RJ Reynolds
Substance Abuse October 1993 (931000). Substance Abuse: the Nation's Number One Health Problem. Key Indicators for Policy.
Fields
- Type
- REPORT
- Attachment
- 4397 -4873
- Site
- Marketing
- Business Information
- Smith Lb
- Sr Mgr
- Business Information
- Referenced Document
- Tax Burdeon on Tobacco: Historical Compilatin, by TI, 930000. State and Local Taxes: All States Tax Guide, by Research Institute of America, 920000. Crime in the United States 1991 (910000), by US Dept of Justice, 920000. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice St
- Date Loaded
- 07 Jan 1999
- Request
- 1rfp102
- 1rfp103
- 1rfp104
- 4rfp12
- 1rfp52
- 1rfp73
- 1rfp88
- 1rfp92
- 1rfp93
- 1rfp105
- 1rfp107
- 4rfp6
- Minnesota
- 1rfp24
- 1rfp71
- 1rfp25
- 1rfp41
- 1rfp44
- 1rfp43
- 1rfp46
- 1rfp45
- 1rfp95
- 1rfp96
- 1rfp97
- 1rfp42
- 1rfp48
- Moore
- 1rfp6
- 1rfp4
- 6
- 1rfp103
- Named Person
- Horgan, C.
- Marsden, M.E.
- Larson, M.J.
- Elliott, E.A.
- List, O.F. Staff Personnel
- Stein, J.
- Barker, D.C.
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Barnett Group
- Brandeis Univ
- List, O.F. Advisory Board Members
- Caffee, R.
- Gfroerer, J.C.
- Novotny, T.
- Stinson, F.
- Garnick, D.
- Prottas, J.
- Webb, A.
- Ama
- Mothers Against Drunk Driving
- Students Against Driving Drunk
- F Columbus
- Nixon
- Natl Organization For The Reformati
- Bias, L.
- Bush
- Rice, D.P.
- Univ, O.F. Ca
- Us Public Health Service
- Univ, O.F. Mi
- Us Substance Abuse & Mental Health
- Surgeon General
- Us Natl Institute, O.N. Drug Abuse
- Natl Highway Traffic Safety Adminis
- Fed Center For Substance Abuse Prev
- Boston Univ
- Marsden, M.E.
- Author
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
- Brandeis Univ
- I, C.H.
- I Mem
- I Mjl
- Schroeder, S.A.
- Brandeis Univ
- Box
- Rjr3161
- UCSF Legacy ID
- zdf13d00
Document Images
....~.._ ..~..~._~_.~..__..,, . _.__..
Substance Abuse
October 1993
51422 4577

;FURHEALTH _POLICY, BRANDEIS UNIVERSCI'Y
for
THE ROBERT WOO[> JONNSC~N
FOUNDATION
PRINCEI'ON, NF.W JERSEY
October 1993

511B5T11111E JIB115E:
THE NATION'S NUMBER
ONE HEALTH PROBLEM
Key Indicators for Policy
1'rcy,,o ,'rl fip
[V; i i r(' ri~ EOEZ HE~.\t:rii PM«:Y, BizANDr.is UN ivrhsrrY
f'or
Tr-1E. RoBE:K-r V'ooi) JOHNsoN YouhuAriC>N
hRfNCE"!Y)N, NI:Av JERSF.Y
C)ctober 1993
^ \'\~
~ ~.
~,.~.c..~ ...~es. ....r..

{
k
c
ft
r-

~ ~ TABLE OF COnTEnTS
............................
ACKIlOIULEDGEItlEI1TS ......................................................... 5
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
DATR UOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
~ ~ OUERUIEW: THE COIITEHT OF SUBSTAIICE ABUSE .................................... 0
~.~ Use, Abuse and Dependence, 8
~ ~ Historical 'Irends in Consumption and Policy, 9
~ ~ All Segments of Society Affected, 14
Societal Costs of Substance Abuse, 15
~ Taking Action, 17
~ ~ Monitoring Change, 17
Further Reading, 18
~
A
~ 7 SECTIOII 1: PRTTERIIS OF USE .................................................. 19
~ ~ Perception of Risk, 20
~ ~ Implications of Early Use, 22
~ i '1rends in Heavy Use, 24
~ I)emographic Differences in Heavy Use, 26
, ~ Attempts to Quit, 28
Further Reading, 30
SECTIOII 2: COIISEQUEIICES OF USE .............................................. 31
~ ~ "lobacco I)eaths, 32
Alcohol I)eaths, 34
~ : Illicit I)rug I)eaths, 36
~
~: Strains on the Nation's Health Care System, 38
~; Eflects of Substance Abuse on Families, 40
+ Relationship to Crime, 42
a ~ Workplace Burden, 44
Further Reading, 46
~
SECTIOIl3:C0It1BATTIIIGTHEPROBLEm........,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,47
Public Attitudes, 48
Illicit I)rug Control, 50
~ ~ Community Coalitions, 52
~ ~ Alcohol and Cigarette 'laxes, 54
Restrictions on Alcohol Use, 56
0' ~ Restrictions on Smoking, 58
Alcohol and I)rug Abuse Treatment, 60
Smoking Cessation Programs, 62
Further Reading, 64
~.
00
. . ConClUSlo11
,- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
~-~
00 ~,
IIIDEH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
~
~
~
r `.
.r
SUBSTAACE ABUSE
. _ . . .... ........:~. . _.. ,., .~ -,.~.;

ACHOtULED GErClEI1TS
~
~
~ :
~ J
~ J
~ ~
-~
~
~ J
~
.~
~
~
~ ~
~ J
~ :
~ i
~ :
. '~
a ~
~ ~
-~ ~
3 :
~
0
1. WOU1.I)1.IKF, to thank a num-
ber of people who provided very
helpful advice on aspects of this
report, including the overall orga-
nization and content, the list
of indicators, and locating data sources. The
following people served on our Advisory Board:
James J. Collins, John S. Gustafson, Michael
Klitzner, Patrick M. O'Malley, Peter Reuter,
Nancy Rigotti, and Robin Room. Also help-
ful were government officials who served in an
ex-oflicio capacity on the Advisory Board: Zili
Amsel, Ann Blanken, Richard Fuller, Gary
A. Giovino, Thomas Harford, Gale Held,
Jerome Jaffe, and James Kaple. Dorothy Rice
provided special cost calculations, and data also
were provided by Rosanna Coffey, Joseph C.
Gfroerer, Thomas Novotny, and Fred Stinson.
Additional reviewers from Brandeis University
were Deborah Garnick, Jeffrey Prottas, and
Arthur Webb. Each provided useful advice on
the most recent data sources as well as on accu-
rate interpretation of data.
C.H., M.E.M., M.J.L.
i
:
:
I
SUBSTAIICE BBUSE

PREFRCE
I
MI'ROVING THE HFAI:r'H and health care
of the American people is the mission of
"I'he Robert \Cood Johnson Foundation.
As a national philanthropy, the Founda-
tion supports projects that provide ser-
vices, conduct research and training and aa
range of other activities that we hope will have
an impact beyond our grantees' efforts: New
models of care are tested so that others may
adopt the most promising ones; health care
leaders are trained so that they may discover
new approaches and, in turn, influence the
next generation.
Policymaking takes place on many levels,
with the participation of many people-busi-
ness and communitv leaders, legislators, health
professionals, interest group representatives,
and voters. All have a role to play. Through
the publication of a series of policy-relevant
reports, the Foundation hopes to strengthen
the ability of those participants to play effec-
tive roles in the decision-making process, by
arming them with simple, yet critical indica-
tors that quickly summarize the nation's progress
regarding specific health pol icy issues. Tracked
over time, these indicators also can serve as
early.varning signals, alerting policymakers to
future problem areas.
SUBST9]CE BBBSE
Each report in the current indicator series
describes one of the four health policy areas
chosen by the Foundation as major program
goals for the 1990s:
assuring access to basic health care for
all Americans;
improving the way services are organized
and provided to people with chronic health
conditions;
. promoting health and preventing disease
by reducing harm from substance abuse; and
seeking opportunities to help the nation
address the problem of escalating medical costs.
Once our authors constructed a conceptu-
al framework to measure each area, indica-
tors were selected based upon their policy-
relevance, the availability of data, and their
ability to highlight a specific point and con-
tribute to an overall understanding of the area.
We hope this report will serve as a helpful
resource, and we encourage readers to share its
information with others. If you have comments
or stiggestions, we would like to hear from you,
as we decide whether subsequent editions would
be usefitl. Please tell us what you think.
STF\'EN A. SCHROEt)ER, \1D
President
(
(
(
0
(
(
(
(

k
,
BOU7' THF. TERMS USEI) IN THIS
REPORT... The labels used in this
report for population groups, risk
groups, and health problems are those
used by the original data sources.
In some cases, these labels--ethnic and racial
identities are a good example-reflect old val-
ues. We adopted this approach, despite our
desire to be sensitive to changing preferences,
because of the lack of consensus about which
terms are preferred and to avoid potential con-
fusion when people go back to an original data
source to learn more about an issue.
CAU'I'IONARY NO'FF;S FOR I)ATA INTERPRF:-
T,tTIOti... "I-his report presents data on trends
in substance use, consequences, and inter-
DATA I10TES
vention efforts, as well as comparisons among
subgroups of the population on these issues.
In most cases, available information was not
sufficient to test for statistical significance
of differences between years or between sub-
groups. Accordingly, caution should be exer-
cised in comparing the magnitude of such
differences. In addition, trend data are gen-
erally drawn from cross-sectional surveys or
other data that do not represent the experi-
ence of the same individuals over time. Despite
these cautionary notes, the consistency of
long-term trends and evidence from several
sources is supportive of the major conclusions
discussed here about the magnitude of the
substance abuse problem and progress made
in combatting it.
SA85TA11CE BBU5E

OUERUIEUI: THE COI1TEXT OF SUBSTAIICE ABUSE
R S THE NUMBER one health problem in the country, substance abuse
places a major burden on the nation's health care system and con-
tributes to the high cost of health care. In fact, substance abuse-the
problematic use of alcohoZ illicit drugs and tobacco-places an enor-
mous burden on American society as a whole. It can harm health, family life,
the economy and public safety, and it threatens many other aspects of life as
well. Substance abuse aects all segments ofsociety but it disproportionate-
ly affects disadvantaged groups and threatens the future ofyoung people.
...........................................................................
'1'here are more deaths, illnesses and dis-
abilities from substance abuse than from any
other preventable health condition. Of the two
million U.S. deaths each year, more than one
in four is attributable to alcohol, illicit drug or
tobacco use. Many of these deaths and other
losses could be reduced-if not eliminated--
by changing people's habits.
Alcohol and illicit drug use can result in
family violence and maltreatment of children,
and the loss of a family member due to sub-
stance abuse has lifelong ramifications. Passive
smoking causes respiratory problems in chil-
dren and adults. The workplace is affected as
well. Alcohol and drug abusers are costlier, less
productive employees. Millions of people are
arrested for driving under the influence of
alcohol or drugs and for other crimes related
to alcohol and illicit drug use. The safety of
many neighborhoods-and the people living
and working in them-is threatened bv vio-
lence associated with drug sales.
Federal, state, and local governments, as
well as private citizens' groups, have acted to
counter the enormous societal impact of sub-
stance abuse, but much remains to be done.
A great deal of the harm associated with sub-
stance abuse can be prevented with increased
public awareness of the problem and concerted
public action. One step in this direction is the
spread of effective prevention programs
throughout the country with widespread sup-
port from community groups, business and
private citizens.
GSE, ABUSE ANC) DEPF.NDENCE...Many people
who drink, take illicit drugs or smoke occa-
sionally do not experience problems from
using these substances (although it is possible
to have a serious injury or even to die from a
single episode of alcohol or drug use). How-
ever, with heavier, more frequent consump-
tion, they are more likely to experience prob-
lems with health, family members and other
people, school, work or the law. Substance
abuse refers to patterns of use that result in
51422 4585
SUBSTAACE ABU5E
:
t
..., ~,
,. , . . _. , . -. - , ,. . ,- .

.
:
0
~
y
y
V
~
:
i
i
V
1;
i
V
health consequences or impairment in social,
psychological, and occupational functioning.
While substance abuse concerns problems in
living, dependence involves compttlsive use,
craving, and increased tolerance.
Although it is not possible to predict who
will develop problems under what circum-
stances, in general, moree serious problems
develop when people become dependent on
alcohol, illicit drugs or tobacco. A person who
is dependent on a substance has a great need
for it--often in inc.reasing amounts-in spite
of trying to cut back. The process of becom-
ing dependent is complex and is related to a
number of factors, including the addictive
properties of the substance, family and peer
influences, personality and existing psychi-
atric disorders. Genetics also plays a role in
alcohol addiction, and recent research sug-
gests that it may play a role in tobacco addic-
tion, as well. At this time, its role in addiction
to illicit drugs is not clear.
Once a person is dependent on a substance,
abuse becomes a chronic, relapsing condition
characteriz.ed by waves of abuse, decreased
use, and abuse again. It is very difficult to
quit or curtail use, and frequently more than
one attempt is nceded--sometimes over a
long period of time-before a person suc-
cessfully quits or gets use ttnder control. The
likelihood of relapse is high.
This report presents measures of use, abuse
and dependence to illustrate the magnitude
of thC substance abuse problem. Although the
focus is substance abuse-use that has result-
ed in significant problems for the user-infor-
mation also is presented about patterns of
use and the populations at risk.
HISTORICAL TRENDS IN CONSUMPTION &
PoI,ICY...The use of alcohol, illicit drugs and
cigarettes has fluctuated during this century in
response to shifts in public tolerance and with
various political and economic events. In recent
times, smoking began to decrease in the mid-
1960s, drug use in the late 1970s and alcohol
consumption in the mid-1980s. Many people
attribute these decreases to:
increased awareness of the health risks posed
by substance abuse;
more governmental involvement in preven-
tion, intervention and treatment efforts; and
the development of grassroots efforts and
community coalitions directed toward decreas-
ing substance abuse and its negative impacts.
Alcohol... Alcohol consumption in the United
States has risen and fallen over time. It was
high during war years-the Civil War, World
War I and World War 11-and low following
Prohibition and during the Depression.
Consumption was the lowest in U.S. history
-0.9 gallons of ethanol per person aged 14
and older-in 1934, as the Depression was
at its peak, and highest at 2.8 gallons per capi-
ta-around 1980, following a period in which
niore than half the states lowered the legal
drinking age to 18.
SU9STAUCE ABUSE
