Tobacco Institute
'Untitled' (Film on Smoking and Lung Cancer)
Fields
- Alias
- TIOK0027320 - TIOK0027341
- Type
- OTHER
- Characteristic
- DRAFT
- Date Loaded
- 24 May 1999
- Request
- Ok1-21
- Litigation
- Oklahoma AG
- Box
- 180
- UCSF Legacy ID
- kxu91f00
Document Images
DICK (SYNC):
At best, they're a big help; at worst, terribly
misleading.
CAMERA MOVES TO MONITOR WITH U.S. MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF GREATEST
INCIDENCE OF LUNG CANCER.
DICK (VO):
For instance, you take a look at some general
statistics about smoking and lung cancer and
you would get the idek that wherever smokers
live, the lung cancer rate is high. Makes sense.
But, it isn't so.
STATISTICAL READOUTS BY GEORGRAPHIC AREA.
DICK (VO):
Look at this. From the National Cancer Institute...
New Jersey. The petroleum regions...the heavy
manufacturing areas...this is where lung cancer is
heaviest. Are these the areas where smokers are
most likely to live? No, smokers live all over
the United States.
T1OK 0027331

- 11 -
CUT TO INTERNATIONAL GRAPHICS ON MONITOR.
DICK (VO):
Internationally there are a lot of questions;
questions not answered but raised by statistics.
MONITOR SHOWS CLOSEUP OF U.S. AND CANADA. STATISTICS SUPER OVER
MAP OUTLINES.
DICK (VO):
The U.S. and Canada have the highest per
capita cigarette consumption in the world,
but they rank eigth and 15th respectively
in lung cancer deaths of males.
MONITOR CHANGES TO EUROPE OUTLINE.
DICK (VO):
Conversely, the United Kingdom, Finland
and the Netherlands have lower per capita
consumption than the U.S. and Canada, but
they have far higher lung cancer death rates.
TIOK 0027332

- 12 -
SUPER STATISTICS OVER MAP OUTLINES.
DICK (VO):
Number? Let's take an even closer look.
After all, the evidence about smoking and
lung cancer depends on numbers. Where do
the numbers come from?
CAMERA MOVES TO A MONITOR WITH THE FACE OF A PHYSICIAN, A MEDICAL
EXAMINER.
MEDICAL EXAMINER:
We get most of our lung cancer statistics
from death certificates...you know, the form
that is filled out in the hospital when
someone dies. The problem is they're not
terribly accurate. A lot of it is based on
guesswork. You can't really know the cause of
death without an autopsy, and autopsies are
performed in relatively few cases -- maybe
one in five.
DICK, CU.
TIOK 0027333

DICK (SYNC):
Here's another interesting fact we uncovered
on the subject of autopsies and statistics.
Can doctors look at a lung and know if the
person was a smoker? We put this question
to our panel of 1,500 American adults.
CAMERA MOVES TO MONITOR SHOWING TEXT OF QUESTION AND BANK OF NUMBERS.
NUMBERS TOTAL RAPIDLY SHOWING A LARGE PERCENTAGE WHO BELIEVE DOCTORS
CAN LOOK AT A LUNG AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE PERSON SMOKED.
DICK (VO):
Let's talk to some folks directly and
get their answers.
CAMERA MOVES TO THE MONITORS WITH THE INDIVIDUAL FACES. A MAN APPEARS.
MAN (SYNC):
Sure. I understand a smoker's lung gets all
black over time.
WOMAN IS ON THE NEXT MONITOR.
T1OK 0027334

WOMAN (SYNC):
That's probably the tar and nicotine you're
talking about. Sure, I've seen pictures...
I guess.
ANOTHER WOMAN.
WOMAN (SYNC):
Smoker's lungs are definitely blacker... makes
sense.
DICK, CU.
DICK (SYNC):
Well, maybe it makes sense because it's been
said so often. But that doesn't make it true.
Let's look at the Congressional Record, testimony
from a pathologist who has looked at thousands
of lungs. . .
CAMERA MOVES TO MONITOR WHERE THESE WORDS ARE DISPLAYED.
TIOK 0027335

PATHOLOGIST (VO):
It is not possible, grossly or microscopically,
or in any other way known to me, to distinguish
between the lung of a smoker or a nonsmoker.
DICK (VO):
At the same hearing, another expert said:
NEW TEXT DISPLAYED ON MONITOR.
EXPERT (VO):
I would estimate that of a thousand pathologists
in this country 998 would say, 'I could not tell'
and two would say 'I could tell' and that those
two who could tell either had some divine
intuition or were not telling the truth.
DICK, WALKING BEHIND CONSOLE.
DICK (SYNC):
Pretty strong words.
TIOK p02733b
~

DICK SITS DOWN. MONITORS IN BKG.
DICK (SYNC):
Well what have we found so far?
We started by agreeing that most people believe
cigarette smoking causes cancer...but we found
that some scientists aren't so sure...
CUT TO MONITOR AND REPRISE FACES OF INTERVIEWEES. THEN CUT TO
MONITOR WITH EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL FOOTAGE.
DICK (V0):
We found that most people believe that
extensive laboratory experiments involving
animals is the basis of knowing that smoking
causes lung cancer. But we found that just
wasn't so either.
MS. DICK NEW ANGLE.
DICK (SYNC):
We found that most people are satisfied that
TiOK 0027337

DICK (SYNC):
statistics tell the whole story, but we found
out that statistics do a better job of
raising questions than answering them.
DICK, ANOTHER ANGLE.
DICK (SYNC):
And we found that even the statistics that
are being used...well, maybe they're not all
that accurate.
DICK GETS UP FROM BEHIND THE CONSOLE, WALKS OVER TO A MEDICAL MODEL
OF A SET OF LUNGS.
DICK (SYNC):
Does cigarette smoking cause lung cancer?
You may be expecting me to say 'no.' But the
answer is. I don't know...no one does.
Not the scientists, nor the physicians; not
the American Cancer Society nor the American
Lung Association. And the people who make
cigarettes, they don't know either.
TIOK 0027338

DICK, ANOTHER ANGLE.
DICK (SYNC):
Does that surprise you? Certainly, we've all
read that the cigarette industry denies that
smoking causes lung cancer.
CAMERA MOVES TO MONITORS WITH INDIVIDUAL FACES. A MAN'S FACE FILLS
THE SCREEN.
MAN (SYNC):
The cigarette companies? I've heard they say
that smoking definitely doesn't cause lung
cancer, or anything else for that matter.
A WOMAN APPEARS.
WOMAN (SYNC):
No. The cigarette companies believe their
products do not cause lung cancer. What do
you expect them to say?
DICK, CU.
TIOK 0027339

DICK (SYNC):
Well, let's hear what the cigarette companies
do say. Let's go to Washington and hear from
the chairman of The Tobacco Institute, the
organization which represents tobacco companies.
Horace Kornegay.
CAMERA MOVES TO MONITOR WITH KORNEGAY.
KORNEGAY (SYNC):
We don't know, nobody does. But, as an
industry, we've spent more than any non-governmental
agency trying to f ind out, more than the American
Cancer Society and Lung Association combined.
We have one position and that's all: there is a
clear need for answers and carefully conducted
medi=al research is the only way we're going to
get answers.
KORNEGAY, DIFFERENT ANGLE.
KORNEGAY (SYNC):
We do know that a lot of folks feel that all
T1OK 0027340
