RJ Reynolds
Mid-America Toxicology Course. &Quot;Inhalation and Toxic Responses of Lung&Quot;.
Fields
- Type
- REPORT
- Attachment
- 6200 -6954
- Site
- R&D
- Biochem Biobehavioral-Toxicology
- Burger Gt
- Dir
- Named Organization
- Crc Press
- Academic Press
- Intl Comm on Radiological Protectio
- Pergamon Press
- Acgih Air Sampling Procedures Comm
- List of Authors
- American Conference of Governmental
- Natl Academy of Sciences
- Request
- Rogers 1rfp1
- US Comprehensive Request 80
- US Comprehensive Request 277
- US Comprehensive Request 47
- Minnesota 4rfp9
- Named Person
- Henry
- Ostwald
- Haber
- Niosh
- Gargas
- Anderson
- Macfarland
- Silver, S.D.
- Epa
- Barrow
- Brain, J.D.
- Valberg, P.A.
- Boltzmann
- Cassarett
- Mcclellan
- Palm
- Raabe
- Lucia, H.
- Barrow, C.S.
- Stock, M.F.
- Alarie, Y.
- Buckley
- Mcjilton, C.
- Thielke, J.
- Frank, R.
- Goldstein, A.
- Stewart, R.D.
- Eger
- Mcgraw Hill
- Andersen
- Netter, F.
- Caplan
- Schaumann
- Osha
- Brownian
- Stoke
- Referenced Document
- Modeling of Inhalation Exposure to Vapors: Uptake, Distribution and Elimination, by Fiserova V, Bergerova, 830000. Respiratory Toxicology, by Macfarland Hn, Essays in Toxicology, 760000. Constant Gassing Chambers: Principles Influencing Design and Operati
- Author (Organization)
- Univ of Pittsburgh
- Author
- Klaassen, C.D.
- Alarie, Y.
- Box
- Na
- Characteristic
- Marginalia
- UCSF Legacy ID
- weo13a00
Document Images
YVES ALARIE, PH.D,
DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONf4ENTAL
HEALTH SCIENCES
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
PITTSBURGH, PA 15261
"INHALATION AND TOXIC RESPONSES OF LUNG"
MID-AMERICA TOXICOLOGY COURSE
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI
I. DESCRIPTION OF CONTAMINANTS, TERMS AND UNIT USED
A. GAS
B. VAPOR
C. AEROSOL
FUMES
DUSTS
MISTS
FOGS
SMOKE
HAZE
SMOG
HOMOGENOUS, HETEROGENOUS
MONODISPERSED, POLYDISPERSED
l
279

II, CONCENTRATION UNITS
A, MG/M3
B, PPM
C. VOLUME PERCENT
D, PPM TO MG/M3
E, MG/M3 TO PPM
F. FIBERS/CC
6, I FT3 =
Hr INDUSTRIAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
0 DILUTION To TLV
0 A LITTLE GOES A LONG WAY
0 SATURATION CONCENTRATION CONCEPT
III, OTHER CONCENTRATION UNITS
A. PARTIAL PRESSURE
B, PV = NRT
C, HENRY'S LAW, OSTWALD COEFFICIENT
IV. ACUTE INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
A, LC50
B, LT50
C, LCT50
D. HABER'S RULE
E. EXPRESSION OF TOXICITY
F. BEST
G. SECOND BEST
H. COMPARING LC50
I, COMPARING LT50
J. COMPARING BOTH LT50 AND LC50
280

G, SPECIFIC OCCUPATIONAL PULMONARY DISEASE
1, CADMIUM AND BERYLLIUM
2. SILICOSIS
3. SILICOTUBERCULOSIS
4, ASBESTOSIS
5, COAL WORKER'S PNEUMOCONIOSIS
~
6. .
KAOLIN
7. SIDEROSIS. NICKEL
8. METAL FUME FEVER, ZINC, CADMIUM
9. TEFLON FUME FEVER
H, LUNG CARCINOMA
1. CLASSIFICATION
2. HUMAN CARCINOGENS
3, MESOTHELIOMA
283

X. STANDARDS FOR AIRBORNE CONTAMINANTS
A. DEFINITIONS, PROMYLGATING AGENCIES
I) TLV-TWA
ii) TLV (C)
III) STEL
iv) PEL
v) EEL
vi) AQS
B, OSHA HEALTH HAZARD CATEGORIES
I) SYSTEM
II) EXAMPLES
C, NIOSH/OSHA
I) POCKET GUIDE TO CHEMICAL HAZARDS
D, AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
E. ESTABLISHING TLVs
A) TYPE OF DATA
B) TYPE OF EFFECTS
c) TLV ARE NOT TOXIC INDICES
XI. FEDERAL HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ACT
A) Toxic
B) HIGHLY Toxic
284

2, HIGH REACTIVITY, Low WATER SOLUBILITY
3, Low REACTIVITY, No METABOLISM
A. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
B. PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
C. INFLUENCE OF METABOLISM
4. QUICK SUMMARY
o APPLICATION IN TOXICOLOGY
5. PRACTICAL USE, ALVEOLAR AIR
o EXAMPLE OF INDUSTRIAL EXPOSURE
0 BREATH ANALYSIS
IX, EFFECTS ON THE RESPIRATORY TRACT
A. SENSORY IRRITANTS
B, PULMONARY IRRITANTS
C, BRONCHOCONSTRICTORS
D. RESPIRATORY IRRITANTS
E. PULMONARY SENSITIZERS
F, TISSUE REACTIONS
1. OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC BRONCHITIES
2. CENTRILOBULAR EMPHYSEMA
3, ASTHMA
4. OXIDANT INJURY
5, PULMONARY EDEMA
282

V. CHAMBERS
A. BEST DESIGN
B. DESIGN FOR VERY HIGH LEVEL OF AEROSOL
C. CHEAP CHAMBER, GOOD RESULTS
D. VERY SHORT EXPOSURE
E. DON'T EXPOSE ANIMALS UNLESS SURE
F. GUIDE FOR EQUILIBRATION TIME
G. AIR CHANGES
VI, FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DOSE FOR AEROSOLS
A. FACTORS INFLUENCING TOTAL DOSE (TOTAL DEPOSITION)
B. FACTORS INFLUENCING REGIONAL DEPOSITION
I) SEDIMENTATION
II) IMPACTION
III) DIFFUSION
IV) ELECTROSTATIC FORCES
V) INTERCEPTION
VI) QUICK SUMMARY
VII, RETENTION - CLEARANCE
A,
B,
C .
D,
E,
MODEL
INPUT
ABSORPTION - TRANSLOCATION
IMPLICATION OF THE MODEL
MAN VS, LABORATORY ANIMALS
PROCESSES
VIII. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DOSE FOR GASES, VAPORS
1. HIGH WATER SOLUBILITY AND REACTIVITY
0 IMPORTANCE IN TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES, MAN VS. MOUSE
4
291

I, DESCRIPTION OF CONTAMINANTS, TERMS USED
A, GAS
A STATE OF MATTER IN WHICH THE MOLECULES ARE PRACTICALLY
UNRESTRICTED BY COHESIVE FORCES,
A GAS HAS NEITHER SHAPE NOR VOLUME FOR OUR USE, IT IS A
SUBSTANCE WHICH HAS A CRITICAL TEMPERATURE BELOW 20OC AND THUS
CANNOT BE CONDENSED AT ANY PRESSURE AT THIS TEMPERATURE,
EXAMPLES: METHANE (-82), FLOURINE (-129), HELIUM (-268),
B. VAPOR
SUBSTANCE DISPERSED IN AIR AS INDIVIDUAL MOLECULES, BELOW
ITS CRITICAL TEMPERATURE AND THUS COULD BE CONDENSED TO A LIQUID
AT 200C BY INCREASING THE PRESSURE.
THE WORDS VAPOR AND GAS ARE OFTEN USED INTERCHANGEABLY,
VAPOR IS MORE FREQUENTLY USED FOR A SUBSTANCE WHICH, THOUGH
PRESENT IN THE GASEOUS PHASE AT 20OC, GENERALLY EXISTS AS A
LIQUID OR SOLID AT THIS TEMPERATURE AND NORMAL ATMOSPHERIC
PRESSURE,
EXAMPLES: IODINE (512), BENZENE (289), CARBON DISULFIDE
(279), WE CAN ALSO SAY THAT S02 (157), CL2 (144), N02 (158) AND
C02 (289) CAN BE OBTAINED AS "VAPOR" SINCE AT 200C THEY CAN BE
CONDENSED IN THE LIQUID PHASE BY INCREASING THE PRESSURE,
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO SETS OF EXAMPLES IS SIMPLY
THAT FOR THE FIRST SET THEY ARE SOLID OR LIQUID AT ATMOSPHERIC
PRESSURE AND 200C WHILE FOR THE SECOND SET THEY ARE NOT,
285

OTHER EXAMPLES (FROM REFERENCE 1)
SUBSTANCE WATER/GAS QIL/GAS BLOOD/GAS SPECIES
ACETONE 395 86 245 MAN
BENZENE 2,8 492 7,8 MAN
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 0.25 . 361 2.4 MAN
CYCLOPROPANE 0.21 11,5 0,55 MAN
METHYL ETHYL KETONE 254 263 202 MAN
SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE 0.006 MAN
OTHER EXAMPLES (GARGAS AND ANDERSON, SOT, L985)
SUBSTANCES SALINE/GAS BLOOD/GAS
1.1 DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.4 5,0
BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 8 41
DIETHYL ETHER 11 12
METHYL CHLOROFORM 0,75 5.8
293

0 HOMOGENOUS: REFERS TO CHEMICAL CONSTITUTION, I.E.o SULFURIC
ACID$
0 HETEROGENOUS: REFERS TO CHEMICAL CONSTITUTION. I.E. COAL
DUSTI
0 MONODISPERSED: REFERS T0- DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICLES AROUND
THE GEOMETRIC MEAN OR MEDIAN, USUALLY WHEN GEOMETRIC STANDARD
DEVIATION IS 1.2 OR LESS AEROSOL IS SAID TO BE MONODISPERSED1
0 POLYD RSED: AS ABOVE, GEOMETRIC STANDARD DEVIATION LARGER
THAN 1.2. HETERODISPERSED ALSO USED.
NOTE: AEROSOLS CAN BE HOMOGENOUS AND POLYDISPERSED, HOMOGENOUS
AND HETERODISPERSED, ETC. SOME AUTHORS ALSO USE HOMOGENOUS FOR
MONODISPERSED, BE CAREFUL, THIS IS WRONG.
287

III, OTHER CONCENTRATION UNITS
A, PARTIAL PRESSURE
FRACTION (VOLUME/VOLUME COMPOSITION) OF THE TOTAL PRESSURE
OF A MIXTURE EXERTED BY A COMPONENT OF THE MIXTURE.
FOR EXAMPLE, AT SEA LEVEL. l ATMOSPHERE (760 MMHG, 760
TORRS, 11013 BAR, 1.03 KG/CM2, OR 14.7 P,S,I,A,), IF WE KNOW THE
VOLUME COMPOSITION OF EACH COMPONENT IN THE MIXTURE, WE CAN
CALCULATE THE PARTIAL PRESSURE OF EACH. ASSUMING THE FOLLOWING
COMPOSITION:
N2
02
C02
H20
TOTAL
78.6% = 597 MMHG PARTIAL PRESSURE
20Z = 159 MMHG PARTIAL PRESSURE
0,04% = 0.3 MMHG PARTIAL PRESSURE
0,5% = 3.7 MMHG PARTIAL PRESSURE
100% = 760 MMHG TOTAL PRESSURE
THE VOLUME COMPOSITION CAN BE IN % OR PPM, SEE ABOVE, SINCE
BOTH ARE VOLUME/VOLUME UNIT. THEREFORE, 0,1% OR 1,000 PPM = 0.76
MMHG AT SEA LEVEL,
B, PV = NRT
IF THE CONCENTRATION IS GIVEN AS MOLES/LITER (N/V), THE
PARTIAL PRESSURE P(IN MMHG) CAN BE OBTAINED USING THE VALUE OF
THE GAS CONSTANT R AS 62 AND THE TEMPERATURE T IN DEGREE KELVIN.
C, HENRY'S LAW ANI~ CO-EF CIENT ( S ~
THE AMOUNT (/tMOLES) OF A GAS DISSOLVED IN A LIQUID IS
DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO THE PARTIAL PRESSURE OF THE GAS IN THE
GAS PHASE ABOVE THE LIQUID. AT EQUILIBRIUM THE PARTIAL PRESSURE
IN BOTH PHASES IS EQUAL BUT THE AMOUNT, IN MOLES, WILL VARY
ACCORDING TO EACH GAS. THIS RATIO, $, IS CALLED THE SOLUBILITY
COEFFICIENT,
291

CAEROSOL N+ d-
STABLE OR QUASI-STABLE SUSPENSION OF SOLID OR LIQUID
PARTICLES IN A GASS VARIOUS TERMS ARE USED TO BETTER DEFINE AN
AEROSOL DEPENDING ON ITS ORIGIN OR STATE. THESE ARE:
o FUMES: SOLID PARTICLES FORMED BY CONDENSATION GENERALLY USED
FOR METALS SUCH AS CD, PB, ETC, . BUT CAN BE USED FOR ANY
SOLID AFTER HEAT TREATMENT SUCH AS TEFLON OR PVC FUMES.
USUALLY BELOW .I UM AND FAIRLY HOMOGENOUS, IN THE CASE OF
METALS.
o DUSTS: SOLID PARTICLES, FORMED DISINTERGRATION PROCESSES OF
A MECHANICAL NATURE, MINING, GRINDING, ETC, USUALLY ABOVE I
UM, HETEROGENOUS. LESS STABLE BECAUSE OF LARGER SIZE POLY-
DISPERSED, ,P~~ ~""`-
0 MISTS: REFER TO LIQUID PARTICLES. FORMED BY CONDENSATION OF
A VAPOR (SMALL PARTICLE. HEMOGENEOUS. STABLE) OR BY ATOMI-
ZATION OF A LIQUID (LARGER PARTICLE AND LESS STABLE)l
(ke%lvuvt
o FOG: A MIST WHICH APPRECIABLY REDUCES VISIBILITY.
0 SMOKE: NPART~~ SS IN SUSPENSION IN AIR RESULTING FROM COMBUS-
TION OR PYROLYSIS OF ORGANIC MATERIALS.
0 HAZE: COMBINATION OF VAPOR, DUST, FUME, MIST.
0 $MOG: COMBINATION OF SMOKE AND FOG AS IN THE LONDON SMOG BUT
MORE RECENTLY. USED TO DESCRIBE THE RESULTING COMBINATION OF
GASES AND AEROSOLS FORMED DURING U-V IRRIADIATION OF HYDRO-
CARBONS AND OXIDES OF NITROGEN. OZONE, ETC. . L.A. SMOG.
DENVER SMOG, ETC.
286

F, BEST
0 FIX DURATION OF EXPOSURE, ACCORDING TO' SITUATIONS (I.E
SPILLS, WORKDAY, ETC). VARIOUS CONCENTRATIONS,
0 TRY TO GET DEATHS TOWARD END- OF EXPOSURE OR BEGINNING OF A
SHORT POST-EXPOSURE PERIOD (NO MORE THAN 1/3 OF DURATION OF
EXPOSURE).
CALCULATE LC50 AND ALSO OBSERVE ANIMALS FOR 14 DAYS AND
CALCULATE LC50 INCLUDING THIS POST-EXPOSURE PERIOD. RATIO OF
THE TWO GIVES INDICATION OF DELAYED TOXICITY1
G, SECOND BEST
WHEN IT IS MECHANICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GENERATE CONCENTRA-
TIONS HIGH ENOUGH FOR ACUTE TOXICITY DURATION OF EXPOSURE CAN BE
INCREASED.
- CGQ Al-us
HOWEVER, COMPARISON OF LC50 FOR TWO MATERIALS WHEN THE DURA-
TION OF EXPOSURE IS DIFFERENT BY MORE THAN A FACTOR OF 2 IS RISKY
(SEE ABOVE)
297

S =CONCENTRATION IN MOLES (OR MILLIGRAMS) IN LIQUID/CONCEN-
TRATION (SAME UNITS) IN GAS PHASE,
S=CL
CG
SOME EXAMPLES
#
CL 1
O
OlS = L
N
H
O
CG .
ow:
ITROGEN,
ELIUM
XYGEN
100
CL 150
55 = M
C0
N
0
- 0
CG 100 ,
ODERATE:
2
2t
CL 50
5S = M
= 1
V
E
CG 100 ,
ODERATE:
INYL
THER
CL _ 1500 =
CG 100 - 15S = HIGH: DIETHYL ETHER
CL __ 110000 = 1.1005 = VERY HIGH: ETHANOL
CG 100
LIQUID = BLOOD (WATER) T = 37OC
292

H, SEE REFERENCE 1. MODELING OF INHALATION EXPOSURE TO VAPORS:
UPTAKE, DISTRIBUTION AND ELIMINATION. VOLUME I AND VOLUME
II, V. FISEROVA- BERGEROVA, ED,. CRC PRESS, INC., BOCA
RATON, FLORIDA, 1983,
1, INDUSTRIAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS
0 DILUTION TO TLV. ASSUME I GRAM OF TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE
(TDI), (SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1.2) EVAPORATES COMPLETELY,
0 THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE (TLV), 1979 IS 0,02 PPM OR 0,14
MG/M3
FOR DILUTION TO 1 PPM: NEED 141 M3
FOR DILUTION TO 0,02 PPM: NEED 7,000 M3
EQUIVALENT TO A BUILDING OF 30 X 15 x 420 FEET
o A LITTLE GOES A LONG WAY
ASSUME TDI IS STORED AT ABOUT 1000F, WHEN A 55 GALLON
DRUM IS FILLED, 55 GALLONS OF "SATURATED" TDI VAPOR ARE
LIBERATED,
55 GALLONS 2001 OR 200,000 ML
DILUTION TO I PPM: NEED 200,000 ML .
DILUTION TO 0.02 PPM: NEED 107M3, A HUGE BUILDING!
0 A LARGE AMOUNT, EVEN WITH HUGE DILUTION GOES A LONG WAY.
THE EPISODE IN BOPHAL ILLUSTRATES THE POINT, WITH TONS OF
EVAPORATING METHYL ISOCYANATE (MIC), EVEN WITH LARGE AIR
DILUTION, THE LC50 FOR 4 HOURS IS PROBABLY AROUND 30 PPM
(A BEST GUESS) AND. THEREFORE. THE RESULTS CAN BE
~ DEVASTATING,
269

0 SATURATION CONCENTRATION (CS) VERSUS TOXIC LEVEL
C_ MW z 273 = P 106 = MGIM3
S 22.4 - T- 760
MW: MOLECULAR WEIGHT
P: VAPOR PRESSURE (TORR OR MMHG)
T: TEMPERATURE °K
22.4: VOLUME OCCUPIED BY I MOLE OF GAS AT O°C. LITER FOR
TDI, AT 25°C, P = 2 x 10-2
0 174,2 ,273 ; 2x10-2~ 106 3
25 C
C = 171
/
24
5
S, 24,5 e 298 ' 760 MG
M OR
,
PPM
0 IF TOXIC LEVEL IS 1 PPM
IF TOXIC LEVEL IS 5 PPM
IF TOXIC LEVEL IS 20 PPM
HAZARD LEVEL FOLLOWS,
290

II, CONCENTRATION UNITS AND VOLUME UNITS
A MG/M3 - Ap"4-i cohi aP,o~-C--C_
MILLIGRAMS OF POLLUTANT PER CUBIC METER OF AIR, CAN BE USED
FOR GAS, VAPOR, AEROSOL.
B. P P M tGA- v' wAc°" q `"_ n 01, t,r,~ ;!.,-o vO1LXo-v
PARTS PER MILLION = VOLUME OF GAS/VOLUME `OF AIR RELATION-
SHIPI
VOLUME OF VAPOR OR GAS POLLUTANT X 106
TOTAL VOLUME OF CONTAINER OR
TOTAL VOLUME OF AIR SAMPLE
C. VOLUME PERCENT
SAME VOLUME/VOLUME RELATIONSHIP AS PPM, USED FOR HIGH
CONCENTRATION. I.E., 1% OR 0.1% INSTEAD OF 10,000 OR 1,000 PPM
RESPECTIVELY,
l
D. MG/M3 TO PPM = MG/M3 x 24.5 = PPM (AT 250C, 760 MMHG) (22.4
M,W,
AT 0°C 760 MMHG)
k
E. MPpm G/M~0 _ PPMo M~~ESULAR WEIGHT = MG/M3 (AT 25oC. 66OMMHG)
22,4 AT 0 C. 760 MMHG)
F, FIBERS/CC
NUMBER OF FIBERS/CUBIC CENTIMETER OF AIR, ASBESTOS
G. 1 FT3 =28.32 LITERS
288

IV, ACUTE INHALATION TOXICOLOGY
A. LC50
ATMOSPHERIC CONCENTRATION, STATISTICALLY ESTIMATED, TO KILL
50% OF THE ANIMALS EXPOSED FOR A FIXED TIME, WITHIN A SPECIFIED
POST-EXPOSURE PERIOD,
5/10
EXPOSURE RECOVERY
5/10
EXPOSURE RECOVERY
EXPOSURE: I HOUR, RECOVERY 14 DAYS
EXPOSURE: 4 HOUR, RECOVERY 14 DAYS
0 TIME: FIXED
0 CONCENTRATIONS: VARIABLE
0 LC50: MG/M3 OR PPM, FOR A SPECIFIC EXPOSURE
PERIOD AND A SPECIFIC RECOVERY PERIOD,
294

B. DESIGN FOR VERY HIGH LEVEL OF AEROSOL EXPOSURE
THE DECISION TO USE A CHAMBER OR HEAD ONLY EXPOSURE IS
IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE WITHOUT SOME PRELIMINARY WORK WITH MATERIAL.
THIS WORK CAN BE DONE USING A SMALL CHAMBER AND A FEW ANIMALS.
IN GENERAL, CONCENTRATION OF THAN 50 MG/M3 ARE DIFFICULT TO WORK
WITH UNLESS THE PARTICLE SIZE IS SMALL, HED ONLY EXPOSURE IS
INDICATED. THIS PRESENTS SOME PROBLEMS, CAGE CONTROL AND HEAD
ONLY EXPOSURE CONTROL MUST BE USED, HIGH LABOR, BUT IT CAN BE
DONE WELL AND HAS BEEN DONE WELLI
THERE HAS BEEN SOME TALK ABOUT AN EPA RECOMMENDED LEVEL OF 5
GRAM/LITER OF AEROSOL. THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE FOR MOST
SOLID OR LIQUID AND KEEPING THE PARTICLE SIZE REASONABLY SMALL
FOR RATS TO INHALE AND AT THE SAME TIME USING AN INHALATION
CHAMBER. DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME TRYING THISI
0 50 MG/M3, SMALL PARTICLES#: OK; LARGER PARTICLES: OK
0> 50 MG/M3. SMALL PARTICLES: OK; LARGER PARTICLES: MORE DIFFI-
CULT.
0 500 MG/M3. SMALL PARTICLES: OK; LARGER PARTICLES: LARGE
PARTICLES WILL DEPOSIT.
0 5,000 MG/M3, SMALL PARTICLES: OK; LARGER PARTICLES: TOO MUCH
DEPOSITION,
~
1-2 UM MMD AND BELOW,
~
0
~
w
0
rn
Ln
0
Ln
304

0 WITH REACTIVE GASES "CONDITIONING" OF THE CHAMBER SHOULD BE
DONE PRIOR TO LOADING ANIMALS IN THE CHAMBER, ONCE THIS IS
DONE, ADDITION OF ANIMALS WILL DROP THE CONCENTRATION BY AT
LEAST 50% AND SOMETIMES BY AS MUCH AS 95%. THIS IS NOT
SERIOUS FOR A LONG-TERM CHRONIC STUDY. INDEED DURING THE
FIRST WEEK OF SUCH STUDY ADJUSTMENT CAN BE MADE TO THE
DELIVERY SYSTEM TO BRING THE CONCENTRATION UPWARD TO THE
DESIRED LEVEL. IN CASES OF ACUTE STUDIES, IF YOU WANT TO
KNOW WHAT THE ANIMALS ARE LIKELY TO 't SOAK" COLLECT DEAD
ANIMALS. KEEP THEM REFRIGERATED AND THEN PLACE IN YOUR
CHAMBER. THERE WILL BE NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIVE AND DEAD
ANIMALS SINCE THE AMOUNT OF POLLUTANT INHALED BY THE LIVING
ANIMALS IS EXTREMELY SMALL, THE MAJOR CONTRIBUTION COMES FROM
REACTION WITH THE FUR. PROBABLY THE BEST DESIGN IS HEAD ONLY
EXPOSURE FOR THESE SITUATIONS, REDUCING THE POSSIBILITY OF
INTERFERENCE.
302

~~45C~er~
C, CONCENTRATION X TIME (HABER'S RULE)
LCT50: MG ; MIN/M3 OR PPM= MIN USE TO COMPARE
ORANGES1
APPLES AND
'ABER1S RULE, WORKS WITHIN LIMITED RANGE ~
nr~ RESPONSE: C r T
C OR T WITHIN 2 OR 3, WILL NOT WORK WITH SUBSTANCES HAVING
OBVIOUS THRESHOLD (CO) UNLESS QUITE ABOVE THRESHOLD, WORKS
BETTER WITH PROGRESSIVE. CUMMULATIVE EFFECT.
HABER'S RULE G7
~ 50% MORTALITY AT 10 MG/M3 10 MIN, C'T = 100
~k(5C% MORTALITY AT 5 MG/M3 20 MIN, C, T= 100
50% MORTALITY AT 1 MG/M3 100 MIN, Ci-T = 100: INCORRECT
E. EXPRESSION OF TOXICITY
DOSE: MG: NONE OF THE ABOVE, RATHER, INTENSITY OF EXPOSURE
KG IS INVOLVED,
~ FURTHER READING ON CONCEPT OF DOSE IN INHALATION TOXICOLOGY:
MACFARLAND, H,N RESPIRATORY TOXICOLOGY, CHAPTER 5 IN ESSAYS IN
TOXICOLOGY, VOL, 7, PP. 121-154, 1976, ACADEMIC PRESSI
296

H. COMPARING LC50
I) REGARDLESS OF STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE, LC50 FOR TWO
MATERIALS ARE COMPARABLE IF WITHIN A FACTOR OF 3.
II) IF ABOVE A FACTOR OF 3: START TO THINK ABOUT ITI
III) IF ABOVE A FACTOR OF 10. WILL DEFINITIVELY MAKE A
DIFFERENCE IN REAL LIFE SITUATIONS.
J, COMPARING LTSO
NO GOOD GENERAL RULE, A FACTOR OF MAYBE 0,5 OF THE ABOVE,
USE LT50 TO COMPARE RAPIDITY OF EFFECT OF TWO MATERIALS AT
SIMILAR CONCENTRATION OR FOR TWO MATERIALS FOR THE SAME
SITUATION, I,E, SATURATED VAPOR, IDEA OF TENABILITY LIMITS,
WHEN COMPARING LT50, MAKE SURE THAT YOU ARE COMPARING THE
SAME LEVEL OF EFFECT, FOR EXAMPLE, 99 RATS ARE EXPOSED FOR 4
HOURS TO A SATURATED VAPOR ATMOSPHERE OF MATERIAL A OR MATERIAL
B. FOR MATERIAL A THE 5OTH DEATH OCCURRED AT 2 HOURS AND 66
DEATHS OCCURRED BY 4 HOURS, FOR MATERIAL B THE 50TH DEATH
OCCURRED AT 2 HOURS AND ALL THE ANIMALS WERE DEAD BY 3 HOURS.
COMPARING LT50 IS A TRICKY BUSINESS,
298

B, LT50
TIME FOR 50% OF THE ANIMALS TO DIE AT A.PARTICULAR CONCEN-
TRATION, OFTEN USED FOR SATURATED VAPORS. NOT A MEASURE OF
TOXICITY,
5/9
EXPOSURE RECOVERY
5/9
EXPOSURE RECOVERY
~ \' Y Y
5/9
EXPOSURE RECOVERY
0 TIME: VARIABLE
0 CONCENTRATION: FIXED
0 FAST ACTING, $LOW ACTING. HAZARD CONCEPT
0 RESEMBLES ANESTHETIC GASES COMPARISONS ON THEIR
POTENCY (MG/ML OF BLOOD) AND SPEED OF INDUCTION
(TIME FOR A PARTICULAR LEVEL OF ANESTHESIA).
---~ ~ .
! a l -~'L '~21~~a
vte
~
0
~
~
0
a,
F
~
O\
295

0 PERMITED DAILY VARIATION
REACTION GASES 20% OF DESIRED
NON-REACTIVE GASES 15% OF DESIRED
AEROSOL "l*1 UM 20% OF DESIRED
AEROSOL=1-5 UM 20% OF DESIRED
AEROSOL '>5 UM DON'T USE THEM IN LARGE CHAM ER.
HEAD ONLY EXPOSURE. RELEVANCE IS
IN QUESTION. RATS DO NOT INHALE
ROCKS!
BIG PROBLEM: CONSUMER SPRAY CAN PRODUCTS.
SPRAY PAINTS.
POSSIBLY: REDUCE TO SMALLER SIZE
SET-UP ELUTRIATION SYSTEMS,
3 03

V, CHAMBER ~~
ALL THERE IS T KNOW ABOUT INHALATION CHAMBERS WAS WRITTEN
BY SILVERS IN 1946 (SILVER, S.D. - CONSTANT GASSING CHAMBERS:
PRINCIPLES INFLUENCING DESIGN AND OPERATION, J. LAB. CLIN, MED,
31, 1153-1161, 1946). ANYONE STARTING AN INHALATION STUDY
WITHOUT READING IT IS MAKING A BIG MISTAKE.
A, BEST DESIGN
THERE IS. NO SUCH THING AS "BEST DESIGN" CHAMBER TO ANSWER
ALL THE NEEDS OF INHALATION TOXICOLOGY STUDIES, THE "BEST
DESIGN° IS A CHAMBER THAT WORKS ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING
CRITERIA:
0 FAIRLY UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION OF CONTAMINANTS, VARIATION OF 10-
15% BETWEEN SAMPLING PORTS ARE QUITE ACCEPTABLE,
0 AIRFLOW (LITERS/MINUTE) EQUAL TO THE TOTAL VOLUME (LITER) OF
CHAMBER IS.A GOOD BET TO RUN A CHAMBER.
THIS IS GENERALLY SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT TEMPERATURE RISE
IF CHAMBER IS CONSTRUCTED WITH METAL, KEEP C02 AND AMMONIA
LEVEL LOW.
AMMONIA LEVEL SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH HIGH ANIMAL LOAD
PARTICULARLY WHEN REACTION WITH POLLUTANTS IS POSSIBLE, CL2,
S02, N02, ETC.
IF THIS AIRFLOW PRESENTS A PROBLEM (HIGH COST OF POLLU-
TANT, AVAILABILITY OF POLLUTANT, CLEANING, ETC.) IT CAN BE
REDUCED BUT PROBABLY NOT BELOW 0,2 THE TOTAL VOLUME OF THE
CHAMBER WITHOUT CREATING PROBLEMS WITH TEMPERATURE, AMMONIA,
ETC,
,.-IACFARLAND HAS REVIEWED SILVER'S ARTICLE AND EXPANDED IT, SEE
FUND, APPL, ToxlcoL, 3, 603-613, 1983.
1
300

0 ANIMAL LOAD SHOULD BE LOWER THAN 1% TO 5% OF CHAMBER
VOLUME, CALCULATE AS FOLLOWS: TAKE BODY WEIGHT OF EACH
ANIMAL TO BE SAME AS ITS VOLUME (I.E.. 200 GRAMS RAT =.Z
LITER) AND MULTIPLY BY NUMBER OF ANIMALS. THUS, TO EXPOSE
100 RATS OF 200 GRAMS (20 LITERS OF RATS) YOU NEED A CHAMBER
VOLUME OF MINIMUM 2,000 LITERS AND PREFERABLY THERE WILL BE
ONLY ONE LAYER OF ANIMALS -THIS CAN BE REDUCED TO A 400 LITER
CHAMBER (5%) BUT LIKELY TO NEED 2 LAYERS. THIS ONE LAYER IS
PREFERABLE IF WORKING WITH HIGHLY REACTIVE GASES WHICH WILL
REACT WITH FUR OF ANIMALS OR WITH LARGE PARTICLES BUT IS NOT
NECESSARY WITH AEROSOL AROUND I UM AND WITH NON REACTIVE
GASES SUCH AS CO ETC. OR VAPORS SUCH AS BENZENE, CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE, ETCt
I 0 DO NOT U§E THE CHAMBER FOR MIXING. THE ADDED POLLUTANT
SHOULD BE MIXED WITH THE INCOMING DILUTING AIR IN A MIXING
DEVICE PRIOR TO ENTERING THE CHAMBER OR MIXED AT THE TOP OR
ENTRANCE OF THE CHAMBER. THE IDEA OF PLACING BAFFLES, ETC,
IN A CHAMBER FOR BETTER MIXING IS ABSURD. THE GOLDEN RULE:
MIX YOUR MARTINI BEFORE YOU DRINK IT. NOT AFTER,
o DO NOT USE FAN IN A CHAMBER FOR MIXING A FAN WILL INCREASE
TURBULANCE WHICH WILL INCREASE AEROSOL COAGULATION. STRATI-
FICATION AND DEPOSITION ON VARIOUS SURFACES.
,
t
301

D, VERY SHORT EXPOSURE (10-15 MINUTES)
FOR VERY SHORT-EXPOSURE A CHAMBER OPERATED AS ABOVE WOULD BE
INAPPROPRIATE UNLESS THE AIRFLOW WAS RAISED TO ABOUT 500
LITERS/MINUTE TO REDUCE EQUILIBRATION TIME, THIS MAY PRESENT
SOME PROBLEMS. INSTEAD A CHAMBER HAVING A VOLUME OF 10 LITERS
CAN BE MADE OUT OF A GLASS CYLINDER AND USED FOR HEAD ONLY
EXPOSURE WITH AN AIRFLOW OF 50 LITERS/MINUTE (SEE BARROW, ARCH,
ENV, HLTH, 32, 68-76, I977),
)
I
306

G. AIR CHANGES
AN AIR CHANGE IS SAID TO OCCUR WHEN A VOLUME OF AIR EQUAL TO
THE VOLUME OF THE CHAMBER HAS PASED THROUGH THE CHAMBER.
THIS IS A CONVENIENT TERM FOR VENTILATION ENGINEERS BUT IS
NOT STRICTLY SPEAKING CORRECT.
WHEN SUCH OCCURS, FROM EQUATION 2. ONLY 63% OF THE AIR HAS
BEEN '1CHANGED". FROM EQUATION 3, THE TIME FOR ONE "AIR CHANGED"
MUST BE MULTIPLIED BY A FACTOR OF 4.6 BEFORE EVEN 99% OF THE
EXPECTED CHANGE CAN BE DONE.
THEREFORE, IF A AND B ARE EQUAL. THERE IS ONE °AIR CHANGE"
EVERY 4.6 MINUTES OR IZ/HOUR, THE BEST THING TO DO IS TO FORGET
ABOUT °AIR CHANGE" AND GIVE A AND B. THEN WE KNOW.
)
I
310

THE TIME REQUIRED FOR EQUILIBRATION OF THE CHAMBER TO 99% CAN BE
CALCULATED BY SETTING EQUATION 2 EQUAL TO 99,
-BT -BT
99 = 100 (I-E A) OR E A = 10000 99 =,01
TRANSFORMED INTO LOGARITHM FORM
BT
- - = LN 0.01 = -4.6052
A
AND
T99 (MINUTES) = 4,6052 A
(3)
T99 SHOULD BE CALCULATED FOR EACH SITUATION SO THAT THE TIME TO
REACH EQUILIBRATION IS VERY SHORT COMPARED TO THE DURATION OF
EXPOSURE,
THUS, WHEN A AND B ARE EQUAL X IS ABOUT 5 MINUTES.
309

C. CHEAP CHAMBER, GOOD RESULTS
FOR ACUTE, SUB-ACUTE OR CHRONIC WORK USING 10-20 RATS OR 20-
50 MICE AN ALL-GLASS 100-LITER AQUARIUM IS JUST PERFECT, A COVER
CAN BE MADE OUT OF PLYWOOD OR PLEXIGLASS WITH THE INSIDE OF THE
COVER LINED WITH TEFLON OR POLYETHYLENE FILM, SUCH A CHAMBER
COST ABOUT $100 WITH ALL FITTINGS, OPERATED AT 100 LITERS/MIN
EQUILIBRIUM CONCENTRATION WILL"BE REACHED IN ABOUT 5 MINUTES WITH
UNIFORM DISTRIBUTION OF CONTAMINANTS, GASES OR AEROSOLS (SEE
BARROW, TAP, 49, 89-95, 1979).
-I 1
~
-----1-
-4
A
-->
305

