Tobacco Institute
Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People a Report of the Surgeon General
User-Contributed Notes
- p. 6 this is a test
- p. 15 this is a test
Fields
Annotations
- 1. Hhs Author
- Affiliation:
Hhs
- Affiliation:
- 2. Public Health Service Author
- Affiliation:
Public Health Service
- Affiliation:
- 3. Centers Disease Control Preven Author
- Affiliation:
Centers Disease Control Prevention
- Affiliation:
- 4. National Center Chronic Diseas Author
- Affiliation:
National Center Chronic Disease Preventi
- Affiliation:
- 5. Office Smoking Health Author
- Affiliation:
Office Smoking Health
- Affiliation:
Document Images
Surgeon General's Report
J.P. Peddicord, M.S.,'Computer Scientist, Office on
Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Richard Ray, Director of Computer Services, Circle
Solutions, Inc., McLean, Virginia.
John Robey, Word Processing Specialist, Circle-Solutions,
Inc., McLean, Virginia.
Kathleen L. Schroeder, D.D.S., Associate Professor of
Oral Pathology, West Virginia University School of
Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Maggie Shelby, Secretary, HCR Consulting Group,
Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael B. Siegel, M.D., M.P.H., Epidemiologist, Office
on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Renee E. Sieving, M.S.N., Doctoral Student, Division of
Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael J. Staufacker, M.P.H., Doctoral Student, Division
of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Scott L. Tomar, D.M.D., Dr.P.H., Epidemiologist, Office
on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Traci L. Toomey, M.P.H., Doctoral Student, Division of
Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Laura Williams, Student, Northeast Ohio University
College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio.
Rebecca B. Wolf, M.A., Program Analyst, Office of
Program Planning and Evaluation, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bao-Ping Zhu, Ph.D., Research Scientist, Battelle Memorial
Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
x
TIMN 0138856

THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
WASHINGTON. 0 L 20201
The Honorable Thomas S. Foley
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Mr. Speaker:
It is my pleasure to transmit to the Congress the Surgeon
General's report on the health consequences of smoking
entitled Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People. This
report is mandated by section 8(a) of the Public Health
Cigarette Smoking Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-222) and includes
the health effects of smokeless tobacco products as mandated
by section 8(a) of the Comprehensive Smokeless Tobacco Health
Education Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-252). The report was
prepared by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's
Office on Smoking and Health.
This report focuses on the vulnerable adolescent ages of 10 -
through 18 when most users start smoking, chewing, or dipping,
and become addicted to tobacco. It examines the health
effects of early smoking and smokeless tobacco use, the
reasons that young men and women begin using tobacco, the
extent to which they use it, and efforts to prevent tobacco
use by young people.
Smoking kills 434,000 Americans each year. Adolescent smoking
and smokeless tobacco use are the first steps in this totally
preventable public health tragedy. The facts are simple: one
out of three adolescents in the United States is using tobacco
by age 18, adolescent users become adult users, and few people
begin to use tobacco after age 18. Preventing young people
from starting to use tobacco is the key to reducing the death
and disease caused by tobacco use. This report documents that
intervention programs targeting the broad social environment
of adolescents are both effective and warranted.
A great:,-opportunity lies before us to prevent millions of
premature deaths and improve the quality of lives. This
report points out the overwhelming need in public health for
efforts directed toward stopping young people before they
start using tobacco.
Enclosure
TIMN 0138846

Preface
from the Surgeon General,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The public health movement against tobacco use will be successful when young
people no longer want to smoke. We are not there yet. Despite 30 years of decline in
overall smoking prevalence, despite widespread dissemination of information about
smoking, despite a continuing decline in the social acceptability of smoking, substantial
numbers of young men and women begin to smoke and become addicted. These
current and future smokers are new recruits in the continuing epidemic of disease,
disability, and death attributable to tobacco use. When young people no longer want to
smoke, the epidemic itself will die.
This report of the Surgeon General, Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People,
delineates the problem in no uncertain terms. The direct effects of tobacco use on the
health of young people have been greatly underestimated. The long-term effects are, of
course, well established. The addictive nature of tobacco use is also well known, but it
is perhaps less appreciated that early addiction is the chief mechanism for renewing the
pool of smokers. Most people who are going to smoke are hooked by the time they are
20 years old.
Young people face enormous pressures to smoke. The tobacco industry devotes
an annual budget of nearly $4 billion to advertising and promoting cigarettes. As this
report so well describes, there has been a continuing shift from advertising to promo-
tion, largely because of banning cigarette ads from broadcast media. The effect of the
ban is dubious, however, since the use of promotional materials, the sponsoring of
sports events, and the use of logos in nontraditional venues may actually be more
effective in reaching target audiences. Clearly, young people are being indoctrinated
with tobacco promotion at a susceptible time in their lives.
A misguided debate has arisen about whether tobacco promotion "causes" young
people to smoke-misguided because single-source causation is probably too simple
an explanation for any social phenomenon. The more important issue is what effect
tobacco promotion might have. Current research suggests that pervasive tobacco
promotion has two major effects: it creates the perception that more people smoke than
actually do, and it provides a conduit between actual self-image and ideal self-image-
in other words, smoking is made to look cool. Whether causal or not, these effects foster ,
the uptake of smoking, initiating for many a dismal and relentless chain of events.
Ort the brighter side, a large portion of this report is devoted to countervailing
influences. We have the justification: there is a substantial scientific basis for primary
prevention of cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use. A number of successful
prevention programs, based on the psychological and behavioral factors that create
susceptibility to smoking, are available. We have the means: the report defines a
coordinated, effective, nonsmoking public health program for young people. And we
have the will: schools, communities, legislatures, and public opinion all testify to the
growing support for encouraging young people to avoid tobacco use.
itt
TIMN 0138849

