Jump to:

Women's Collection from Marketing to Counter-Marketing

MARKET POTENTIAL OF A HEALTH CIGARETTE

Date: Jun 1966
Length: 28 pages
1000338644-100038669
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 1000338644-1000338671

Abstract

In this confidential, internal 1966 Philip Morris (PM) report, PM market researcher Myron Johnston, Jr. analyzes the feasibility of introducing a"health cigarette." The report shows that PM viewed medical reports linking cigarette smoking and disease as simply another driver for the cigarette market.

Ignoring the physical devastation their product causes hundreds of thousands of Americans, Johnston coldly observed that the American Cancer Society's conclusion that cigarettes cause disease in women as well as men could result in the generation of a whole new market for a "health cigarette":

"[Young women's] willingness to accept health filters may increase now that the American Cancer Society purports to have found a relationship between smoking and health for women as well as men. This group could provide a market for a health cigarette..."

and

"Women, and particularly young women, would constitute the greatest potential market for a health cigarette."

He suggests the strategy of marketing a "health cigarette" (or one with the illusion of being healthier) only when pressed to do so by authorities:

"My recommendation is that we not introduce a new health cigarette unless there is another health scare or additional restrictive legislation is passed. In the event of another health scare...our entry should be determined by the form of the scare..."

Johnston also touches on the addictive properties of nicotine as he observes:

"A cigarette that does not delivery nicotine cannot satisfy the habituated smker and cannot lead to habituation, and would therefore almost certainly fail.

He discusses the dynamics of smoking initiation among young people, saying,

"...Tobacco flavor is absent or far down the lists of reasons given for beginning to smoke, so it should be theoretically possible for a health cigarette to satisfy the most common reasons (to be like friends, to feel or look older, to combat nervousness, to be rebellious). This is apparently not the case. Young smokers are the ones...least likely to smoke health cigarettes..."

There is no mention in the report of empathy or concern for the fact that their products cause painful illness and early death among consumers, although Johnston states (on page 1000338652) that "Most smokers would rather quit than switch." The concern is clearly only to determine ways to market more cigarettes.

Quotes: "Women, and particularly young women, would constitute the greatest potential market for a health cigarette."

"Advertising should be directed to both sexes but in such a way as to have the greater appeal to women."

Fields

Quotes

"A large proportion of smokers are concerned about the relationship of cigarette smoking to health..."

"The anti-cigarette propaganda will probably be more effective in reducing the rate of smoker recruitment than in stimulating smokers to quit or switch."

"The market share of health cigarettes increases rapidly for a brief period during each health scare and quickly stabilizes at a new and higher level of marketing penetration."

"Thus a new health cigarette entry could not rely on increased demand for health cigarettes, but would have to take its place at the expense of existing brands of health cigarettes..."

"Women, and particularly young women, would constitute the greatest potential market for a health cigarette."

"Advertising should be directed to both sexes but in such a way as to have the greater appeal to women."

"My recommendation is that we not introduce a new health cigarette unless there is another health scare or additional restrictive legislation is passed...."

"I have assumed that any health cigarette must compromise between health implications on the one hand and flavor and nicotine on the other. It seems clear from the performance of existing health cigarette entries that flavor and nicotine are both necessary to sell a cigarette. A cigarette that does not delivery nicotine cannot satisfy the habituated smker and cannot lead to habituation, and would therefore almost certainly fail. Health claims alone without flavor or nicotine cannot sell cigarettes--most smokers would rather quit than switch."

The Beginning Smoker

Persons under 25 years of age constitute over one-fourth of the total number of smokers. Of greater importance is the fact that this group will increase by about 18% between now and 1971...Any intensification of the anti-cigarette propaganda will almost certainly be aimed largely at this group. Indeed, there is evidence that the health scare has already had an effect on the rate of smoker recruitment and on the smoking habits of the under-25 group.

...Toacco flavor is absent or far down the lists of reasons given for beginning to smoke, so it should be theoretically possible for a health cigarette to satisfy the most common reasons (to be like friends, to feel or look older, to combat nervousness, to be rebellious). This is apparently not the case. Young smokers are the ones...least likely to smoke health cigarettes...

Apparently the reasons for beginning to smoke dictate the choice of brand as well, particularly for males. They appear to choose cigarettes that produce a proper image. Males under 25 are much more likely to smoke Winston, Marlboro and Lucky Strike...all of which project a male image...This suggests that there is something of a stigma attached to smoking health cigarettes and that a health cigarette would not be well received by young males.

Young females appear to be more willing to accept health filters, and for them the health filter may have more prestige value...With young women, it may be true that the fact of smoking is the major motivation and that a mild cigarette would be acceptable. Their willingness to accept health filters may increase now that the American Cancer Society purports to have found a relationship between smoking and health for women as well as men. This group could provide a market for a health cigarette.

