Tobacco Institute
Reduced Tar and Nicotine Cigarettes: Smoking Behavior and Health
Fields
Annotations
- 1. Gerstein, D.R. Author
- Affiliation:
National Research Council
- Affiliation:
Document Images
Meduced Tar and
NICOUn. G Carees:
igftSmoking Behavior
and Health
. NAS
NAE
IOM
TIMN 308064

r
e
ReduCed7arand
Nicotine Cigarettes:
Smoking Behavior
and Health
Dean R. Gerstein and Peter K. Levison, Editors
Committee on Substance Abuse
and Habitual Behavior
Commission on Behavioral and
Social Sciences and Education
National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
Washington, D.C. 1982
TIMN 308065

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report
was approved by the Governing Board of the National
Research Council, whose members are drawn from the
councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the
National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of
Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for
the report were chosen for their special competences
and with re ard f ropr a e a ance.
3s report has been reviewe y a group other than
the authors according to procedures approved by a
Report Review Committee consisting of members of the
National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of
Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was established by the
National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the
broad community of science and technology with the
Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and of .
advising the federal government. The Council operates''
in accordance with general policies determined by the
Academy under the authority of its congressional
charter of 1863, which establishes the Academy as a
private, noriprofit, self-governing membership
corporation. The Council has become the principal
operating agency of both the National Academy of
Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in the
conduct of their services to the government, the
public, and the scientific and engineering
communities. It is administered jointly by both
Academies and the Institute of Medicine. The National
Academy of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine
were established in 1964 and 1970, respectively, under
the charter of the National Academy of Sciences.
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-81147
International Standard Book Number 0-309-03246-0
Available from
NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS
2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20418
Printed in the United States of America
TIMN 308066

COMMITTEE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND HABITUAL BEHAVIOR
LOUIS C. LASAGNA (Chair), Department of Pharmacology
and Toxicology, University of Rochester
HOWARD S. BECIOrR, Department of Sociology, Northwestern
University
PETER'DEWS, Department of Psychiatry and Laboratory of
Psychobiology, Harvard Medical School
JOHN L. FALK, Department of Psychology, Rutgers
University
- DANIEL X. FREEDMAN, Department of Psychiatry,.
University of Chicago
JEROME H. JAFFE, University of Connecticut.School of
Medicine and Veterans Administration Hospital,
Newington, Connecticut
,J DENISE B. KANDEL, Department of Psychiatry,- Columbia
University, and New York State Psychiatric
Institute, New York
JOHN KAPLAN, School of Law, Stanford University
GARDNER LINDZEY, Center for Advanced Study in the
~ . Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California
GERALD McCLEARN, College of Human Development,
. Pennsylvania State University
CHARLES P. O'BRIEN, Drug Dependence Treatment Service,
Veterans Administration Hospital, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
~ JUDITH RODIN, Department of Psychology, Yale University
. STANLEY SCHACHTER, Department of Psychology, Columbia
University
THOMAS C. SCHELLING, John F. Kennedy School of
Government, Harvard University
~ RICHARD L. SOLOMON, Department of Psychology,
University of Pennsylvania
FRANK STANTON, New York, New York
,ALBERT M. STUNRARD, Department of Psychiatry,
University of Pennsylvania Hospital '
RICHARD F. THOMPSON, Department of Psychology, Stanford
University
PETER K. LEVISON, Study Director
DEAN R. GERSTEIN, Senior Research Associate
DEBORAH R. MALOFF, Research Associate
MARIE A. CLARK, Administrative Secretary
111
TIMN 308067

i
CONTENTS
PREFACE . v
INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS 1
THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF CIGARETTE SMOKING 7
Earlier Studies, 7
Changes in-Death Rates from Respiratory
System Cancer in the United States
S ince 1.940, 10
Su.*imary, 16
SMOKING BEHAVIOR
18
The Nicotine Compensation Hypothesis, 21
A Note on Cutting Down and New Smokers, 26
TOWARD A'RESEARCH PROGRAM ON ALTERNATIVES
28
Introduction, 28
Cigarette Research and Development, 29
Delivery and Absorption of Tobacco Products, 30
Standardized Measures of Smoking Behavior, 31
Studies of Alternatives, 33
Smokers' Responses to Existing
Alternatives, 34
Health Effects, 36
SPECIFIC RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS
Cigarette Research and Development, 38 38
Delivery and Absorption of Tobacco Products, 38
Standardized Measures of Smoking Behavior, 39
Testing the Addiction Model, 39
Smokers' Responses to Existing Alternatives, 40
Health Effects, 41
APPENDIX
2
REP'ERENCES 45
iv
TIMN 308068

PREFACE
Since the early 1900s, cigarette smoking has increased in
popularity with relatively muted concern over its health
effects or'habituating properties. Reports of cancer
risk based on hospital studies in the early 1950s and the
landmark Surgeon General's report in 1964 induced many
cigarette smokers to quit smoking entirely-but many
others who tried to stop discovered the habit to be one
not so easily broken. The persistence of smoking habits
in those who wanted to quit and the great difficulties
experienced by many others who finally stopped smoking
only after repeated cycles~bf withdrawal, abstinence, and
relapse led to the recognition of cigarette smoking as an
addiction, at least for a substantial proportion of
smokers.
The Committee on Substance Abuse and Habitual Behavior
was formed within the National Research Council to
examine similarities and differences among many kinds of
firmly established habitual behavior patterns, princi-
pally but not exclusively involving chemical substances,
and to see what common processes might be found to
underlie compulsive, resistant habits that can endanger
health and well-being. The comrnittee's work has been
sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA),
which, in conjunction with its charter mission of
research on and treatment and prevention of problems
associated with narcotic drugs, was persuaded by the
commonalities between habitual cigarette smoking and
classical drug addictions to propose this major public
health concern as an addictive process. in 1978, the
committee and NIDA cosponsored a symposium entitled
Cigarette Smoking as a Dependence Process, the
V
T,MN 308069

proceedings of which were published in 1979 as NIDA
Research Monograph No. 23.
The committee members who participated in the symposium
were especially interested in the hypothesis that habitual
smoking reflects an addictive process involving the bio-
logical and behavioral effects of nicotine. Experimental
studies of the quantity of smoking in relation to the
nicotine content of cigarettes form a growing body of
evidence suggesting that smokers who are given cigarettes
yielding less nicotine (in standard mechanized assays
that simulate smoking) than their usual ones smoke more
of them. Such experimental findings might be especially
important for persistent smokers in light of some major
changes in the cigarette marketplace. First, measures of
the average tar and nicotine yields of commercial cigar-
ettes have declined dramatically since 1955. Second,
some investigators have argued, with considerable support
in public health circles and attendant publicity, that
these lower yields represent a lessening of the health
hazards of cigarette smoking (in short, that they amount
to "less hazardous cigarettes"). Third, "light" and
"low"-yield brands have been heavily promoted by cigarette
manufacturers. This confluence of factors led the
committee to form a subgroup to study the question of how
tobacco products with reduced yields of nicotine, tar, or
other components affect the health of those smokers who
continue to use tobacco products.
The first draft of this study was discussed by the
full committee and a number of consultants in a small
conference in 1979. Initially the study sought to place
equal emphasis on a range of alternatives to cessation of
cigarette smoking, including pipes, cigars, "smokeless"
tobacco for chewing or snuffing, and nicotine-bearing
gum. However, the scarcity of useful epidemiological
data on these alternatives to cigarettes and the com-
mercial growth in demand for decreased-yield cigarettes,
persuaded us to place the major emphasis of the study on
cigarette smoking. The committee ended up synthesizing
and drawing inferences from evidence on nicotine as the
key addictive component of cigarette smoke, on the
behavioral and health effects of reducing the standard
yields of tar and nicotine in cigarettes, and on the
consequences likely to result from the interaction
between these two factors (addiction and yield
reduction). In its survey of epidemiological studies,
the committee was struck by the growtrh in death rates
vi
TIMN 308070

from respiratory system cancer in the same period when
tar and nicotine yields were falling, leading us to
undertake a new analysis of these data.
The committee is grateful to a number of individuals
and institutions for help given during the preparation of
this report. The comments of our consultants Lynn
Kozlowski, Lee Fredericksen, and Dan Beauchamp on an early
draft were very helpful in setting its final direction.
Unpublished and prepublication materials supplied to us
by Lawrence Garfinkel, Frank Godley, G.-H. Miller, Carl
Pieper, and Eugene Rogot were most useful. The biblio-
graphic services of the library of the National Academy
of Sciences and the Technical Information Service of the
Office on Smoking and Health, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, were very valuable. I would also
like to acknowledge the advice of John Bailar, Robert
Enstrom, E. Cuyler Hammond, Daniel Horn, Zdenek Hrubec,
Morton Levin, Abraham Lilienfeld, and Marvin Schneiderman.
The committee subgroup, comprised of Louis Lasagna
(chairman), Jerome Jaffe, Stanley Schachter, Thomas
Schelling, and Albert Stunkard, was responsible for
overseeing this report through many rounds of criticism
and redrafting; they deserve a large share of the credit
for its completion. This report was also the beneficiary
of constructive criticism by individual reviewers of the
Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Report
Review Committee of the National Academy of Sciences.
Gardner Lindzey chaired the Committee on Substance Abuse
and Habitual Behavior during the larger part o: the study.
I would also like to acknowledge the role of Christine
L. McShane, editor of the Commission on Beha, rioral and
Social Sciences and Education, who polished rhe report
and prepared it for publication, and of Deborah Maloff,
research associate for the committee, who tracked down
and organized much of the data used in the epidemio-
logical analysis. Finally, the committee has relied on
Dean Gerstein and Peter Levison, the committee's senior
research associate and study director, resnectively, who
designed and executed the analysis of respiratory system
cancer data, organized the research recommendations, and
in general shared primary staff responsibility for the
report.
Louis Lasagna, Chair
Committee on Substance Abuse
and Habitual Behavior
vii
TIMN 308071

INTRODUCTION AND CONCLUSIONS
Habitual cigarette smoking is hazardous to health.
This is not only a scientific finding widely accepted
by the biomedical research community; it has also become
accepted as fact by a large majority of cigarette
smokers. Mainly for this reason, more than 30 million
of the 60 million habitual smokers in this country
report having made serious but unsuccessful attempts to
quit smoking. And more than 30 million others have in
fact quit smoking since 1964 (U.S. Department of Health.
Education, and Welfare, 1980; U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, 1981). Nonsmokers, especially young
ones, are also aware of the hazards of cigarettes, and
since ].975 fewer young people have started smoking them
(U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,
1980).
Nevertheless, many people do not want to give up
smoking cigarettes, and many people who want.to quit
still do not. Further complicating matters, tobacco
has been an economic staple of a large region of the=
country for more than 250 years. Finally, cigarettes
have acquired firm cultural associations, at times with
social sophistication, individuality, or maturity, and
such associations remain attractive to many people.
From this mixture of motives has come a movement for
"reducing the risk" for those who continue to use
, tobacco. People can attempt such reductions in three
principal ways. The first is by reducing the number of
cigarettes smoked. The second is by taking tobacco in
a different way than cigarettes--such as pipes, cigars,
chewing tobacco, or snuff. The third is by smoking
"less hazardous cigarettes." Although we comment on
the first two methods, the focus of this report is on
the third: first, because there are adequate scientific
TIMN 308072

2
reports to evaluate this method as a health strategy
for smokers; second, because it has unquestionably been
the major direction of consumer interest, commercial
development, and governmental activity in this country
in the past 25 years; and finally, because experiments
with different types of cigarettes have provided the
opportunity to assess the role of nicotine in the
motivation to continue smoking.
The assumptions that have guided development of the
less hazardous cigarette were outlined by Hammond et
al. (1977:105):
(1) Death rates from lung cancer, cancer of
several other sites, coronary heart disease, and
several other diseases increase with degree of
exposure to cigarette smoke. (2) Many experi-
mental studies have shown that material condensed
from cigarette smoke (usually called "tar") is
carcinogenic when applied to animals. (3) The
known acute effects of nicotine uponthe heart
and circulatory system suggest that the nicotine
content of cigarette smoke is partly, if not
entirely, responsible for the fact that age-
specific death rates are higher among cigarette
smokers than among nonsmokers. (4) Therefore, it
seems reasonable to suppose that if the tar and
nicotine content of cigarette smoke were reduced,
then the harm done per cigarette smoked would be
correspondingly reduced.
Due in part to this kind of reasoning, the tar and
nicotine (T/N) yields of commercially available cigar-
ettes in the United States have declined markedly over
the past 25 years. In 1955 the average cigarette sold
in the United States yielded 43 mg. of tar and 2.8 mg.
of nicotine (43/2.8) in standard tests. Almost no
cigarettes yielded less than 30/2.0; the highest-yield
brands were considerably higher; and virtually all
cigarettes were unfiltered. In 1979 the average
cigarette yielded about 15 mg. of tar and 1.0 mg. of
nicotine; almost no cigarette yielded more than 30/1.8;
and the tar and nicotine yields o.: readily available
cigarettes ranged down to 0.5/0.01. The overall
reduction has been achieved both by smokers' choosing
the new, lower T/N brands and the steady reduction by
cigarette companies of the T/N ratings of already
TIMN 308073
