+< . ~ .
SMQKING RESTRL('J10N
. , . . " . ,. . N
&I
j0jw'-:; E:
OK I NG,.
ODAY, IHZ OF: AMERICANS' ARE -'AFFECTED! BY,LAWS ,RESTRICTING SM
~
~
~
,
COMPARED TO 352 10 i'EARS AsO '- MORE THAN DOUR1.E
IH% OF AMERICANS ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERE RESTRICTIONS, WHICH AFFECT
:,,i;: ., . ,_,.-~. . ,. 4.,.;
THEIR.ABILITY TO SMOKE''INTNE COURSE OF NORMAL SOCIAL AND WORK LIVES,
BY SEGREGATING OR PROHIBITING SMOKERS IN RESTAURANTS OR I{II. N_EiAZARD03!S
PLACES OF WORK'
STRTE LEGISLRTION RESTRICTING SMOKING
T f us r01.1M'ILC".b /MO itvOQTY
g
M
1tl12AR0&A NOIq'L=
atMER, sCfIObL
tllMlsnneX,TU rBcurrr
.e : ~~ W~ ~ .. . . ~ . . . .
~~f~/AIWV.b= ~ i7M
t
//{/'///I
~I,
./I
...11111.(l.
~
t
I~fr... 1
,'1!*::s:
0 ...::i
a.a ...................... 1
::::::::::::::::::::::::: _;
rrl..r.f.a.
1
..1 l
t . ... r ..~ 0 "
H ,' .......,~ ., '0 ,
14 r to./ ... ..,..
%/
// I
. ! 1.....
~ .. ; r.f .r..u./r 1 . . u! ./ !I~ i.
!
a~ .
~aa .. a......r. .v~t! t 1! ~ r ~.
. aH i ..a.r. a
. .
,
flf.0/1 1 .0 . 1 . ~ ~
~1 f1a 1 .
1/1 ' .
f..11 .
.fy.r.. ri ~ .::
.
:'nri...:.::a::::
'"
.1f..tl
~!!.
4. st>ll
aN~a.....~.~~.~...~L. r..d ll
.. ~!
_ .. ~, .. a . .
.. ~ ~;
_.
1~4
1;n

it:
BACKGROUND (CONT'D)
.i ywil.f ,)
V.
C}a~;Ly-7>Rc
~a W{
in: , -.~. ..a... . . . . . 'yyk:4-
- !
,
THE,
;,PRESSURE O,F, SMOKINGriISSUESa~IS°r~,ALMOST`CERTAIN`°TO ;INCREASE
THE.LATE'.HU'S.
, . .,, . . ..
m,.,- , . ...w:-~.- . ,~
INDEX
SOURCE: VdLS 1983
ONE CLEAR INDICATOR OF THIS IS THE BABY.BUBBLE. ALTHOUGH THERE,
WILL MBE A SI1EfABLE INfLU~X}' OF SMOKERS~INTO AG
ES 35-49 IN THE LATE
$0"5, THIS WAS A LOW °INCIDENCE GROUP"- THUS, THERE WILL BE A' j1LICH
k 'i4)fb'I:Wll
N
WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN THAT AGES 35-49 ARE MORE HEALTH CONSCIOUS THAN
OLDER OR ,:Y01lHGER GROUPS,-THEY ARE; ALSO: AT~ A,, STAGE OF 1 NCREASED ~
POLITICAL CLOUT, ECONOMIC SOPHISTICATION, AND `SOCIETAL
CONSCIOUSNESS~'
~SOCIETALLY CONSCIOUS~,s,
x-L DISTRIBUTION.W"40-A
18-24: 25-34 35-44 45-65
31 1 171 224 65
"BABYllBUBBLE4""~`"~
INCREASING POPULATION 65+ WILL PROVIDE A RELIABLE GROWING CLIENT
BASE TO
~ .. ,, . ~ ~ , W.,~.~~,, ,,; ,
BOOST`THE'`INFLUENCE`'`OF HEAITH'IlkSTITUTIONS AND DRAW EVER
MORE ATTENTION TO HEALTH CARE AND 1NS:IRANCE COSTS
< 65
65+
SOURCE: HEM4, ....*,,
gYG HEAI COST
S 597
31,026
w
.0
~