Type
Report
Company
Philip Morris
Author
Johnston, Myron E. (PM Marketing researcher)
Recipient
Wakeham, Helmut R. R., Ph.D. (PM R&D VP)
Vice President and Director of Research & Development, Philip Morris
Seligman, Robert B. (PM VP of R&D c. 1976-82)
Vice President of Research and Development at Philip Morris Richmond, VA 1976-1982. Reported to Senior Vice President of Operations. In 1982 transferred to tobacco technology group. Wanted to share ammonia and other tobacco technology with PM International companies.
Operation/Project
Health cigarettes
Region
US

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
,I
Page 2: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
Copy No.~~ Issued to,(). 9~11,,> June 1966 I Special' Report No. 248' MARKET POTENTIAL OF~+ A,HEA~LTH CIGARETTE CONFiDENTIAL Joh d v_:-;f~ W. L. Dunin, Jr. Diis triibuti on Dr. H. Wakeham (10) Dr. R. B. Seligman > ~v. F.
Page 3: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
~ C O N T E N' T S ~ I. CON'CLUSION'S . . . . . . . . . ~ I .......... 1 II. RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . .. . . . , , , , , 3 I I I . AN!Al1Y S I'S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 I A. S&les Patterns . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. The Beginning Smoker . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 C. Potenti al Swi tchers . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 i APPEND,IX ( EVIDENCE OF CONCERN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ( I-
Page 4: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
I I. CONCLUSIONS As a resul!t of the investigati'ons summarized in this report I have reached the following conclusions: 1. A large proportion of smokers are conicernied about the relationship of cigarette smoking to health (see Appendix). 2. The antt-cigarette propaganda will probably be more effecti ve in reduciing, the rate of smoker recrui tment than in stimullating smokers to quit or switch. 3. The market share of health cigarettes increases rapidly for a birief period during, each health scare and q,uickly stabilizes at a new and hiigher level of market penetration. 4. Thie Surgeon General's Report had markedly less effect on the demand for health cigarettes than the first health scare in the 1950's. Any future h1ealithiscares will probably have even less effect. 5. Thus a new healith cigarette entry could not rely on increased demand for heal'th cigarettes, but woulld have to take i'ts pilace at the expense of existing birands of health ciigarettes. However, 6. the health cigarette market is characterized by low birand l oyal ty, and shoulld be fai rly easy to, penetrate. 7. Women, and particularly young women, would constiitute the greatest potential market for a health cigarette. 1 ~ ti
Page 5: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
I I I I I F L L L 8. There is a growfng, willingness on the part of smokers, particularly women, to accept nontobacco fliavor. 9. Mere red~ucti Qn in ni coti ne and TPM del ilveriies by conven.- tilonal' methods of fi ltrati on would' not be a suiffi cilent basis for launching a new cigarette, and, to attempt iit would~ be to court disaster. 10. The illusion of filtration is as important as the fact of filtration. 11. Therefore any entry should be by a radliically diifferent method of filtration but need not be any more effective. 12. Advertiisinig should~be directed~to both sexes but in suich a way as to have the greater appeal' tolwomen. 2
Page 6: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
fT I fT r I I I I [ I L L L I L L II. RECOMMENDATIONS Our posture with regard to a health cigarette entry should'be determined by~ anticipated po:litical and market co:nditi~ons. All indlications are that 19&6 elections will resu1it iin a Congress more sympathetic to business anid' less inclined than the present Congress to pass restri c.ti ve legiiisl ati on. My recommendation is that we not introduice a new health ciga- rette unless there is anothier health scare or add'iti'onal restrictive legislatiion iis plassed. In the event of another health scare or restrictive llegislatilon our entry should be determined~by the form of the scare or legisllation. In the event of a resumption of the tar derby or the passage of legislation requiring a statemenit of "tar" and nicotine content on the pack, the de1ayedldilutioin cigarette could be a formidable entry as a: full tobacco: flavored cilgarette. It could:compare favorably with any heallth cigarette currently on the market yet dleli ver ful l flavor throughout the cruci all fi rst 40 mm of the rod'. I am of the opini'on that we should press development of this concept. In the absence of legislation or a resumption of the tar derby, LonigPar wouild probably be the best entry, since it is withiout questi on a radi cal ly di fferent method of fi l'trati on and can be made to gi ve the i l l usilon, of fi lltrati on wi thout i mpai ri ng the tobacco flavor. It is a uniq,ue concept that could~catch on, but would probably have trouble reachiing five billiioni in the absence of another healithi scare. ' IL000338650 3
Page 7: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
r I F I F I I L L L I L L III. ANALYSIS Avaiilabile evidence from surveys shows conclusively that smokers are concerned about the relationship of cigarette smoking to health but thiat they do not want to quit smoking. They are, however, chaniging their smoking habits, generally toward higher filtration,, even at the expense of a lioss of some tobaccolflavor. That these chiang!es are health motivated is clear from the timiing of the shiifts: The boom in filters came on the heels of the first health scare, and the Surgeon General's Report stimulated the shift to charcoal filters. The acceptance of inentholl cig&- rettes ani6Lark indicates a willingness to accept niontobacco flavor as a substitute for tobacco flavor. There is some evidence that the antil-cigarette propaganda is more effective in reducing the rate of smoker recruitment than in changing thie habits of smokers. It should be noted that thiiis report is an evaluation of th~e market potential of a"healthier"' cigarette rather thian a"healthy"' cigarette. If we couldidevelop a medically and golvernmentally endorsed! "healthy" cigarette that tasted exactlly like a Marlboroi, delivered the nicotine of a Marlboro, and was called Miarlbioro, it wouild probably become the best selling brand. There is, of course, .considerable doubt as to whether the medical profession and the federal governmenit would ever endoirse any cigarette. Since any health cigarette we might develop would have to compete wi th the allleged "heal th ci garet.tes" now on the market, I have accepted as a workinig definition, of a health cigarette the defi- nition commonly used in the R'esearch Center: All cigarettes about which health claiims have been made or implied~(charcoal filter 1000338651 4
Page 8: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
cigarettes; Kent_and P'arliament; and minor brands such as Duke, Life, Saino, and True). L & M is a borderline case: At one time it was the major health cigarette enitry and iits sales patterns are des.cribed in this report, but it is not iincl'uded in the definition of health cigarettes. Similarly, Philip Morris Menthol and Montclair are not included~inithis definition,, although they could be considered health cig&rettes by virtue of their charcoal filters. Since their comb:iined sales constiitute only 0.6% of the total cigarette market, however, th,eiir inclusion would in no way affect the anialysis. I have assumedithiat any health cigarette must compromiise between health implications on the one hand and flavor and nicotine on the other. It seems cl!e&r from the perfoxmenice of exiisting healthi cig,arette entriies that flavor and nicotine are both neces- sary to sell a cigarette. A cigarette that d~oes not deliver nicotine canniot satisfy the habituated smoker and~cannot lead to habituation, and would therefore almost certainly faill. Health claims alone without flavor or n1ilcotine cannot selll cigarettes- most smokers would rather quite thaniswitch. A. Sales Patterns The health scare in the 1950's was accompanied by a decline in ciigarette sailies (see Fig. 1), although the health scare was only one of many reasons for thie decline. Of greater importance, probably, were the end of the Korean War and the Accompanying: recession, cigarette tax increases, and changes in the age compo- sition of the population. The increase in sales of king-size cigarettes during this period also contributed to the overall ~ decline in sales, siince fewer kiing-s.ize cigarettes are necessaryr to proviide the same amount of tobacco. The health scare undoubtedly 1000338652 5
Page 9: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
figure 1 CIGARETTE SALES BY TYPE, 1946-65 7 Health Filters (incl. menthol) Other Filter (incl- menthol) O I I ( I I I I 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966
Page 10: bdw67e00 Log in for more options!
fl I 11, was responsible f.or the rapid increase in filter cigarette sal!es, and contributed to the riise in king-size cigarettes (see Fig. 2). Apparently, however, the illusion of filtration was more impoirtant than the fact of filtration, and consumers were still' moist interested in flavor. It is possible that the tar derby in the 1950's was a major factor in arousing conicern over the _question of smoking and health. L & M sales began a marked rise in 1955 after the favorable coverage in Consumer Reports that year and received an addi tiionall bolost fromiConsumer Reports in 1957. The most spectacular performer in the 501's, of course, was Kent, which iintroduced the "Micromite filter" in July 1957, immediately after the rellease of the final report of the Ameri can, Cancer Society study of smoking and hiealth, and received rave reviews from Reader's Digest in Juily and August 1957 (see Fig. 3). It seems more than mere co,inci dence that Parl i ament experilenced a three-foilld increase in sales after favorable reports on thie new filter iin both Reader"s Digest and Consumer Reports in early 1958. By 1959, smokers hiad apparently become inured to compet- ing healthl clai'ms and to the health scare iin general. Duke of Durham and Life were bothi colossal flops, in spite of favorable reports iniboth Reader's Digest and Consumer Reports, and salles of Kent*and L & M beg,an toidecline. The hiealth scare in 1964 was undoubted'.ly the cause of the ci1ga- rette sales decline, the accelerated shift to filters, and the 126% increase in sales of ch&rcoal filters. The indirect approval gi ven Lark by the Su!rgeon General's offi ce pxob&bl)WA helped all charcoial fi lters. Q - O 7 ~. L..l

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: