Jump to:

Tobacco Institute

The Hundred-Year War Against the Cigarette

Date: No date
Length: 16 pages
TIFL0069563-TIFL0069578
Jump To Images
snapshot_ti TON05119.76-TON05119.91

Fields

Type
PUBLICATION
ADVERTISEMENT
PERIODICAL / NEWS ARTICLES
Date Loaded
24 May 1999
Site
TI Storage Box 229: Florida
Tobacco Institute
Author (Organization)
American Hertiage Publishing Co Inc
Tobacco Inst
Request
Fla.4/23/97rfp
Author
Dillow, G.L.
Ending Date
No date
Box
Tony4
Litigation
Florida AG
UCSF Legacy ID
oit02f00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 11: oit02f00 Log in for more options!
ments the antismokers had to offer against cigarettes-and as recent developments indicate, they had the right idea but the wrong criteria-were lost in the barrage of idiotic pronounce- ments and ill-considered "facts." (Physicians, particularly repelled by the hysteria, were quick to leap to the cigarette's defense; only in the past thirty years or so has the medical profession as a group joined in condemning cigarette smoking.) Finally, cigarettes benefited from that almost perverse quality of human nature that makes what is despised and outlawed by some people-particularly Sunday-school teachers and reformers-absolutely irresistible to others. By the beginning of the First World War, then, most even marginally sophisticated Americans regarded the anticigar- ette, antismoking crusade with cheerful ambivalence, an attitude nicely summed up in the following pithy lines first published in the Penn State Froth in 1915: Tobacco is a dirty weed. I like it. It satisfies no normal need. I like it. It makes you thin, it makes you lean, It takes the hair right of f your bean, It's the worst darn stuff I've ever seen. I like it. As popular antipathy toward cigarettes waned, so did the legislative fortunes of the anticigarette movement. The cigarette prohibition laws had never been very effective anyway; state legislators had been easily pursuaded to pass them when faced with well-organized pressure groups, but enforcement was quite another matter. After the usual rush to dispose of (or at least hide) their cigarettes, tobacco dealers found that they could sell them without too much fear of prosecution. They were also easily available by mail, and in states where "giving away" cigarettes was not specifically prohibited, matches sometimes were sold for ten cents with the cigarettes thrown in "free." In 1909 Indiana admitted defeat and repealed its cigarette prohibition law, leaving only the ban on sales to minors. Washington followed in 1911, Minnesota in 1913, Wisconsin and Oklahoma in 1915, and -South Dakota in 1917. Even in those states where cigarette prohibition laws remained on the books, cigarette sales continued to climb. For the anticigarette movement it was a most discouraging turn of events, and the worst-in the form of World War I-was still to come. The war did great things for cigarettes, and for smoking in general. No less an authority than General Pershing himself declared that tobacco was "as indispensable as the daily ration," and Army doctors sent home glowing accounts of the cigarette's salutary effects on wounded soldiers: "Wonder- ful," one Army surgeon reported from France. "As soon as the lads take their first 'whiff' they seem eased and relieved of their agony." The home front responded enthusiastically to the call for more. An Army Girl's Transport Tobacco Fund and the National Cigarette Service Committee sent millions of cigarettes overseas, and even the YMCA, which previously had campaigned against smoking, sold and gave away cigarettes in the trenches. Finally, in 1918, the War TIFL 0069575 Department bestowed official government blessings on the smoking habit by making tobacco part of the daily ration. Cigarettes were no longer "coffin nails" or "little white slavers"; they were healthy, masculine, and-whoever would have thought it possible?-downright patriotic. nd that might have been the end of America's first great antismoking movement, and of this article, were ~ it not for two important facts: first, we still have to get Bamberger and his colleagues out of the Salt Lake County jail, and second, in January, 1919, the Eighteenth Amendment was ratified by the states. If the war provided a lift for cigarettes and smoking's social standing, passage of the "dry" amendment provided an even greater lift for the war-demoralized antismoking movement. If drinking could so easily be legislated out of existence, why not smoking? "Prohibition is won; now for tobacco," declared the evangelist Billy Sunday, and throughout the early postwar years rumors of an impending WCTU campaign to enact the "Nineteenth Amendment" were rife. "The creaking tumbrel which carted King Alcohol to the gallows has been turned around and started back after Lady Nicotine," the Cincinnati Times-Star reported in 1919. "The time when the suggestion of tobacco prohibition could be laughed at has passed," the New York World warned, and even the moderate New York Times noted that "the Nineteenth Amendment shoves a saintly nose above the horizon." The WCTU and the Anti-Saloon League denied that tobacco was next on the prohibition hit list, and at its "Vic- tory Convention" in St.. Louis in 1919 the WCTU vowed to continue its educational campaign against smoking but resoundingly defeated a resolution calling for an anti- Lucy Page Gaston, who led the war on cigarettes, watches a youngster take the cure from Dr. D. H. Kress. LitNafy Dlgest, DEC. 6.1911 13

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: