Jump to:

RJ Reynolds

An Overview of Anti-Smoking Organizations.

Date: 26 Oct 1990
Length: 57 pages
507746158-507746214
Jump To Images
snapshot_rjr 507746158-507746214

Fields

Type
REPORT
Site
External Relations
Public Relations
Harris Tc
Dir
Copied
Rjr
Harris, T.C.
Jones, M.W.
Moskowitz, S.W.
Piscitelli, J.M.
Maher, K.
Klein, W.
Osmon, H.E.
Request
Mangini
Court
Order
19960800
1rfp52
1rfp72
1rfp73
1rfp74
1rfp76
1rfp77
1rfp88
1rfp92
1rfp
93
1rfp98
1rfp107
4rfp5
4rfp6
Minnesota
1rfp71
Texas
Initial
Disclosure
Castano
1rfp1
Burton
2rfp16
Referenced Document
Legislative Approaches to A Smoke Free Society, by Americans for Nonsmokers Rights, Hanauer P, Barr G, Glantz Sa, 860000. Indoor Air News, Consumer Federation of America. Smoking Behavior and Policy, by Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Poli
Date Loaded
27 Feb 1998
Named Person
Ti
Coalition
American Heart
American Lung
Acs
Consumer Federation, O.F. America
Carter Center
Advocacy Institute
American Council, O.N. Science & Healt
Americans For Nonsmokers Rights
Citizens Against Tobacco Smoke
Ash
Doctors Ought, T.O. Care
Martin Himmel Health Foundation
Ciglit
Interfaith Center, O.N. Corp Responsib
Tobacco Divestment Project
Institute For The Study, O.F. Smoking
Smoking Policy Institute
Who
Professional Medical Assn
American Public Health Assn
Hhs
Koop, C.E.
Myers, M.
Cullen, J.
Nci
Waxman, H.
Pertschuk, M.
Congress
Smoking Control Advocacy Resource, C.
Carnegie
Kaiser
Kellogg
Rockefeller
List, O.F. Prominent Anti Tobacco Orga
Banzhaf, J.F. III
List, O.F. Trustees
George Washington Univ Natl Law Cen
Fcc
Cohen, D.
Blum, A.
Harvard Univ
Pinney, J.
Foege, W.
Welan, W.M.
Dow Chemical
American Cyanamid
Dupont
Union Carbide
Uniroyal
Ciba Geigy
Coca Cola
Eli Lilly
Shell Oil
Georgia Pacific
Ca For Nonsmokers Rights
Gasp
Glantz, S.A.
Univ, O.F. Ca
Hanauer, P.
Barr, G.
Braude, M.
Burns, D.
Surgeon General
Ernster, V.
Cancer Precention & Control
Steinfeld, J.
Emory Univ
List, O.F. Fellows
Carter, J.
Townsley, W.
Watkins, W.W.
Fisher, W.
Leichtman, A.
Natl Education Assn
Ucla
Greater Cincinnati Coalition, O.N. Smo
Triag Tobacco Free Young America, P.R.
Gadberry, G.R.
Davis, A.
Madigan, J.
Wilson, K.
Rivkin Radler
Hafner, D.H.
Ballin, S.
Crane, M.
Langager, R.
Garrison, J.
Dumelle, F.
Health & Medicine Counsel, O.F. Wa
Minority Outreach Comm
Consumer Fedration, O.F. America
Brobeck, S.J.
Epa
Fda
Cpsc
Advocacy Institute Smoking Control
Richards, J. Jr
Gouin, C.L.
Daynard, R.
Slade, J.
Smith, T.H.
Martin Himmel Helath Foundation
Himmel, M.
Jeffery Martin
Dep
Schwartz, A.
Reynolds, P.
Reynolds, R.J.
Sullivan, L.
Rosner, R.
List, O.F. Board, O.F. Directors
List, O.F. Affiliations
Albers School, O.F. Business
Seattle Univ
Pacific Northwest Bell
Interagency Comm, O.N. Smoking & Healt
Gsa
Stop Teenage Addiction, T.O. Tobacco
Tye, J.B.
Krevor, B.
Everett, E.
Cuny
Tobacco Products Liability Project
Northeastern Univ School, O.F. Law
Charney, M.
