Fields
- Date Loaded
- 13 May 1999
- Type
- PUBLICATION
- Named Organization
- Advocacy Inst for Natl Cancer Inst
- Natl Cancer Inst
- NCI
- Smoking Tobacco and Cancer Program
- Advocacy Inst
- American Cancer Society
- Intl Union Against Cancer
- Non Smokers Rights Assoc
- Federal Election Commission
- Doc
- US Office of Smoking and Health
- Cnn
- Parliament
- Legal Defense and Education Fund
- Varied Didrections
- American Medical Assoc
- American College of Obstetrics and Gyn
- Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
- US Dept of Health and Human Services
- Federal Trade Commission
- Office of Technology Assessment
- American Heart Assoc
- Harvard Univ
- Ca Nonsmokers Rights Found
- Consumer Reports
- Named Person
- Altman, D. 1
- Glynn, T. 2
- Bettinghaus, E.P. 3
- Blum, A. 4
- Butler, J. 5
- Cummings, K.M. 6
- Denniston, R. 7
- Dresner, D. 8
- Felix, M. 9
- Glantz, S. 10
- Harty, K. 11
- Hutchings, R. 12
- Johnson, L. 13
- Kennard, B.
- Klein, T. 14
- Kosack, E. 15
- Mahood, G. 16
- Manley, M. 17
- Manoff, R. 18
- Mcallister, A. 19
- Mcckenna, J. 20
- Nmeinert, L. 21
- Menichelli, K. 22
- Okeef, A.M. 23
- Pechacek, T. 24
- Pertschuk, M. 25
- Pierce, J. 26
- Rimer, I. 27
- Romano, R.M. 28
- Sachs, C. 29
- Samuels, S. 30
- Schwartz, T. 31
- Shopland, D. 32
- Simpson, D. 33
- Tannenbaum, S. 34
- Taylor, H. 35
- Wallack, L. 36
- White, N. 37
- Wilbur, P. 38
- Okeefe, A.M.
- Wilbur, P. 39
- Cullen, J.W. 40
- Morris, P.
- Rimer, I. 41
- Taylor, H. 42
- Kossack, E.
- Glantz, S. 43
- Mahood, G. 44
- Simpson, D. 45
- Daube, M.
- Schwartz, T. 46
- Dresner, R.
- Waxman, H.
- Klein, T. 47
- Koch
- Jamieson, K. 48
- Campbell, K. 49
- Schwartz, T. 50
- Hanauer, P. 51
- Barr, G. 52
- Glantz, S. 53
- Mcelwee, D. 54
- Pollack, M.M. 55
- Mattson, N. 56
- Cullen, J. 57
- Warner, K. 58
- Chapman, S. 59
- Tye, J.
- Warner, K. 60
- Ernster, V.
- Holbrook, J.
- Lewit, E.
- Pertschuk, M. 61
- Steinfield
- Whelan, E.
- Myers, M.
- Arnold, S.
- Hanauer, P. 62
- Barr, G. 63
- Author (Organization)
- US Dept of Health and Human Services
- Public Health Service
- Natl Inst of Health
- Ending Date
- 15 Jan 1988
- Litigation
- Texas AG
- Site
- TI Storage Box 1746, Cb1145
- UCSF Legacy ID
- tqs32f00
Annotations
- 1. Altman, D. Named Person
- 2. Glynn, T. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Natl Cancer Inst
- 3. Bettinghaus, E.P. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Mi State Univ
- 4. Blum, A. Named Person
- 5. Butler, J. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 6. Cummings, K.M. Named Person
- 7. Denniston, R. Named Person
- 8. Dresner, D. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Dresner Sykes Assoc
- 9. Felix, M. Named Person
- 10. Glantz, S. Named Person
- 11. Harty, K. Named Person
- Affiliation:
MN Dept Okf Health
- 12. Hutchings, R. Named Person
- 13. Johnson, L. Named Person
- 14. Klein, T. Named Person
- 15. Kosack, E. Named Person
- Affiliation:
American Lung Assn
- 16. Mahood, G. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Non Smokers Rights Assn
- 17. Manley, M. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Natl Cancer Inst
- 18. Manoff, R. Named Person
- 19. Mcallister, A. Named Person
- 20. Mcckenna, J. Named Person
- 21. Nmeinert, L. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Nj Health Dept
- 22. Menichelli, K. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Benton Found
- 23. Okeef, A.M. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 24. Pechacek, T. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Natl Cancer Inst
- 25. Pertschuk, M. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 26. Pierce, J. Named Person
- 27. Rimer, I. Named Person
- Affiliation:
American Cancer Society
- 28. Romano, R.M. Named Person
- 29. Sachs, C. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Benton Found
- 30. Samuels, S. Named Person
- 31. Schwartz, T. Named Person
- Affiliation:
New Sounds
- Affiliation:
Anchor Press Doubleday
- 32. Shopland, D. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Natl Cancer Inst
- 33. Simpson, D. Named Person
- 34. Tannenbaum, S. Named Person
- Affiliation:
American Cancer Society
- 35. Taylor, H. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Louis Harris and Assoc
- 36. Wallack, L. Named Person
- 37. White, N. Named Person
- 38. Wilbur, P. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 39. Wilbur, P. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 40. Cullen, J.W. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Natl Cancer Inst
- 41. Rimer, I. Named Person
- Affiliation:
American Cancer Society
- 42. Taylor, H. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Louis Harris and Assoc
- 43. Glantz, S. Named Person
- 44. Mahood, G. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Non Smokers Rights Assn
- 45. Simpson, D. Named Person
- 46. Schwartz, T. Named Person
- Affiliation:
New Sounds
- Affiliation:
Anchor Press Doubleday
- 47. Klein, T. Named Person
- 48. Jamieson, K. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Wadsworth Publishing
- 49. Campbell, K. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Wadsworth Publishing
- 50. Schwartz, T. Named Person
- Affiliation:
New Sounds
- Affiliation:
Anchor Press Doubleday
- 51. Hanauer, P. Named Person
- 52. Barr, G. Named Person
- 53. Glantz, S. Named Person
- 54. Mcelwee, D. Named Person
- 55. Pollack, M.M. Named Person
- 56. Mattson, N. Named Person
- 57. Cullen, J. Named Person
- 58. Warner, K. Named Person
- 59. Chapman, S. Named Person
- 60. Warner, K. Named Person
- 61. Pertschuk, M. Named Person
- Affiliation:
Advocacy Inst
- 62. Hanauer, P. Named Person
- 63. Barr, G. Named Person
Document Images
Page 1: tqs32f00
Media Strategies for
Smoking Control
CuIDELINES
.
f;ft..~t~
M
January 14-15, 1988
US Department of Health
and Human Services
Public Health Service
Notional Institutes of Health
TITX 0021008
Page 2: tqs32f00
CONTENTS
Introduction
8 What Do We Mean by "Media Advocacy?"
8 What is the Role of Smoking Control Media Advocacy?
1 Basic Principles of Media Advocacy
12 Be Flexible, Spontaneous, and Creative
12 Seize the Initiative/Don't be Intimidated
13 Stay Focused on the Issues
14 Make it Local/Keep it Relevant
14 Know the Medium ~
16 "Narrowcast," or Target Your Media Messages
16 Make Sure Your Media Know and Trust You
17 Your Best Spokesperson May Be Someone Else
18 Wit and Humor Have Many Uses and Virtues
2 Strategies for Gaining Access to the Media
20 Soft Path and Hard Path
21 Creative Epidemiology
22 Relative Harms of Smoking
22 Localizing Statistics
22 Public Policy Implications
23 Timely Reaction to the General News Environment
23 Turning the Tables of the Tobacco Industry
23 Distortions of Science .
24 Marketing, Advertising, and Promotional Excesses and Abuses
24 The Misuse of Philanthropy
24 Political Excesses
25 Public Policy Initiatives are Newsworthy
26 Promoting Public Policy Role Models
27 Creating News With Created Events
27 Public Service Announcements
28 Paid Advocacy Advertising
3 Strategies for Framing and Seizing the Symbols of the Debate
31 Labeling "We" and "They"
33 Associating Public Policy Objectives With Popular and
Legitimate Values and Symbols
34 Characterizing the Scientific Case Against Smoking
34 Characterizing Smoking Control Policies
35 Restrictions on Smoking in Public Places
35 Restrictions on Smoking in the Workplace
36 Restrictions on Cigarette Advertising and Promotion
36 Excise Tax Increases
Appendices
37 Appendix A: Selected Media Resource Guides
38 Appendix B: Smoking Control Laws and Policies
39 Appendix C: Creative Epidemiology
43 Appendix D: Selected Papers and Briefs in Support of
Principal Smoking Control Initiatives
~X 1p09
Ti

Page 3: tqs32f00
MEDIA STRATEGIES FOR SMOKING CONTROL
GUIDELINES
Page 4: tqs32f00
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
; .
A
two-day consensus workshop convened by the
Advocacy Institute for the National Cancer Institute's Smoking,
Tobacco, and Cancer..Program was held at the National Institutes
~.-
of Health on Januar}i 14-15, 1988.
Participants in the January conference included:
David~Altman
Stanford Center for Research
in Disease Prevention
Erwin P. Bettinghaus
Michigan State University
Thomas Glynn
National Cancer Institute
Kathy Harty
Minnesota Department of
Health
Alan Blum
Baylor University School
of Medicine; Doctors Ought
to Care
Judy Butler
Advocacy Institute
K. Michael Cummings
Roswell Park Memorial
Insitute
Robert Denniston
Office of Substance Abuse
Prevention
Dick Dresner
Dresner-Sykes Associa tes
Michael Felix
The Henry J. Kaiser Family
Foundation
Stan Glantz
University of California
Robert Hutchings
Office of Smoking and Health
Lenora Johnson
American Public Health
Association
Byron Kennard •
Author
Ted Klein
Ted Klein and Company
Ellie Kosack
American Lung Association
Garfield Mahood
Non-Smokers' Rights
Association
Marc Manley
National Cancer Institute
Richard Manoff
Manoff International
TITX 0021011

Page 5: tqs32f00
Alfred McAllister
Center for Health Promotion
Research and Development
Jeffrey McKenna
Office of Cancer
Communications, NCI
Larry Meinert
New Jersey Department
of Health
Karen Menichelli
Benton Foundation
Anne Marie O'Keefe
Advocacy Institute
Terry Pechacek
National Cancer Institute
Michael Pertschuk
Advocacy Institute
John Pierce
Office of Smoking and Health
Irv Rimer
American Cancer Society
Rose Mary Romano
Office of Cancer
Communications, NCI
Carolyn Sachs
Benton Foundation
Sarah Samuels
The Henry J. Kaiser Family
Foundation
Tony Schwartz
New Sounds, Inc.
Don Shopland
National Cancer Institute
David Simpson
British ASH
Stanley Tannenbaum
American Cancer Society
Humphrey Taylor
Louis Harris and Associates,
Inc.
Larry Wallack
University of California
Norman White
McMaster University Health
Sciences Centre
Phillip Wilbur
Advocacy Institute
,~ITX 0021012
u
Page 6: tqs32f00
0
FOREWORD
The Surgeon General's recent report on nicotine addiction
underscores the importance of mobilizing all segments of society
toward the elimination of tobacco use from our culture. As part
of its goal to reduce the U. S. cancer mortality rate by 50 percent
by the year 2000, the National Cancer Institute, NCI, through its
Smoking, Tobacco, and Cancer Program, is developing a number
of approaches to prevent and reduce tobacco use in the country.
This research intervention effort includes four clinical trials using
mass media strategies that have reached more than four million
people with anti-smoking messages.
This monograph reports on a consensus workshop that
included the Smoking, Tobacco, and Cancer Program media
researchers, as well as other public health and media experts.
These guidelines offer expert advice useful in the continuing '
effort to assist smoking control advocates to influence the media
and bring about changes in the public's knowledge, attitudes,
and behavior related to tobacco use.
Because the mass media have been used so effectively to
promote the use of tobacco, the use of media to counteract such
behavior appears equally promising. The media are a rapid and
effective channel to reach large numbers of people: We believe
that the media would better serve the public to reduce the
prevalence of tobacco use.
The NCI wishes to thank Mr. Michael Pertschuk, Co-
Director of the Advocacy Institute, and his staff, particularly Dr.
Anne Marie O'Keefe and Mr. Phillip Wilbur, for taking the lead
and developing these guidelines. Their vision, together with the
insight of the workshop participants, has produced a valuable
handbook. We hope that those who read and use it will add to
the momentum toward a tobacco-free society by the year 2000.
Joseph W. Cullen, Ph.D.
Deputy Director
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control
National Cancer Institute
0021013
~, r

Page 7: tqs32f00
••
S
S
S
S
TITX 0021014
Page 8: tqs32f00
INTRODUCTION
0
P
~
. V
e know that the mass media are a great force in our
society - a force for change, if not always a force for good. We
know that the media carry cigarette advertising and thus may not
be as diligent as they could in telling the whole truth about the
dangers of tobacco.
~ These guidelines are grounded upon the conviction -
based upon hard-earned experience, not wishful thinking - that
the media are far more open to the true story of smoking than
smoking control advocates previously believed.
But we have also learned that the promise of that open-
ness will only be realized if we develop strategies, the skills, and
the confidence to bring our story forcefully to the media.
Consider the recent media successes gained by the smok-
ing control movement. Recently, broadcast news and the front ;
pages of the nation's newspapers have trumpeted the news of
smoking hazards and of the struggles and triumphs of smoking
control advocates:
• A steady drumbeat of science, health, and life-style fea-
tures as new studies confirm the old and as involuntary,
or passive, smoking takes its place in the pantheon of
toxic pollutants; • The potent media presence and authoritative voice of the
Surgeon General, speaking boldly, to a national audience,
of smoking as an incomparable health hazard and as an
addiction comparable to heroin and cocaine;
• Cascading coverage of the wave of non-smoking laws and
policies sweeping workplaces, restaurants, health facili-
ties, schools, buses, trains, and airlines;
• At first, a trickle, then a torrent of print and broadcast
stories on revelatory tobacco industry documents ex-
tracted in cigarette product liability cases, judicial pro-
nouncements on tobacco industry wrongdoing, and
ensuing Congressional investigations and legislative
initiatives;
• Hard-hitting investigative stories in many newspapers on
the tobacco industry's market targeting of women, blacks,
Hispanics - the industry's "third world" strategy within
the United States.
TITX 0021015

Page 9: tqs32f00
Now it will come as no secret to those who are wise in the
ways of media, to learn that most of these stories did not write
themselves. The Surgeon General has proved to be a skilled and
formidable public communicator. Many others, too, have learned
the skills of communicating through the public media. Indeed,
behind each story were likely to be one or more of the following:
• A scientist wise in the ways of "creative epidemiology,"
i.e., the presentation of data - both scientifically sound
and artful - so as to catch the glint of media attention;
• A grass-roots activist with an eye or an ear for the perfect
media "bite," the fifteen second quip which leaps out of
the notes or film clips of the journalist seeking to encapsu-
late his or her story;
• A smoking control advocate who knows how to convey to
the media information that can expose tobacco industry
marketing or health disinformation strategies;
• An expert witness, university-credentialed in health
science, and equally adept at the art of debating industry
P.R. professionals;
• The staff director of a local voluntary health agency who
has made it her business to seek out every local journalist
on the health beat, learn about his or her needs, make
herself always available for straight and informed
answers, build trust, and respect the journalist's
professionalism;
• The health policy advocate, who understands that a
supportive mayor or city council president needs suppor-
tive publicity; ~
• The volunteer media genius who creates compelling low-
cost radio commercials that shock or create conflict, and
thereby become themselves the subject of news stories -
using "paid media" to help structure "unpaid media;"
• The law professor who recognizes the potential media
value of cigarette product liability litigation in highlight-
ing industry strategies of denial and. obfuscation.
In short, the extent and quality of the recent coverage of
the smoking issue were not fortuitous; they were earned. And
the skills and strategies employed in the effort are a prime
example of the emerging field of smoking media advocacy.
These Guidelines are designed to help you, the smoking control
TITX 0021016

Page 10: tqs32f00
advocate, to better understand media advocacy: what it is, what
its potential is, and how best to reach that potential.
What Do We Mean by "Media Advocacy?"
Media advocacy is the strategic use of mass media as a
resource for advancing a social or public policy initiative.
Media`advocacy does not view publicity as an end in itself, but is
constantly asking, "How can this media initiative or opportunity
best serve to advance our policy goals?"
Media advocacy comes into play whenever the media
become the arena for contesting public policies. Media advocacy
encompasses all the skills and strategies employed by policy
advocates to use media to
Philip Morris is spending billions of dollars
build
marketing~death. We are spending a few hundred support for public
~~ policy initiatives.
thousand dollars marketing life. Media advocacy
Irv RirnK
L~J
recognizes the existence of a struggle wi,th an opposing force.
Thus, it requires both positive issue advocacy and negation of the
disinformation activities of adversaries. With this in mind,
smoking control media advocates identify the tobacco industry as
their opponent and recognize the importance of nqgating the
industry's disinformation activities.
Media advocacy takes an activist approach to media,
viewing media as a potential resource which must be aggres-
sively pursued. A media advocacy campaign is more like a
political campaign in which competing forces continuously react
to unexpected events, breaking news, and opportunities, rather
than a static, preformulated educational campaign.
While there may be a role for paid media (advertising) in
media advocacy, limitations of funding for smoking control
advocacy and the pervasiveness of unpaid media (news) in the
shaping of public perception of issues, make the news media the
primary arena for media advocacy.
adoption of smoking control policies.
What is the Role of Smoking Control
Media Advocacy?
The priority task for the smoking control advocate is to
master and implement the full complement of strategies for
gaining access to the mass media in ways that contribute to the
TITX 0021017
