RJ Reynolds
Brand R&D Mid Year Report 1986 (860000). Technology Development.
Fields
- Type
- REPORT
- Named Person
- Ftc
- Rjr
- Dube, M.F.
- Marc
- Saintsing, B.L.
- Walker
- Firmenich
- Naarden
- Iff
- Tox
- Florasynth
- Battelle Memorial
- Kaymich
- Molins
- Ecusta
- Archer
- Norman, A.B.
- Bellomy Carrigg
- Frye, D.R.
- Shear Kershman Laboratories
- Celanese
- Perfetti, T.A.
- Southwest Research Institute
- Cps
- Natl Family Opinion
- Eskridge, G.C.
- Hawley, R.W.
- Site
- Executive
- Christopher Fh Jr
- Executive Vp Operations
- Attachment
- 7154 -7319
- Author
- Brand, R.&D
- Box
- Rjrc2315
- Request
- Court
- Order
- 19960800
- 1rfp4
- 1rfp61
- 1rfp62
- 1rfp63
- 1rfp65
- Minnesota
- 1rfp93
- Mangini
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Brand
- Camel Lights 85
- Marlboro
- Now
- Winston
- Winston 85
- Winston Box 80
- UCSF Legacy ID
- udx25d00
Document Images
50516 7211
i

50516 7212
~. .
L7
I i I

Pro3ect SSA
Executive Sumnary
Products have been developed, using microencapsulation technology, which
improve sidestream smoke aroma while maintaining acceptable mainstream
taste characteristics. The microcapsules are incorporated into the
cigarette via the sideseam glue. These capsules are composed of a
urea-formaldehyde polymer wall with a 65% vanillin/
ethyl-vanillin payload and are supplied by 3M. The sweet, pleasant
aroma of vanillin is liberated into the surrounding air when the
cigarettes are burned. An initial consumer test (MARC, blind two-pack)
will field on 7/14.

Project SSA
Project Leaders: M. F. Dube, B. L. Saintsing
Objective:
To develop cigarettes which address identified social acceptability
concerns of smokers. In particular, to improve the sidestream smoke
aroma.
Benefits:
Products with improved sidestream smoke aroma (SSA) offer the
following potential benefits:
Improved aroma while smoking
Improved room aroma (lingering aroma)
Less absorbed tobacco smoke odor (clothes, drapes, etc.)
Less offensiveness to others
Status:
Sidestream aroma exploratory study conducted 11/19/8' by Walker
Research. Fifty-four aromas were evaluated. Results, received
1/86, indicated that vanillin-type aromas were preferred
(marshmallow, toffee, coconut, vanillin). Additionally, females
ranked floral types high. Based on these results, R&D narrowed
down the potential number of aromas to the top fifteen.
Firmenich, Naarden, IFF and Florasynth, the flavor houses
supplying the top fifteen flavors, have signed special
confidentiality agreements with RJR.
The top fifteen aromas have been submitted to Tox for approval.
All required reformulation. The flavor houses have complied,
although approval has not been granted.
Contract research with Battelle Columbus has been ongoing.
Attempts to prepare microcapsules by organic phase separation have
been unsuccessful. Prilled microspheres containing wax and
vanillin cause staining problems. Direction, now, is to prepare
prills of 100% vanillin and overcoat with ethyl-cellulose.

Microcapsules, prepared by a proprietary 3M process, cocnposed of
an urea-formaldehyde polymer wall and a vanillin/ ethyl-vanillin
core, perform well. These capsules have been evaluated by Tox and
approved for use. Scale-up capability has been demonstrated. One
hundred pounds of capsules were prepared and shipped to RJR.
Microcapsules have been incorporated in the sideseam glue and
applied to cigarettes using a Kaymich applicator (gravity-fed,
Molins Mark 9) and a pumped delivery system (Protos). Both
methods successfully added microcapsules to products without
mechanical breakage at controllable rates and with only minor and
correctable problems in sealability.
Efforts with Ecusta, under a joint-development agreement, have
resulted in an alternate method of applying microcapsules to
cigarettes. Using a Gravure printing method, microcapsules.have
been dispersed over the surface of the paper and adhered using
ethyl-cellulose.
U. S. Patent No. 827568, a cigarette having sidestream aroma, was
filled on 2/10/86 to protect such products.

Pro3ect AP
Executive SumoarY
Cigarette packaging materials have been developed which incorporate
controlled release flavor delivery systems. When opened, packages
employing this technology, provide a noticeable aroma. The expectation
is that this aroma will coanuunicate quality and freshness to the
consumer.

Pro3ect AP
Project Leaders: M. F. Dube, B. L. Saintsing
Objective:
To develop packaging materials which release preferred aromas when
opened.
Benefits:
Pack aroma technology offers the following benefits:
Communication to end-user of product quality and freshness.
Basis for brand uniqueness and identity.
Reinforcement of cigarette characteristics by the package into a
total concept.
Ability to subtly alter flavor characteristics (taste) of
cigarette products.
Status:
Confidentially agreements have been negotiated with IFF (Po1yIFF)
and Naarden (PFC, Polymer-Fragrance-
Complex).
U.S. Patent No. 857710, cigarette packaging having unique aromas,
was filed on 5/1/86 to cover our interests in this area.
LDPE (low density polyethylene) slow-release materials containing
vanillin, chocolate, cinnamon, peppermint, cedar, lemon have been
prepared by IFF and Naarden.
Flavored LDPE has been blown into film and laminated onto
cigarette foil and carton-stock by Archer. Additionally, flavored
LDPE in roll form has been supplied by the flavor houses.
Flavored LDPE has been placed in the top of te1KS/CPB and shown to
consumers at focus groups. Reaction to aromas was positive and
product taste differences were noted.

WKS/CPB products with cinnamon and chocolate flavored LDPE strips
inserted into the box top were evaluated on the SED external QDA
panel. Products with the strips were judged intermediate to
Marlboro and WINSTON on the majority of attributes, indicating
that subtle taste modifications can be made in cigarettes by i:his
technology.
WCS foil laminated with flavored LDPE has not been successfully
run on the packer in the R&D plant. The laminated foil does not
slide through the inlet to the slitter. R&D plant personnel
indicate that minor machine modifications will be required.
i

Project DFC
Executive SummarY
Puffing parameters (puff volume, frequency and duration) have been shown
to vary depending on which product is smoked andwho smokes it. These
objective measurements of smoking behavior were,obta.ined concurrently
with subjective ratings of satisfaction and Desire For a Cigarette
(DFC). The subjective measures effectively detect product differences
as do the objective measures. Preliminary results of a consumer study
of WINSTON and Marlboro smokers indicate that WINSTON and Marlboro
smokers smoke products differently (Marlboro smokers tend to take puffs
with larger volume, longer duration and less frequently). Males and
females also smoke the same products using widely different puffing
parameters. These results suggest methods for measuring objectively the
effect of product changes on smoking behavior and allow correlation with
the ratings of satisfaction and DFC.

Project DFC
Project Leaders: A. B. Norman, M. F. Dube, R. W. Hawley (Jointly with
Biobehavioral R&D).
Objectives:
To evaluate methodology for measurement of sm6kers' desire for
cigarettes.
To evaluate the viability of objectively measured smoking behavior as
a means of detecting differences among products.
Benefits:
The benefits of this methodology are:
Ability to measure objectively whether or not products are
different.
Ability to tailor product deliveries.to the smoking requirements
of specific smokers.
Ability to objectively determine similarities and differences
among smokers of the same brand.
Status:
Contract with outside marketing research firm (Bellomy Research,
Inc.) was made to supply a panel of Marlboro and WINSTON smokers
(total of 60 consumers).
Testing site (Northpoint Office Complex) was rented and outfitted
for use.
Initial test of the "desire for cigarette" (DFC) methodology was
completed 3/14/86. Preliminary findings indicated that the
methodology effectively measured differences in "L>FC" and
satisfaction among test cigarettes including WINSTON, Marlboro,
CAMEL Light, Marlboro Light and NOW. The NOW and Marlboro Light
products had significantly lower ability to quench "desire for
cigarette" than the other products. No differences owing to the
usual brand of the smoker were found.
