RJ Reynolds
Elayne D. Galbraith V. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. Deposition of Richard A. Bordow, M.D.
Fields
- Site
- Jones Day
- Author
- Bordow, R.A.
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Box
- Rjr4085
- Request
- Minnesota
- Letter
- Request
- 19970311
- Letter
- Type
- DEPOSITION
- UCSF Legacy ID
- pym14d00
Document Images
FRANK 0 NELSON & ASSOCIATES !NC.
I330CHAPAI,AS'REET SANTA8AR8ARA CA 93101 -t8051966-456Z
Z
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA
--------------------------------- ~.-
)
ELAYNE D. GALBRAITH; ESTATE OF )
)
JOHN M. GALBRAITH, through its ~
)
Executrix ELAYNE D. GALBRAITH )
)
J. MARK GALBRAITH; )
)
~ HOLLY GALBRAITH WERNER; and
)
I
CARRIE JANE GALBRAITH, )
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
-vs- ) No. 144 417
)
R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, )
)
a New Jersey corporation; )
)
ISLA VISTA MARKET, a California )
)
corporation; PRUITT'S VILLAGE )
)
MARKET; and DOES 1 through 400, )
)
inclusive, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
DEPOSITION OF RICHARD A. BORDOW M.D. , !:aK?.^.
at 10:00 A.M. T~ur~3ay, -Oc'*_o'bnr-3,- -''335 _,_nr _2U00 V31~
Qo3d, San Pablo California, before FRANK 0. NELSO`7,
CSR #636, Notary Public in and for the C(:)unty ,Df
Santa Barbara, State of California.
_RF.POR'TED_aY_: FRANK 0. tic:1SO.J, C:iR =63'6
OUR FILE NO: 15043
_ Z _.3' NJLL~ STREE' SuI7E 101 - ~~- .SOS :ra- ,.. = a
SAN'> MAPIA CA 4345.4 3a': :_.,'S )B:SP') :a . i
-qq5, ?2535.iJ ."Q5. s.t' .,L.

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
1 430 CHAPALA STREET. SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 - igO5) 966-4562
2
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
For Plaintiff:
LAW OFFICES OF MELVIN M. BELLI, SR.
BY: PAUL M. MONZIONE, ESQ. and
JOHN PAYNE, ESQ.
722 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94111
For Defendant R. J.-ReYnolds-Tobacco Compan~:
-------------------
JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE
BY: ROBERT C. WEBER, ESQ.
1700 Huntington Building
Cleveland, Ohio 44115
- and -
JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE
BY: MARIANNE CORR
655 Fifteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-5701
and -
LAWLER, FELIX & HALL
BY: CHRISTOPHER J. McNEVIN
700 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, California 90017
312 EAST MILL STaEET SV;TE .- :S05 S-nE°- _,. -E 5
SANTA MARIA CA 93451 SA?+ L:,,:5 ')BISPn :a +?Sr,!
't305' )25-55-4.1 yf15, Sll.r']Z.:

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES INC.
! 430 CNAPALA STREET SANTA 9AR8ARA CA 93 101 805) 966-4562
I N D E X
WITNESS EXAMINATION BY
BORDOW, RICHARD, M.D. MR. WEBER
E X H I B I T S
3
PAGE
4
DEFENDANT'S DESCRIPTION PAGE
A Application for subpena duces 86
tecum re Deposition of Richard
Bordow and Attachment "A"; Civil
subpena for Richard
Bordow; proof of service dated
August 22, 1985
B Three-page Xerox copy of pages 153
21600, 21601 and 21602 from
Volume 49, No. 100 of the
Federal Register dated May 22,
1984
C Two-page Xerox copy of Richard 126
Bordow's handwritten notes
Ln
312 EAST M/LL STVEE7 SUITE i') l 37+ 9 ~
$ANTA MARIA ;A 934t.1 5iN '_~i5 ':815? ~ ..1
.aO5- 32S55.1.1 7"~! G.]' -112-

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
1430 CHAPALA STREET. SANTA BARBARA. CA 93101 -~805) 966a562
4
1 San Pablo, California
2 , October 3, 1985
3 ~ 10:00 A.M.
RICHARD A. BORDOW, M.D.
BY MR. WEBER:
EXAMINAT_TON
Q.
Having been sworn, testified as follows:
State your name for the record, Doctor,
would you?
A. Richard Bordow, B-o-r-d-o-w.
Q.
And your address?
A. 2000 Vale Road, San Pablo, California.'
Q. You were served with a subpoena to give
testimony today, were you not, Doctor?
A. I was not.
Q. You have not been served with a subpoer.a?
A. That's correct. vot personally.
Q. Mr. Monzione has requested that you bring
with you, I take it, documents on which you rely, or
at least documents you may wish to refer to, with
23 respect to the subject matter of your testimony today;
~24 1correct?
25 A. No, that's not true.
i
26 ~ Q. Pardon?
27 ~ A. That's not tr~ae. I just asked him if I m
_J
co
28 ~ could bring them. N
' Ln
- m
712 2AST MiLL STaEET SLI'E 101 ?~? OSOS ;*aEE" >.I'E 3 Ql
SANTA MARIA CA '33454 SAN L-IS -4 "a')' 14
905. 925-5544 - ti(,59.11 " ,2.

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
1430 CHAPALA STRE'c' SANTA BARBARA.CA 93101 805)9661562
R
1
2
Q
You brought in several piles of documents
today, Doctor. And I take it these are generally
3 Iscientific texts and articles to whichu you may wish
4
5
U
z
16
21
to make reference during the course of the day?
A. That's true.
Q. Do you have any specific documents relating
to John Galbraith?
A. No, I don't.
Q. Have you ever seen any specific documents
relating to John Galbraith, Doctor?
A. No, I haven't.
Q. Do you have any specific information
whatsoever relating to John Galbraith,. Doctor?
A. No, I don't.
Q. Has Mr. Monzione imparted to you any
information respecting John Galbraith, Doctor?
A. No.
Q. So that, insofar as John Gaibraith is
concerned, you're operating on a clean slate?
A. So to speak.
Q. You're not here today to speak about Mr.
Galbraith's situation soecifically, 'out,.rather,
about the issue of causation in 3more general sense?
A. That's correct.
Q. Doctor, I'm going to ask you a series cf
questions today. By and large, I will attempt to as'<
them in a way that I hope you can answer in a yes or
22
27
28 Ino fashion.
I
312 EAST AiL:. STwEET. SUITE .7'+ :)SOc ='REE_ -..:i7E 9
SAN'A MARIA CA 9345J SAN L.:iS ')BISP^, :> 740'
905- 92S5544 -v,55ai -432-s

FRANK 0 NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
1 430 CHAPALA STREET SANTA BARBARA CA 93 101 - i8051 966-15oZ
6
1
As Mr. Monzione, I'm sure, has told you,
2 Itoday is not the time, in the course of the
~
3~deposition, for you or for Mr. Monzione, for that
4
5
matter, or for us, to set forth our full proposition
or our full hypothesis about the issues before the
court. It is an opportunity for me to ask you
specific questions and get answers from you. If you
are able to answer in a yes or no fashion, you ought
to answer that way.
If you are not able to answer a question
fairly yes or no, just let me know and then I'll
either rephrase it in a way that I hope will solve
the problem, or we can deal with it in a more
narrative answer at that time. All right?
A. All right.
Q. The main reason I suggest that, Doctor, is
that we have a great many issues in front of us, as
I'm sure you know, and I have got to try to manage my
time. Mr. Monzione tells me he's got an appointment
in San Francisco for another hearing that
necessitates our being completed today by --
MR. MONZIO[vE: I think 4:45 P.M.
Q. BY MR. WEBER: -- 4:45 P.M. I'm not su=e
we can be done by then, but we wiLl give it our best
W 20
2
21
25 ` shot. If you can't do that, you tell me; all rig`it?
~
A. We'll give it a try.
27 ~ r~. If you don't understand a question, Doctor,
28
please let me know right away, because your answer
31 2 EA ST "iV_ 9T4EET SU1 7505 9'RCC- o
SANTA MARIA =A ?3453 SAV ~-,;i5 ~BI~PrI ~A ~l.l~~t
,305, ) 25-554a .3 () ` . S.t 1 .4 '.Z^

FRANK 0 NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC
1 430 CHAPALA STREET SANTA 8AR8ARA. CA 93101 (805) 9664502
~,~oA q ,-
j/
7
1 will otherwise be on the record, and there will be ar.
2 assumption that's the answer you wanted to give. All
3 ;right?
4
A. All right.
5
Q.
Please do not use head nods or huh-uh or
6
21
uh-huh, because the reporter can't take those down
effectively.
Have you ever testified in a deposition
before, Doctor?
A. Yes, I have.
Q. What kinds of cases?
A. Medical/legal asbestos cases, for the most
part. Some malpractice cases.
Q. Doctor, I have a slight hearing problem.
A. I'll speak up.
Q. With the air conditioner going in the
background, if you could speak up a little bit, it
would help me.
You have testified, then, in asbestos
litigation?I
A. Yes.
22 I Q. On behalf of whom, Doctor?
`i-w..-'I I
A. A variety of people: Steven Kazan in
Oak land --
25 I Q. What I mean now, and what Paul was about to
~ 26 say, is in terms of what parties, do you know? A
27 jcompany, an insurance company, an asbestos company?
28
A. I have done work for both sides.
312 EAST MILL STREE' SUt'E t^.( fT? `)Sr:> >TpF:C~ :' --- a
SA'1TA MARIA :A 33154 SA~+ LUIS OB1S~/) =
aO5, 3255544 y(:5 . i3 : 47:4

