State and Local Strategies of the Tobacco Industry
Philip Morris USA 1992-1996 CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Abstract
States, "PM USA's Corporate Affairs objective is to minimize government interference in the production and marketing of cigarettes, and to protect the right of our consumers to smoke." States that "one of the greatest threats to the industry is taxation." Breaks down goals into three broad categories of 1) taxation 2) product and 3) consumers. Details more specific goals that fall within one or more of these categories, regarding marketing restrictions, social cost of smoking, accommodation, excise taxes, smoker privacy rights, and fire-safe cigarettes. Identifies major issue, PM strategy and action plan for each.
Fields
- Named Organization
- ACLU
- AMERICAN CIVIL UNION
- AMERICAN MFG ASSN
- ANTI TOBACCO FORCES
- ASSN OF SMOKING + ALLEGED HEALTH SOCIOE
- CENTERS IN PUBLIC POLICY + SOCIETY GOVER
- CONGRESS
- COURSE
- EPA, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
- HOSPITALITY SERVICE ASSN
- HOST INDOOR AIR QUALITY WORKSHOP
- INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS
- MOBILIZATIONS
- NATL ASSN OF STATE BUDGET OFFICERS
- NATL CHAMBER FOUNDATION
- NATL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATORS
- NATL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS
- NFIB FOUNDATION
- PM MAGAZINE
- SMOKERS ADVOCATE
- SMOKERS CAUCUS
- TSG, TECHNICAL STUDY GROUP
- WLF, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
- Named Person
- Nelson, J (Head of State Activities of the ETS Management Committee (EM)1989
- XXGLADYS
- Subject
- Cigarettes
- Economic Costs
- Industry Strategies
- marketing
- Restrictions
- Smokers
- Taxes
- tobacco use
- accommodation
Document Images
PHILIP MO'RRIS uSiA
1992- 1996
CORPORATE AFFAIRS
Pfui'-USA''s Corporate Atfairs objective is to miniimize governmen; intct~ai erice in tiue
pioduction and'
marketing of cigarettes, and to protect the right of o'ur consumers to~smoke..
During,the plan period, PMrUSA will have to accomplish its volumeshare and profit'objectives in
an,
increasingly hostile socio-politicaf environme'nt. One of the greatestthreats to t'he industry is
taxation.
Statie excise taxes are forecasito increase overthe plan period betiween17 and 1Q'percent, annually.
It is PMLUSA's objective to keep annual cigarette excise tax increases under 7 percent and promote
the development of'stable fiscalltax policies which distribute the tax burden equitably.
Other major challenges over, the plan period include providing a balancedj accuratie pidture of
environmental tobacco smoke (IETS) and preventing marketing restrictions on sa'mpling; POS
displays; vending, sponsorships, andi advertising. PM-USA will continue to work with industryy
associations, business coalitions, non-profit organizations and grDvemment officials to promote
legislation protecting smokers from discrimination by employers. Also, we will work to defeaf anyy
legislation mandating product specifications such as 'Yire safe" cigarettes, ingredient labeling or
packaging composition.
P'M-US~A~CorporatleAffair~s~,go'als fbrthe~ next five years arer
Taxation,
Minimize overall rate of excise tax increases..
Reform legislative ballot process to lirnit'tax initiatives,.
Promote a progressive and equitable tax structure.
Refute myth of "social costs" placed on society by smokers.
Eliminate ad valorem tax systems.
Prod uct
Preserve freedom to advertise/promote products.
Demonstrate commitment to market only to adults.
Prevent onerous or burdensome mandated product specifications.
Consumers
Defeat or modify state public or workplace smoking bans.
Prohibit employment discrimination against! smokers.
Promote accomrnodation of smokers and non-smokers in public a!ndiprivate sectors.
1

PHIUP'MORRIS USA
1I992- 1996
Marketing and Sales Restrictions
The organized anfi-smokingimoverment is attempting to restrict or ban our abilitytbireach existingg
smokers with marketing and sales vehicies considered legitimate tools for virtually all other
products.
