Women's Collection from Marketing to Counter-Marketing
Cigarette Smoking And Health Risks: Four Hundred Years Of Information And Public Awareness
Abstract
Recounts the 400-year history of the anti-smoking movement, beginning with the "earliest warnings" of King James I in his "counterblaste to Tobacco." Discusses nicknames used for cigarettes beginning in the 20th century that denote the public's familiarity with the dangers of cigarette smoking. Names individuals, organizations, and publications that have been associated closely with the anti-smoking campaign. Attempts to place the 'anti-smoking campaign' in a context of 'propaganda.' Duplicate of Bates #2021269115.
Fields
- Type
- Position Statement
- Named Person
- King James I
- Gaston, Lucy Page
- Reiley, J.H. Dr.
- Ford, H.
- Hammond, Edward Cuyler, Sc.D. (Epidemiologist, ACS (1950s), Plaintiff's Expert)PMI
- Coob, T.
- Dempsey, J.
- Tunney, G.
- Edison, T.
- Named Organization
- Surgeon General
- Women's Christian Temperance Union
- Anti-Cigarette League
- International Boys & Girls Anti-Cigarette League
- LIfe Extension Institute
- Non-Smokers Protective League
- The Clean Life Army
- No-Tobacco Army
- Methodist Church
- American Society of Friends
- YMCA
- Salvation Army
- Seventh Day Adventists
- Presbyterian Board of Temperance
- National Education Association
- Boy Scouts
- Girl Scouts
- American Cancer Society
- International Anti-Cigarette League
- Thesaurus Term
- Mass media
- Lung Cancer
- Diseases
- Advertising
- Lobbying
- Legislation
- Public Policy
- Product Liability
- Public Relations
Document Images
Burson'Marsteller
Position. paper
Historic Awareness
Third Draft
5/i0/88
CIGARETTE SMOKING AND HEALTH RISKS:
FOUR CENTURIES OF INFORMATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS.
Everyone has heard about the alleged risks of smoking.
Indeed, no consumer product ever marketed has been
surrounded by more ~nformation regardiing its potential
health hazards. The public has received this information
through every conceivable medium including radio,
television, movies, newspapers, magazines, books, sermons,
pamphlets, lectures and brochures, as well as through, advice
and word-of-mouth communications from physicians, teach.ers,
coaches., parents and others. Smoking and health~ issues have
been part of h,ealth education, pro:grams in virtually every
state since the early 1900s and the su,b:ject of a wilde
variety of programs conducted by various educational,
social, medical, pol~tical and other groups.
Early Warnilnqs
The dissemination of anti-smoking! information is anything
but a recent phenomenon. Indeed, claims of health risks
associated with. smoking date back more than 400 years. As
long ago as 16:04, England's K~ng James I issued, his
Cou.nterblaste to Tobacco denouncing smoking as "a custom
,
loathesome to the eye, hatefu~ to the nose, harmful to the O
brain, dangerous to the lungs . . ." ~

-2-
From the ~ate 1.800's to the present,~ th,e United States has
witnessed, a vocal revival o.f King James' opinion on smoking.
Numerous we~l-organ~ized groups -- armed with pamphlets,
school programs, f~ims, demonstrations, posters, no-smoking
p~edge cards and' the like -- orchestrated, zealous campaigns
against the use of tobacco in general and cig!arettes in
particular. Organizations like the Women's Christian
Temperance Union, the Anti-Cigarette League, the
International Boys & Girls Anti-C~garette League, the Life
Extension ~nstitute, th.e Non.-Smokers Protective League, the
Clean ~ife Army, and the NO-Tobacco Army we:re formed: for the
express pu,rpose of combatting tobacco use. Such diverse
religious org!an~zations as the American Society of Friends
(Quakers)., the Methodist Church, Baptists, Mormons., YMCA,
Salvation Army, Seventh. Day Adventists, and the Presbyterian
Boa:rd of Temperance wagedl vigorous anti-smoking campaigns as
part o4 their overall mission. Their efforts were
complemented by anti-smoking crusad~es undertaken by a host
of civic and ed:ucation groups including PTA's, the National
Edu,cation Association, the Boy Scou,ts and the Girl Scouts.
~n addition to the many anti-smoking groups who campaigned
against the use of tobacco, a variety of colorful and
prom,inent individuals participated in the movement. For
eĆaaple, Lucy Page Gaston, a former I~linois school teacher
and. founder of the International Anti-Cigarette League,
sought the Republican nomination for President in 1920 on an.
anti-tobacco platform. Dr. John Harvey Kellog of Battle
Creek, publisher of Good Health magazine, utilized his
publication as a vehicle for spread!ing his fervent
anti-smoking message. Other well known individuals who
campaigned vigorously against smoking in.cluded au,tomobile

-3-
magnate Henry FOrd,: baseball great Ty Cobb:, boxers Jack
Dempsey and Gene Tunney, and inventor Thomas Edison.
The Warnings. Continue
In more recent tilmes, the anti-smoking message has been
spread primarily through the popular press. The Reader's
D'i@est, one of the most widel;y-read magazines in the world,
has been front and center in t~,is movement. As long ago as
1924, the editors o4 th,at publilcation embarked on a campaign
to alert the public to the presumed dangers of smoking with
an. article entitled "Does Tobacco In.ju,re th.e Human Body?"
During the 19:50's the campaign intensified. For example,
"Cancer by the Carton," an article published in. 1952, linked
the reported increase in the: incidence of lung cancer to an
increase in cigarette consumptions. An. article published in,
Augu,st 1957, "Wanted - ~nd Available - Fi.lter-Tips That
Really Filter," has been credited with. the tremendous growth
in the sales of filter tip. cigarettes. The six-decade old~
R__eader's Digest campaign, which both urges smoking cessation
and provides advice on how to quilt, continues to this day.
In addition to the Reader's Digest, other widely-circulated
magazines -- including Time, Newsweek, Good Houskeeping, and
Consumer Reports -- closely tracked new events in the
smoking: and health controversy. For example, the February
26, 1954 issue of U.S. News and World ~eport ran as its
cover story an article entitled, "Is There Proof Smoking
Causes Cancer?" This 10-page article contained an in-depth
interview with Dr. E. Cuyler Hammond, then Director of
Research for the American Cancer Society, and outlined, the

-4-
steps the ACS was taking to determine if smoking was
causally-related to lung cancer. In the decade following
publication of that interview, U.S. News ran at least 18
follow-up articles.
During the past two decades, the publicity attending claims
o.f ch.ron.ic dlisease hazards said to be associated with.
smoking~ has intensified. For example, there was widespread
pu~blicity -- not only in the national med:ia, but also in
"h,ometown" newspapers and magazines -- concerning the 1964
Report of The Advisory Comm,ittee to the Surgeon. General and
su,bsequ~ent, similar reports about smoking. In addition, for
more than. 20 years smokers have been, constantly and
repeatedly informed of the health, risks attributed, to
smoking through the warnings requ~ired on c~garette packages
and in cigarette advertising~ by Federal Law.
The Message Was Heard
The n,~merous activities undertaken by anti-smoking groups,
with the: attendant widespread publicity, have not gone:
unnoticed. To the contrary, the message has been recognized
and accepted by the American. public. For example:, in
response to intense lobbying efforts by anti-smoking
org~anizations, 15 states banned the sale of cigarettes for
various, periods between 1895 and 1927. While these
prohibitions were eventually repealed, virtually every state
retained some ~egis~ative restrictions on the sa~e of
tobacco, especially to minors. In addition, many states
have required instruction on. tobacco use as part of the
standard elementary and/or high school cu,rrilculum, since the
early 1900's.

-5-
Awareness o~ the risks of smoking is also reflected in, the
many epithets which have been coined to describe cigarettes..
The term "coffin na~is", ~or example, can be traced back to
18186. Terms such as "cancer stick," "poison sausage,"
"little wh,ite slaver,," "smoker's cough," and "n[cotfne fit"
are also firmly establishedi in the folklore o~ this country.
Perhaps the most direct evidence that the message~ has been~
heard is found in the results of public opinion polls on
smoking and health ~ssues. The earliest scientifical~y-
designed polls were conducted during the late 1940's and
showed that the public was well aware of the alleged hazards
of smoking. According to a 1949 Gallup poll, for instance,
more than half of all cigarette smokers believed that
smoking was h.arm.ful to their health.. In~ 1954 -- the year in
which the ~merican Cancer Society ~or the first time
"cautio~sly" voiced its "su~spicion" that cigarette smoking
had something to do with lung cancer "to a degree as yet
undetermined" -- a poll showed that almost 90 percent of the
publ~c had recently heard %hat cigarette smoking causes lung
cancer.
These and other surveys conf~rm the blunt observation of a
close neighbor of a smoker involved in a tobacco ~iability
case who testified that "you would have to live in a cave"
to: avoid hearing claims of health risks associated with
smoking. That statement applies to anyone living in the
civilized world during the last 400 years. To believe
otherwise is quite simply a den~ia~l of historical fact. To:
be sure, many people may have disagreed with various health
risk allegations or have chosen to continue smoking,~ but no
one could have escaped, them.
