State and Local Strategies of the Tobacco Industry
PUBLIC SMOKING RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO STATE ACTIVITIES
Abstract
Indicates attachment of a "Resource Inventory" (not included). States "the [Tobacco Institute State Activities] Division's use of the 'workplace kits' serves as an example of how we employ resource material." Describes "successful use of the kit" in lobbying state and local officials, as well as with organization and coalition members and the press.
Fields
- Named Organization
- BUSINESS + HEALTH
- NRA NEWS
- RESPONSE ANALYSIS
- TAN, TOBACCO ACTION NETWORK
- NRA NEWS
- Subject
- Coalitions
- Industry Strategies
- Legislatures
- lobbying
- Local Level
- public relations
- Restrictions
- State Level
- tobacco use
- workplace
- City Councils
- Industry Strategies
Document Images
Public Smoking Resources Available to State Activities
There are a number of resources, developed by our Public
Relations Division, available to field staff and lobbyists to
combat state and local smoking restriction initiatives. The
attached Resource Inventory [Exhibit A] gives an indication of
those resources--and future resources--and how they are best put
to use. State Activities is responsible for maintaining a
delivery system for these resources.
The Division's use of the "workplace kits" serves as an example
of how we employ resource material.
The workplace kit continues to be a useful tool for our field
staff and lobbyists. When supplemented with other material--such
as Response Analysis surveys, the Business & Health piece in
defense of smokers, and the NRA News article against manadatory
restaurant smoking laws--the workplace kit has been received
favorably by our allies and others. [Exhibit B]
The kits were prepared primarily for use with business leaders
and coalition members. They have, however, been presented to
state legislators and city council members--friends, opponents
and fence-sitters--as well as to coalition members, including TAN
Advisory Committee members, farm groups, restaurateurs, vendors,
retailers, grocer association members, chambers of commerce,
union officials, hotel/motel association personnel and others.
Additionally,, the kits have been shared, when appropriate, with
members of the press.
Generally, successful use of the kit includes:
1) Presentation before and during specific legislative
situations.
2) Personal presentations, when possible, with distribution.
3) Inclusion of additional workplace material, such as the
Response Analysis surveys or Business and Health article,
when appropriate.

Specifically, workplace kits have beenc
1) Mailed to lobbyists with oral presentation follow-up by
Regional Vice Presidents and~Directors..
2)~ Discussed with and d'i.stributed to TAN Advisory Committees.
3) When possible, presented to members of appropriate state
legislative committees and to members of local governing
bodies.
4) Prior to workplace hearings, presented to our natural
allies and to leaders of potential coalition groups that
could be affected~by workplace smoking laws.
While the kit can be extremely helpful in our overall workplace
plans, its usefulness varies greatly from region to region, state
to state, even locality to locality.
In Memphis, TN, for example, the workplace kit was used
successfully with proponents and opponents of that city's
workplace bill. The bill was weakened and~eventually defeated.
Obviously, the kit is most persuasive when used as "leave behind"
information following a personal visit with council members,
legislators and allies. Field staff and lobbyists strive to use
the kit in conjunction with such personal visits.
In some places, however, the kit has been viewed's as too "slick"
for effective use with officials. This was true in Cheyenne, WY.
To tone down the "Madison Avenue" look, our lobbyist simply
photocopied the documents and distributed the copies to the city
council. This less formal presentation was considered the
superior approach in this instance. The Cheyenne measure is
pending.
As part,of the overall plan to combat the New York City workplace
measure now under review, the kit--and other material--is being
presented~personally to each of the 35 members of the city
council before the April 12 hearing. Additionally, the kit is
being distributed to and discussed' with key coalition members
such as labor, business, restaurant and bowling groups.
These examples of kit use illustrate the general manner in which
the ki;ts are being used nationwide. Staff and lobbyists continue
to brief allies, legislators and council members, leaving the
workplace kit with these people after discussing the workplace pp
issue with them. ~
~
N
~
-2- W

Occasionally it is not feasible to make a personal presentation.
In such cases the kit is sent to the lawmaker or ally with a
cover letter explaining our position and some of the highlights
of the kit. When kits are not presented personally, staff and
lobbyists make follow-up contact for reactions to the material.
Obviously, situations vary greatly from area to area, and kits
are not used where workplace smoking restrictions are not under
review or not soon to be reviewed--such workplace discussions
could backfire.
The workplace kit is a useful tool, but only one in our arsenal.
As with all resource material, the most effective use of the kit
is best determined when we have a grasp of the anti-smokers'
motives, strength and a time frame for action in a given
situation.
#~~
