Youth and Marketing
Smoking Issues 3 Key Areas: Taxes, Social Acceptability, Restrictions
Abstract
Examines smoking issues in three key areas: taxes, social acceptability, and restrictions. Discusses impact of taxes and pricing on cigarette sales. Analyzes how smoking acceptance has declined, how more smokers are affected by laws, and how future will impact. Mentions youth (16+) opinion on social acceptability of smoking. Analyzes price leverage and production cost. Outlines psychological impact of smoking restrictions, smoker/non-smoker differences in mindset. Discusses how smokers tend to retain young adult outlook on life; warns against marketing to non-smoker mindset.
Fields
- Notes
Original document code was 1003.
- Company
- R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
- Minor Subject
- Advertising and Marketing -research
- Advertising and Marketing -strategy
- Smoker -profile
- Smoking -incidence
- Smoking -laws
- Advertising and Marketing -strategy
- Major Subject
- Advertising and Marketing
- Smoker
Document Images
SMOKING ISSUES
3 KEY AREAS: TAXES
SOCIAL ACCEPTABILITY
. RESTRICTIONS
4w,

,
,~ s 4`:. . - . . , .
'SMOKING'"`ISSUES"
~ . BACKGROUND';'
NrrCs jrGA f2 j:TE,:. S-
` ~
AL
,
TAXES ON CIGARETES HAVE MORE THAN DOUBLED SINCE THE MID'6O0S
EVEN IF,THE,FET.NERE;'..TQ BE RETURNED FROM 161 TO H1,.-THE AVERAGE`
. ,.. ,:. .. . . . . ;
. . . . y ;q . . . . . . .
SMOKER WOULD STILL PAY NEARLY 24E PER PACK IN STATE
EXCISE TAXES
~ -. ~ra~~ T~
C I ~'ARE~TE'f AX~`P'ER?'~P'R
ift[i 1WINTEO AM 900 TAXDIA ATATi1 rliM li4OM
AND FEDERAL
..
v::
.a.
.!
. r!
,gu!
.a
..rr
,..rs.
+fl.s
..a..4~a.flalafaf
:
,w-...sl..wl:./a!!!lwr.!!f!!rf
~ ..:..............l.........*......
:..:......laaala!!l.....l......f......f
...........w..!!l..rl............l.......
"!!!rlfR!!a!l!!!!.!!!1!!!!!r!!.la.!!!f!!f!rlf/f
'laflfla.la.a.aalal.!!.!a!a!.laa!!lall..lfaal.R~
i!!!.lar.!!la..l......!!a.!!f!!!.!la.r.!!r
. _
~l.llrll!l.1.ll.lr.l1!!!!..!!!!!a!!f1!!!!!!!l..r.
......aa.Na/alrarir!!ia .!!!!!al.rr.!!!!l..ar+
lT~raJl.a!!!falllrf!!a!f!!!.!!!..l.~,:y
a
.aua.a..a.aaa .u.a.aua...ara ,
ll!!f.!!r!al~,la.afa!!.a!!!1P":.t..
la!!.a!!!f.l.a!!Ialallll!!. , . . .- . . . . :"J .
!la..u ..r...l..l....!-
r.aar.l...!!!ffl.rwt . ~'. ,~.
.l.rsaas..a~...r.!...r- r , .
asaarr!.
.
s a s s . - . -
0
®
STATL Ayp
f!n[IMl
pi1t1CAS Tlr TAX UA03c! r?loam
ALTHOUGH TAXES MAY ROUTINELY DEPRESS DEMAND, THEIR MAJOR MARKETING
IMPACT RESULTS FROM THEIR SUDDEN CHANGES, AT THE STATE, LOCAL AND
NATIONAL LEVEL. THESE SUDDEN SHIFTS HAVE INDUSTRY MIDE IMPACT,
~
0
BUT ALSO DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT BRANDS WHICH HAVE MORE, OR p~.
LESS, PR1Ce~SENSITIVE$tFRAMCHIY
SES-
W
m
m
..
f

..:
SMQWG'
ISSIfES
: 5 a_~#w~~rrw~w!L`tsi~.
TOTAL 16+ ` ' , , " 42
SMOKERS 18+ 75
-s
x z~v`i~w~
3~1'
'r! ai
y-;h t ri;:t ~s
ACCORDING TO.YANKELOVICH, ONLY 36X°OF.AMFRiCANS OVER THE`AGF. OF-16"
ENJOYMENT. ABOUT HALF AGREED 10 YEARS AGO
FEEL IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO SMOKE CIGARETTES, L~'10i?ERATION, FOR
X AGREE 48 45 43 42 41 36
EVEN AMONG SMOKERS, MORE THAN 1-OUT'OF'3 HAVE COME TO FEEL THAT
SMOK I NG I S NOT AC,f4 PTAALF .
<
64
THESE ATTITUDES APPEAR IN LEGISLATION,, AS, SMOKijNG,,
R[S?RI.CTIONS~---
,-

L
' 1i. .., ~ ..
?f%~+< . ~ .
SMQKING RESTRL('J10N
. , . . " . ,. . N
&I
j0jw'-:; E:
OK I NG,.
ODAY, IHZ OF: AMERICANS' ARE -'AFFECTED! BY,LAWS ,RESTRICTING SM
~
~
~
,
COMPARED TO 352 10 i'EARS AsO '- MORE THAN DOUR1.E
IH% OF AMERICANS ARE SUBJECT TO SEVERE RESTRICTIONS, WHICH AFFECT
:,,i;: ., . ,_,.-~. . ,. 4.,.;
THEIR.ABILITY TO SMOKE''INTNE COURSE OF NORMAL SOCIAL AND WORK LIVES,
BY SEGREGATING OR PROHIBITING SMOKERS IN RESTAURANTS OR I{II. N_EiAZARD03!S
PLACES OF WORK'
STRTE LEGISLRTION RESTRICTING SMOKING
T f us r01.1M'ILC".b /MO itvOQTY
g
M
1tl12AR0&A NOIq'L=
atMER, sCfIObL
tllMlsnneX,TU rBcurrr
.e : ~~ W~ ~ .. . . ~ . . . .
~~f~/AIWV.b= ~ i7M
t
//{/'///I
~I,
./I
...11111.(l.
~
t
I~fr... 1
,'1!*::s:
0 ...::i
a.a ...................... 1
::::::::::::::::::::::::: _;
rrl..r.f.a.
1
..1 l
t . ... r ..~ 0 "
H ,' .......,~ ., '0 ,
14 r to./ ... ..,..
%/
// I
. ! 1.....
~ .. ; r.f .r..u./r 1 . . u! ./ !I~ i.
!
a~ .
~aa .. a......r. .v~t! t 1! ~ r ~.
. aH i ..a.r. a
. .
,
flf.0/1 1 .0 . 1 . ~ ~
~1 f1a 1 .
1/1 ' .
f..11 .
.fy.r.. ri ~ .::
.
:'nri...:.::a::::
'"
.1f..tl
~!!.
4. st>ll
aN~a.....~.~~.~...~L. r..d ll
.. ~!
_ .. ~, .. a . .
.. ~ ~;
_.
1~4
1;n

it:
BACKGROUND (CONT'D)
.i ywil.f ,)
V.
C}a~;Ly-7>Rc
~a W{
in: , -.~. ..a... . . . . . 'yyk:4-
- !
,
THE,
;,PRESSURE O,F, SMOKINGriISSUESa~IS°r~,ALMOST`CERTAIN`°TO ;INCREASE
THE.LATE'.HU'S.
, . .,, . . ..
m,.,- , . ...w:-~.- . ,~
INDEX
SOURCE: VdLS 1983
ONE CLEAR INDICATOR OF THIS IS THE BABY.BUBBLE. ALTHOUGH THERE,
WILL MBE A SI1EfABLE INfLU~X}' OF SMOKERS~INTO AG
ES 35-49 IN THE LATE
$0"5, THIS WAS A LOW °INCIDENCE GROUP"- THUS, THERE WILL BE A' j1LICH
k 'i4)fb'I:Wll
N
WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN THAT AGES 35-49 ARE MORE HEALTH CONSCIOUS THAN
OLDER OR ,:Y01lHGER GROUPS,-THEY ARE; ALSO: AT~ A,, STAGE OF 1 NCREASED ~
POLITICAL CLOUT, ECONOMIC SOPHISTICATION, AND `SOCIETAL
CONSCIOUSNESS~'
~SOCIETALLY CONSCIOUS~,s,
x-L DISTRIBUTION.W"40-A
18-24: 25-34 35-44 45-65
31 1 171 224 65
"BABYllBUBBLE4""~`"~
INCREASING POPULATION 65+ WILL PROVIDE A RELIABLE GROWING CLIENT
BASE TO
~ .. ,, . ~ ~ , W.,~.~~,, ,,; ,
BOOST`THE'`INFLUENCE`'`OF HEAITH'IlkSTITUTIONS AND DRAW EVER
MORE ATTENTION TO HEALTH CARE AND 1NS:IRANCE COSTS
< 65
65+
SOURCE: HEM4, ....*,,
gYG HEAI COST
S 597
31,026
w
.0
~

... . ... .. ~d':,*>ti
! } +."-a~ T1~2 f21ZLA aL <
y~`.~ ~ . .. . . . .. ~-. ..
y
2. GROWING SMOKER/NONSMOKER'DIFFERENCES
.lWi.:J'! .a
..r:..fw r.1.,. ~ . .
11
a,

DEGREE OF LEVERAGE AVAILABLE
PROFIT
.,~..~..,~..~.~
.
g
r
r
e
9
. j. . . : .v-' ~:. .F Y
}
ISSM,Lsoq PRIC'-1NG#LEVERAGE4*~-
STRUCTURE FOR CIGARETTES,'GIVI"tG !lNBRANiED'CIGARETTES MORE. THAN
4 POINTS OF THE MARKET AND ADDING ANOTHER POINT OF SAVINGS
BRANDS
MSA -St ARr,
.
1m 1981 `. M
GENERICS .04 .46 .95 2.92 4.35
SAVINGS SEGMENT 04 .46 .95 3.34 5.50
BY EARLY 1984,1
SMOK
ER
l
N,°S
HAD.'AL
READY
; P
(JRCHASED
~
ENERIC4,~.
G
,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
.
:
.
CIGARETTES OR WAS SERIOUSLY CONSIDERING BUYING THEM
(YaHKftovtCOY: ~.~:
I OF TOTAL SMDKERS
TOTAL 18+
Lm
8%
20%
v
HOWEVER, THERE ARE TWO KEY PROBLEMS IN CONSIDERING SAVINGS
BRANDS:
1983 1984

0
S
t03Jb~`rvF5, ' - "- .3!
1 + K-".ar ?
~~~ ~ ~ aSM01CING ICSIIF ;.,_
_,t7in .'.h T
A.~ S YINGS.SIDF~~Co,N~n
.. . .. , r'.::~ . -.. ~ . . -. .. ~ . . , ~ i'-.
..
s
THERE IS NOT MUCH LEVERAGE ON THE,LOif'.PRICE,END FOR CIGAR'
ETTES HERE WE SEE,THAT',BECAUSE`0F THE FIXED TAXES INCLUDED
IN THE-CONSUMER PRICE OF CIGARETTES, IT TAKES A LARGE PR1CE
4+'~*., s: }, t....;+,., w. o NA'.ar^.~s a~~:+s: q r.r,.~.urt4
CUT AT THE~'t~A~NUFACTURER CEVEI- T0 SE'KORTH ANYTH 1 NG! 3!0 THE Y~
CONSUMER PRICE
: :a?
..,.,.^
x CHANGE
E PER
PACK
2
16`
91
86
IF MFGR. CUTS-BY
32 .
~.~
32 -,
15 14 12
34 22
80 66
5% 12% 27%
.. . ~~.b&". .. a ~ '=r: C 3

A. HERE.IS AN AVERAGE`1984 BREAKDOWN
< A PACK OF C I GAfi£T T
PURCHASED LEAF
PROCESSING
TOTAL TOBACCO
F II,TER
PAPER, ETC
PACKAGING
TOTAL OTHER MAT'L
MANUFACTURING LABOR
TOTAL DIRECT
ADVERTISING
->OVERHEAD/TRANSPORTAI'ION'.
~m W
TOTAL INDIRECT
TOTAL MFG. COST
OPERATING PROFIT
PRICE EXCL. FET
.
a
L PER PaC A
-
7.3 17
4.0 9
11.3 26
1.6 4
1-3 3
2.6 6
5.5 13
2.8 -2 -.$ 6
19.6 45
7-2 17
1.6 .4
8.8 20
.
28.b 66
14.7 34 ~
..
43.1 100
yo~ 6wa.~ ,w..k,:...ww +ll~"~rt«~MyS ~ irliW«~WMMY.~rY~kr~i'.awa:^~a _
+w~
w Tluiww~:,HERE "IS NO ITEM ON}THIIST~s'JaNtl4MI~fHICH CAN BE CUT ENOUGH TO GIVE{~
THE CONSUMER A 1OL PER PACK SAVINGS WITHOUT UNDERCUTTING PRODUCT
ACCEPTABILITY OR REDUCING PROFIT
ADVERTISING IS THE MOST CCNTROLLABLE ITEM, BUT ELIMINATING
ADVERTISING ONLY SAVES 71 A PACK
%0
N

y A-MJ"9io% 4~:s
1
B
PREMIUM SI[_1.L
~
~
p,
% CHANGE
OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS, THE INDUSTRY
UP-SIDE LEVERAGE WITH ITS AGGRESSIVE
~M~
'
11 "TH' TES IF wE
ER .
GARET
E I'S'LEVERAGE ON THE HIGH PRICE SIDE INCI
WERE TO INCREASE OUR_PRICE 25%, AND THE,TRADE TOOK THE SAME
MARKUP, THE' CONSUMER MIGHT.ONLY SEE At1Ql,INCRE
....,__....... ASE
TRADE MARK'
MANUFACTURER
CONSUMER PRICE
YEAR AVERA aE;
1994
!
.K.
~
a}
y
'
43
CONSUMER PRICE
MANUFACTURER
15
91
43
100
100
41< 35
34 > 47
BUT, THERE HAVE BEEN NO SIGNIFICANT PREMIUM BRANDS
IF WE INCREASE
~
.;
32 E
.32
NAS,,TAKEN.ADVANTAGE OF THIS.,
PRICING STRATEGY ~
l
% OF T_oSAI
~.
e
kn
0
®
w ,.
~o ..
P