Tri, A.G. Tobacco Free Young America, P.
New England Medical Center
Ma Gasp
Hutt, P.
Davis, R.
Mahler, H.
American Academy, O.F. Family Physicia
American Nurses Assn
American Medical Womens Assn
Stark, P.
Todd, J.
List, O.F. Dc Key Staff
List, O.F. Dc Consultants
Keefe, R.J.
Ampac
Lauer, P.
Sammons, J.
Mcgrath, E.
England, M.J.
Graham, R.
Sweeney, R.
Fleischmann
Ryan, J.A.
Hope, G.S.
Health Policy Alternatives
Ogilvy Mather
Nurses Coalition For Action, I.N. Poli
Mcbeath, W.H.
Centers For Disease Control
Walker, B. Jr
Off, O.N. Smoking & Health
Terry, L.
Novello, A.C.
Davis, R.M.
Shopland, D.
Nih
Cancer Prevention & Control
Greenwald, P.
Culen, J.W.
Sondik, E.
Warner, K.
Faa
Nhlb
Samet, J.
Congressional Task Force, O.N. Tobacco
Rogers, H.
Hrycaj, C.
Foundation Center
North Bay Health Resources Center
Rockefeller Family Fund
American Nonsmokers Rights Foundati
Gerbode Foundation
List, O.F. Anti Tobacco Funding Founda
Bc Gamble
Gerbode, W.A.
Grant, W.T.
Kellogg, K.W.
Macarthur, J.D.
Macarthur, C.T.
Mcbeath, F.
Mott, R.
Sloan, A.P.
Cabot Family Charitable Trust
List, O.F. Anti Tobacco Recipients
Sloan Foundation
Educational Foundation, O.F. America
Grant Foundation
Kaiser Family Foundation
Gannett Foundation
Metropolitan Life Foundation
Blandin Foundation
First Bank System Foundation
Macarthur Foundation
Mcbeath Foundation
Mott Fund
Minneapolis Foundation
Pittsburgh Foundation
Gamble Foundation
General Mills Foundation
Natl Council, O.N. Alcoholism
Seessel, T.V.
Brookings Institution
Schelling, T.C.
Weinberg, V.
Pw Skogmo Foundation
A Smoke Free Generation
Wqed Metorpolitan Pittsburgh Public
Smoke Free Generation Minnesota, M.N.
Bok, D.C.
A Non Smoking Generation, U.S.
General Mills
Brown, H.G.
Pender, J.E.
Film Arts Foundation
Hamrick, L.
Orr, G.W.
Everett, H.
Kennedy School, O.F. Govt
Kellogg Foundation
Author
Osmon, H.E.
Box
Rjr1202
Brand
Dakota
Premier
UCSF Legacy ID
wmt14d00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: wmt14d00
, ~ti°1~~ Tobacco Company HERBERT E. OSMON Staff Vice President Public Policy Winston-Salem, N.C. 27102 919-741-0619 October 26, 1990 TO: VMr. T. C. Harris Mr. Mr. Mr. M. S. J. W. W. M. Jones Moskowitz Piscitelli Mr. K. Maher (Walt Klein) Attached is the updated "Overview of Anti-Smoking Organizations" _ I referenced in Thursday's meeting- Osmon HEO/bjs Attachment "We work for smokers."
Page 2: wmt14d00
PREFACE This summary of the anti-smoking community is a compilation of materials produced earlier and separately by The Tobacco Institute and others, with considerable updating and editorial revision. H. E. Osmon October 26, 1990
Page 3: wmt14d00
THE ANTI-SMOKING MOVEMENT • Oraanizations There are numerous organizations involved in the anti-smoking movement, and they fall into three broad categories: • Private Organizations • Professional Medical Associations • Government Organizations The Private Organizations group are those organizations which seek memberships and solicit contributions as a source of funding. While some of these claim to have other agendas in addition to anti-smoking, most of them devote their energies to the anti-smoking movement. There are 19 of these organizations listed, with some differences in focus and level of expertise. One category comprises organizations which attack smoking on a broad front and which tend to be well-organized, well-funded, and professionally managed. Included are such groups as the Coalition on Smoking OR Health and the organizations which support it (AHA, ALA, ACS), the Consumer Federation of America, the Carter Center, The Advocacy Institute, and the American Council on Science and Health. This last group is funded largely by chemical companies, and it tends to try to divert attention from chemical issues by attacking cigarettes. + Nonsmokers' rights is the claimed primary objective of Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights (ANR), Citizens Against Tobacco Smoke, and Group Against Smokers' Pollution (GASP). In addition, these organizations, together with Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) and Doctors Ought to Care (DOC), could be considered the "grass roots agitators" group. The focus of Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco (STAT) is obvious. The Martin Himmel Health Foundation is both new and unique, since it limits its activities entirely to radio commercials. CIGLIT and the Tobacco Products Liability Project concentrate on litigation. The Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and the Tobacco Divestment Project are working to get investors to divest themselves of tobacco company stocks. The Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy and the Smoking Policy Institute are not pure activist groups, as they are more interested in public policy and education. The World Health Organization, a multifaceted organization with groups interested in all the above areas, has an international focus and does not participate in the U.S. market. 0
Page 4: wmt14d00
-2 - • The second category, Professional Medical Associations, consists of the AMA, the American Public Health Association, and other similar groups. They have a broad spectrum of interests of which anti-smoking is only one. The third group consists of key Government Organizations which focus on anti-smoking, particularly the various parts of HHS. Important individuals in the anti-smoking movement include symbolic leader Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, John Banzhaf (ASH), Matt Myers (Coalition on Smoking OR Health), Joseph Cullen (director of NCI's Smoking, Tobacco and Cancer program), Congressman Henry Waxman, Michael Pertschuk (Advocacy Institute), and Joe Tye (STAT). In some cases individuals (e.g., Banzhaf) are more important and more prominent than their organizations. Coordination/Interrelationships Many of the organizations, and their leaders, have relationships at both the professional and personal levels. There appears to be a "core" group of antis who attend the same conferences, sit on the same advisory boards, and serve in "interlocking directorships" for the various organizations. A network has developed for those individuals who know what they're doing to unite and communicate with each other. They have attempted to maximize their similarities by developing standards for training, • "educational" materials and objectives. Many well-known antis control government purse-strings for research funding as members of scientific advisory boards. At the same time, their institutions often receive large research grants and can be counted on to provide private-sector support for government programs before Congress. For example, millions of dollars in research grants flow from NCI to anti-smoking organizations and individuals. These groups often lobby on NCI's behalf and endorse its work during reauthorization and appropriations battles. This control over research,grants makes it very risky for a scientist to make himself known as someone who does not agree with the "party line" on one or another smoking issue. Intercommunication has been enhanced by the efforts of The Advocacy Institute, which has created the Smoking Control Advocacy Resource Center (SCARC). Advocacy Institute Director Michael Pertschuk has identified some key problems of the anti-smoking movement and developed some strategies to correct them. While SCARC is not designed to do the antis' legwork, it is set up to make front-line advocates more effective, to coordinate their efforts, to keep them better informed, and to do their strategic thinking and planning. SCARC has recently developed an on-line capability which any activist group can • access by paying a nominal annual fee ($100) and getting an access code.
Page 5: wmt14d00
-3- • • Funding Some money comes from government institutions at the federal, state and local levels in the form of appropriations and research grants. Federal funds in particular have indirectly turned universities and other institutions into anti-smoking propagandists through publication of studies and news releases. Many anti-smoking organizations actively solicit funds. Several foundations, including Carnegie, Kaiser, Kellogg, and Rockefeller, provide grants to the antis. Some of the major groups in the movement exist on tax-deductible contributions from small donors. Despite these varied sources of income, not all anti-smoking organizations are well-financed. Some, such as the ACS and AMA, have considerable means; others operate on minimum budgets. The dollars spent on anti-smoking activities by the larger groups is closely guarded information and virtually impossible to determine with precision. Similarly, the balance sheets of smaller groups are not generally available for public scrutiny. 0
Page 6: wmt14d00
~ ORGANIZATIONS 50774 6165 I
Page 7: wmt14d00
PROMINENT ANTI-TOBACCO ORGANIZATIONS is A. Private Organizations 1. Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) 2. The Advocacy Institute (AI) 3. American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) 4. Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights (ANR) 5. Carter Center 6. CIGLIT 7. Citizens Against Tobacco Smoke (CATS) 8. Coalition on Smoking OR Health • American Cancer Society (ACS) • American Heart Association (AHA) • American Lung Association (ALA) 9. Consumer Federation of America (CFA) 10. Doctors Ought to Care (DOC) 11. Group Against Smokers' Pollution (GASP) 12. Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy 13. Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility (ICCR) 14. Martin Himmel Health Foundation 15. Smoking Policy Institute 16. Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco (STAT) 17. Tobacco Divestment Project 18. Tobacco Products Liability Project (TPLP) 19. World Health Organization (WHO) B. Professional Medical Associations 1. American Medical Association (AMA) 2. American Medical Women's Association (AMWA) 3. American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) 4. American Nurses Association (ANA) 5. American Public Health Association (APHA) C. Government Organizations 1. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 2. Congressional Task Force on Tobacco and Health ~ rn rn
Page 8: wmt14d00
• A. PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS • Ln m J ~ ~ F-~ ~ J
Page 9: wmt14d00
1. ACTION ON SMOKING AND HEALTH (ASH) • Founded: 1967 Executive Director: John F. Banzhaf, III Trustees: Oscar Austad Charles F. Tate Betty Carnes Martin Jacobs Prince Joli Kansil. Alfreda Winnings Staff: 3-4 Budget: $600,000 ASH is a public interest organization sponsored by doctors, scientists, lawyers, educators, commentators, and celebrities. The purpose of ASH is "to take effective national action to protect the rights of 'the nonsmoking majority' against.problems caused'by smoking." In a public sense, however, ASH is John Banzhaf. Banzhaf, a professor at George Washington University's National Law Center, teaches legal activism through creative use of.the law. ASH's entire history is an example of this teaching. Banzhaf filed a complaint under the "fairness doctrine" which resulted in the FCC ruling that broadcasters were required to • provide "a significant amount of time" for anti-smoking messages. He also deserves substantial "credit" for the 1973 CAB rule mandating separate smoking and nonsmoking sections on commercial airlines. The media often turns to Banzhaf because of his colorful and aggressive arguments and strong on-camera personality. Once during a debate on public smoking, Banzhaf threw water on his aged opponent. For a time, the media lost interest in him after that action, but more recently he has again become a media favorite. ASH was also a primary force in establishing the Tobacco Products Liability Project. 0
Page 10: wmt14d00
2. THE ADVOCACY INSTITUTE • Founded: 1984 Headquarters: Washington, D.C. Director: Michael Pertschuk President: David Cohen Staff: Uncertain but probably less than 15 Budget: FY 1990 - $750,000 The Advocacy Institute (AI) was established to be a "nonprofit center for the study, analysis and teaching of advocacy strategies and skills for use by nonprofit and citizen groups to effect public policy change." It serves "at the invitation of foundations and citizen groups as an intermediary in convening, counseling and administering the process of strategic planning to achieve a variety of social goals." Its primary focus, however, is anti-smoking. AI proclaims that "within the last three years virtually every significant organization involved in smoking control activities has sought guidance and strategic counseling" from AI, including the International Union Against Cancer, National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, American Lung Association, American Heart Association, and Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights. Consequently, AI has developed its "interactive, smoking control leadership network" and "expanded and institutionalized its smoking control support services." Using seed money from the Kaiser Family Foundation, AI is packaging its network and services into a Smoking Control Advocacy Resource Center (SCARC). SCARC is designed to make front-line advocates more effective, to coordinate their efforts, to keep them better informed, and to do their strategic thinking and planning. SCARC appears to be a serious effort at coordinating the antis and a potentially powerful boost to the movement. As an example, the Institute has recently (1990) created an on-line networking system called SCARCNet which anti-smoking organizations can access for a nominal fee. Its purpose is to rapidly spread information and coordinate anti-smoking activities of the anti-smoking community. The roster of the SCARC advisory group illustrates the cross- fertilization of the anti-smoking movement. Activists like Alan Blum, M.D. (DOC), and Stanton Glantz (Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights), as well as academics like Harvard's John Pinney and the Carter Center's William Foege, have agreed to commit some of their energy to the SCARC. Meanwhile, Pertschuk believes he has • identified the principal problems of the anti-smoking movement (communication and coordination) and developed some basic strategies to correct them.

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: