Tobacco Institute
Tobacco Debate: Imports and Health
Fields
Annotations
- 1. Molotsky, I. Author
- Affiliation:
New York Times
- Affiliation:
Document Images
Tobacco Debate: Imports and Health
By IRVIN MOLOTSKY
Spacial to The New York TIIOm
.
WASHINGTON, Aug. 10-Tobacco
has played an important part in this
city's history, from Colonial times,
when it was the leading local crop, to
current times, when talk about to-
bacco is one of the leading cottage in-
dustries on Capitol Hill.
The most recent discussion has
moved from a debate over tobacco's
effect on health to how much of it
should be imported. What is more,
the argument has spilled over into a
close race for the United States Sen-
ate in North Carolina, a major pro-
ducer of tobacco.
Leaders in Congress reached
agreement with the tobacco industry
recently on a bill that would put
harsher health warnings on cigarette
packages. But Senator Jesse Helms,
a North Carolina Republican who op-
poses any legislation he deems harm-
ful to the big tobacco industry in his
state, said he would block Senate ac-
tion unless the cigarette companies
reassured him it was acceptable.
Senator Helms, facing a strong
challenge from his Democratic oppo-
nent, Gov. James B. Hunt, was given
that assurance. However, Mr. Helms,
chairman of the Senate Agriculture
Committee, has now added another
condition, one with appeal to another
large constituency, tobacco growers.
He wants the cigarette companies to
agree to limit their purchases of im-
ported tobacco.
Stronger Than Old Warnings
Representative Henry A. Waxman,
a California Democrat who strongly
supports cigarette warnings, con-
tends that Senator Helms has intro-
duced an unrelated element into the
labeling debate. "I wish they would
consider these bills on the merits,"
Mr. Waxman said.
The new warnings would replace
the current one, which says, "The
Surgeon General has determined that
cigarette smoking is, dangerous to
your health."
The four new warnings, used on an
an alternating basis, would advise
that smoking causes lung cancer,
heart disease and emphysema and
may complicate pregnancy; that
quitting smoking reduces health
risks; that "smoking by pregnant
women may result in fetal injury,
premature birth and low birth rate,"
and that cigarette smoke contains
carbon monoxide.
Actions of Senator Helms
The new language represented a
compromise, with Mr. Waxman
pressing earlier for even stronger
warnings that spoke of tobacco's ad-
dictive qualities and that stated there
was a relationship between smoking
and miscarriages. The tobacco indus-
try has accepted the revised prntxnal
reluctantly, judging that the cornpro-
mise would be less harmful than the
original legislation.
Commenting on Mr. Helms's be-
half, Ronald B. Phillips, a spokesman
for the Senate Agriculture Commit-
tee, said of the Senator's maneuveur-
ing on the bill, "He wants to know if
the tobacco family is in favor of it,"
He said the Senator was pressing
the cigarette companies to buy Amer-
ican tobacco, much of it grown in
North Carolina, because their pur-
chases of tobacco from Brazil and Af-
rica have been rising.
"If that continues," Mr. Phillips
said, "they are not going to have the
family tobacco grower. Senator
Helms Is using the leverage that he
feels he has."
Senator Waxman, Senator Orrin G.
Hatch, Republican of Utah, and Rep-
resentative John D. Dingell, Demo-
crat of Michigan, have told the to-
bacco industry that they will push
through the e iginal harsh labeling
languagener.. year if the compromise
is scuttled by the cigarette companies
or Senator Helms.
Stance of Trade Group
The Tobacco Institute, which lob-
bies for the industry in Washington,
has declined to state its position on
the warning labels publicly. Mem-
bers of Congress have said, however,
that the institute and the nation's
seven major tobacco companies have
stated privately that they can accept
the new warnings.
' Representative Charlie Rose, a
North Carolina Democrat who has
t>Pen working with Ihn Toharro Insti-
Ihywing by R.d/cy-
tute, says that as a result, the com-
promise bill 'has a "very good"
chance of being passed.
Asked why the institute did not pub-
licly state its approval of the meas-
ure, Mr. Rose said, "Reluctantly,
they will support the legislation, but
they will not go out and stump for it.
They don't want to be in a position of
openly admitting a health hazard."
Mr. Rose said Senator Helms had
further contused matters by refusing
to give a clerar timetable of what ac-
tion he planned to the bill's advo-
cates, including Mr. Dingell, chair-
man of the House Energy. and Com-
merce Committee.
"I got Dingell to go with me to see
Senator Helms," Mr. Rose said. "He
told both of us that he wanted an op-
portunity to jawbone the companies
into buying more American tobacco
before he would let the bill move
through the Senate."
Action Is Delayed
Hearing that, Mr. Rose concluded
that Congress would not have a
chance to act until it returned from
the break for next week's Republican
National Convention. He asked Mr.
Dingell to put off further considera-
tion until then, and Mr. Dingell did so.
Reflecting on Senator Helms's at-
tempt to use what leverage he has to
maintain a high level of domestic pur-
chases by the tobacco companies,
Representative Rose said, "Senator
Helms says you can call it blackmail
it you want to. He cantry the tough-
guy approach. I want to try the'What
will vnu do withtiut mPl' rtpprnach "
I
t
t
t
c
:30ti08
i
v
0
R