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
' 430 CHAPALA STREET. SANTA gARBARA. CA 93 101 ;8051 960-4562
8
1
2
Q.
When you say "both sides,"
you mean
~ A. Plaintiff and defer.dant.
~
i
3 Q. -- plaintiff and defendant?
~PO- _ I
i
z
~ - -- .Q101l
.! f'4 ~ How many cases have you testified in for a
C, '_ zA~Je
51plaintiff in a piece of asbestos litigation, if you
6
z
0 7
H
IL
X
8
U
N
9
z
Q
10
X
p
11
W
~
12
Q
~
13
W
j
14
a
2
15
0
U 16
Z
W
17
W
Z
18
0_
a. 19
= 20
H
21
22
recollect, Doctor?
A. You mean in court or in deposition?
Q.
Either way, in deposition or in court.
A. Perhaps 10 to 15.
Q. And when you say "plaintiff," you mean an
individual suing an asbestos company?
A. Right, or vice versa, a company defending
themselves against someone else. I mean, I have done
both sides of expert testimony --
Q. I understand, but right now I want to find
out what your understanding of testifying for the
plaintiff is. When you say you have testified for
the plaintiff, you mean to indicate that you have
testified for individuals some 10 to 15 times in
suits they have
~ A. When I
I
ihave worked for
Q.
brought against asbestos companies?
say 10 to 15 times, I;nean that I
both plaintiff and defendant --
A total of 10 to 15 times?
A. -- a total of 10 to 15 times.
Q. Okay, I don't think the record reflected-
26 ithat. I think what the record reflected is that you
27
I
lworked for plaintiffs 10 to 15, so let's go through
28 ;it again, because I want to be as accurate as
312 EAST MILL S7RE_T S,I'E Ir)l
SANTA MARIA CA 4345.4 4AN '_.,5 qPIS?O ;~ ! J4r)1
805 - 925-5544 NriS. 51t43~t

1
2
3
~~
~ 4
I
'_' ,
71
~ vI~Q
!
5
6
Z
O
7
H
a.
y
8
N 9
Z
~
10
H
p
11
W
~
12
Q
W
13
j 14
a
O
15
U 16
Z
~V
LL
17
W
L1J
Z
18
0
a 19
T 20
F-
21
22
possible
involved
other in
FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. INC.
1 430 C4APALA STREc'T SANTA gARBARA. CA 93' 01 gO5/ 966-45i32
9
for
You your
are sake.
saying
10
to
15
time
s you have
been
in asbestos iitigation for o ne side or the
which you have given either deposition or
trial testimony?
A. Right.
Q. Of that 10 to 15 times, have some of those
involved retentions on your behalf in which you were
working for the plaintiff, that is, an individual?
A. Yes.
Q. Approximately how many of the 10 to 15 times,
Doctor?
A. Perhaps half.
Q. Do you recollect the attorney who was
representing the plaintiffs with whom you were
working in those cases?
A. One of them I remember is Steven Kazan. And
there have been some others in San Francisco.
Q. Can you spell his last name for me?
A. K-a-z-a-n.
Q. Is he a San Francisco lawyer?
A. Oakland.
Q. And do you recollect who the d4~?fer.l-ants in
those cases were, Doctor?
25 ~ A. I don't remember.
~! \ 26 They were asbestos compan;es?
27
A. That's correct.
28 1 Q. Do you re.:,ember any of the otl:er at torneys
Ln
m
312 EaST MILL STPEET 3UI'E 101 37'1 i405 i'p°_ET 5'.:I'c o Ql
. SAVTA NAaIA --A 93451 S.:N -:IS )BISPC) _.1 ?2-1,). tZI
805, 9255544 H05 `.i I.i 324

FRANK O. NELSON & ASSOCIATES. !NC
' 330 CHAPALA STREE' SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101 805) 9bb-15o2
10
O( 511a
1 you have worked for on behalf of plaintiffs, now,
2 Doctor?
3 1 A. Richard Jacobsmeyer.
= 20
in the case you consulted with him on?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. And have you testified on depositior, in 'any
21
Q
Richard -
A. Jacobsmeyer.
Q. That's one word, Jacobsmeyer?
A. Yes.
Q. And where is he located?
A. He's located in San Pablo.
Q. How.many cases did you do for Mr.
Jacobsmeyer?
A. Well, none of his cases have actually come
to deposition. Most have just been reviewing records
and providing an opinion.
Q. When you provide an opinion, do you
typically write an opinion letter, or do you provide
the opinion orally, Doctor?
A. I provide a written opinion.
Q. Have you provided any written opinions in
this case, Doctor?
A. vo, I haven't.
22 i 0. Did vou provide Mr. Kazan a written ooinion
26 ,of the cases that Mr. Kazan was involved with?
27 ; A.
28
Yes, I have.
Q. Do you have transcripts of cases in which
3 12 E>5T MiL- 5TR=E- S..iTr ~,37? OSnS i-aEE' -.,"E Ej
SAN7A M AR!A CA "?735d SAh L_iIS OBISPrj .:, f'.J1:;
905, d2555-:i Hr.5, .4i 1?L1