... . ... .. ~d':,*>ti
! } +."-a~ T1~2 f21ZLA aL <
y~`.~ ~ . .. . . . .. ~-. ..
y
2. GROWING SMOKER/NONSMOKER'DIFFERENCES
.lWi.:J'! .a
..r:..fw r.1.,. ~ . .
11
a,

DEGREE OF LEVERAGE AVAILABLE
PROFIT
.,~..~..,~..~.~
.
g
r
r
e
9
. j. . . : .v-' ~:. .F Y
}
ISSM,Lsoq PRIC'-1NG#LEVERAGE4*~-
STRUCTURE FOR CIGARETTES,'GIVI"tG !lNBRANiED'CIGARETTES MORE. THAN
4 POINTS OF THE MARKET AND ADDING ANOTHER POINT OF SAVINGS
BRANDS
MSA -St ARr,
.
1m 1981 `. M
GENERICS .04 .46 .95 2.92 4.35
SAVINGS SEGMENT 04 .46 .95 3.34 5.50
BY EARLY 1984,1
SMOK
ER
l
N,°S
HAD.'AL
READY
; P
(JRCHASED
~
ENERIC4,~.
G
,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
.
:
.
CIGARETTES OR WAS SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING BUYING THEM
(YaHKftovtCOY: ~.~:
I OF TOTAL SMDKERS
TOTAL 18+
Lm
8%
20%
v
HOWEVER, THERE ARE TWO KEY PROBLEMS IN CONSIDERING SAVINGS
BRANDS:
1983 1984

0
S
t03Jb~`rvF5, ' - "- .3!
1 + K-".ar ?
~~~ ~ ~ aSM01CING ICSIIF ;.,_
_,t7in .'.h T
A.~ S YINGS.SIDF~~Co,N~n
.. . .. , r'.::~ . -.. ~ . . -. .. ~ . . , ~ i'-.
..
s
THERE IS NOT MUCH LEVERAGE ON THE,LOif'.PRICE,END FOR CIGAR'
ETTES HERE WE SEE,THAT',BECAUSE`0F THE FIXED TAXES INCLUDED
IN THE-CONSUMER PRICE OF CIGARETTES, IT TAKES A LARGE PR1CE
4+'~*., s: }, t....;+,., w. o NA'.ar^.~s a~~:+s: q r.r,.~.urt4
CUT AT THE~'t~A~NUFACTURER CEVEI- T0 SE'KORTH ANYTH 1 NG! 3!0 THE Y~
CONSUMER PRICE
: :a?
..,.,.^
x CHANGE
E PER
PACK
2
16`
91
86
IF MFGR. CUTS-BY
32 .
~.~
32 -,
15 14 12
34 22
80 66
5% 12% 27%
.. . ~~.b&". .. a ~ '=r: C 3

A. HERE.IS AN AVERAGE`1984 BREAKDOWN
< A PACK OF C I GAfi£T T
PURCHASED LEAF
PROCESSING
TOTAL TOBACCO
F II,TER
PAPER, ETC
PACKAGING
TOTAL OTHER MAT'L
MANUFACTURING LABOR
TOTAL DIRECT
ADVERTISING
->OVERHEAD/TRANSPORTAI'ION'.
~m W
TOTAL INDIRECT
TOTAL MFG. COST
OPERATING PROFIT
PRICE EXCL. FET
.
a
L PER PaC A
-
7.3 17
4.0 9
11.3 26
1.6 4
1-3 3
2.6 6
5.5 13
2.8 -2 -.$ 6
19.6 45
7-2 17
1.6 .4
8.8 20
.
28.b 66
14.7 34 ~
..
43.1 100
yo~ 6wa.~ ,w..k,:...ww +ll~"~rt«~MyS ~ irliW«~WMMY.~rY~kr~i'.awa:^~a _
+w~
w Tluiww~:,HERE "IS NO ITEM ON}THIIST~s'JaNtl4MI~fHICH CAN BE CUT ENOUGH TO GIVE{~
THE CONSUMER A 1OL PER PACK SAVINGS WITHOUT UNDERCUTTING PRODUCT
ACCEPTABILITY OR REDUCING PROFIT
ADVERTISING IS THE MOST CCNTROLLABLE ITEM, BUT ELIMINATING
ADVERTISING ONLY SAVES 71 A PACK
%0
N

y A-MJ"9io% 4~:s
1
B
PREMIUM SI[_1.L
~
~
p,
% CHANGE
OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS, THE INDUSTRY
UP-SIDE LEVERAGE WITH ITS AGGRESSIVE
~M~
'
11 "TH' TES IF wE
ER .
GARET
E I'S'LEVERAGE ON THE HIGH PRICE SIDE INCI
WERE TO INCREASE OUR_PRICE 25%, AND THE,TRADE TOOK THE SAME
MARKUP, THE' CONSUMER MIGHT.ONLY SEE At1Ql,INCRE
....,__....... ASE
TRADE MARK'
MANUFACTURER
CONSUMER PRICE
YEAR AVERA aE;
1994
!
.K.
~
a}
y
'
43
CONSUMER PRICE
MANUFACTURER
15
91
43
100
100
41< 35
34 > 47
BUT, THERE HAVE BEEN NO SIGNIFICANT PREMIUM BRANDS
IF WE INCREASE
~
.;
32 E
.32
NAS,,TAKEN.ADVANTAGE OF THIS.,
PRICING STRATEGY ~
l
% OF T_oSAI
~.
e
kn
0
®
w ,.
~o ..
P

PAPER
PaCKAGING
MFG. LABOR
ADVERTISihG
1984 MULTIPLIER To
_l.__ ADn 18t CosT
73 25
40 45
1.5
1.3 13.8
2.6 d, 6.9
2.8 6.4
7.2 2.5
6
CONSUMER
BENEFIT ???
, 1~ ~..pr'4...
TRANSPORT/1T l OMO~)
t .
. . : ,~.~,...,, ..
THE KEY AUE".TIOH /4BOLT,,,:PREMIUM
, . . .., .
,.. ,
DESIRABLE ADDED VALUE COULD WE GIVE THE CONSUMER FOR OUR PREMIUM
PRICE?
CONSIDER, FOR EXAMPLE, A CONSUMEfi PACK PRICE OF $1.15, A 25%
PREMIUM. KEEPING SULL PERCENTAGE MARGI!!S FOR OURSELVES AND THE,
,._. , .
TRADE, WE COULD ADD 181 TO MANUFACTURi,NG,.COSTS
,.. . . _
LEAF
PROCESSING
. FILTER'
FOR THESE KINDS OF INVESTMENT IN A PREMIUM PRODUCT, COULD WE
GIVE THE CONSUMER 25% MORE?
i,

' *k'k~ idmi^P+41i~u 1'
"'A
,
ISSUE 2:r'` GRO~l1NG ~SMOKER%NONSMOKER DIFFERENCES
THE.PSYCHOLOGICAt lMPACT OF SOCIAL ACCEriAt3ILITY AND SMOKING
RESTRICTION ON ALL ASPECTS OF SMOKERS' LIVES MAY BE OF KEY IMPORTANCE
TO OUR MARKETING-
IN 1984, 47% OF SMOKERS AGREED THAT 'SMOKERS ARE TREATED LIKE
SECOND CLASS CITIZEhS TODAY~
IN THE 1950'5, IT WAS BLACKS WHO WERE FORCEL TO RIDE IN THE BACK OF
, 7,HE BUS AND,USE ~SEPARATE FACILITIES«: IN THE H0'S IT IS SMOKERS-
THIS KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE MEANS THAT SMOKERS OF ALL AGES
< ~DIFFERENT~ IN MANYd WAYS, ME ' AVERAGE SMOKER~JS N0"[,QHGER THE
MUST BE INCREASINGLY AWARE THAT BECAUSE THEY SMOKE THEY ARE
.
~AVERACE MERI _AN'
OVERALL tiIHDSET
SMOKERS DIF ER NOT ONLY LY IN EDUCATION, BUT IN
.~ ,. , .. ":;.,,
~~.. , . ~ ,s,. , . . .,.
.
~
,
,THESE° DIFFERENCES IN MINDSET ARE'APPARENT"'TODAY AND CIKELY""Y' OT'~GROM/"."`
WIDER IN THE FUTURE
TO ILLUSTRATE SOME OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SMOKER AND NONSMOKER
Ln "
0
1, GAPS~ BETWEEN THE TWO GROUPS. KEYING ON THOSE WHICH ARE NOT A '~
v
...
MINDSETS, WE CAN LOOK AT SOME OF THE ATTITUDINAL AND BEHAVIORAL
FUNCTION OF AGE OR SEX BUT LIKELY RELFECT A FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE "'
, . , ^ fAO , ~
k

I
ShiQKERSR ARE~~~IOT4~IgT0:~4~^£'
THE PHYSICAL` FITNES TR ND
'PHYSICAI FITN ts` (YANKELOVICH) .
SMOKER ACTIVITI S ($IMMONS)
- _ _ . .... .,
,*-,
°
+a ~ A t,H9F1~+t~lldFft
~~1
i
',M~«spr"V I~~~ ~ fi
p
~? ' P" ~
4
^
i~(??in
y
14
B SMOKER'NON,t K 'R DIFFERE
E
,
.~V'`.: *.
rt ~ , .~u ra,,, s t'. 5
HUNTING
MOTORCYCLES
HORSEBACK RIDING
FISHING
CAR RACE/RALLY
dw~
NOT:
BICYCLING
HIKING,-
SNOW SKIIING (DOWNHILL)
SKIN DIVING
RACQUETBALL
GOLF
w.4~,,...4~ , .,
75
133
127
125
119
,119
78
, .u. 79
79
84
87
89
W
~O

T'V;rSMQK ~ISSIJ S ,
,x1
? .>SOCIJAL:.I.SSI!
;:"BiSMkE~RL44)!`Jf~~?`~?~1'~~';ti4~4.t~~3~t
~1QNSMOKER DIFFERENCES
PREFER.TO
,~. ,
SMOKERS ._
VS :~~' TOTAL`"' ='
~AUTHEN,T.1C,SELF~.JYANKEL,OVICH),.
FIND. THE INTEREST1NG. "NEwS",AN: -,-,
NATIONAL ENOUIRER
TRUE STORY
SOAP OPERA IUIGEST
xNOT :'*l"NAl°&'Sl`0ttl*Jb`B"RA
N.Y. TIMES DAILY
U.S. NEWS
CONSIDER THEMSELVES IMPULSIVE BUYERS (S)
-4W
INDEX`
SMOKERS PREFER THE-SPONTANEOUS,
,COLQRFUL.' ANQ~ INPRF,jFNI_(_ll_IS~
'TOLERANCE FOR CHAOS~ (YANKELOVICH).
PLEASURE OK As A GOAL (YANKELOVICH)
BUY COMEDY RECORDS (SIMMONS)
, k . .
WATCH SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE (SIMMONS)
LIKE To BE OUTRAGEOUS (SIMMONS)
167
132.
114
125,
1 6
115
137
123
67
86
0
0

~Y t ~q~r a~!~~)P.»s y~~.`k. f w mr+r. s~ t 7,x e;
L~Sd~'i'Yd~.Y~~ ~~, .-c. ,..
,
~2:ANll LELILOTHEP
~~7~ ~ ~iHE~,~S Ea;~
i.,..
d4
4
BELIEVE,THERE IS.NO,RIGH,T AND WRONG. ONLY,
~ PERSONAL"CHOICES ~Y)
"REJEC'fION OFr AUTHORITIES
. . . . ~ .~. _ . . . .
. . , . ~ , ...~.~ .,.~'.:... s::.,-'
DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES ~VERY RELiGIOUS~
~
UPPORT FOR "FEMALE CAREERISM" (Y)
vy~
0
DoN';T EVEN READ READER'S`DIGEST,
t
VEW%LIBERAL" '
~
SMOKERS~;.
I NhEX-
.137
TEND TO1. BE; POLITIC,A4LY, LIBERAL ~$):
t,.VERY CONSERVATIVE,
~~
" ..`.~ f I$J(.
SOM W.HAT CON.SERVATi E ~
{4~~~~~±w~+~~~ ". 5 ~ ~~
;MIDDLE-OF-THE'ROAD'
a.
~~~ .' ,BERA~~~'~~~ ' `.
203r
'102
~~1274,
r