:cstricti©iob on advertis:ng sponscrshipsarmpling, couponing and sales practices prevent
usf,onn
maintaining our consumer base, and limit our efforts to increase market-share relative to other
cigarette manufacturers. By restricting the indust'ry's ability to use widely accepted marketing and
sales techniques, the anti-smoking forces are attempting to reduce our public credibility im selling
aa
legal product.
P'M-USA's goal is to defeat proposed marketing and isafes restrictions ar bans, PMWSA isproactively
introducing legislat~ion to prohibit these restrictions, as well as tio estabiish tobacco industry
marketing
and sales guidefines asstate law. The campany, is also responding to the "youth" issue by developing
programs to demonstrate its commitrroentto ensuring that smoking remains an adult practice. -
Issue:
THE ANTI-SMO'KING1MOVEMENT IS USING FALSE CHARGES ABOUT THE TARGETING OF
YOUTH, WOMEN AND MINORITIES TO ADVANCE LEGISLATI'ON TO RESTRICT OR BAN THE
MARKETING AND SALE OF CIGARETTES.
Strategy:
PM-USA will use two strategies to combat! marketingirestrictions: First, we will advance our
position
that s moking is an adult custom, andlthat PM-USA does not want minors to smoke; and is working
in cooperation with re3ailers to prevent minors fromipurchasing cigarettes: Second, we will
demonstratie to elected officials, public poJicy decision makers, the media and consurrrers that
advertising sampling and sponsorship are a form of free speech protectedibythe First Amendment.
To increase awareness of companylindustry initiatives we will use PM-USA communication vehicles
(PM Editorial Services, Magazine, Advocate and Sfrnoker's Caucus, G1obe),
Action Plain:
1992-1994
YoutJt & Smoking
Promote and enforce industry positions on
responsible rnarketingiand sales practices:
Responsible Living Program
(Helping Youth Say No)i
Advertising/Marketing Guidelines
Responsible Vending Program
It's the Law Awareness Program
Pass indust'ry age limit (18) in,6 States
without limits;
Run:PM-USA Youth Ads and expand presss
coverage of PM-USA's "Actions and Initia+
tives" Program.
1992-1994.
Youth & Smoking
Sponsor Family C.O:U!R.S.E. Consortium
Public Service Advertisements in place of
anti-smoking ads..
Work with state law enforcement groups to
develop "Helping Youth Say No" school
curricu la.
Marketing; Freedorns.
2

11i MORRIS USA
1992 - 1996
1992-1994
Develop state legal fellowship programs with
the American Civil Liberties Union and
Washington Legal Foundationto oppose
bans or restrictions ('Fieedum of Speech).
Develop Sports Sponsorship Coalition to
promoterdefendi corporate right ofsponsor-
ship.
1992-1994
Coordinate with minority business organiza+
tions to demonstrate the economic benefiits of
the industry on minority communities.,":
Use PM-USA communication vehicles (PM
Editorial Services,, Magazine, A'dvocatie and
Srnoker's Caucus, Globe)~to increase aware-
ness of responsible sales practicesa
Coordinate with minority interestigroups to
counter anti'-smoker's claims on"targeting":
Work with our advertisers and advertising
associations in developingi grass roots
lobbying activities to assist Governrnent
Affairs.
Work with the National Conference ofStatle
Legislators and other government associa-
tions to oppose resolutions on bans and
restrictions.
Continue to broaden coalition of free speech
advocates and work with other industries
"targeted" for marketing bans or restrictions.
Long Termi Goals
Counter ASSIST Program in 17 states:
- Work with grass roots organizations to
divert state health departmenti funds,,
equivalent to the amount of ASSIST
funding to support other health programs
(pre-natal care, half-way houses, etc.),.
Rollback Program:
Particularly in localities, introduce lagisla-
tion to reinstate marketing activities, such
as sampling and couponing t'hat, have
been banned or rest'ricted.
Pass state preemption.
Sales Freedoms
Develop retailer mobilization program to aid in
identifyingiand fightingilocal sales restrictions
- particularly vendingiand free standing dis-
play bans or restrictions.
Work with the National' Conference of State
Legislators and other government associations
to oppose resolutions o n bans and ire strictions,
LongiTerm Goals
Rollback Program:
Particularlyin localities, introducelegislation
to reinstate sales practices,sueh as free
standing displays, that have been banned or
restrictedl - Pass state preemption.
3

PHIUP'MIORRIS USA
19'92'- 1996
"Social Costs"
Cigarette smoking has been inappropriatieliy associated with a number of adverse social and
economic consequences. Productivity losses, absenteeism, rising health care costs and increases
in various type of insurance coverages are just a fev:..
The association of smoking withthese'sociai problems has spawned Inumerous antii-smoking ipoiicias.
Smokingibans andirestirictions, divestiture of'tobacco stocks, attacks on'the tobacco price support
program, segregationsof'smok'ers and privacy infringement are activitibs which~have been promofed
in the name of "social'cost" offsetsa
Issue:
THE ASSOCIATION OF SMOKING AND' ALLEGED HEALTH/SOCIOECONOMIC COSTS IS
BEI NiG LEWERAGED BY ANTI-TOBACCO FO'RCESTO ADVANC'E ANTI-TOBA'CCO LEGI'SLATION.
Strategy:
Educate the media, policy makers and relevant business and civic groups to' create ai truthful,
balanced view, of't~he "sociallcost" issue.
Action Plan:
1992-1994
Develop and publish studies:
Systematic, external micro-economic
models to provide a clear picture of
smoking's imp'act on society.
Applicability and measurement of'social
costs and social benefits to fiscal/tax
policy development.
The value ofifree~choice in a dernocratic!
society.
1992-11994
Develop studies comparing social fund
performance vs. PM and industry as a
whole.
Write op-ed pieces in financial publications
on dangers of fu.nd mismanagement,ernpha-
sizing managiers' fiduciary responsibility.
Long Term Goals
Identify andiaddresspoliticallgroups, fiscaVl
tax analysts groups and appropriate govern-
mental bodies on social costs and the valuee
of individual freedoms.
Develop, disseminate and publish editorials
on social cost theory.
Write op-ed pieces on various poiidy deci-
sions which have incorrectly used social
cost theory as a basis for justification.
Sponsor sessions at annual conferences on
social costtheory and its application in
public policy development.
Co-sponsor symposiums with Centers in
Public Policy andiSocioty of Government
Econbrnists on social cost theory for
legislators andlother government officials.
4

PHIUP MORRISUSA'
1992 - 1996
Accommodation
PM'-USA is takling a proactive approachtbsrnoking~bans and restriction bypromofing accommodation
programs as the prirnary legislative and private sectioraltiernative.
Issue:
ONEROUS RESTRIICTION'SA'ND BANS REDUCE THE NUMBER OF ENVIRONMENTS IN WHICH
INDIVIDUALS CAN ELECT TO SMOKE.
Strategy:
Demonstrate to elected'officials; public poliay decision makers, industry; unions, and trade
associations
that the public supports accommodatiion programs. In addition, bans and restrictions impose costs
on the private sector, redUce tax revenue and promote government interference inibusiness,
ActioniPianc
1992-19941
Introduce and market restaurant accomrno-
dation program with state restaurant asso-
ciations, restaurateurs, and chains.
1992-1994
Sponsor study of:
Costs of work plate bans (e.g; morale;
productivity).
The fallacy of'costs savings (e,g. health,
Promote building systems approach over
source control.
Promote innovative HVAC (Heating, Ventila-
tioniAir Coni) Systems.
Develop andlmarket workplace and servic&
venue accommodat~ion programs with:
National Federation of Independent
Businesses
American Manufacturers Association
International Councillof Shopping Centers
Hospitality/Service Associations
Use indoor air quality experts as witnesses,
testimony, op-ed and editorial visits to:
promote sound indoor air quality programs
andldemonstrate the problemiof sick build-
ing syndrome.
absenteeism claims).
- Present results initrade journals.
Publicize PittSburgh Benedurn Project ar1d
other innovat~ive indoor air quality technology
through journal articles, trade publications,
etc.
Implement EPA "Class A" mitig,ationistrat-
egy:
- Host IndoorA'ir, Quality Workshop wit'h
NFIB Foundation and National Chamber
Foundation.
Develop a business coalition to advocate
uniform federal risk assessmea guide-
lines.
Persuade OSHA to establish acceptable
ETS threshold levels for the workplace,
Encourag;e~further investigationiof proce-
dUral biases in EPA review process~
Long Term Goals
Enact~acceptable ventilation rates inistatee
building codes.
5

PHIUP MORRIS USA
1'992- 1996
Taxation
Forecasts of state fiscal and economic conditions conducted by the National Conference of State
Legislatures and the NationallAssociation of State Budget Officers, as well as others indicate that
more than haC the biates are unoer, substantial fiscal ctress. Governors and Iegislators stilllface
increasing pressure to provide services and fund escalating infrastructu!re; education and medical'
costs. This significant'ly raises the probability of increased cigarette excise taxes which continue
to
be alrevenue source for legislators seeking to close budget deficits. In additio~n, the Hawaii ad
valorem
tax systemiplaces more of a burdenion premium priced products..
Issue:
STATE LOCAL EXCISE TAX INCR'EAS'.ES RAISE THE RETAIL PRICE OF C'IGARETTES AND
CO'NTRIB'UTE TO INDUSTRY VOLUME DEC'LIN!E.
Strategy:
Defeat cigarette excise tax proposals by participating int'he development stages of'tax
ppJicythrough
the dissernination of information rto public policy analysts, aswell as executive officers and
legislators..
These efforts are designed to cultivate them into reliable and well versed allies.
Action Plan:
199'2-1I994
Develop and publishistwdies on:
Bootlegging/cross-border activities.
Regressive nature of proposed taxes.
Inflexibility/instability of "earmarked" taxes.
Progressive solutions to deficit redtuctions..
Efficiency of' localltaxing authority.
Wasteful governrnent'prograrms and exces-
sive spending.
Tobacco economic impact' analysis.
Stability of taxes derived via the ballot'vs.t those derived via the legislature.
1992-1994
Initiate, coordinate and develop grass roots
lobbyingiactivities through Smokers' Cau-
cus, "Mobilizations", Smokers' Advocate.
Identify and address community, civic andl
business groups on excise taxes and tax
ballot initiatives.
Publish editbrials on tax developments
inefficiency of tax ballot initiatives, gowern,
ment waste and regressivity, etc.
- Prormulgat'e~ analysis of alternative revenue
sources.
Co-sponsor forums and special events to
strengthen constituency development:
Role of private sector in the delivery of
government services and efficient govern-
ment.
History of'the tax initiative and its impact
on development of'fiscal and tax policies.

PHI!UP MORRIS USA
199'2 - 1996'.
Anti~-discrimInation and Privacy
Increasingly, Ibgal off-the-job activities and lifestyle choices are used as criteria for
empibyment:
diicisions includingi hiring, promotion and dismissaii Emp1o ,ee privacy rights are vivlated by
ernpi'oyer mandates regulating off'work actiivi!lies an:'testing.rr,ec:::,nisms established ily
empioyers
to ensure compliance with these mandates. Employers argue that these measures are necessary
to control costsi including health care benefits a'ndl productivity allegedly linked to certain
lifiestylee
choices and behavior.
Issue:
LEGAL AVOCATIONAL ACTIVITIES SUCHI A'S'~ SMOiKIIN,{^a+ UNRELATED, TO JOB PERFOR-
MANCE, ARE BEING~ USIED~ BY ~ EMRLOYERS'~ IINi MA'TTERS~~ OF~ HIRING, PROMOTION AND~~
DISMISSAL.
Strategy:
Demonstrate to elected ofticials and private sectordecision makersthat t'he pubiicsupports
individual
privacy rights that protect legal, avocational activities. In addition, show thatthe pubiic favors
only
the use of! job p'erfbrmance criteria for employment decisions.
Action Plan:
1992~~-11994
1I992'-1994
in print and broadcast media.
Further develop coalitions with labor unions,
ACLU, human resource officials to promote
anti+discrimination effbrts.
Demonstrate public support for privacy rights
and nondiscrimination.
Use privacy experts for speeches, expert wit-
ness testimony incourtcases, legislative/rule
making bodies, rnedia:' op-ed, editoriallvisits
and feature articles, etc.
Place privacy/anti-discrimination news items
Utilize PM-USA communication vehicles such
as PMI magazine, Srmo'ker's Advocate artd
Smokers' Caucus to:
- Identify aggrieved parties.
- Raise public awareness of privacy and dis-
crimination issues,
- Specifically alert smokers to private/pufj';lic
sector infringerments'.
Pass legislation prohibiting, discrimination in
employment conditions based on smoking
status in a tbt'aI of 40 states.
Long Term Goals
Pass anti-discriminatiion legislation in all ;50
states:
7

PFHIUP MORRrS'WSA
11992 1998
Mandated Product Specifications
Through mandatiedlproduct specifications, anti-srrnoking groups are atrtempting to eliminate b'rand
competitiveness, increase manufactiuring costs, or ba'n the sale of tobacco products in their
present
forrncr packaging. Presently, two efforts inithis area pose a significant threa: tc tf,a tubacco
iiidustry:
1) "Fire Safie'' Cigarettes: Anti'-smoking,groups allr3ge thatcigarett'es are the most identifiable
causes
of f ire-reJated deaths in the United States: In 11990, the Moakley Bill was signed into law
reauthorizing
the Technical Study Group (TSG) fort'hree y,ears to create a standard for measuring cigarette
ignition
prope'nsity. Ih 119931he TSG will report to Congress on its efforts to create a test tb measure
cigarette
ignition propensity as well as to examine the feasibility of producing and marketing a'Yire-safe"
cigaretrte..
2) Packaging/Matieria'Is'Bans: With the growth of'environrrlentallawareness in this courntry, the
anti+
smoking forces could also seek to banicigarette packaging thatidoes not meet minimum recycled
contentreqpirements; or ban certain packaging eiementssuch as polypropylene oraluminum-paper
laminate which are difficult to recycle or parts of'cig,arettes, such as fiiter TOW, which do not
naturally
biodbgrade when disposed of.
"Fire-Safe" Cigarettes
Issue:
EFFORTS BY ANTISIvtOKING GROUPS TO MANDATE A' "FIRE SAF'Y-" CIGARETTE COULD
DESTROY THE COMPETITIVENESS OF LEADING BRANDS AND INCREASE THE COST QF
MANUFACTURlNG C'IGAR'E, I IES..
Strategy:.
During the plan period, PM-USA will expand lcoallit ions among the fire prevention community, and
public policy makers to diffwse support for"fiire-safe'"'Ibgislation at the state and federal level,
as well
as build public awareness of fire safety and.preventio'n. A number,offire professionals believe that
cigarette-reJated fire's are just one symptom of a more serious problem in the Uhitied'States: the
lack
of public fire safiety educationiand awareness. This is demonstrated by the fact thati in all
categories
of fire; the U.S. has one of the worst fire records of'any industrialized nation, including Japan
and
Germany where the incidence of smoking is as much as twice as high as Uhe U.S. and yetthe incidence
of fire in all categories is very'low. Careless srnoking,in the U.S. is also t'he!sixth leading
cause of,
fire after eloctricalidistribution; incendiary and suspicious fiires, appliances, heating
equiprme'nt, other
equipment and openrfilaime.
Action Plan:
1992 -11994
1992-1994
Work with National Conference of'Statla
Legislators and other government associar
tibns to oppose reso'lutionsi
Coo'rdinate lobbyingiactiwities o'n state bills
with state fire; police and paramedic organi-
zations and'unions.
- Feature articles in PM,putblications highiight-
ing,significant achievements of fire, police
and paramedic professionals.
Sponsor fire-safety awareness prograrns
with leading associations representing the
fire community (smoke detector use, Exit
Drills in t'he Home, Stop Drop and Roll),
Use experts to develop information on costs
other causes ofifire and study combustibiiity'
of foreign products.
Long Term Goals
Develbp database of PM employees who
serve as volunteer fire fighters in their
communities.