Sur'gcun General'> ReEorP
Table 1. Continued
Reference Location/year Study population
Stanhope and Prior 1975 NewZealand, 1972 Maori and European high school
students aged 13-15 years
Bewley and Bland 1976 England, 1971 5,355 schoolchildren
aged 10-12 years
Bland et al. 1978 England, 1974 5,835 schoolchildren; first-year
level in secondary school
Weiss et a1.1980 Massachusetts, 1975 650 children aged 5-9 years,
population sample
Kujala 1981 Finland, 1976 1,075 male military recruits,
mean age = 20 years
.
Charlton 1984 England, 1982 15,709 students aged 8-19
years
Adams et al.1984 .='-`;. England,1975-1979 405 secondary schoolchildren
141 Rim
eIs 2985
ela and Rim Finland
1983 4,279 16- and 17-year-olds
p
p
, in a national sample
Oechsli, Seltzer, California, 1977-1979 1,445 children in a cohort
van den Berg.1987 study
"Smoking at least one cigarette weekly. Percentages combine data reported separately in
authois'`table V for urban and rural children.
"RR = Relative risk for children smoking ? one cigarette weekly vessus children who had never
smoked, adjusted for parental smoking.
xSmoking at least one cigarette weekly.
20 Health Consequences
TIMN 0138873

Foreword
This Surgeon General's report on smoking and health is the twenty-third in a
series that was begun in 1964 and mandated by federal law in 1969. This report is the
first in this series to focus on young people. It underscores the seriousness of tobacco
use, its relationship to other adolescent problem behaviors, and the responsibility of all
citizens to protect the health of our children.
Since 1964, substantial changes have occurred in scientific knowledge of the
health consequences of smoking and smokeless tobacco use. Much more is also known
about programs and policies that encourage nonsmoking behavior among adults and
protect nonsmokers from exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Although con-
siderable gains have been made against smoking among U.S. adults, this progress has
not been realized with young people. Onset rates of cigarette smoking among our
youth have not declined over the past decade, and 28 percent of the natiori s high school
seniors are currently cigarette smokers.
The onset of tobacco use occurs primarily in early adolescence, a developmental
stage that is several decades removed from the death and disability that are associated
with smoking and smokeless tobacco use in adulthood. Currently, very few people
begin to use tobacco as adults; almost all first use has occurred by the time people
graduate from high school. The earlier young people begin using tobacco, the more
heavily they are likely to use it as adults, and the longer potential time they have to be
users. Both the duration and the amount of tobacco use are related to eventual chronic
health problems. The processes of nicotine addiction further ensure that many of
today's adolescent smokers will regularly use tobacco when they are adults.
Preventing smoking and smokeless tobacco use among young people is critical to
ending the epidemic of tobacco use in the United States. This report examines the past
few decades' extensive scientific literature on the factors that influence the onset of use
among young people and on strategies to prevent this onset. To better understand
adolescent tobacco use, this report draws not only on medical and epidemiologic
research but also on behavioral and social investigations. The resulting examination of
the advertising and promotional activities of the tobacco industry, as well as the review
of research on the effects of these activities on young people, marks an important
contribution to our understanding of the epidemic of tobacco use in the United States
and elsewhere. In particular, this research on the social environment of young people
identifies key risk factors that encourage tobacco use. The careful targeting of these risk
factors--on a communitywide basis-has proven successful in preventing the onset
and development of tobacco use among young people.
Philip R. Lee, M.D. David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Secretary for Health Director
Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention
i
TIMN 0138848

Preveatiny Tobacco Use Anwng Young People
Symptoms Prevalence (%a) by smoking status
Never smoker Smoker'
Phlegm _ 3 months/yr 2.4 26.5x
Breathlessness 2.4 20.5=
Wheezing (apart from colds) 7.3 31.3t
Colds go to chest 4.9 31.3t
General findings: Increased cough and phlegm in smokers of > i cig/week versus never smokers.
Dose-response
evident. Prevalence of cough and phlegm dropped among smokers who quit smoking between 1965 and
1966.
Never smoker Smokert
Daily cough ? 3 months 4 10
Daily phlegm ? 3 months 3 9
Dyspnea when hurrying 16 30
Chest cold for 1 week 22 30
Wheezing or asthma 12 13
Number of cigarettes smoked per day
0 < 1 1-10 11-20 > 20
Cough 2.0 5.8 18.1 27.8 64.7
Phlegm 3.3 5.8 19.4 31.9 58.8
Shortness of breath _ 5.3 13.5 13.5 36.1 58.8
Never smoker Smoker'
Morning cough
Boys
5.4
18.2
Girls 5.9 19.8
Cough 3 months
Boys
3.8
15.4
Girls 3.5 12.1
Never smoker Ex-smoker Present smoker
Cough (day ortfi M in winter)
Boys
Girls
5.2
6.5
7.1
10.5
13.9
16.0
Nonsmoker Ex-smoker Smoker
Number of cigarettes smoked per day
Cough >_ 3 months/yrt S 1-9 10-14 _ 15
Boys' 2.9 4.5 9.2 16.2 29.0
Girls 4.4 6.0 12.0 23.1 35.9
tAt least one cigarette daily for the past year.
t p < 0.01. ,
'
'Smoking at least one cigarette weekly. Percentages combine data reported separately in
authors'Table 4 for urban
and rural children.
9For white children only.
Health Consequences 19
TIMN 0138872

Surgeon General's Report
Table 1. Published studies of the effects of smoking on respiratory symptoms among young people,
various countries, 1965-1983
Reference* Location/year Study population
Peters and Ferris 1967 Massachusetts, 1965 124 Harvard College seniors
Holland and Elliott 1968 England, 1965-1966 9,786 13- and 14-year-olds in 1965;
9,433 in 1966
Addington et al. 1970 Oklahoma9 557 high school students,
(grades 9-12) aged 13-19 years
Seeley, Zuskin, Bouhuys 1971 ConnecticutS 195 male and 170 female high -
school students aged 15-19 years ;
Bewley, Halil, Snaith 1973 England, 1971 8,682 schoolchildren
aged 10 and 11 years
Colley, Douglas, Reid 1973
United Kingdom, 1966 3,899 persons aged 20 years
sampled from 1946 birth cohort
study
Rush 1974 New York, 1968 12,595 high school students aged
13-18 years
*Listed chronologically by publication date. .
°Year not provided.
18 Health Consequences TIMN 0138871

Prerviiting Tohaceo Use Among YvunY Pevple
Symptoms Prevalence (%) by smoking status
Gerierrzl rinudine: Cough grade, phlegm grade, and loose cough sign significantly associated with
smoking.
Never smoker Smoker** RR"
Morning cough
Boys
8.3
16.3
5.9
Girls 8.5 28.6 6.8
Cough 3 months
Boys
7.2
13.4
2.4
Girls 6.0 10.7 2.6
Never smoker Smokeru RR49
Morning cough
Boys
3.1
19.2
5.9
Girls 1.8 13.5 6.8
Cough day or night
Boys
20.4
46.5
2.4
Girls 18.5 47.3 2.6
Breathlessness
Boys
11.8
34.9
2.9
Girls 16.5 39.2 2.3
General findings: Persistent wheezing reported for 13.8% of ever smokers and 9.7% of never smokers;
difference not significant.
Nonsmoker'' Ex-smokerll Smoker***
Cough all day 1 2 8
Phlegm all day 1 1 7
Wheezing 5 13 22
Frequent cough
0 Number of cigarettes smoked per day
1-6
> 6
Boys
Age 11-13
23
32
42
Age->14 9 16 29
Girls
Age 11-13
19
34
49
Age>-14 9 18 32
General findings: Increased risk of cough, dyspnea, and phlegm.
Never smoker
Low-tar smokerm
Medium-tar smoker$#
Morning phlegm 2.7 7.6 11.4
Morning cough 6.3 20.7 20.5
Phlegm day or night 5.2 13.8 13.2
Cough day or night 19.1 43.9 40.6
General findings: Starting smoking associated with bronchitis and pneumonia.
'°RR = Relative risk for children smoking at least one cigarette weekly versus children who hatd
never smoked.
"Nonsmoker =:Vever smoking and smoking not more than one cigarette daily for 5 one year.
9lEx-smoker = Smoking one month or more before date of the interview.
*5moker = Smoking ? 1 g of tobacco daily; one cigarette was estimated to contain Ig of tobacco.
'-Smoking daily, cigarettes < 10mg of tar.
tuSmoking daily, cigarettes 10-18mg of tar.
Health Consequences 21
TIMN 0138874

Surgeon General's Report
Table 3. Published studies of the effects of smoking on respiratory morbidity among young people,
various countries, 1963-1987
Reference* Location/year Study population
Haynes, Krstulovic, Bell 1966 New Jersey' 191 male prep school students
aged 14-19 years
Parnell, Anderson, Kinnis 1966 Canada, 1963-1964 175 senior student nurses
Finklea et al. 1971 South Carolina, 1968-1969 1,900 college students
Pollard et a1.1975 Florida, 1971-1972 1,100 U.S. Navy recruits, most
aged 18-22 years ,
Kark and Lebiush 1981 Israe1,1979 Female military recruits,
mean age = 18.5 years
Kark, Lebiush, Rannon 1982 Israel, 1978 Male military recruits,
mean age = 18.5 years
Blake, Abell, Stanley 1988 . Georgia, 1982 1,230 Army recruits,
~ ~ most aged < 22 years
Charlton and Blair 1989 England, 1987 2,885 schoolchildren aged.
12 and 13 years
Schwartz and Zeger 1990 Californiat 100 student nurses
*Listed chronologically by publication date.
tYear not provided;
26 Health Consequences
TIMN 0138879

Surgeon Genera!'s Report
normative, peers' and siblings' use and approval of
tobacco use, and lack of parental- support and in-
volvement as adolescents face the challenges of
growing up.
4. Behavioral risk factors for tobacco use include low
levels of academic achievement and school involve-
ment, lack of skills required to resist influences to use
tobacco, and experimentation with any tobacco prod-
uct.
5. Personal risk factors for tobacco use include a lower
self-image and lower self-esteem than peers, the be-
lief that tobacco use is functional, and lack of self-
efficacy in the ability to refuse offers to use tobacco.
For smokeless tobacco use, insufficient knowledge
of the health consequences is also a factor.
Chapter 5. Tobacco Advertising and
Promotional Activities
1. Young people continue to be a strategically impor-
tant market for.the tobacco industry.
2. Young people are currently exposed to cigarette
messages through print media (including outdoor
billboards) and through promotional activities, such
as sponsorship of sporting events and public enter-
tainment, point-of-sale displays, and distribution
of specialty items.
3. Cigarette advertising uses images rather than infor-
mation to portray the attractiveness and function of
smoking. Human models and cartoon characters in
cigarette advertising convey independence, health-
fulness, adventure-seeking, and youthful activities-
themes correlated with psychosocial factors that
appeal to young people.
4. Cigarette advertisements capitalize on the disparity
between an ideal and actual self-image and imply
that smoking may dose the gap.
5. Cigaretteadvertisingappearstoaffectyoungpeople's
perceptions of the pervasiveness, image, and func-
tion of smoking. Sinco misperceptions in these areas
constitute psychosocial risk factors for the initiation
of smoking, cigarette advertising appears to increase
young people's risk of smoking.
Chapter 6. Efforts to Prevent Tobacco Use
Among Young People
1. Most of the American public strongly favor policies
that might prevent tobacco use among young people.
These policies include tobacco education in the
schools, restrictions on tobacco advertising and pro-
motions, a complete ban on smoking by anyone on
school grounds, prohibition of the sale of tobacco
products to minors, and earmarked tax increases on
tobacco products.
2. School-based smoking-prevention programs that
identify social influences to smoke and teach skills to
resist those influences have demonstrated consistent
and significant reductions in adolescent smoking
prevalence, and program effects have lasted one to
three years. Programs to prevent smokeless tobacco
use that are based on the same model have also
demonstrated modest reductions in the initiation of
smokeless tobacco use.
3. The effectiveness of school-based smoking-preven-
tion programs appears to be enhanced and sustained
by comprehensive school health education and by
communitywide programs that involve parents, mass
media, community organizations, or other elements
of an adolescent's social environment.
4. Smoking-cessation programs tend to have low suc-
cess rates. Recruiting and retaining adolescents in
formal cessation programs are difficult.
5. IIlegal sales of tobacco products are common. Active
enforcement of age-at-sale policies by public officials
and community members appears necessary to pre-
vent minors' access to tobacco.
6. Econometric and other studies indicate that increases
in the real price of cigarettes significantly reduce
cigarette smoking; young people are at least as re-
sponsive as adults to such price changes. Maintain-
ing higher real prices of cigarettes depends on further
tax increases to offset the effects of inflation.
10 Introduction
TIMN 0138864