7
Sh10KIN I"ISS IES'
1
A-
1
;,~SOG I ALSy,J SSUE~;S;
u
KER-NONSMQ
J
"'A
SMOKERS T Nn TO LIVE WITH MORFINTENSITY
~ ..T..~. .w..~..~..~_ _ . . ~ . . _ ... . ~ {,~ ~, ~
t
_ .i ~~..
~"~r
SLEEP 7 OR LESS HOURS A NIGHT (ROPER 1980)
;..
DRINK COFFEE.(Y)
DRINK ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES , REGULARLY
OCCASIONALLY
;LIGHTLY
NONE
REALLY DISLIKE STANDING IN LINES
SMOKERSr UON!7~; D.p.WN f:ASTERMrTHANrMOST-
PEOPLE AFTER I'VE BEEN UPSET"
HAVE HAD MORE THAN MY SHARE OF THINGS TO
WORRY ABOUT
x:e
128
123
233
143
113
48
122
90
119

210KERS TEND TO RF MORF, nFMAfJDING ,
I N RElAT I ONSN I PS TNAN S(Qy,SM[1KFRS *
TEND TO BE SELECTIVE IN LABELLING
TUNE OUT OTHERS IF RELATIONSHIP HAS TOO
MANY PROBLEMS/DEMANDS (Y)
FEEL AN 1HCREASING NEED FOR SOMEONE TO
TELL ME I'M OK (Y)
DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS:
STUBBORN (S)
DOMINATIN ~S) ,...
L~y, ,~':aJ,
MUCH MORE LIKELY TO HAVEfBEEN DIVORCED
INDEX
SMOKERS
YS .:,1'OTAL °
-129,
130
129
111
156:}
O
W

I
4
S M 0 K IH ;VI S fi I . ',,
~2.fSOCIALISSUES
1
~MOKER'NONSMOKFR QjFFERE,NGES
4'
J
,,.,.~.,; ,.>.-.-44,
4k,
~ S j~,t,~~
>.
11
~~.Selic
,
srz
,:,, "l;I" 'r,
I
A
a
°T`~ a~ ,4,.
THEY DON'T THINK.
PORNOGRAPHY SHOPS SHOULD BE CLOSED (S)
TOO MUCN.sEx ON TV (S)'
CONSIDER THEMSELVES ~SWINGERS` (S)
WERE SEXUALLY ACTIVE IN THEIR TEENS (FEMALES
USED CONTRACEPT I VES AGE,S., 15'i9,HEN)
PREFER LESS "SOCIALLY,REDEEMING" LITERATURE (S)
-INDEX
SMOKERS
VSLTOTAL.'
225
88
89
121
278
READERSHIP OF:

1
I
xlq s t,0,
`q'
OCJA ",~;I S S U E S
SMQKFR-NONSMnKFR IIFF}R NC S
~- alr~
sA:R~ '~1'
:,>,;_~. .r r . . µ':.wYlL17~
SMOKERS AREATTIINV D. TO
-" OD _ 01 D RAY
_ ~. '
1
s
.THEY suY: -,: 60's ROCK
TRADITIONAL COUNTRY
FoLK MUSIC `
+RETURN TO NATURE" (YANKELOVICH)
BUT NOT AS SHOWN IN:
.:...~.~~
TOWN 8 COUNTRY
COUNTRY LIVING
BETTER HOMES 8 GARDENS
157
134
136
112
122
76
/8
87

e
~ SMOK I NC~ I S$!I~`"
~ S~OCIAL~' lSSUES r.:
4
/
>1(sJit ;r i'~~,
[t
SMQKER'NONSMOKER DIFFERFNCES
A
4kfi xi¢i
a
SMOKERS AR~NO___T_.A.TT IN D 0
TH " FRIENTIA! J IFESTYI 1-
~,
"TONARD INTANGIBLES" (YANKELOVICH)
THEY DON'
READ:
TK SMQKER'S IDEA OF EXPER[ N.E IS.
METHING m ""r.FT i nSTINV
'RESPONSIVENESS-TO FANTASY" (YANKELOVICH)
LIKE TO IMAGINE MYSELF DOING SOMETHING I`
WOULDN'T DARE DO
BUY ~HEAVY METAL" RECORDS (S)
GO TO DISCOS & BARS (Y)
SMITHSONIAN
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
TRAVEI 8 LEISURE
FOOD & NINE
CUISINE
82
72
84
80
74
81
139
119
139
142
.
r

y .~,, ~r~ e yA;
Y5M0KIN L5 ISS11U
~
r7*
i
Cf{
LLU f~ L (]
N MOR
!1 -AU
4A
,
Self-Pocu.aed
Relatiotuhip
Pleaaure
~. ;~.coalq~~
Panta.y
Cood Old Days
ve Today
Pemale
Careeriao
18-20
DUTLOOK TNROUGNOUT LIF .
I
+8
. .. _ . .. _. . , . . . . .
YAA'KELOVICH 1:ET AGREFKE\T.
- Smokera va. Nonaaokera (18+)
0 = 1a-24 vs. 18t- . . ,
+9
+12
+13
+15
+19 +20
>
>
>
+18
>
t-n
cs
~
P
W

,
`~t14~ I~`' I S S t/
?f
r
r
THE PRESSURE AGAINST SMOKING AND SMOKERS IS LIKELY TO INCREASE IN
TNE LATE',I9$O'S-
` THIS WILL MAKE INDUSTRY AND CORPORATE EFFORTS TO DEFEND THE
SMOKERS~' POSITION"EVEt(;`HORE,_RCRITICtAI,a:
- FOR BRANDS, EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO MAXIMIZE QUALITY AND..
ELIMINATE ANY PRODUCT NEGATIVES
THERE IS N0T MUCH LOW SIDE PRICE LEVERAGE IN CIGARETTES
ADDITIONAL SAVINGS,ENTRIES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY AS AN "'
INVESTMENT IN A KEY SMOKER GROUP, EG, IF SUCH A BRAND COULD BE
MADE,.APPEALING TO-,FU$YAS ~
! CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO A~PREMIUM BRAND' AN EARLIER
STRATEGIC STUDY SUGGESTED THAT THE MARKET MIGHT SUPPORT UP TO 4
SHARE POINTS OF PREMIUM BRAND POTENTIAL IF SUFFTCIENT CONSUMER
BENEFITS COULD BE ADDED TO WARRANT A PREMIUM PRICE
WE SAW EARLIER THAT SUCH A PREMIUM BRAND MIGHT HAVE
DISPROPORTIONATE APPEAL TO BLACK AND HISPANIC SMOKERS, WHICH ARE
OPPORTUNITY MAPI.ETS FOR RJR.
~
0
0o
R.JR ESTABLISHED'BRANDS SHOULD BE"WELL'PREPARED TO REACT TO
PERIODS OF HIGH LOCAL OR NATIONAL SAVINGS INTEREST, SINCE THERE
WILL BE A GROWING POOL OF 3S'49 SMOKERS WILLING TO ADOPT SAVINGS
BRANDS

e
,4,
SMOKERS AND NONSMOKERS DIFFER IN THEIri FUNDAMENTAL VALUES.'
ATTITUDES AND;APPROACH,TO LIFE -' THEIR TOTAL MINDSET
GIVEN THEPRESSURE OF;.SMOK,kNG,ISSUES, IT.IS INCREASINGLY~LIKELY
THAT SMOKERS CHQQSE TO BE DIFFERENT FROM NONSMOKERS " IF THEY HAD
A STRONG INTEREST IN EMULATING NONSMOKERS, THEY COULD SIMPLY QUIT
YHUS:
THE MOST LEVERAGEABLE IMAGERY IN THE CIGARETTE MARKET MAY ARISE
FROM THE KEY VALUES AND ATTITUDES WHICH DIFFERENTIATE THE SMOKER
MINDSET FROM THAT.OF NONSMOKERS" RJR SHOULD DEVELOP A CLEAR
PASfOE bFARiiIK_BOUT TH4U I2IFFERENCES AND INCORPORATE THA'f'
LEARNING IN ALL OF OUR MARKEIING ACTIVITIES
HAVING CHOSEN'TO BE DIFFERENT, THERE MAY BE A SIGNIFICANT RISK
TO MARKETING PROGRAMS WHICH SEEM TO REFLECT finNShQKER MINDSETS
THIS UNDERSCORES OUR NEED TO FULLY UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCES
IT ALSO POSES A STRONG NEED FOR RJR TO ALERT ITS MARKETING
4
SUPPLIERS THAT FADS,-TRENDS. ETC="`SEEN°°FOR'TNE`TOTAL U$ AND
EVEN MARKETING APPROACHES USED WITH SUCCESS IN SOME OTHER
CATEGORIES AY BE_1RQE VAi{j OR EVEN DJJ IM NTAL TO OUR
9USINESS
yf, .,., ~;~c,~<,,. ~~;
'~;°=+G1YEN THE" SIMILARITY 'OF`"VALUES AND`ATT,..I"TUDES BETV,EEN SMOKERS OF
ALL AGES AND YOUNGER ADULTS, THERE SHOULD BE LESS RISK INVOLVED
IN MARKETING PROGRAMS TARGETED TO YOUNGER ADULT SMOKERS THAN IN
MANY OTHER PROnUCT CATEGORIES-
f
O
~
