Tobacco Institute
Use of Economic/Public Policy Consultants
Fields
Annotations
- 1. Delanty, M. Author
- Affiliation:
Ogilvy Mather Public Relations
- Affiliation:
Document Images
Ogilv~T &~ Z~~ther Public Relations
From: Maureen Delanty
To: Fred Panzer
Date1/31/85
RE: Use of Economic/Public Policy Consultants
F
1901 L STREET, :V.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036-3540 (202) 466-7590
Memarandum
The most important thing to remember in using the economists is that these
people cannot address the health question. This means they should never
testify on behalf of The Tobacco Institute or the manufacturers in any capacity.
In the best possible situation, they should be representing a coalition of state
business and labor interests. When this is not possible, any group of local
businessmen would be satisfactory.
Indeed, the economists can be most useful to the industry in shifting the debate on
a piece of legislation away from the health argument (which TI cannot win) and
toward a discussion of economics and public policy. This can only be accomplished,
however, if the economists are representing some local interest other than the
tobacco manufacturers.
The point should also be made that these economists are not "silver bullets."
They are meant to be used in addition to and along with other industry strategies
( to defeat a piece of legislation.
As for timing -- depending on the complexity of what is being asked
for -- four to six weeks advance notice is ideal for completing research,
drafting testimony, and briefing the economist. However, something can almost
always be prepared on shorter notice. In many situations, we can also help with
identifying possible front groups in a local area.
cc: Jim Savarese
.TIMN 0137228
