Women's Collection from Marketing to Counter-Marketing
Established Brands Research Proposal (Mrd #89-12102). Project Sb Packaging Qualitative Research.
Fields
- Type
- PROPOSAL
- Author
- Hunter, C.S.
- Bellis, J.V.
- Weber, J.D.
- Marketing Research
- Verner, K.L.
- Blackmer, E.M.
- Brand Marketing
- Copied
- Leung, J.Y.
- Horrigan, B.P.
- Vuksan, K.W.
- Creighton, F.V.
- Miller, D.C.
- Kimmer, L.R.
- Mric
- Named Person
- Leber Katz
- Waner, P.
- Philadelphia Focus
- Brand
- Salem
Document Images
SECRET
~ r.:S ¢'~ ;~ `[1 tN7
ESTABLISHED BRANDS RESEARCH PROPOSAL
`."':'~~ '" '
h ~.
(MRD #89-1`'~
'1~"~~j '
TITLE: PROJECT SB PACKAGING pUALITATIVE RESEARCH UL.~ ,~ ~~"~t B
v
PURPOSE:
To assess consumer reaction to packaging prototypes for Project SB.
BACKGROUND:
Project SB is a SALEM PF M 80mm cork-tipped box/soft pack line extension
targeted to 18-24 year old male smokers, the key subgroup fueling SALEM's
long-term decline. Previous test marketing of this line extension in early
1986 shoved that although overall share/volume contribution was low, it did
provide highly targeted incremental share among 18-24 year old smokers, both
Black and White, particularly in pack action outlets. Nov that the SALEM
family is solidly positioned (via "The Refreshest" restage), the Brand Team
feels an opportunity exists to revisit the SALEM Box proposition for lead
market introduction in the 3rd or 4th quarter, 1989. Based on the learning
from the previous SALEM Box introdY.~ction, Project SB will be positioned (via
all the marketing elements) as distinctly different from all other SALEM
styles.
A product was recently identified for Project SB which is significantly
superior to Newport Box among target competitive younger adult male smokers,
both Black and White. A quantitative concept/name test was also completed
which showed one name in particular, SALEM Gold, to have the greatest overall
appeal, the strongest communicator of both desired product and user
perceptions, and provide the best fit with the SB concept.
Packaging prototypes have been developed utilizing the SALEM Gold and Shades
names (Shades, which was also tested, did not perform as well as SALEM Gold.
However, the Brand would like to assess whether or not strong pack c~esigns can
compensate for the weaknesses of this name in the absolute). Therefore, the
Brand Team would like to explore consumer reactions to these packaging
prototypes in addition to assessing the performance of additional names from
the agency; FCB/LKP.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of this research are to qualitatively explore:
- The appeal and communication of packaging prototypes for Project SB which
utilize the SALEM Gold and Shades names and how well these packs fit with
the concept and SB product, among the 18-24 year old male target Black and
general market smokers.
- The appeal and communication of alternative names for Project SB and how
well these names fit with the concept and SB product, among the 18-24 year
old male target Black and general market smokers. ,,,
r
USE OF RESULTS/NEXT STEPS: w
The results of this research will be used as input into the refinement and ~
selection of a final pack design for Project SB. Results will also be used to ~
provide development direction for the introductory creative. A small scale
quantitative pack test was recommended, but its status is TBD.

i
HYPOTHESES TO BE EXPLORED:
Hypotheses to be explored include
Packaging prototypes appeal to male YAS such that they vill be proud to
shov the pack to their friends.
Packaging prototypes have as ,much appeal among Black YAS as among general
market younger adult smokers.
Packagir.g prototypes communfcate that SB will be different from other SALEM
styles (i.e. that it is not as light tasting and better balance of menthol
to tobacco taste).
Packaging prototypes communicate a quality product.
Packaging prototypes have some involvement such that they will be noticed
in a cluttered retail environment.
The packaging prototypes provide a good fit with the concept and SB product.
METHODOLOGY:
Six focus group sessions will be held in Philadelphia, PA on March 1-2, 1989.
All six groups vill be competitive 18-24 male FF M 80-85mm soft pack and box
smokers (primarily Newport smoker&).
There will be:
3 General Market groups
2 18-24 male box and soft pack smokers
1 18-24 male box smokers only
.1 Black groups
2 18-24 male box and soft pack smokers
1 18-24 male box smokers only
General market smokers vill be single v3th a high school education or some
college (but not currently attending college).
Black smokers will be recruited to be representative of inner city Blacks via
screening from designated areas identified as having 50% or greater Black
population density. Smokers vill be douAscale with annual household incomes
less than $20,000 and have no more than a high school education. Black
smokers can be married with children.

Tl~G: Focus Groups: 3/1-2/89
Final Report: Veek of 3/6/89
SUPPLIER: Moderator: Paul Varner
Facility: Philadelphia Focus, Inc.
COSTS: Facility: $14,800
Moderator 6,000
Moderator's travel expense 1,500
Total
$22,300
(To S-e funded out of 1989 MRD SALEM Research Budget.)
PROPOSAL PREPARED BY: Cynthia S. Hunter
CONCURRENCE:
Ms. C. S. Hunter
M,,-. J. V. Bellis
Mr. J. D. Weber
+;-~o/DyMr. K. L. Verner
Mr. E. M. Blackmer
' ~b
$3s)
Signed Pro2osal Distribution List:
Concurrence List
Mr. J. Y. Leung
Mr. B. P. Horrigan
Ms. K. V. Vuksan
Ms. F. V. Creighton
Ms. D. C. Miller
Ms.
MRIC L. R. Kimmer