F. RAPID GUIDE FOR EQUILIBRATION TIME AND ITS USE
AS A GAS OR AEROSOL IS INTRODUCED AT A UNIFORM RATE IN THE
CHAMBER MAINTAINED AT A CONTINUOUS FLOW, THE CONCENTRATION WITHIN
THE CHAMBER INCREASES UNTIL IT IS PRACTICALLY CONSTANT. ASSUMING
PERFECT MIXING (FROM SILVER, SEE REFERENCE ABOVE)l
-BT
C = w Q-E A )
B
C = CONCENTRATION IN MG/LITER AT TIME T
W = MILLIGRAMS OF AGENT INTRODUCE/MINUTE
A = VOLUME OF THE CHAMBER IN LITER
B = VOLUME OF AIR THROUGH THE CHAMBER IN LITERS/MIN
E = THE BASE OF NATURAL LOG, 2.7182
THUS, THE % OF THE DESIRED CONCENTRATION W OBTAINED IN TIME
B
-BT
% = 100 (1-E A )
(1)
T IS:
(2)
308

DOSE VT F C' T = MG/KG
KG
~ REMEMBER; THIS GIVES ONLY TOTAL DEPOSITED, DOES NOT GIVE
REGIONAL DEPOSITION WHICH IS HIGHLY IMPORTANT. THIS DOES NOT
TAKE CLEARANCE INTO ACCOUNT1
To GET A°BALL PARK" FIGURE, ASSUME 50% (0,5) FOR aI
THUS:
0.5 X SOO ML X 15 X I MG X 60 MIN
MIN 1,000 ML
70 KG
= MG/KG
As CAN BE SEEN. WE NOW HAVE THE PROPER UNITS FOR TOXICITY INSTEAD
OF JUST HAVING AN EXPOSURE CONCENTRATION IN MG/L OR MG/M3, COM-
PARISONS OF TOTAL DOSE RECEIVED CAN BE MADE BETWEEN VARIOUS
ANIMALS, EXPOSED AT TH~ SAME CONCENTRATION, ON THE BASIS OF MG/KG
OF BODY WEIGHT OR MG/M OF BODY SURFACE AREA OR PULMONARY SURFACE
AREA. MG/ML,
312

VI, FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DOSE FOR AEROSOLS 0
A. FACTORS INFLUENCING TOTAL DOSE
I) CONCENTRATION IN AIR, C, MG/M3 OR MG/L
11) PARTICLE SIZE.~gp WHICH WILL DETERMINE THE FRACTION
OF AEROSOL DEPOSITED)
III) MINUTE VENTILATION, MV, WHICH IS DETERMINED BY TIDAL
VOLUME (VT) AND NUMBER OF BREATHS PER MINUTE (F)
IV) DURATION OF EXPOUSRE IN MINUTES (T)
V) BODY WEIGHT, KG
USEFUL VALUES AT REST
SPECIES VT (ML) F
MAN (70 KG) 800 15
MOUSE (.02 KG) 0.1 - 0.2 250
RAT (.2 KG) 2 120
GUINEA PIGS (.2 KG) 2 120
MONKEYS (3 KG) 40 35
MAN (MO
DERATE
EXERCISE)
1.450
15
f
DEPOSITION: ALL FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE WHAT FRACTION OF THE
INSPIRED AEROSOL WILL BE CAUGHT IN THE RESPIRATORY TRACT (NOSE TO
ALVEOLI) AND FAIL TO EXIT WITH THE EXPIRED AIR,
0 REQUIRED READING FOR ANYONE PLANNING TO WORK WITH AEROSOLS:
DEPOSITION AND RETENTION MODELS FOR INTERNAL DOSIMETRY OF THE
HUMAN RESPIRATORY TRACT, TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS HEALTH
PHYSICS 1?. 173-207, 1966, RECENT REVIEW: J,D, BRAIN AND
P,A, VALBERG. AMER. REV, RESP. DISEASE 120, 1325-1373, 1979,
311

B. FACTORS AFFECTING REGIONAL DEPOSITION: SIZE, SHAPE, DENSITY
I) SEDIMENTATION (GRAVITY), SETTLING
ALL PARTICLES WITH DENSITY GREATER THAN AIR EXPERIENCE A
DOWNWARD FORCE DUE TO GRAVITY
F GRAV = V PART'(D PART - D AIR) G
V PART = VOLUME OF THE PARTICLE
D = DENSITY
G = GRAVITATIONAL ACCELERATION
THUS. THE PARTICLE ACCELERATES DOWNWARD UNTIL ITS VELOCITY
INCREASES TO THE POINT WHERE THE RETARDING FORCE DUE TO ITS
MOTION THROUGH AIR JUST BALANCES ITS WEIGHT1 IF PARTICLE IS
SPHERIC AND SMALL ENOUGH SO THAT VISCOUS FORCES ARE THE PRIMARY
RESISTIVE FORCES STOKE'S LAW APPLIES TO PREDICT RETARDING FORCES.
F RESIST=3%~D N V
D = DIAMETER OF PARTICLE
N = VISCOSITY OF AIR
V= VELOCITY OF THE PARTICLE
313

I) DIFFUSION, BROWNIAN MOVEMENT
MOTION CAUSED BY RANDOM MOLECULAR COLLISON THIS PROCESS CAN
BE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A = ~ 6DT
A: ROOT-MEAN SQUARE DISPLACEMENT AFTER A TIME. T
D: DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT OF PARTICLES WHICH IS EXPRESSED AS
FOLLOWS:
KT
D = 3~7 ND
T: TEMPERATURE. KELVIN
K: BOLTZMANN CONSTANT (1,3g X].Q-16 ERGS/KO)
N: GAS VISCOSITY
D: DIAMETER OF PARTICLE
IT IS IMPORTANT FOR PARTICLES ]. UM, IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT
PARTICLE DIAMETER IS THE PRIMARY FACTOR.
316

THE VELOCITY AT WHICH THIS RESISTIVE FORCE EQUALS THE GRAVITA-
TIONAL FORCE IS THE TERMINAL VELOCITY, VT
VT =(D PART - D AIR) GD2
18N
EXAMPLE: I UM PARTICLE, D = I. VT = 33 UM/S AND WOULD BE
ESTABLISHED IN 10 US FOR PARTICLE STARTED FROM REST9
APPLIES TO PARTICLES 1-40 UM. CORRECTION CAN BE MADE FOR 0.001 UM
TO 200 UM BUT NOT RELEVANT FOR OUR USE@
FOR NON-SPHERICAL PARTICLES, THIS CANNOT BE CALCULATED BUT
MEASURED EXPERIMENTALLY AND CHARACTERIZED AS '1 AERODYNAMIC
DIAMETER~~. IT HAS THE SAME SETTLING VEOLICTY OF A UNIT-DENSITY
SPHEREI
i
314

E. DON'T EXPOSE ANIMALS UNLESS You ARE SURE
PRIOR TO EXPOSING ANIMALS YOU SHOULD HAVE A GOOD EXPERIENCE
WITH AN EMPTY CHAMBER. INCLUDING THE HOUSING CAGES, YOU SHOULD
KNOW HOW LARGE A DIFFERENCE THERE IS BETWEEN THE NOMINAL CONCEN-
TRATION AND ACTUAL CONCENTRATION,
NOMINAL CONCENTRATION = AGENT FLOW IN MILLIGRAMS/MINUTE
AIRFLOW IN LITERS/MINUTE
ACTUAL CONCENTRATION = OBTAINED FROM SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS,
f
~~`~ ~t rGi v~ LJ
-b
307

II) IMPACTION, INTERTIA
WHEN AN OBSTACLE IS PLACED IN THE PATH OF THE AIRFLOW OR
BIFURCATIONS OR TORTUOUS PATHS SUCH AS IN THE NOSE OR TRACHEO-
BRONCHIAL TREE ARE PRESENT SMALL PARTICLES WILL FLOOW THE GAS
FLOW LINES BUT LARGE PARTICLES, BECAUSE OF GREATER INTERTIA ARE
UNABLE TO CHANGE DIRECTION AND WILL IMPACT ON THE SIDEN
IMPACTION WILL DEPEND ON 4 FACTORS
LG AIR VELOCITY
tr0 DENSITY OF THE PARTICLE
~D SQUARE OF THE PARTICLE DIAMETER
L-9 ANGLE OF AIRSTREAM DEFLECTION
IMPORTANT: 3 UM, NASOPHARYNGEAL AREA. CENTRAL AIRWAYS,
315

VI, CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AEROSOL, INFLUENCING THE TOXICITY
WE NEED TO KNOW:
I, MASS CONCENTRATION: MG/M3, DIRECT SAMPLING, GRAVIMETRIC OR
OTHER ANALYSIS
2. SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION
SIZE OR MASS ARE GIVEN AS COUNT MEDIAN DIAMETER (CMD)
/(J\ AND MASS MEDIAN DIAMETER (MMD) WITH THE GEOMETRIC STANDARD
31,
DEVIATION (GSD), SINCE TOXICITY IS MORE LIKELY TO BE
RELATED TO MASS THE MMD IS THE EXPRESSION OF CHOICE, WE
ALSO LIKE TO DEFINE IT AS AN 11 AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER" WHICH
TAKES INTO ACCOUNT SHAPE AND DENSITY OF THE PARTICLES WHICH
INFLUENCE THEIR BEHAVIOR (SEE ABOVE) AND THIS IS OBTAINED
EXPERIMENTALLY,
SOLUBILITY IN BODY FLUID WILL AFFECT RETENTION, SYSTEMIC
EFFECT, STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS NOT THE SOLUBILITY IN
WATER, UNLESS MATERIAL IS HIGHLY WATER SOLUBLE AND NON-
REACTIVE, BUT INCLUDES OTHER PARAMETERS SUCH AS REACTION
WITH BIOLOGICAL MOLECULES WHICH MAY INCREASE TRANSPORT
(CARRIERS ETC) AND WILL ALSO VARY WITH PARTICLE SIZE.
THEREFORE, THE TERM "TRANSLOCATION" IS MORE APPROPRIATE,
0 3 CATEGORIES (TASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS)
Y: (YEAR): VERY INSOLUBLE
W: (WEEKS): SOMEWHAT SOLUBLE
D: (DAYS): VERY SOLUBLE
319

IV) ELECTROSTATIC FORCES
ALL AEROSOL PARTICLES HAVE A + (NON-METALLIC) OR -
(METALLIC) CHARGE WHICH MAY AFFECT DEPOSITION. HOWEVER,
LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT THE EFFECT OF CHARGE$
V) INTERCEPTION
OF IMPORTANCE FOR FIBERS AS THE INSPIRED AIR COMES IN
CLOSE CONTACT WITH A SURFACE. FIBER DEPOSITION MODELS ARE
MUCH LESS WELL DEVELOPED THAN FOR PARTICLES1
l
317

VI, QUICK SUMMARY
Directional
Chan9es Air
Velocity
Very abrupt ++++
Nearlv
straight
+++
Abrupt ++
Mild +
0
Nasopharyngeal
[ \
/
ronchiole
Pulmonary
\S=70m2
V=3,000m1
Cross Importance of Mechanisms
Sectional Residence
Area Time
2
cm +
cm2+
2
10 cm + brief
brief
brief
~ 5
2
> 10 cm
large
~
Impaction Sediment'ation Diffusiona
+++ + ++
+ + +
+++ ++ +
+ ++++ ++++
(a) diffuslonal deposition of very small particles and reactive gases may be high
in nasopharYnx and tracheobronchial regions.
FROM CASSARETT, MODIFIED BY MCCLELLAN
GL59 05h05

}
F-
)
PHYSICAL DIAMETER, µm
{
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER (Def), µm-
Figure 1111. Deposition of inhaled monodisperse aerosols of fused aluminosilicate spheres in small
rodents showing the deposition in the extrathoracic (ET) region, the tracheobronchial (TB) region,
the
pulmonary (P) region, and in the total respiratory tract based upon Raabe et a{. (1977).
COMPARE THIS FIGURE WITH THE PREVIOUS ONE GIVEN FOR MANI
326

t
K. COMPARING BOTH LC50 AND LT50
THIS CAN BE DONE BUT REQUIRES THAT A "STANDARD" BE USED AND
THEN COMPARISONS ARE MADE TO THE STANDARD, ANYTHING CAN BE USED
AS THE STANDARD OR REFERENCE MATERIAL. FIRST A PERIOD OF TIME
MUST BE SELECTED, RELEVANT TO THE SITUATION TO BE INVESTIGATED,
IN THE EXAMPLE BELOW, 30 MINUTES WAS SELECTED. THEN THE LC50 I5
DETERMINED, ARRANGING SO THAT 50% OF THE ANIMALS DIE CLOSE TO THE
END OF THAT PERIOD. THE TIME WILL BE THE LT50 (22 MINUTES IN THE
EXAMPLE GIVEN BELOW FOR WOOD SMOKE AS THE REFERENCE MATERIAL).
THEN THE OTHER MATERIALS ARE TESTED, IN THIS PROTOCOL, THE LEVEL
OF EFFECT IS FIXED, I,E 50% LETHALITY AND WE ASK WHAT WILL BE
THE CONCENTRATION TO KILL 50% (LC50) AND THE TIME TO DO THIS
(LT50), HOWEVER, REMEMBER THAT A FIXED MAXIMUM TIME WAS SELECTED
AND THAT RANKING CAN CHANGE IF ANOTHER TIME PERIOD IS SELECTED,
THIS CONCEPT OF CONCENTRATION AND TIME DOES NOT BELONG ONLY TO
INHALATION EXPERIMENTS, IT IS ALSO OF IMPORTANCE IN CHRONIC
STUDIES WHEN CONSIDERING THE DOSE TO PRODUCE 50% EFFECT (ANY
EFFECT SUCH AS TUMORS, ETC) AND THE TIME REQUIRED FOR THIS GIVEN
LEVEL OF EFFECT TO OCCUR, THE SAME APPLIES IN AQUATIC
TOXICOLOGY.
G[.u.arl CONCENTRATION - RESPONSE
I MUCH MORE~ MOLE TOXIC ~ AS TOXIC
TOXIC TNANITNAN WOOO{AS WOOD
~ WOOD I
E
0.1
CIASS 0
7.01 1 1 1l 1 I I 1 11 1 1 1111111 I 1 1111111
Fm. t. Each paint represents the amount ut matetial (grun on the X aais) which produced
eufflciem smoke to kBt 50% of the anima0 (LC50) and the time (minutes on the Y asul required to
kiB 50% of the animals (LTS/) using that amaunt of material. Reading the gtaph vertically each ma
tesial is classificd in terms of patency while eseh nuterisl is classified In terms of onset of
ecsion by
reading IlorizontaBy. To cambine both, pamVel quadrants sepamte class A. B. C. and D. For clarity
some mmesials listed in Table I have been umitted. However. Table 2 contains the coults far
alt macends.
FROM TOXICOL, APPLr PHARMACOL, 51, 181-188, 1981,
1.0 10.0 10410 1000.0
GRAMS1
'
<,tW103[~ t
1 s.r wooo
I rp.ne ..... . i
eGC ~. .~LrO
299

VII, RETENTION - CLEARANCE
A, MODEL
A MODEL PROPOSED BY THE ASK GROUP ON LUNG DYNAMICS IS
USED. THIS MODEL INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING AS PRESENTED IN THE NEXT
FIGURE AND THE TABLE BELOW,
B, INPUTS
DI: TOTAL DUST CONCENTRATION IN INHALED AIR
D2: TOTAL DUST CONCENTRATION IN EXHALED AIR
D3: TOTAL DUST DEPOSITED IN N-P COMPARTMENT
Dl}: TOTAL DUST DEPOSITED IN T-B COMPARTMENT
D5: TOTAL DUST DEPOSITED IN P COMPARTMENT
C, ABSORPTION - TRANSLOCATION PROCESSES
A: UPTAKE INTO SYSTEMIC BLOOD FROM N-P (MIN)
B: UPTAKE INTO G,I, TRACT FROM CILIARY MUCUS TRANSPORT
(MIN)
C: UPTAKE INTO SYSTEMIC BLOOD FROM T-B (MIN)
D: UPTAKE INTO G,I, TRACT FROM CILIARY MUCUS TRANSPORT
E: FROM T-B (MIN-DAYS)
UPTAKE INTO BLOOD FROM DIRECT TRANSLOCATION TO
SYSTEMIC BLOOD FROM P(MIN. SOLUBLE)
F: UPTAKE INTO G,I, TRACT FROM RELATIVELY RAPID
CLEARANCE, DEPENDENT ON RECRUITABLE MACROPHAGES AND
COUPLED TO CILIARY - MUCUS TRANSPORT
G: UPTAKE INTO G,I, TRACT MUCH SLOWER THAN F, STILL
H: DEPEND_ --O.N. -_ENDOCYTOSt_S- AND_--GILT,a,RY - MIIrIIS FOR
CLEARANCE (YEAR)
UPTAKE BY SLOW REMOVAL VIA LYMPHATIC SYSTEM (YEAR)
I: UPTAKE FROM LYMPH TO LYMPH NODES TO BLOOD (YEAR) N
J: UPTAKEFROM G,I, TRACT TO BLOOD AND VICE VERSA, r
~
. o
322

2, HIGH REACTIVITY, Low WATER SOLUBILITY poa~e
THESE WILL PENETRATE DEEPER INTO THE LUNG, NO2, 03, COCL2.
TDI, METHYL ISOCYANATE. REACT WITH PULMONARY TISSUES, GENERALLY
PRODUCE EDEMA. CALCULATE LIKE AEROSOL, ASSUME 100% FOR ?,,
__
~
~
~I~~/[n~ni"`~ ~
/ ~}.U R2~
n .
-
330

1.Or A - "v[" B - 2150m1
u.yu r- 0 V.tM
0 RT
0.80F:'hb . N-P
0.80~- AW z
o
0.70~- -Nasa4P V 0.70E- N~U - ,- / rSl i
Q
0.60~ _ LL 0.60
z
~:4~t- ® 1 N ~:4~
0
0.30 IL 1110FAMM~ w 0.30
O
0.20 T~Brondiial ' 0.20
0.10 0.10
0 0
0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1.0 5 10 50 100 0.01
MASS MEDIAN AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER (µm)
0.10
1.0
10
100
MASS MEDIAN AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER (µm)
Figure 6-7. Regional deposition predictions based on model proposed by the International Commission
on Radiological Protection Committee li Task
Crroup on Lung Dynamicst4f indicating effect of variations in oi and flow rate. (A) Each of the
shaded areas (envelopes) indicates the variable deposition
for a given mass median (aerodynamfc) diameter in each compartment when the distribution parameter
e, varies from 1.2 to 4.5 and the tidal volume is
1,450 m1. (B) Two ventilatory states, 750 and 2,150 ml tidal volume (- ll and -32 liter/min volumes,
respectively), are used to indicate the order and
direction of change in compartmental deposition that are induced by such factors. Reprinted with
permission of Pergamon Press, Ltd., and Task Group
Chairman. From Health Physlcs 12:173-207, 19G6."' '
321

3. Low REACTIVITY WITH SURFACE OF RESPIRATORY SYSTEM. ASSUME
INERT GAS AND No METABOLISM, USE THE FOLLOWING SYSTEM:
333

MAN VS, LABORATORY ANIMALS
IN AEROSOL EXPOSURE WITH LABORATORY ANIMALS, IT IS IMPORTANT
TO RECOGNIZE THAT ALTHOUGH THE SAME PARTICLE SIZE IS USED,
DEPOSITION AND RETENTION IS LIKELY TO BE DIFFERENT, FEW STUDIES
HAVE BEEN MADE (SEE PALM ET AL ARCH, IND, HLTH, 13, 355, 1956,
~ MCMAHON ET AL INHALED PARTICLES, VOL. IV, 23, 1977). SOME
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS:
0 THE MAJOR FACTOR CONTROLLING NET DOSE RECEIVED SEEMS TO BE
MINUTE VENTILATION AND, THEREFORE, THE SMALL ANIMALS WILL
RECEIVE A HIGHER TOTAL DOSE BECAUSE OF THEIR HIGHER
VENTILATION TO BODY WEIGHT RATIO, HOWEVER, THERE IS A
LARGE VARIATION BETWEEN ANIMALS OF SAME SPECIES, AND
DEPOSITION SITES WILL VARY DESPITE SIMILAR PARTICLE SIZE
BEING USED,
0 THE SMALLER THE ANIMAL THE LARGER THE PROBABILITY OF NASAL
~ RETENTION, A 2 UM PARTICLE: SAME PROBABILITY OF BEING
RETAINED IN THE MOUSE NOSE AS AN g UM PARTICLE IN MAN,
IMPORTANT FOR LARGE PARTICLES,
0 THE LARGER THE PARTICLES ARE ABOVE 3 UM THE MORE CHANCE OF
DIFFERENCE IN REGIONfAL DEPOSITION WITH MAN. TOTAL NET DOSE
MAY BE THE SAME BUT BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS MAY BE DIFFERENT.
0 TO HAVE THE SAME RELATION WITH MAN BETWEEN ATMOSPHERIC
PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION AND RATE OF DEPOSITION OF
PARTICLES IN THE LUNGS, FAIRLY UNIFORM PARTICLES AROUND 1-3
~ UM (MMD) SEEMS TO BE HIGHEST TO USE WITH SMALL RODENTS,
325

I
(OOOi9 01 N0IMOlSNV211 1401)
- (000'1S 01 NOI111001SNV2l1 H9IH)
1300W 3H1 d0 SNOIIVDIIdWI '
,t

-13-
I01
VT= 500 ml
t=2sec
10l
E
~
.
~ 105
v . r^~`
Q)
0 I
~ 106~ ~
1
1
i03
107'
S 02
lobar
t r a c h e a bronchi rbl alv
IOg
0 5- 10 15 20 25
Model Segments
figurc 4. Reprinted from IkJiiton, C., Thiclkc. J., and Frank, R., 1972.
332

INSPIRED -
CONCENTRATION
~ EXPIRED
CONCENTRATION
VENTILATION
DIFFUSION
1
CARDIAC OUTPUT
AMOUNT OF BLOOD
TISSUE DISTRIBUTI01
AND METABOLISM
WATER: 40 LITERS
FAT: 15 LITERS
336

VIII. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DOSE FOR GASES, VAPORS
1. HIGH WATER SOLUBILITY AND REACTIVITY
FOR THESE GASES, S02, HCL, HF, HCHO. CALCULATE LIKE AEROSOL
ASSUME IOOX FOR . ESSENTIALLY COMPLETELY REMOVED BY SOLUTION
AND REACTION AT THE SURFACES OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACT AND VERY
EFFICIENTLY SCRUBBED BY THE UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT, VERY LITTLE
PENETRATION TO THE ALVEOLAR REGION UNTIL HIGH CONCENTRATIONS ARE
REACHED. FEW GASES HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATED FOR REGIONAL PENETRA-
TION, S02, 03, SEVERAL ALDEHYDES. HIGH WATER SOLUBILITY DOES NOT
SEEM TO BE SUFFICIENT SINCE ACETONE IS NOT ENTIRELY REMOVED BY
THE NOSE WHILE S02 IS. WITH S02 THE REACTION WITH WATER AT PH
7.4 WILL YIELD
SO? + H20 I:z ' H2S03 ,-' H+ + HS03-
HS03 - ~ H+ + S03 =
THEN REACTION OF HS03 AND S03 = WITH PROTEIN DISULFIDE BONDS TO
YIELD SULFONATES1 SIMILAR SCHEMES CAN BE PRESENTED FOR SEVERAL
WATER SOLUBLE AND REACTIVE CHEMICALS$
0 IMPORTANCE IN TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES: SINCE MICE, RATS,
GUINEA PIGS. HAMSTERS ARE OBLIGATORY. NOSE BREATHERS. THE
FIRST AREA AFFECTED BY THESE GASES WILL BE THE NOSE. NASAL
CARCINOMA IN RATS AND MICE DUE TO FORMALDEHYDE IS A GOOD
EXAMPLE. J)y.v~_
' 0 (J (}
1 0 CALCULATE DOSE SAME AS FOR AEROSOL, USE 100% RETENTION1
328

j---DIAMETER OF AVERAGE MASS (2.056pm)
C
M ASS MEAN (5L.374~m) I
A
PA.TICI,L Di 1~z~o~~ /71~C~t-P«TL~S
N

\
'C7
0
10~
169
->.2-
VT= 500 ml
t = 2 sec
0 5 10 15 20 25
Model Seyments
Figure 3. Reprinted frcr.rtlcJilton, C., Thielke, d., and Frank, R., 1972.
331

10`G
.,
~..~~,
4~ `~ (4')
~ __: _ --- --- .
LYMPH
.. . . --
~

C, BRONCHOCONSTRICTORS
I) DEFINITION: CHEMICAL WHICH WHEN INHALED WILL INDUCE AN
INCREASE IN RESISTANCE TO AIRFLOW WITHIN THE CONDUCTING
AIRWAYS OF THE LUNG, THE ACTION CAN BE VIA DIRECT EFFECT ON
~ SMOOTH MUSCLES OF THE CONDUCTING AIRWAYSt BY AXONAL REFLEX,
BY VAGO-VAGAL OR - TRIGEMINAL-VAGAL REFLEXES FOLLOWING,
STIMULATION OF NERVE ENDINGS BELONGING TO THESE SYSTEMS OR ~
BY LIBERATION OF HISTAMINE,
II) OTHER CHARACTERISTICS: MOST OF THESE CHEMICALS ARE ALSO
SENSORY IRRITANTS. THEIR ACTION ON THE BRONCHIAL MUCOSA
PRODUCES A PAINFUL SENSATION.
III) TYPICAL EXAMPLES: SULFUR DIOXIDE, AMMONIA, INERT PARTICLES.
SENSITIZATION BY ALLERGENS SUCH AS FOREIGN PROTEINS OR
CHEMICALS ACTING AS HAPTEN SUCH AS TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE.
AEROSOLS OF HISTAMINE OR CHOLINERGIC AGONISTS,
343

A. PHYSICAL PARAMETERS
I) CONCENTRATION IN AIR (MMHG) DETERMINES MAXIMUM CONCEN-
TRATION (MMHG) IN BLOOD SINCE EQUILIBRIUM WILL BE
ESTABLISHED AT SOME TIME.
ii) KNOWING S# GIVES THE MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION IN MOLES OR
MILLIGRAMS/LITER OF BLOOD WHICH CAN BE ACHIEVED. I.El.
AT EQUILIBRIUM$
III) SUBSTANCES WITH HIGH $ WILL TAKE A LONG TIME TO REACH
EQUILIBRIUM (METHANOL, ETHANOL, ACETONE, ETHER.
ETC,)l SUBSTANCES WITH LOW S(METHANE, ETC.) WILL
REACH EQUILIBRIUM VERY QUICKLY. S VALUE CAN BE TAKEN
FOR WATER AT 37OC BUT BE CAREFUL (SEE ABOVE).
B, PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS
I) MINUTE VENTILATION: IMPORTANT FOR HIGH S SUBSTANCES
II) CARDIAC OUTPUT: IMPORTANT FOR LOW S SUBSTANCES
III) AMOUNT OF BLOOD TO BE SATURATED. 5 LITERS AND TOTAL
BODY WATER. 40 LITERS.
IV) OIL/WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT: FROM BLOOD TO TISSUES,
ADt
SOURCES: REFERENCE No. 1, GOLDSTEIN ET AL PRINCIPLES OF DRUG
ACTION AND REF. 1t
S = SOLUBILITY COEFFICIENT
t
334

loo
O
PARrIAL PR8SSy RE ,mumN1,3:N BRo~ a
Ti m E -_......~
loo,n,,,, N
Pri R
a
/d0rtn.n H,~
8ceeD
4
0
O.F.F
G G O v c
0 0 0 o a
p O o
oooa o-0
00000
0
hi4k S Co~ S
J 335
w
0
~
w
0

5. PRACTICAL USE OF THE CONCEPT (ADAPTED FROM R,D, STEWART)
0 BLOOD CONCENTRATION = ALVEOLAR AIR CONCENTRATION X S
ry'~K - L~
HUMAN EXPOSURE TO TRICHLORETHYLENE. 200 PPM. 7 RHS/DAY FOR 5
DAYS,
ALVEOLAR AIR CONCENTRATION (PPM)
k
1ST DAY 2ND DAY 3RD DAY 4TH DAY 5TH DAY
PRE-EXPOSURE
(MORNING) 0.01 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.6
3 HOURS 76 75 76 79 76
30 MIN AFTER
LUNCH 10.3 10,9 11.5 8.4 8.5
1 HR POST-
EXPOSURE 8,3 9.4 9.0 7,7 8,7
3 HR POST-
EXPOSURE 5.1 4.4 3,5 3,5 3,6
6 HR POST-
EXPOSURE 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.9 2.9
90 HRS, POST-5 DAY EXPOSURE: 0.2
DOES NOT REACH EQUILIBRIUM WITH INSPIRED AIR
No CUMMULATION
INCOMPLETE RELEASE
`~'-V
~
~~ ~
Ci l~~lc~ }N~~ C~ ~" ~
~f vi^~ klN
0 ALCOHOL BREATH TEST ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE BLOOD CONCENTRATION
FROM A SAMPLE OF ALVEOLAR AIR, SINCE ALVEOLAR AIR IS AT
EQUILIBRIUM WITH CAPILLARY BLOOD. BY KNOWING THE AMOUNT IN
ALVEOLAR AIR AND THE SOLUBILITY COEFFICIENT ONE KNOWS THE
CONCENTRATION IN THE BLOOD,
338

I
INSPIRABLE 6D
MASS
FRACTION 60
EHTERS VIA NOSE
~ DR MOUTN ) 40
9
W
EJ
J
THORACIC
MASS
FRACTION
( RNETRATION
PAST EARYHR I
T r E
10 20 30
40 60 60 70 80 90 100
THORACIC PARTICULATE MASS
5 i0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
RESPIRABLE
MASS
FRACTION
( PENETIIATION /ASS
TGMINA{
RRONCNIOEES (
20~
xm` RESPIRABLE PARTICULATE MASS
80~
6%
40.J
20.
0
INSPIRABLE PARTICULATE MASS
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 18 18 20
AERODYNAMIC DIAMETER (Nml
~
Figure1-1-Thethreeaerosolmassfractionsrecommendedforuseinparticalsize-selectiveaerosotsamplingbytheA
CGIHNrSamplingProceduresCommittee.
9ZS 9 061t0S

IX. EFFECT ON THE RESPIRATORY TRACT*
A. SENSORY IRRITANT
I) DEFINITION: CHEMICAL WHICH WHEN INHALED VIA THE NOSE WILL
STIMULATE TRIGEMINAL NERVE ENDINGS, EVOKE A BURNING,
SENSATION OF THE NASAL PASSAGE AND INHIBIT RESPIRATION,'{
ALSO MOST WILL INDUCE COUGHING FROM LARYNGEAL STIMULATIOND
II) OTHER CHARACTERISTICS: THESE CHEMICALS ARE ALSO CAPABLE OF
STIMULATING TRIGEMINAL NERVE ENDINGS OF THE CORNEA AND
INDUCE TEARING, AT HIGH CONCENTRATION, PARTICULARLY ON
MOIST FACIAL SKIN, THEY ARE CAPABLE OF INDUCING A BURNING
SENSATION, SOME HAVE ODORANT AND/OR GUSTATORY QUALITIES,
MOST WILL INDUCE BRONCHOCONSTRICTION, USUALLY AT
CONCENTRATIONS IN THE AIR HIGHER THAN REQUIRED FOR
STIMULATION OF NERVE ENDINGS IN THE NASAL PASSAGES1
III) EQUIVALENT TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEIR ACTION: UPPER
RESPIRATORY TRACT IRRITANT, NASAL OR CORNEAL TRIGEMINAL
STIMULANT, COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE STIMULANT, CHEMOGENIC PAIN
STIMULANT, SUFFOCANT, LACHRYMATOR, STERNUTATOR,
IV) TYPICAL EXAMPLES: CHLORACETOPHENONE. O-CHLOROBENZYLIDENE
MALONONITRILE, B-NITROSTYRENE, DIPHENYLAMINOCHLOROARSINE,
SULFUR DIOXIDE, AMMONIA, CROLEIN, FORMALDEHYDEt
PRACTICAL, INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION FOR A, B, C, D- FROM ALARIE,
CRC, CRIT, REV, ToxICOL 2, 299, L973,
341

Table I. (cont'd.)
Industrial
Compound
Symptoms
Reference
;Platinum salts Asthma, dermatitis Freedman and Krupey,
1968; Cleare et
! al., 1976
Sodium bichromate Asthma Kobayashi, 1974
'Spiramycin Asthma, dermatitis Davies and Pepys,
1975
I (
FT_annic acid _ _ Asthma, urticaria, Johnston et a1., 1951
I rhinitis
Tetracycline Asthma Menon and Das, 1977
~
,Toluene diisocyanate Asthma, urticaria Avery et.al., 1969;
(TDI) ~ Pepys et al., 1972;
I Karol e t a1. , 1979b
Trimellitic anhyd- Asthma ; Zeiss et al., 1977
; ride ;
347

E, PULMONARY SENSITIZERS (HYPERSENSITIVITY, DIFFERENT FROM
HYPERSUSCEPTIBILITY)
I) DEFINITION: CHEMICALS WHICH WHEN INHALED STIMULATE
IMMUNOLOGIC SYSTEM SUCH THAT UPON RE-EXPOSURE TO A VERY LOW
CONCENTRATION A PULMONARY REACTION OCCURS,
A) FOREIGN PROTEINS: DEPENDENT ON MOLECULAR WEIGHT,
EXAMPLE: SUBTILISINS (PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES)
10w "1-v
) SIMPLE CHEMICALS WHICH ACT AS HAPTENS
HAPTEN: ANY SMALL MOLECULE WHICH WHEN ATTACHED TO A
MACROMOLECULE INDUCES FORMATION OF ANTIBODIES TO THE
CHEMICAL AND WHICH CAN REACT WITH SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES.
EXAMPLE: TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI). TRIMELLITIC
ANHYDRIDE. POTASSIUM CHLOROPLATINATE. PHTALLIC
ANHYDRIDE,
II) TYPE OF PULMONARY REACTIONS
A. IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY: ASTHMA ATTACK, OCCURS
WITHIN 1 HR OF EXPOSURE, CLASS OF ANTIBODY RESPONSIBLE
MAINLY IGE ALSO 1 GG4 POSSIBLY OTHERS.
B. LATE REACTION: STARTS AFTER 1 HR. . LAST 2-3 HRS, OR
START AFTER 3-4 HRS. LAST 24-36 HRS, MAINLY 1GG
PRECIPITATING ANTIBODIES, BIRD FANCIERS DISEASE,
FARMERI S LUNG DISEASE (THERMOPHYLLIC ACTINOMYCETES)
ALLERGIC ALVEOLITIS1
C, GRANULOMA FORMATION: CELL-MEDIATED MECHANISM INSTEAD OF
ANTIBODIES, TUBERCULOSIS, BERYLLIUM,
345

D, RESPIRATORY IRRITANTS
I) DEFINITION: CHEMICAL WHICH WHEN INHALED CAN ACT AS SENSORY
IRRITANT, BRONCHOCONSTRICTOR AND PULMONARY IRRITANT. THESE
CHEMICALS ARE CAPABLE OF ALL THREE ACTIONS AND THERE IS
LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CONCENTRATION AT WHICH THEY
ARE SENSORY IRRITANT AND PULMONARY IRRITANTS1
II) OTHER CHARACTERISTICS: SIMILAR TO SENSORY IRRITANTS AND
LUNG IRRITANTS.
III) EQUIVALENT TERM TO DESCRIBE THEIR ACTION: ANY OF THE TERMS
MENTIONED IN THIS TABLE, DEPENDING ON THE EXPOSURE
CONDITIONS INVOLVEDI
iv) TYPICAL EXAMPLES: CHLORINE, KETENE, CHLOROPICRIN,
DICHLOROMETHYL ETHER. CHLORINE PENTAFLUORIDE, DIEPOXYBUTANE,
METHYL ISOCYANATE8
344

4. QUICK SUMMARY (ADAPTED FROM A. GOLDSTEIN ET AL.)
AGENT
S
TIME TO
EQUILIBRIUM
QUANTITY IN
MOLES PHYSIOLOGICAL
FACTOR -
LIMITING UPTAKE
ETHYL ETHER 15 S LOW LARGE VENTILATION
CHLOROFORM
HALOTHANE 7.3
2.5
T
~
X 1.0 50/50
NITROUS OXIDE 0.5
EHTYLENE 0.15 FAST SMALL CARD IAC OUTPUT
oAppe,
N1 o u ser
00
337

(
Microscopic'. .
Pathology of Status Asthmaticus
PAS-positive matrix
Polymorphonuclear ~
neutrophils
349
Tenacious, viscid mucous plugs in airways
Regional or ditfuse
hyperinflation

metaar
totai
tbw
~ thrYl
311 chamber GC
~p.
! n
ftowmeter
f!1/mM
action port
Integrator GLC
gas ehrom"raph
~y~OZ electrode.
H20 scrubber
C02 xrubber
Lrce pu
IvaN
1~
valves u
bber diaphragm pump
Fto. 1. Chamber configuration used for gas uptake studies.
. eontroi
o . amhwtrLzON
pyrazols
e.CC4
i
\
\
/`.&k-(t~w"
U.~OYui-v
e e A
,w 40 TIME (min0utee) 120
Fta. 9. Semilogarithmic plots of chamber concentration vcrsus time for rats pretreated with
pyrazole,
aminotriazole and CCI.. The rate constants for the slow phase on a weight basis were: controls,
0.272 hr' kg-'; aminotriazole, 0.096 hr' kg-'; pyrazole, 0.037 hr' kg-'; and CCl 0.020 hr'
kg''. The total weights of the nine rats used in each of these exposures were, respectively, 2.33, ,
2.11, 2.05, and 2.15 kg. -
FROM ANDERSEN ET, AL T,A,P, ~,7, 395-409, 1979
340

Table I. Respiratory Hypersensitivity from Industrial
Chemicals
Industrial
Compound Symptoms Reference
,
:Cement dust Asthma ' Kobayashi, 1974
----- -----------dyspnea, cyano- - 1946
sis ;
~ .
Amprolium hydro- Asthma ; Greene and Freedman,
chloride ---- i _---- 1976
Beryllium Rhinitis, cough, Hardy and Tabershaw,
1979
Diphenylmethane __Zeiss et al., -1980;
diisocyanate (tIDI) j Konzen et al.,
I 1966 "
lChloramine _ _----Asthma I
- - - - - - Bourne et al.
i .. -- - ~ -
i
iEnflurane
I
:Ethylenediamine
Formalin
Naphthylene diiso-
cyanate
cyanate
; Ilickel sulfate
I
Persulfate salts
Phenyiglycine acid
chloride
Phenylmercuric pro-
. prionate
Asthna
Asthma '
Asthma (
I
Asthma '
I
Asthma
f
Asthma, derma-
titis :
As thma I
,
I
i
Asthma, urticaria
I
:Phthalic anhydride
i
Asthma, rhinitis
i
2
Schwettmann and
Casterline, 1976
Lam and Chan-°eung,
1980
Hendrick and Lane,
1975
Harries et al., 1979 -
McConnell et al.,
1973
Pepys et al., 1976
Baur et al. , 1979
Kammermeyer and
Mathews, 1973
Koszewski and'Hub-
bard, 1956;
Mathews, 1968;
Morris, 1960
Kern, 1939; Piaccia
et al., 1976
346

Pulmonary Edema
Pathway of normal
pulmonary fluid resorption
-
Central
perivascular
and interstitial
spaces ~
' Thin Thick
l ' ' side side +~~ t
' Interalveolar septum
,, Lymph
Lymphatics cuats
-Surfactant layer
Capillary endothelium
Basement membrane (fused)
Type I pneumocyte Alveolar
epithelium
Type II pneumocyte
359

Hypothesis of the Role of
a,-Antitrypsin
A. a,-Antilrypsin present
In sufficient amount
Circulating granulocyte
Proteolytic enzyme (trypsin)
a,-Antitrypsin
Granulocyte engulfing and
digesting bacteria and/or
particulate matter
Granulocyte lysed, releasing
proteolytic enzymes
Proteolytic enzymes
inactivated by
a,-antitrypsin
Granulocyte lysed, releasing
proteolytic enzymes
Proteolytic enzymes
attack lung parenchyma; .
alveolar walls and
respiratory bronchioles
weakened, resulting in
panacinar emphysema
Emphysema with a,-antitrypsin
deficiency tends to be more
marked at base, probably due to
gravity-induced increase in perfusion
and sequestration of granulocytes
355

B. PULMONARY IRRITANT
I) DEFINITION: CHEMICAL/ WHICH WHEN INHALED WILL STIMULATE
SENSORY RECEPTORS WITHIN THE LUNG AND INCREASE RESPIRATORY
RATE WITH A DECREASE IN TIDAL VOLUME RESULTING IN RAPID
SHALLOW BREATHING. THEIR ACTION, AS OPPOSED TO THAT OF
SENSORY IRRITANTS. OR BRONCHOCONSTRICTORS EVOKE A SENSATION
OF DYSPNEA AND BREATHLESSNESS RATHER THAN A CONSCIOUS
PAINFUL SENSATION$
II) OTHER CHARACTERISTICS: THESE CHEMICALS ARE CAPABLE OF
INDUCING PULMONARY EDEMA WHICH IS THEN ACCOMPANIED BY
PAINFUL BREATHING, THEY HAVE NO OR LITTLE ACTION AS SENSORY
IRRITANTS OF THE EYE OR NASAL PASSAGES AT CONCENTRATION
SUFFICIENT FOR PULMONARY IRRITATION AND, THEREFORE THEY
PROVIDE LITTLE WARNING OF THEIR PRESENCE. SOME HAVE ODORANT
OR GUSTATORY QUALITIES AND SOME EXERT A BRONCHOCONSTRICTING
ACTION.
III) EQUIVALENT TERMS TO DESCRIBE THEIR ACTION: LOWER
RESPIRATORY IRRITANT, LUNG IRRITANT, DEEP LUNG IRRITANT.
IV) TYPICAL EXAMPLES: PHOSGENE, NITROGEN DIOXIDE, SULFURIC ACID
MIST, OZONE, SULFUR AND NITROGEN MUSTARD, SULFUR
PENTAFLUORIDE, CADMIUM FUMES.
~,unn ~ j~~ UJ 1h~t~
~.~-----
342

H. Lucia, C. S. Barrow, M. F. Stock and Y. Alarie
Ethmoid Sinus I
with Turbinates (7) I
v
r
Direct Passage
to Pharynx
. 1
I
~
SECTIONS
3 i 2
I `. _i __ I
`~ External Nares
(Squamous)
~Maxilloturbinate
`~'Maxillary Sinus
~'Canine
--Canal from Nose
to Mouth (Squamous)
Figure 1. Parasagital view of the nore, showing the sections used In proc-
e.uing and for microscopic examination.
SECTION t
EXTERNAL NARES
Nasaturbinate
~
Pseudo-
stratif ied Maxil lary
Calumnar-° Sinus
Epithelium -Maxillo-
turbinate
-- C' &.I::::
M
y
Bone
"'-Squamous Epithelium
Figure 3. Corone/ section #2, normal anatomy.
SECTION 3
Figure 2 Coronal section st l, normal anatomy.
H. Lucia, C. S. Barrow, M. F. Stock and Y. Alarie
k
t
A sessing Damage Sustained by Upper Respiratory Tract of Laboratory Moua~
SECTION 2 - RESPIRATORY
,Olfactory Mucosa
Nasal Bone-, Frontal
' '
'
; // I I
!YJ ~r '\
I ' '
P late
t .
1
I
SECTION 4
Skull---; .Brain
, , -Ethmoid Sinus
Columnar
Epithelium
Psaudosirutitied ,
Cartilage-,
Nasal Bone ~
Jaw
Muscules
-
Palate
-i-Saucmaus Epithelium
Figure 4. Corona/ section #3, normal anatomy.
Table 1. Rating System for Evaluation of the Damage Due to
Exposure to Airborne Chemicals in the Upper Respiratory
Tract of Mice.
0 no damage seen at 24 hours
1+ 1-50% of the mucosa is damaged, but underlying
tissues are intact '
Cartilage--I 1 Palate
LDirect Passage `J`MOlar
to Pharynx
fonly Nomaeactory Muee.al
Figure & Coronal section #4, normal anatomy
2+ 25-75% of the mucosa is destroyed, and some
damage to the submucosa is noted
3+ 50-99% of the mucosa is destroyed, and there
is damage to the submucosa and underlying
support structures
4+ 100% of the mucosa is destroyed and there is
extensive destruction of all underlying
tissues
Anteriatmost
Ethmoid --Olfaetory
Turbinate , Muaosa
, : Nasoturbioate
_ rna.mary eone
FOR BETTER FIGURES, SEE BUCKLEY et al., T.A.P. 74, 417-429, 1984.
329

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (continued)
Acute bagassosis: small nodular and miliary Chronic bagassosis: intense fibrosis and bulious
densities throughout both lungs. Deposits may emphysema after many episodes ot respiratory
be more hazy and homogeneous in some cases Illness during 9 years of industrial exposure
c
Tissue reaction in bagassosis.
Alveolar walls thickened with
infiltrate of plasma cells
and lymphocytes. Some alveolar
spaces contain edema fluid
and desquamated histiocytes
with vacuolated cytoplasm.
High-power section inset
above shows macrophages with
vacuolated cytoplasm filling
alveolar space
:rj~ ' Extensive subpieural and
~
i
1
.
nteraiveofar fibrosis
ith i
fi
w
n
ammatory cell
infiltration character-
istic of advanced stage
of farmer's lung (low-
power section)
351

EMPHYSEM
Normal Lung Acinu.
(Secondary Lobute)
Terminal bronchiole
Septum of acinus
7st order
2nd order Respiratory
bronchioles
3rd order
Alveolar ducts
Alveolar sacs
Centriacinar
(Centrilobular)
Emphysema
Distended respiratory
bronchioles of all
orders communicating
with one another
Panacinar
(Panlobular)
Emphysema
All airways and alveoli
involved with breakdown
of dividing walls
r
353

Centriacinar
(Centrilobular)
Emphysema
Magnified section.
Distended, inter-
communicating,
saclike spaces
in central area
of acini
Microscopic section.
Distention of airspaces
with rupture of
alveolar walls
Gross specimen.
Involvement tends to
be most marked in
upper part of lung
354

Pulmonary Defenses
Against Oxidant and
Other Noxious Injuries
M
X
F
E
Q
Inhaled
High 02
Ozone (O3)
NOZ
Pho`-ige'ne
~ Type I cells
Damaged or destroyed
(more susceptible
5q to injury) _
.7
Btoodborne
Busulfan
Thiourea
Olei~-_'1' J/
a
a
fi
Gtydolysis -
GI ucose--rt GI ucose-6-P-
t
I ceqs
Pentose shunt
a 6-P-gluconate
6-P-GD~_,COz
Ribulose-5-P
9
*- H+-.NADPH NADP
c
Lacfate~-YPyruvate
G-6-PD
Oxal\acetate
Oxidized
glutathione
Hydroxy
fatty acid
Reduced
glutathione
Fatty acid tSSS-- Poly-
peroxide ~ unsaturated
fatty acid
/ a-Tocopherol (vit. E); may
Malate --'-r H+-~ ~' protect against peroxidation
Type il cells
Proliferated
(resistance ! ~
increased Ill{
to high oxidant { `
exposure)
)
358

.-+
V
501190 6553

Complicateo sillcasis.
Maemve librosis and
Conglomerete noClpation.
Plewa mitkeneo.
noEulaleC. and aaheaive
~+J~i~
TS/~;GSA
Typical aNicotlC nodule.
ConCentnc ("onionekui')
m ol colla
en liban
arran
m
g
ge
. - 4
a
$oma of which are hyanmzeC
Complicated allkosu. Eatensive flbrotic
opacificatwn with hyperlucency at baaes
361

Mechanism of Type 1(Immediate) Hypersensitivity
I
A. Genetically atopic patient
exposed to specific antigen
(ragweed pollen illustrated)
Light chain
Heavy chain
Disulfide bonds
~F, fragment
F,, fragment
Cytotropism
6. Plasma cells In iymphoid
tissue of respiratory mucosa
release immune globulin E (IgE)
Smooth muscle
contraction
Mucous gland
hypersecretion
Increased capillary
permeability and
inflammatory reaction
Eosinophii attraction
C. Mast cells and basophils
sensitized by attachment of
IgE to cell membrane
E. Antigen reacts with
antibody (IgE)- on membrane
of sensitized mast cells
and/or basophils which
respond by secreting
pharmacologic mediators ,
VaguS nerve
F. End-organ (airway) response compounded
by nonspecific reactions (ciiiostasis,
, particle retention, and cell Injury)
FROM F, NETTER, CIBA COLLECTION, VOL. 7
SRS-A
(slow-reacting
substance of
anaphyiaxis)
ECF-A
(eosinophii
chemotactic factor
of anaphylaxis)
---- Prostaglandins
? ---- Serotonin
? -f---- Kinins
348

I
Silicotubercutosis
Tuberculosis with cavitation superimposed on sittcosis
Caplan's Syndrome (Rheumatoid Pneumoconiosis)
~ ~.
s.
Section through margin of Caplan's nodule.
A = necrotic central area, B = clefts,
C= zone of fibroblasts and inflammatory cells,
D = collagen
362
Silicotuberculosis. Supervention
of tuberculosis on silicosis may be
difficult or impossible to recognize
radiographically
Caplan's nodules of various
sizes In lung with silicotie
nodules and coal dust
deposits
; Caplan's nodules in both
lungs with some evidence of
i diffuse fibrosis

5D44D 6561
Pulmonary Edema; Some Etiologies and Hypotheses of Mecharusms
Brain lesion
(trauma,
hemorrhage)
Systemic
vasoconsiriction
with shift of blood
to pulmonary
circulalion
I
Pulmonary
arterial
hypertension
Narcotic
High altitude
overdose
y Contaminants Hypopyrfusion
Hypovenlilation I '
Hypoxemia r----~ Increased
i
Nonuniform arterlolar
constriction
f
Nonuniform transmission o/
pressure to capillary bed
HzO
Hp0 I Hz0
Alveolar edema
~~lerstitial
®
Noxious gas
inhalation
permeabnity
Impaired
ventilation
a
'Y.
a,
W,
1
Altered blood
osmolalily
S
Pulmonary veins
L. heart
failure or
obstruction
Pulmonary
venous
hypertension

Coal Worker's Lung
Whcle lung thin section with massive black
deposits as well as smaller nodules, necrotic
areas, and emphysematous changes
363
Slightly magnified detail of lung
showing indurated coal nodules
Microscopic section through a coal
nodule. There are large amounts of
coaldust, both intracellular and
extracellular, with irregularly
arranged collagen fibers near an
artery (fibrosis)
,~' .Yo-v
r' S c CIBA
Chest x-ray film of retired coal
miner showing massive upper lobe
lesions, sometimes referred to as
"angel wings"; also associated
nodular disease

SATURATION
(Y 70e.V"e , ' p 1063) - '
2
'
~
C2H4 (0.85)
1 ...... ....... ».. 1
C2H4 0.14
N20 0.47
C3H6 0.47
Halothane 2.60
Ether 15.0
I
10 3 50
MINUTES
DESATURATION
:
r.
..
~ ..........................
10 350
MINUTES
FIGURE 4. Relation between equilibration rates predicted from blood-air partition
coefficients and shape of saturation and desaturation curves. To calculate the equilibra-
tion curves (values indicated in parenthesis), the following blood-gas partition coef(i-
cients were substituted into Equation 21: 0.14 for ethylene, 0.47 for nitrous oxide and
cyclopropane, 2.6 for hafothane, and 13 for ethyl ether. The saturation and desatura-
tion curves were simulated by Eger." For saturation, alveolar concentrations are ex-
pressed as fractions of the exposure concentration. For desaturation, the ratios of al-
veolar concentration at time interval t (minutes after the end of exposure) to alveolar
concentration at the end of exposure, c., are used. (Adapted from Eger, E. f., ff, in
Uptake and Distribution of Anesthefia Agents, l?apper, E. M. and Kitz, R. !., Eds..
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1963, chap. 8.3Vith permission.) -
ALVEOLAR
VENTILATION PERFUSION ..... AR.TERIAL..I3.LOOD.
.
........................~
Inspir.
a. ...................:
a = DEAD SPACE
a m . .................
J 1?
PaW
GV
LG p- VRG
J f I 1 I'~_~JI iPVaG
.......Pmix-ven f
Vart
FG
(7
VFG
TCFG
.I
.3 : ether (0.05)
.,
r--~
.2
.i f' .
r . -
6
CgH6 (0.63) 9
I-S -- ~.4 V
U t1
~ .7 r halothane (0.26) ~ r7
.6 r V .6
a t '' V
Q
U .5'
FIGURE 10. Schematic comparison of the physiological multicompartment model and its electrical
analogue. Related parameters are listed opposite each other in Table 5. The abbreviations LG, VRG,
MG, and FG are explained in Table 4. The partial pressure, p (analogue of voltage, V); can be
replaced by concentrations divided by appropriate partition coefficients or Expla-
nation in text.
FR0"i REFERENCE 1.
339
MG
IRaG

E. ESTABLISHING TLV
a) TYPES OF DATA
0 HUMAN EXPOSURE, LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
0 ANIMALS ACUTE EXPOSURE
0 ANIMALS LONG-TERM EXPOSURE
0 HUMANS EXPOSED ON THE JOB
0 HUMANS EXPOSED ACCIDENTALLY
0 REPORTS FROM INDUSTRIAL HYGLENISTS
0 REPORTS FROM PHYSICIANS
TLV ARE UNDER CONTINUOUS REVIEW
b) TYPES OF EFFECT
0 ANY TYPE OF EFFECT CAN BE CONSIDERED
0 ALSO "GOOD HOUSEKEEPING"
0 NO TLV ABOVE lOmg/m3 FOR DUST
-__~l
0 NO TLV ABOVE, 1,000 ppm FOR GASES
OR VAPORS (EXCEPT C02, TLV = 5,000 ppm).
C) TLV ARE NOT TOXIC INDICES
394

Bronchogenic Carcinoma:
Epidermoid (Squamous Cell) Type
Low power (H and E); nests
of tumor cells separated by
fibrous bands. Keratin (horn)
pearls present
`- A& -}
b }.
High power: nuclear
pleomorphism and individual
cell keratinization (pink)
368
Tumor
typical ly
located
near hilus. projecting ]
into bronchi
-
Cytologic smear from sputum or broncho-
scopic scraping. Ce{Is with dark nuclei and
cytoplasm strongly pink because of keratin

Etiologic Agents in Hypersensitivity Pneumoni5s
i
Disease
Farmer's lung
Y-r-
r
agassosis
Mushroom picker's disease
Humidifier, air-conditioner or
heating system disease
Fog fever (cattle)
Maple bark stripper's disease
Sequoiosis
Suberosis
Paper mill worker's disease
Pulpwood handler's disease
Brewer's or malt worker's lung
Cheese washer's lung
Paprika slicer's disease
Wheat thresher's lung or grain
measurer's lung
Pigeon breeder's disease
Budgerigar fancier's disease
Chicken handler's or feather
plucker's disease
Turkey handler's disease
Pituitary snuff disease
Smallpox handler's lung
Thatched roof disease (Papuan or
New Guinea lung)
Tobacco grower's disease
Joiner'sdisease
Tea grower's disease
Bible printer's disease
Coptic or mummy disease
Detergent disease (asthmalike
symptoms-true pneumonitis not
identified)
Furrier's lung
Coffee worker's lung
'
Doghouse disease
Lycopenlonosis
Antigen
Micropolyspora faenf,
Thermoactinomyces vulgaris
L saccharil
and possibly other organisms
M. faeni, TT vulgarfs
Thermophilic actinomycetes and
otherorganisms
Same as farmer's lung
CryptosUoma corticale
Graphium, Pullularia, Aureobasidium
pullulans and otherfungi
Penicillium species
Altemaria
Same as above
Aspergillus clavatus, A. fumigatus
P. casef
Mucorstofonifer Sitopht7us granarius
Avian proteins
Parakeet proteins
Chicken proteins
Turkey proteins
Porcine, bovine proteins
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Bacillus subtilis
Unknown
Coffee bean dust
Aspergillus versfcofor
Unknown
PuUularia
water
' Exposure
Moldy hay or grain
Stored sugar cane fiber
(bagasse)
Moldy vegetable compost
Contaminated forced air
system
Moldy hay
Maple tree logs or bark
Redwood sawdust
Moldy cork dust
Moldy wood pulp
Moldywood pulp
Malt or barley dust
CI(eese mold -
Moldy paprika pods
Wheat flour containing
weevils
Pigeon serum and
droppings
Contact with parakeets
Contact with chickens
Contact with turkeys
Porcine, bovine pituitary
gland (Pitressin snuff)
Smallpox scabs
Dried grass and leaves
Tobacco plants
Sawdust
Tea plants
Moldy typesetting water
Cloth wrappings of
mummies
Enzyme detergents
Animal hairs
Coffee beans
Moldy straw
Puffball spores
(Lycoperclonpyriform)
_
i /Sauna-taker's disease Contaminated sauna bath
'F
350

Mesothelioma of Pleura
Neoplastic growth encasing right lung, :
infiltrating interlobar fissure, and
invading parietal pleura and pericardium.
Hemorrhagic fluid in remainder of
pleural cavity. Asbestosis of lung
Fibrosarcomatous type
of tumor
Epithelial cell type Mottled shadow over r. lung area with effusion.
of tumor In advanced cases, lung may be totally obscired
tn
0
t
w
0
rn
Ln
N
O
369

t
Pulmonary Siderosis
Iron dust inhalation is believed to be relatively
benign, producing little change other than
brick-red discoloration unless mixed with other
dusts (chiefly silica, silicates, and/or carbon).
The mild fibrosis, nodulation, and emphysema
shown are probably due to such admixture
Vri
a~'.5
~,.
. 7.~.~4.
~
. ..'.MC.
Mixed-Dust Fibrosis
Fibrosis surrounding deposits of iron oxide,
carbon, and silica. found in sandblasters,
steel dressers, oxyacetylene cutters, and
welders long exposed to such mixed dusts
~. ~ '
~
''
y
?
j+''
=
,
.-,~ .. ,,,.-'
.aY ~
4 ~''ilr,~'
.
i~,yy
~. o( ' ,
i
A
y
':+!~~~.'SiM
e: S
Y
`ir .' ,
-
:
~Y~
!
S,
l
.. '._\Lir
{
'
~~
~: ^~' :.._. !-,M~..+.l3~ 1\.t'.2
r.li
i
Tungsten Inhalation Effects
Cellular infiltration and increased
collagen in lung interstitium.
Alveoli show epithelial metaplasia
and contain cellular exudate
with some multinucleated cells
: Nickel Inhalation Effects
quamous cell carcinoma with overlying
metaplastic bronchial mucosa, believed
attributable to this metal
365~

Copyright 1978 by American Conference of t3overn-
mental Industrial Hygienists.
The American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists will welcome requests for permission to re-
publish or reprint these Threshold Umit Values. Re-
quests for such permission should be directed to the
Executive Secretary, P.O. Box 1937, Cincinnati, Ohio
45201.
PRICE EACH
1-49 ................................. ...................... $1.50
50-199 .................................................... 1.25
200-999 .................................................. 1.10
1004-4999 ............................................... .75
5000 or more ............................................ .65
Documentation of the Threshold Lfmit Values for Sub-
stances in Workroom Air.® A separate companion piece
to the Chemical TLVs is Issued by ACGIH under this title.
This publication gives the pertinent scientific information
and data with reference to literature sources that were
used to base each limit. Each documentation also con-
tains a statement defining the type of response against
which the limit Is safeguarding the worker. For a better
understanding of the TLVs it is essential that the Docu-
mentation be consulted when the TLVs are being used.
Information concerning the availability of copies of
the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for
Substances In Workroom Air should be directed to the
Executive Secretary, ACGIH (third edition, fourth print-
ing,1978, $20.00). '
TLVs®
Threshold Limit Values
for
Chemical
Substances in
Workroom Air
Adopted by
ACGIH
for 1978
~
0
c
a
0
rn
~
a
Ln
i
374

XI. FEDERAL HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES ACT: FROM PRINCIPLES AND
PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING THE TOXICITY OF HOUSEHOLD SUB-
STANCES. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1977.
) TOXIC: SHALL APPLY TO ANY SUBSTANCE (OTHER THAN RADIO-
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE) WHICH HAS THE CAPACITY TO PRO-
DUCE PERSONAL INJURY OR ILLNESS TO MAN THROUGH
INGESTION, INHALATION, OR ABSORPTION THROUGH ANY
BODY SURFACE.
) HIGHLY TOXIC: MEANS ANY SUBSTANCE WHICH FALLS WITHIN ANY
OF THE FOLLOWING CATEGORIES.
A. ORAL: 50mg/kgOR LESS, RATS
B. INHALATION: PRODUCES DEATH WITHIN
14 DAYS IN HALF OR MORE THAN HALF OF
A GROUP OF 10 OR MORE LABORATORY WHITE
RATS EACH WEIGHING BETWEEN 200 AND 300
GRAMS, WHEN INHALED CONTINUOUSLY FOR A
PERIOD OF 1 HOUR OR LESS AT AN ATMOS-
PHERIC CONCENTRATION OF 200 PARTS PER
MILLION BY VOLUME OR LESS OF GAS OR
VAPOR OR 2 MILLIGRAMS PER LITER BY VOLUME
OR LESS OF MIST OR DUST, PROVIDED SUCH
CONCENTRATION IS LIKELY TO BE ENCOUNTERED
BY MAN WHEN THE SUBSTANCE IS USED IN ANY
REASONABLY FORESEEABLE MANNER.
C. SKIN: 200 mg/kg, RABBITS
395

criteria f ®r a recommended standard. . . .
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE
TO
~ ~D5 W ''DiISOCYANATES
~-
1~-
7<
~
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
Center for Disease Control
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
September 1978
rn
~
m
m
387

Classification of Bronchogenic Carcinoma (= 95% of All Lung Carcinoma)
Epidermoid (squamous cell) Small cell anaplastic (oat cell) Adenocarcinoma Large cell anaplestic
EK~ ~k
'.f,',~ ,ey4.
'1p1
WIM,
+S. `t~~';`.YT].
Relatively slow
Late; then primarily
to hilar nodes
Fair
Hitar; but
metastasea
often
present
when
first dis-
covered
r_'r~, , '"
0 50% 100%
Peripheral
(usually
< 4 cm)
k
w
a
0 50% 100%
O
Variable;
peripheral
or
central
4' /6CIBA
0 Moderate Great Moderate Great Moderate Great
Very rapid Intermediate Rapid
Very early; to mediastinum
or distally Intermediate Early
0 Poor Poor
0999 Q6h0S

o,
m
~
0
r
0
~
I
CONTENTS
PREFACE
REVIEW CONSULTANTS
FEDERAL AGENCIES
L RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A DIISOCYANATES STANDARD
Section f - Environmental (Workplace Air)
Section 2 - Medical
Section 3 - Labeling and Posting
Section 4- Personal Protective Equipment and Clothing
Section S- Informing Employees of Hazards from
Diisocyanates
Section 6 - Work Practices
Section 7 - Sanitation
Section 8 - Monitoring and Recordkeeping
ii. INTRODUCTION
III. BIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE
Extent of Exposure
Historical Reports
Effects on Humans
Epidemiologic Studies
Animal Toxicity
Correlation of Exposure and Effect
Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity, Teratogenicity, and
Effects on Reproduction
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
Environmental Concentrations
Engineering Controls
Sampling and Analysis
V. WORK PRACTICES
VI. DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD
Basis for Previous Standards
Basis for the Recommended Standard
vii
388
Page
iii
v
vi
I
2
2
4
5

Transactions -1964
parative Theoretical Approach and Its Applications With Regards
to Exposure Monitoring. tnt. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health
38:231-246 (1977).
33. Ramsey, I-C., J.D. Young, R.J. Karbowski et al: Pharmacokinetics
of Inhaled Styrene in Human Volunteers. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 53:54-63 (1980).
34. Fields, R.L. and S.W. Horstman: Biomonitoring of Industrial
Styrene Exposures. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. 1. 40:451-459 (1979).
35. Bauer, D. and M. Guillemim Human Exposure to Styrene. I. The
gas chromatographic determination of urinary phenylglyoxylic
acid using diazomethane derivatization. Int. Arch. Occup.
Environ. Health 37:47-55 (1976).
36. Bardodej, Z., B. Malek, B. Volfova and E. Zelena: The Hazard
of Styrene in the Production of Glass Laminates. Ceskosloven-
ska Hygiena 5:541-546 (1960). 37. Karbowski, R.J. and W.H, Braun: Quantitative Determination
of Styrene in Biological Samples and Expired Air by Gas
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometery (Selected Ion Monitoring).
1. Chromatog. 160:141-145 (1978).
Ann. Am. Con/ Ind. Byg. VoL I! (1584)
Pagc 118
386

Asbestosis'i /
M
m
W
rid
~tiI?~>~4-,
1
J
rj
'_
~' `Extensive fibrosis with emphysematous
changes and great pleural thickening:
~ visceral, parietal, and diaphragmatic.
Lower lobe predominantly involved
'
17
r~(
.
r
r
i
®
.~
AY
li
FZM
I!f
©
6'
!
~ .
~
1
~ . .
.. '.~-. %i
F.. ,
IM Vf
,
E AE
Section of moderately advanced asbestosis with
extensive fibrosis and distorted alveoli. Asbestos
bodies (some fragmented) in airspaces and
interstitium. Also a few asbestos fibers
364
Oblique chest x-ray film. Calcified pleural
plaques and irregular densities, chiefly in
tower part of lungs
Pleural plaques in pulmonary asbestosis
"a , 41' ~.~sy1
Ilt
Asbestos bodies in sputum
i

~-Pr
~
AIR QUALITY CRITERIA FOR SULFUP' .1XIDES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Pape
Preface
....................................................................................................
.
Introduction ................... .. ...................................
................................ iii
x
1 Physical and Chemical Properties and the Atmospheric Reactions
of the Oxides of Sulfur
..................................:....................---.................. 1
2 Sources and Methods of Measurements of Sulfur Oxides in the
Atmosphere .................. .. ........................................
............................... 17
3 Atmospheric Concentrations of Sulfur Oxides ...................................... 31
4 Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere on Materials .................. 49
5 Effects of Sulfur Oxides in the Atmosphere on Vegetation .................. 59
6 Toxicological Effects of Sulfur Oxides on Animals .............................. 71
7 Toxicological Effects of Sulfur Oxides on Man .................................... 89
8 Combined Effects of Experimental Exposures to Sulfur Oxides and
Particulate Matter on Man and Animals .......... ................................... 103
9 Epidemioloe cal Appraisal of Sulfur Oxides ... ..... ...... ........................ 113
10 Summary and Conclusions ...........................
.......................................... 151
Appendicea
A Symbols .......................................................... ........
................................... 164
B Abbreviations
............................................................................................ 165
C Conversion Factors
.................................................................................... 166
D Glossary ............................................................................
.......................... 167
Author Index
.............................................................................................. 172
Subject Index
.............................................................................................. 175
~ Aeknowledgements
..................---..........................:.................................. 178

POLLUTANTS continued
Table 1
National ambient air quaiity standards
Pollutant Averaging
time Primary'D
standards Secondary
standards
SO2 Annual 80µg/m'
arithmetic mean (0.03 ppm)
24 hr 365pg1m'
(0.14 ppm)
3hr - , 1300pglm'
Total
Annual
75yglm' (0.5 ppm)
60pglm'
suspended
particulate geometric mean
24 hr
260Pg/m' .
150Pg/m'
Lead Quarterly i.5pg/mx Same as primary
average standard
CO 8 hr 10 mglm' Same as primary
3
1 hr
1 hr (9 ppm)
40 mgJm'
(35 ppm)
235µg1m'tl . standard
Same as primary
(0.12 ppm) standard
Total 3 hr 160Nglm3° Same as primary
nonmethane (0.24 ppm). standard
hydrocarbons
Nitrogen
Annual
100pg/m'
Same as primary
dioxide arithmetic mean (0.05 ppm) standard
°Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register36 (84), 8197 (April30, 1971).
bNational standards other than ozone and those based on annual arithmetic means or annual geometric
means are not be be exceeded
more than once per year. The ozone standard is written so that the average number of days per year
above the standard must be less than
or equal to one.
`Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register 43 (194), 46246-46277 (October 5, 1978).
dEnvironmental Protection Agency, Federal Register 44 (28), 8202-8237 (February 8, 1979).
°A planning standard used to develop ozone control strategies.
Table 2
Prevention of significant deterioration increment levels in pglm'
Pollutant
Total
suspended
particulate
Sulfur
dioxide Averaging time
Annual
average
24 hr
average -
Annual
average . '
24hr
average
3 hr
average Class I
5
10
2
5
25 Class ff
19
,
37
20
91
512 Class Ill
37
75
40
182
700
38 : FEBRUARY 1980 393

aels
STYRENE, monomer
CAS 100-42-5
CH6HSCHCH2
RECOMMENDED BEI
indices
Mandelic acid in urine
Styrene in mixed-exhaled air
Phenylglyoxylic acid in urine
' Styrene in mixed exhaled air
(confirmatory test)
'* Styrene in venous blood
(confirmatory test)
CH=CH=
Time
BEI Current
Experience
End of shift G 1 g/L or below Satisfactory
G 0.8 g1g of creatinine
Prior to shift 40 ppb or below Satisfactory
End of shift G 250 mg/L or below Satisfactory
G 240 mg/g of creatinine
During shift 18 ppm or below Satisfactory
End of shift 0.55 mg/L or below Fair
Prior to shift 0.02 mg/L or below
Physical Properties
Highly soluble in fat, poorly soluble in water (0.3 mg/mL
at 20°C). Partition coefficients at 37°C:11i water/gas 4.5;
blood/gas 55; oiVgas 5000. At room temperature styrene is
present as vapor, saturated vapor pressure is 5.8 torr.
Absorption
Inhalation absorption is most significant. Pulmonary reten-
tion levels off at 65°k.1=a1 Skin absorption is significanL'°
Possible Nonoccupational Exposure
Uncommon. (Present in a do-it yourself auto body patching
compound).
Elimination
The major elimination pathway is metabolic clearance.
Only a small fraction of pulmonary uptake is exhaled un-
changed after exposure. Urinary excretion of unchanged
styrene is negligible. Because of high solubility in fat, it ac-
cumulates in the body over the workweek.,&r
Metabolic Pathways
The metabolic pathways for styrene are shown in Figure
3. Metabolism of styrene is capacity-limited. Landry et a/te,
show that elimination of styrene in man follows first-order
kinetics up to exposure concentrations of 80 ppm. At ex-
posure concentrations above 200 ppm, metabolic pathways
become saturated and styrene concentrations in tissues and
styrene mandelic phenylglyoxylic
glycol acid acid
~HZOH 'OOH COOH
_*10X urine
f00H ~ONHCH2COOH
benzoic
acid
Figure 3 - Metabolic pathways of styrene.
OH CHOH C=0
hippuric
acid
Ann. Am. Con(. lrtd. Xyg.. VaG 11 (1984) 381 _ P+qe 113

X. STANDARDS FOR A11d8ORNE GUNIAMINANIb
I
50490 6571
~Y-
Standards, Definitions, and Promulgating Agencies for Airborne Contaminant Standards
Standard Responsible Agency Definition ~
Threshold Limit Value American Conference of Govern- "The time-weighted average concentration for a
normal 8-
(TLV)- Time-Weighted mental Industrial Hygienists hour workday or 40-hour workweek, to which earl
all
Average (TWA) workers, may be repeatedly exposed, day after day, with-
out adverse effect." ** (2)
Threshold Limit Value- American Conference of Govern- "The'concentration that should not be exceeded
even
Ceiling (TLV-C) mental Industrial Hygienists instantaneously." (2)
Sliort-Term Exposure American Conference of Govern- "The maximal concentration to which workers can
be'exposed
Limit (STEL) mental Industrial Hygienists for a period of up to 15 minutes continuously without
suffering from 1) intolerable irritation, 2) chronic or
. irreversible tissue change, or 3) narcosis....provided that
no more than four excursions per.day are pormitted ... The
STEL should be considered a maximal allowable concentration
or absolute
ute ceiling, not to be exceeded..." (2)
Exposure Occupational Safety and Set in accordance with Sec 6(b)5 of Public Law 91-596 "..
Limit (PEL) ' Health'Administration standard which most adequately assures to the extent feas-
O~ ibTe, on the basis of the best available evidence, that no
~
~"'17 employee will suffer material impairment of health or func-
l
l
h
l
ti
it
if
h
ona
capac
y, even
suc
oyee
as regu
ar exposure
emp
~
~
~~ to the hazard dealt with by such standard for the period of
"
. his working life.
(6)
Emergency Exposure Committee on Toxicology, "The EEL for short-term exposure to an airborne
contaminant
Limit (EEL)
National Academy of s a concentration which, when inhaled for a specified
is
single, brief period, rare In
the lifetime of an individual
a period of disability or inte
is believed not to result In
forence with the performance of his assigned task." (7)
Air Quality
' Environmental Protection
"They prescribe pollutant exposures or levels of effect tha
Standard (AQS) Agency should not be exceeded
nes
a political jurisdiction determi
~~
(8)
in a specific geographic area...
** Tlle 1968 TLVs (as 8-hour TWA) have been designated as consensus standards by OSHA until a PEL is
established for any given compound,
From: A.I.H.A. Journal 40, 207-229, 1979.
,
r-
t
I

i ~ .
~~
~
s
, ~t.~ f»c
r i
~~ Cadmium
+
I
h
l
ti
n
a
a
on
7~~~ ~
AA
®
do
C~~a~t Lw1~ I.~` _ 2
Acute effect of cadmium inhalation: metaplasia .
of alveolar epithelium. Acute inflammation of the
tracheobronchial tree and upper respiratory tract
may also occur
Renal effects
of chronic
cadmium
poisoning.
PAS-positive
cast material
in tubules
Effects
Bullous emphysema with
consolidation at base
possibly attributable to
chronic cadmium inhalation
is d . a ,,.,ip- 1~ " 0
i
I
~ ~ V.3.
R.~~.t~:~+ , ® ~!
; :
f
~ r j
p
~ ~
~
-'
,
r
~
;
~
_. ®~~ yt ~~!
l44946N ' ~ il`~~ ff '
1 ts.,a,Y:~ ~
p JM-At?T . 1 ~ -
W ~; ~ ~ . . ~,,,: .
~~` ~, ~
d _. ., _ :. r. ~ ~ . ..
~
Granuloma with interstitial fibrosis
resembling sarcoidosis: central
deposition of endothelioid cells,
some multinucleated, with
surrounding cuff of lymphocytes
and fibrous tissue. Skin and other
tissues may show similar lesions.
High-power inset above shows
detail of giant cells containing
Schaumann bodies
366

50450 5591
~
OSMA/A(,'GIM SU9STAaCETOXICITY REPORT
FILF COvTFO Nv qURSTANCE 0
FIELn
NO CODE SUBqTANCE
-- ----- ------------------ ----------------------
S Pn005 AMATf,
13 0010 ACETAIOEMYOE %
"196~
13 0020 ACETIC ACID ~Ov
G
'9(17
13 0030 ACETIC ANMYOyIDE
7 0060 ACETANE
4 0060 aCETONITRII.E
PMY
ST
A -
------------- 1'--- --------------------
OiNA PEL
PPM M(i/N7 ACGIN PEL HEALTH HA7AR0 PP" M4/M3 CATEGORY -
R NONE
NONf
2S
2n
L 1000 2400
L 40 T0 .
1 C006S 2-ACETYLAMINO£LUORENE S STO 1910,1014
16 0070 ACETVLENE 0 NONE NONE
3 0080 ACETYLENE TETRABROMIDE L 1 14
1] 0110 ACROLEIN I. 0.1 0.25
6 011+ ACRYLAMIDE - SKIN S 0,3
4 0120 ACRYLONITRILE - SKiN L 20 45
10
A C 5
1000
40
06/29/76 PAGE 3
--------- ----------
(CYANOSIS)
NONE NONE CANCER
A F - SIMPLE ASPHYXIATION
1 14 CUMULATIVE LIVER t
LIING DAMAGE
0.1 0.25 MARKEDIRRITATION -
EYE, NbSE.
THROAT. LUNGS
. SKIN
w
10 CHOLINEtTEoARE
INHIBITION
HEALTH HAZARII
CLASSIFICATION
--------------
O-UP TO 3XPEL
S-AROVE .IXPEL
1P0 MARKEO IRRITATION -. S-AT CURRENT
EYE, NOSE, THROAT.
SKIN OSHA PEL OF
200 PPM
2S MARKED IRRITATION- 0-lIP TO )XPEL
EYE. NOSE, THROAT.
SKIN S-AROVE TXPEL
?6 MARKED IRRITATION-
EYE. NOSF.. TMMOAT
SKIN S- ABOVE S PPM
2400 MILD IRRITATION-EYE O- IlP TO 3XPEL
. NOSE THROAT/
NARCOSIS S- AenVE 3xPEL
70 MILD IRRITATION -
EYE, NOSE, THROAT/
ACUTE TOKICITY S
0.] ACUTE SYSTEMIC
TOXICITY ICNSI
20 4S MODERATE IRRLTATION-
EYE, NO.SE THROAT/
ACUTE TOXICITY
(CYANOSISI
S
0-BELOY 5000
PPM
S-AR9VE 5000
PPM
S
S
S
S

Ttansactions - 1984
Factors Affecting Interpretation of BEI
Phenylglyoxylic acid is also a metabolite of ethyl benzene,
styrene oxide, styrene glycol, and mandelic acid t9.=1
justification
Phenylglyoxylic acid is the minor metabolite of styrene.
About 10% of styrene retained during an 8-hour exposure
is excreted in urine as phenylglyoxylic acid.i) To correlate
phenylglyoxylic acid in urine with exposure concentration,
urine samples at the end of the shift were collected. Gotell
et aP"z1 derived correlation equations for exposure concen-
tration in ppm, .,, and phenylglyoxylic concentration in
urine in mg/L, PGA, (urine density not given):
c,,, - 0.37 PGA - 29 (4)
A similar correlation equation was derived by Ikeda et a1t2e1
for urine density of 1.016:
c-p - 0.25 PGA - 20 (5)
and for phenylglyoxylic acid related to 1.0 g of creatinine,
PG'9cr
c. - 0.25 PGA, - 9.5 (6)
These correlation equations are valid for urine samples col-
lected at the end of an 8-hour shift and exposure concentra-
tions below 150 ppm. At exposure concentrations larger than
150 ppm, the elimination of styrene via phenylglyoxylic acid
is saturated, and there is no linear correlation between ex-
posure concentration and concentrations of_phenylglyoxylic
acid in urine."=) According to the above equations,
phenylglyoxylic acid in urine collected at the end of an 8-hour
exposure to 50 ppm is 214 mg/L and 278 mg/L, respective-
ly, or 238 mg/g of creatinine.
Sampling and Storage
Venous blood should be collected at the end of the
workweek in vacutainers containing EDTA anticoagulant.
Since timing is critical at the beginning of exposure and short-
ly after exposure, sampling at the end of the shift or prior
to the shift is recommended. The vacutainer must be filled
completely with blood. Samples must be stored under
refrigeration and contact of samples with rubber and {ilastic
material must be prevented.
Levels Without Occupational Exposure
No styrene is present in blood of unexposed subjects.
Kinetics
Styrene concentration in blood rises during exposure and
starts to decline immediately after exposure with half-times
of the two apparent decays of one-half hour and 13 hours.
Additional decay, with a half-time of 3 days, can be derived
from clearance of adipose tissue.(b1 From data by Ramsey et
aj,(331 it can be derived that after 8-hour exposure to 50 ppm
of styrene, styrene concentration in blood, c, in mg/L,
declines according to equation:
c, - 0.50e-12, + 0.044e-u.os3.1
(7)
where:
t- the time interval (in hours) between end of the exposure
and
sampling
Factors Affecting Interpretation of BEI
Styrene in blood is a specific indicator of styrene exposure.
Current Information Available
Elimination of phenylglyoxylic acid was studied in man.
The studies provide satisfactory information for establishing
BEI. The recommended BEI is based on kinetic studies in man
(controlled and field studies).
Recommendation
The Committee recommends that the concentration of
phenylglyoxylic acid in urine collected at the end of the shift
does not exceed 250 mg/L or 240 mglg of creatinine. lnterfer-
rence by exposure to some other chemicals is possible.
STYRENE IN VENOUS BLOOD INDEX
Method
- Gas chromatography - mass spectrometry13J1 is recom-
mended.
justification
The recommended values are based on pharmacokinetic
evaluations of data from controlled human studies!33)
Current Information Available
Fair (extrapolation from controlled human studies with ex-
posures shorter than 8 hours).
Recommendation
The recommended concentrations for styrene in venous
blood, 0.55 mg/L at the end of the shift and 0.02 mglL prior
to the shift are based on a kinetic study in man. At the end
of the working week, styrene concentrations in blood are
slightly higher than at the beginning of the week. This BEI
is recommended as a confirmatory test.
Other BEI
In contrast to animal species, hippuric acid is a minor
metabolite of styrene in man. Hippuric acid was considered
as a biological exposure index by some investigators,00-1124)
Page 116 384 Mn. Mi. CunL rnd. Hyg.. VoL 11 (r994)

Threshold limit values for chemical substances and_
physical agents in the work environment and. p
biological exposure indices with intended changes a
8Ad
f
1
8
o
r
9-
/~CS
~
Y/~
Preface chemical substances
Threshold limit values refer to airborne concentra-
tions of substances and represent conditions under
which it is believed that nearly all workers may be repea-
tedly exposed day after day without adverse effect. Be-
cause of wide variation in individual susceptibility, how-
ever, a small percentage of workers may experience
discomfort from some substances at concentrations at
or below the threshold limit; a smaller percentage may
be affected more seriously by a'ggravation of a pre-
existing condition or by development of an occupational
illness.
Threshold limits are based on the best available infor-
mation from industrial experience, from experimental
human and animal studies, and, when possible, from a
combination of the three. The basis on which the values
are established may. differ from substance to substance;
protection against impairment of health may be a guid-
ing factor for some, whereas reasonable freedom from
irritation, narcosis, nuisance or other forms of stress may
form the basis for others.
The amount and nature of the infonnation available
for establishing a TLV varies from substance to sub-
stance; consequently, the precision of the estimated TLV
is also subject to variation and the latest Documentation
should be consulted in order to assess the extent of the
data available for a given substance. These limits are intended for use In the practice of
industrial hygiene and should be interpreted and applied
only by a person trained in this discipline. They are not
intended for use, orfor modification for use, (1) as a rela-
tive Index of hazard or toxicity, (2) in the evaluation or
control of community air pollution nuisances, (3) in es-
timating the toxic potential of continuous, uninterrupted
exposures or other extended work periods, (4) as proof
or disproof of an existing disease or physical condition,
or (5) for adoption by countries whose working condi-
tions differ from those in the United States of America
and where substances and processes differ.
The TLV-TWA should be used as guides in the control
of health hazards and should not be used as fine lines
between safe and dangerous concentrations.
In spite of the fact that serious injury is not believed
likely as a result of exposure to the threshold limit con-
centrations, the best practice Is to maintain concentra-
tions of all atmospheric contaminants as low as is
practical.
Legal Status. The Threshold Limft Values, as Issued
by ACGIH, are recommendations and should be used as
guidelines for good practices. Wherever these values (of
whatever year) have been used or included by reference
in Federal and/or State statutes and registers, the TLVs
do have the force and effects of law.
"Notice of Intent." At the beginning of each year, pro-
posed actions of the Committee for the forthcoming year
are issued in the form of a"Notice of Intended
Changes." This Notice provides not only an opportunity
for comment, but solicits suggestions of substances to
be added to the list. The suggestions should be accom-
panied by substantiating evidence. The list of Intended
Changes follows the Adopted Values in the TLV booklet.
Values listed in parenthesis in the "Adopted" list are to,
be used during the period in which a proposed change
forthat Value is listed in the Notice of Intended Changes.
Definitions. Three categories of Threshold Limit Val-
ues (TLVs) are specified herein, as follows:
a) The Threshold Limit Value-Time Weighted Average
(TLV-TWA)-the time-weighted average concentration
for a normal 8-hour workday and a 40-hour workweek, to
which nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed, day
after day, without adverse effect.
b) Threshold Limit Value-Short Term Exposure Limit
(TLV-STEL)-the concentration to which workers can
be exposed continuously for a short period of time with-
out suffering from 1) irritation, 2) chronic or irreversible
tissue damage, or 3) narcosis of sufficient degree to in-
crease the likelihood of accidental injury, impair self-
rescue or materially reduce work efficiency, and provid-
ed that the daily TLV-TWA is not exceeded. It is not a
separate independent exposure limit, rather it supple-
ments the time-weighted average (TWA) limit where
there are recognized acute effects from a substance
whose toxic effects are primarily of a chronic nature.
STELs are recommended only where toxic effects have
been reported from high short-term exposures in either
humans or animals.
A STEL is defined as a 15-minute time-weighted
average exposure which should not be exceeded at any
time during a work day even if the eight-hour time-
weighted average is within the TLV. Exposures at the
STEL should not be longer than 15 minutes and should
not be repeated more than four times per day. There
should be at least 60 minutes between successive expo-
sures at the STEL. An averaging period other than 15
minutes may be recommended when this is warranted by
observed biological effects.
c) Threshold Limit Value-Ceiling (TLV-C)-the con-
centration that should not be exceeded even instantan-
eously.
For some substances, e.g., irritant gases, only one
category, the TLV-Ceiling, may be relevant For other
substances, either two or three categories may be rele-
vant, depending upon their physiologic action. It is im-
portant to observe that if any one of these three TLVs is
exceeded, a potential hazard from that substance is pre-
sumed to exist.
The committee holds to the opinion that limits based
on physical irritation should be considered no less bind-
m
~
N
Ann. Am. Con(. lnd. tlyg,. Vot f I(f994) 373. p,.r 27i

MOOERATE 14
~h MIL~ ,IS
IN CATFGORI7,ING qUBSTANCES AS EITHER SkRIOUS OR OTHER. ONLY THE TOYICOIOGIC PROPERTIES nF A
CHEMICAL SUBSTANCE wEoE 'JSEO. NO ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO INCLUDE AN EVALUATION OF THE INDUSTRIAI_
PROCESSES FnR
SUBSTANCES OR THE LIKLIH00D THAT ANY GIVEN MAfERIAL COULD ExCEED THE PEL. HACICALLrr EIf,HT MAJOR
CATEGOR1Eti
wERE USED A5 FOLLOWS'
OSHA/ACC.IH SURSTANCF_ TOXICITY REPORT
CRITERIA FOR RATING A SUBSTANCE SERIOUS OR OTHER
----------------"---------_--_------_-----_-----
HAJOR HEALTH HAZARD CATEGORY SUBSET EXPLANATION CODE 0
---------------------------- -_----------------
I CANCER NEGULATED AT PkESENT AS CARCINOGENS BY
OSHaI CHIEFLY WORK PaACTICE STANDApOS I
--_~----H~--ON--IC-(--CUMU--~L-a-T--IV-E-I _-- T~X---IC_I--TY --------__-m
---~--_-~_-------~-'--__--_--------- m ---------------- ---- 2 ----
II C SUSPECT CA~CINOOFNS ALSO
NO EVIDENCE OF CANCEO POTENTtAl AT PRESENT 3
------------------------------------- --------------------- ---____---------- -----------
----------------------_---
III ACUTE SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 4
--'-m ---- ------------ ------- ------- m----------------------- _-------- -------- --------------
------------ _--_-
IV NERVOUS SYSTEM DISTURBANCES CHOLINESTENASE INHIBITION 5
CNS EFFECTS OTHER THAN NARCOSIS ' 0+
NARCOSIS , 7
----------------------- _----------- -__-_--_------ ---------------------
------------------------------ ---_---------
V RESPIRATORY EFFECTS OTHER RESPIRATORY SENSITIZATIONIA5THMAI A
THAN IRGITATION CUMULATIVE LUNG OAMAGE(PNEUMOrONIOSISI 9
ACUTE LUNG DAMAGE WITH EDEMA 10
--_'-.------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------
_---------__--_-.-__
VI HEMATOLOGIC(BLOnD) DISTUR- HEMOLYTIC ANEMIA i 11 -
HANCES METHEMOGE.OBINFHIA 12
---- m ---------------- ---..--_----------------------- --------------------- -----------
__..------------ ----------
VII IRRITATION-EYE.NOSErT!'P.OATr MARKED 13
t
------------ -------------------------------- -------------- ----- -----------
--_----_____--__------- ------_---_-
VIII GENERAL LOW RISK HEALTH EFFECTS I AHPHYXIANTS.ANOXIANTS i~..
"INE'7T"(NUiqANCEI PARTICIJI.ATES 17
ODOR lA
G000 HOUSEKEEPING 19
0
THE DOCUMENTATION PRESENTEO BY ACGIH FOR EACH SUBSTANCE WAS REVIEWED AND GQEAT WEIGHT WAS GIvEN TO
ACGIH'S
REASONS FOR ESTABLISHING THE PEL AS WELL AS SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FROM EITHER HUMAN 04 ANIMAI,
EXPERIENCE.
' AN EXPOSURE ABOVE THE PEL WAS CONSIDERED TO RE A POTENTIALLY SERIOUS VIOLATIOM IF THE SUBSTANCE
WAS OOC11-
HENTED AS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING THE EFFECTS AT THE SPECIFIED PF.LiOTHER THAN f.ODES 1Sr17.18.A191t IF
THE
TOXIC EFFECTS WERE CUMUt.ATIVEt AND/nR IF THE TOXIC EFFECTS WERE POTENTIALLY IRRE4F.R,;I9LF. ALL
OTHERSWERE
EITHER NONSERIOUS OR NONSERIOUS WITH SOME tIPPER LIMIT AHOVE THE TLV WHERE CONTINIIED EXPOSU4E wOULO
LEAD
TO IRNEVERSIRLE EFFECTS. '~
0659 0 b h n S

BEfs
Recommendation
The Committee recommends that the concentration of
mandelic acid in urine collected at the end of the shift at the
end of the week does not exceed 1.0 g/L or 0.8 g/g of
creatinine. Interferrence by exposure to some other chemicals
is possible.
STYRENE IN EXHALED AIR INDEX
Method
Suitable specific methods are: gas chromatography,11o.u
IR-spectrophotometry,j1p1 UV-spectrophotometry,1r13, and
detection tubes.("'
Sampling and Storage
Sampling prior to the shift and at the end of the shift is
recommended. Sampling prior to the shift must be performed
in a clean atmosphere wearing uncontaminated clothes.
Samples collected in glass containers should be analyzed im-
mediately. Samples absorbed in ethanol or on activated char-
coal can be store&1=, Contact with plastic material should
be prevented because of absorption of styrene by plastic
Levels Without Occupational Exposure
No styrene is present in exhaled air of unexposed subjects.
Kinetics
During Exposure
Since pulmonary retention levels off between
60-70°1°(2A113=) styrene concentration in mixed-exhaled air
accounts for 35% of exposure concentration. (According to
Stewart et al,]Ta the exhaled concentration accounts for on-
ly 25% of exposure concentration.) Therefore, the average
concentration of styrene during the shift should not exceed
18 ppm in mixed-exhaled air (2 ppm in end-exhaled air) if
the TLV-TWA of 50 ppm is maintained.
Following Exposure
Only a small fraction of uptake is exhaled (Stewart et af,101
0.7%; Landry et af,(9) 1%). The desaturation curve shows
two exponential decays with half-times of 13-52 minutes and
4-20 hours.110311 An additional decay, with a half-time of 3
days, can be derived from clearance of adipose tissue.1e The
relation between exposure concentration in ppm, c0, and
styrene concentration in mixed-exhaled air in ppm, c,, col-
lected t-hours after the end of an 8-hour exposure, is described
by an exponential term:
c0 - cf(0.0093e-0a + 0.0014eo°ru)
The equation was adapted from data by Ramsey et at(13i and
is valid for exposure concentrations below 150 ppm.
Factors Affecting Interpretation of BEI
Styrene in exhaled air is a specific indicator of styrene ex-_
posure. If exhaled air samples are collected prior to the shift
then contact with styrene prior to sampling must be avoided
since exposure to traces of styrene would lead to overestima-
tion of exposure.
Justification
The recommended values are based on evaluation of
kinetic data and match the current TLV. The values are deriv-
ed from experimental data in controlled studies,'Un and in
field studies.t'=,3,)
Current Information Available
Elimination of styrene was studied extensively in man and
in animals. The studies provide satisfactory information for
establishing BEL
Recommendation
The Committee recommends the following concentrations
of styrene in exhaled air as BEls for styrene exposure: Dur-
ing exposure, 18 ppm in mixed-exhaled air. The measured
concentration indicates the recent exposure. Sixteen hours
after exposure the concentration of 40 ppb in mixed-exhaled
air is not measurable by usual analytical methods. In other
words, the preshift samples should be negative if the TLV is
maintained. Styrene in exhaled air is a specific BEI and
analysis of exhaled air during exposure is recommended as
a confirmatory test.
PHENYLGLYOXYLIC ACID 1N URINE INDEX
Method
Specific methods like liquid chromatography,(191 iso-
tachophoresis,(2°) gas chromatography,12031rsi and
polarographyaw are recommended. Colorimetric methods
are not recommended because of their low specificity.t=351
Sampling and Storage
Samples of urine should be collected at the end of the shift.
Timing is critical. Since phenylglyoxylic acid decomposes in
acid solution, the storing should be carefully controlled:2=)
Levels Without Occupational Exposure
Concentrations in unexposed subjects depend on the
method used.
Kinetics
The peak concentration of phenylglyoxylic acid in urine
appear at the end of exposure. Following exposure, the con-
centration declines, with a half-time about 7 to 10
hours.0 124=6)
Ma Am. Conf rn6 rryg.. Yd tl (lBBp 383 hgc 115

Transactions - 1984
blood increase faster than exposure concentrations. The non-
linear, capacity-limited elimination of styrene was cor-
roborated by other investigators.-141 In the range of exposure
concentrations permissible in industrial conditions, the linear
correlation between exposure concentration and concentra-
tions of styrene and its metabolites in excreta is acceptable.
At high exposure concentrations, however, the metabolite
elimination is smaller, and styrene in exhaled air is larger than
expected front a linear correlation. As is common for capacity-
limited enzymatic reactions, styrene metabolism is com-
petitively inhibited by the presence of other xenobiotics!1%1a1
Therefore, when inhaled in mixtures, styrene exposure is
underestimated if assessed from metabolite excretion, and
overestimated if assessed from styrene exhalation.
No reports of protein binding were found.
TLV-TWA
The recommended TLV-TWA of 50 ppm (= 215 mglm3)
is based on preventing "Styrene sickness" (drowsiness,
headache, fatigue and dizziness); TLV has sufficient safety
factor to prevent other toxic effects (1980).
Summary
The linear correlation between exposure concentration and
concentrations of styrene indices applies only if the exposure
concentration is lower than 150 ppm. Determination of
mandelic acid in urine is the most convenient BEI.
Phenylglyoxylic add is preferred by some investigators, since
the correlation between elimination of phenylglyoxylic acid
and exposure concentration is linear over a broader range
of exposure concentrations. Styrene determinations in exhaled
air and in blood are recommended as confirmatory tests since
mandelic acid and phenylglyoxylic acid are also metabolites
of other chemicals.
MANDELIC ACID IN URINE INDEX
Method
Liquid chromatography,m) isotachophoresis,em gas chro-
matography,al-2r, polarography=4) are suitable, specific
methods. Colorimetric methods,t425, are not recommended
because of their low specificity.
Sampling and Storage
Samples of urine should be collected in glass containers
at the end of the shift. Timing is critical. Samples stored under
refrigeration are stable at least 14 days. Ethanol intake should
be avoided 24 hours prior to sampling.
Level Without Occupational Exposure ,
Mandelic acid is not present in urine of unexposed subjects.
Kinetics
The peak concentration of mandelic acid in urine appears
at the end of exposure. Following exposure to styrene
mandelic acid elimination is biphasic with half-times of 4
hours and 25 hours!2^.:n
Factors Affecting Interpretation of BEI
Mandelic acid is also a metabolite of ethyl benzene, styrene
glycol, styrene oxide, phenyl glycol, and a-phenyl-
aminoacetic acids.e,=^1 Exposure to such chemicals would be
manifested by increased excretion of mandelic acid. Ethanol
intake'71 and exposure to some other chemicalst151^, is
manifested by decreased excretion of mandelic acid.
justification
Mandelic acid is the major metabolite of styrene in man.
According to Bardodej,41 following 8-hour exposure to
styrene, 85% of styrene uptake is excreted in urine as
mandelic acid. Concentrations of mandelic acid in urine
samples collected at the end of an 8-hour shift are used for
correlation with exposure concentration. The correlation be-
tween exposure concentration in ppm, c,,,, and concentra-
tion of mandelic acid in urine in g/L, MA, was described by
Gottell et aff121 (urine density not given):
c.w- 54.3MA-8..1 (1)
A similar correlation equation was derived by Ikeda et aP'a
for urine density 1.016: -
c. - 80 MA - 14.5 (2)
and for mandelic acid related to one gram of creatinine,
MA~:
c,,, - 65 MA,, - 3.6 (3)
These correlation equations are valid only if exposure con-
centration (TWA) is below 150 ppm and urine is collected
at the end of an 8-hour exposure.
According to equations 1 and 2, concentration of mandelic
acid in urine of a person exposed 8 hours to a TLV of styrene
equals 1.1 g/L and 0.8 g/L, respectively (or 825 mg/g of
creatinine). Bardodej(r41 suggests that the concentration of
1.3 g/l. for urine density 1.024 or 830 mg/g of creatinine cor-
responds to exposure of 50 ppm of styrene. If the value sug-
gested by Bardodej is corrected for a density of 1.016, then
the corrected value 0.86 gIL agrees well with the value sug-
gested by Ikeda.a^) Harkonen et aN0r9ra also corroborate
these data.
Current Information Available
There is sufficient information on man available to support
the following BEI. The recommended BEI is based on kinetic
studies in man (controlled and field studies).
rige 114 382 Ann. Am. Conf. rnd. Hyg.. VoL 11 (1984)

Supplemental Documentation
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE
CAS 7664-39-3
HF
CEILING LIMIT, 3 ppm (= 2.5 mg/m'), as F
Hydrogen fluoride is a colorless gas at temperatures above
its boiling point of 19.54°C; at lower tempe'ratures it is a fum-
ing liquid. HF has a molecular weight of 20.02, a specific
gravity of 0.988, and a freezing point of -83°C. There is
association of molecules at normal room temperatures, so
that the actual density of the gas is greater than would be
calculated from the formula HF. A water solution, contain-
ing up to 70% HF, hydrofluoric acid, is frequently used. It
is slightly soluble in water and soluble in most organic com-
pounds.
Anhydrous HF is employed as a catalyst in numerous reac-
Ytons of chemical synthesis; as a fluorinating agent in the pro-
duction of fluorine and aluminum fluoride, and in refining
uranium. Hydrofluoric acid is used to etch glass, for pick-
ling stainless steel, in the production of gasoline and
aluminum, and for acidizing oil wells.
Ronzanim found no injurious action of fluoride in animals
exposed for 30 days at 3 ppm HF. At that time, much higher
concentrations (40 ppm) were employed in inhalation therapy
for pulmonary tuberculosis:0 Machle et ahs1 reported that
guinea pigs and rabbits survived 40 ppm for 41 hours; deaths
resulted from 300 ppm for two hours or more. Stokinger and
associatesm found that animals tolerated 7 ppm of HF with
only mild irritation of the respiratory tract in repeated daily
exposures.
Largenfls' reported that repeated exposures at 17 ppm
resulted in damage to the lungs, liver, and kidneys of animals,
but at 8.6 ppm pathologic changes were insignificant, except
for lung injury in one dog. Repeated experimental human
exposures six hours a day for 10 to 50 days at concentra-
tions as high as 4.7 ppm were tolerated without severe ef-
fects. Redness of skin, and some burning and irritation of the
nose and eyes were noted at concentrations above 3 ppm.
Three subjects who inhaled approximately 3 ppm had average
urinary excretion of 6.69, 11.47, and 9.4 mg/day of
fluoride.1s.ei
Prolonged inhalation of HF in high concentrations would
presumably lead to fluorosis, which has been more often
observed as a result of the inhalation or ingestion of fluoride
salts (q.v.).
Kleinfeld(n reported a fatal case of acute pulmonary
edema resulting from an accident involving hydrofluoric acid.
Ceiling limit proposed in 1984.
In its criteria document for hydrogen fluoride, NIOSH
recommends a workplace environmental limit of 2.5 mgimt
as a TWA, with a 15-minute ceiling of 5 mgfm;, correspond-
ing to 3.06 and 6.1 ppm, respectively!- Additional
references cited which support these limits include a PHS
study,(91 which showed that no significant changes in
pulmonary function resulted from occupational exposure at
an average concentration of 1.03 ppm of HF. A report by
Rye/101 indicated no increase in respiratory complaints
among workers exposed at concentrations of HF and SiF,
below 2.5 mg/ms. The study by Derryberry et ail", is inter-
preted as indicating a threshold for minimal increases in bone
density due to fluoride (fluorosis) of below 3.38 mg1m3 of
fluoride, or 4.3 ppm of HF.
The Committee considers hydrogen fluoride a primary irri-
tant, therefore a ceiling limit of 3 ppm is recommended. This
should also minimize the occurrence of fluorosis.
Other recommendations:0Z Australia, Belgium, Finland,
West Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden and Yugoslavia,
3 ppm; Switzerland and Italy, 1.5 ppm; Czechoslovakia, East
Germany, and Romania, 1.2 ppm; and the USSR, 0.6 ppm.
References:
t. Ronzani, E.: Arch. f. Hyg. 70:217 (1909).
2. Roholm, K.: Fluorine Intoxication. H.E. Lewis & Co., London
(1937).
3. Machle, W., F. Thamann, K. Kitzmiller and ). Cholak: J. Ind.
Hyg. 16:129 (1934).
4. Stokinger, H.E. et al: Pharmacology and Toxicology of Uranium
Compounds, Chap. 17. NNES VI 2. McGraw Hill, New York
(1949).
5. largent, E.).: Fluorosis. Ohio State University Press, Columbus,
OH (1961).
6. idem: Arch. Ind. Health 21:318 (1960).
7. Kleinfeld, M.: Arch. Env. Health 10:912 (1965).
8. NIOSH: Criteria for a Recommended Standard - Occupational
Exposure to Hydrogen Fluoride. DHEW Pub. No. (NIOSH)
76-143 (1976).
9. Leiden, NA_ et al: Enviornmental and Medical5urvey, Blockson
Works, Olin Mathieson Corp. DHEW, PHS Occupational Pro-
gram (September 1967).
10. Rye, WA: Proceedings of 13th Int. Congress on Occupational
Health, July 1960, pp. 361-364 (1961).
11. Derryberry, O.M., M.D. Bartholomew and R.B.L Fleming: Arch.
Env. Health 6:503 (1963).
12. Occupational Fxposure Limits for Airborne Toxic Substances, 2nd
(rev.) ed., pp. 128-129. Occupational Safety and Health Series
No. 37. Intematinal Labour Office, Geneva (1980).
~
0
~
a
©
~
Lr1
J
V
)
Mn.Mc ConJ tnd ltyg. vnt 11 11984) 376 Palic 325

19a4-sB rLYs
squamous cell carcinoma, rats,
@ 0.05 ppm, in 13 months
OR
1b. Dermal. Elicit cancer within 20 weeks by
skin-painting, twice weekly at 2 mg/kg
body weight or less per application for a
total dose equal to or less than 1.5 mg, In a
biologically inert vehicle:
Examples: 7, 12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
- skin tumors @ 0.12-0.8 mg
T.D. in four weeks
Benzo(a)pyrene, mice 12 µg,
3X/wk for 18 mas. T.D. 2.6 mg,
90.9% skin tumors
OR
tc. Gastrointestinal. Elicit cancer by daily in- take via the gastrointestinal tract, within six
months, with a six-month holding period, at
a dosage below 1 mg/kg body weight per
day; total dose, rat, s_ 50 mg; mouse, 5 3.5
mg;
Examples: 7, 12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
- mammary tumors from 10 mg
1X
3-Methylcholanthrene - Tumors
@ 3 sites from 8 mg in 89 weeks
Benzo(a)pyrene, mice, 3.9% leu-
kemias, from 30 mg T.D. 198
days
2. Elicit cancer by all three routes in at least two
animal species at dose levels prescribed for
high or intermediate potency.
B. Industrial Substances of Intermediate Carcinogenic
Potency in Experimental Animals.
To qualify as a carcinogen of intermediate po-
tency, a substance should elicit cancer in two an-
imal species at dosages intermediate between
those described In A and C by two routes of ad-
ministration.
Example: Carbamic acid ethyl ester
Dermal, mammary tumors, mice, 100%,
63 weeks, 500-1400 mg T.D. Gastrointes-
tinal, various type tumors, mice 42 weeks,
320 mg T.D.
Gastrointestinal, various type tumors, rats,
60 weeks, 110-930 mg T.O.
C. Industrial Substances of Low Carcinogenic Potency in
Experimental Animals.
To quality as a carcinogen of low potency, a sub-
stance should elicit cancer in one animal species
by any one of three routes of administration at the
following prescribed dosages and conditions:
la. Respiratory. Elicit cancer from (1) dosages
greater than 10 mg/m3 (or equivalent ppm) via
the respiratory tract In 6- to 7-hour, daily re-
peated Inhalation exposures, for 12 months'
exposure and 12 months' observation period;
or (2) from intratracheally administered dos-
ages totaling more than 10 mg of particulate
or liquid per 100 ml or more of animal minute
respiratory volume;
Examples: Beryl (beryllium aluminum silicate)
malig. lung tumors, rats, @ 15
mg/m3@ 17 months
Benzidine, var. tumors, rats, 10-20
mg/m3 @ > 13 mos.
OR
1b. Dermal. Elicit cancer by skin-painting of mice
in twice weekly dosages of > 10 mg/kg body
weight in a biologically inert vehicle for at
least 75 weeks, i.e., a 1.5g T.D.
Examples: Shale tar, mouse, 0.1 ml x 50 = sg
T.D. 59/60 skin tumors
Arsenic trioxide, man, dose un-
known, but estimated to be high
1c. Gastrointestinal. Elicit cancer from daily oral
dosages of 50 mg/kg/day or greater during
the lifetime of the animal.
Appendix B
Substances of Variable Composition
Bt Polytetratluoroethylene'decomposition products.
Thermal decomposition of the fluorocarbon chain
in air leads to the formation of oxidized products
containing carbon, fluorine and oxygen. Because
these products decompose in part by hydrolysis
in alkaline solution, they can be quantitatively de-
termined in air as fluoride to provide an Index of
exposure. No TLV is recommended pending de-
termination of the toxicity of the products, but air
concentrations should be minimal.
B2 Welding Fumes -Total Particulate (NOC)t
TLV, 5 mg/m3
Welding fumes cannot be classified simply. The
composition and quantity of both are dependent on
the alloy being welded and the process and elec-
trodes used. Reliable analysis of fumes cannot be
made without considering the nature of the welding
process and system being examined; reactive metals
and alloys such as aluminum and titanium are arc-
welded in a protective, inert atmosphere such as
argon. These arcs create relatively little fume, but an
intense radiation which can produce ozone. Similar
processes are used to arc-weld steels, also creating a
relatively low level of fumes. Ferrous alloys also are
arc-welded in oxidizing environments which generate
considerable fume, and can produce carbon monox-
ide instead of ozone. Such fumes generally are com-
posed of discreet particles of amorphous slags con-
taining iron, manganese, silicon and other metallic
constituents depending on the alloy system Involved.
Chromium and nickel compounds are found in fumes
when stainless steels are arc-welded. Some coated
and flux-cored electrodes are formulated with
fluorides and the fumes associated with them can-
contain significantly more fluorides than oxides. Be-
-Trade Names: Algollon. nuon, Halon, Teflon, Tetran.
t Not otherwise dassified (NOC).
I
Ann.,rna Can6 rrtd. Hyg., Vd [I (r984/ 37 rage 787
9

19s4-a5 TcUs
I
(
AOOPTEO VALUES
TWA STEt.
Substance [CAS #1 PPm"r mg/mab1 Ppm", mg/m3"'
$ Calcium prbonate/ marble
[1317-65-3] ............... D - (20)
$Catcium cyanamide
(156-62-71 .................
0.5
(1)
Calcium hydroxide
[1305-62-0] ...............
5
Calcium oxide (1305-78-8] 2
Calcium siicate
[1344-95-21 ...............
D
Camphor, synthetic
[76-22-21 ..................
2
12
' 3
18
Caprolactam [105-60-21
Oust ........................
-
1
. -
3
Vapar ....................... 5 20 10 40
Captafol (2425-06-1) -
Skin ........................
0.1
-
-
tCaptan [133-0621........... 5 - (15)
tCarbaryl [63-25-21 .......... 5 - (10)
Carboturan (1563-66-21.... 0.1 - -
$Carbon black [1333-86-4].. 3.5 - (7)
tCarbon dioxide [12438-91. 5,000 9,000 (15, 000) (27, 000)
Carbon d]sulfide [75-15-0]
- Skin .....................
10
30
-
Carbon monoxide
[630-OS-01 .................
50
55
400
440
Carbon tetrabromide
[558-13-4] .................
0.1
1.4
0.3
4
t
t
hl
id
-
C
b
rac
e
or
e
t
ar
on
[56-23-51-Skin ........ 5; A2 30, A2 (20, A2) (125, A2)
Carbonyl chloride, see Phosgene
Carbonylfktoride
[353-50-01 ................. 2
5 5 15
Catechol (Pyrocatechol)
[120-80-91 ................. 5
20
$Cellulose (paper fiber)
[9004-34-6] ...............
D (20)
Cesium hydroxide
(21351-79-1 ] ..............
2
Chlordane (57-74-91 -
Skin ........................
0.5 2
Chlorinated camphene
[8001-35-2] - S kin .....
0.5 1
Chlorinated diphenyl oxide
(55720-99-5] ..............
0.5 2
Chlorine [7782-50-5] ....... 1 3 3 9
Chlorine doxide
(10049-04-4] .............. 0.1
0.3 0.3 0.9
Chlorine tri0uoride
[779091-21 ............... C 0.1
C 0.4
Chloroacetaldehyde
[107-20-01 ................. Gt
C3
arChloroacetophenone
[532-27-0] (Phenacyl
chloride) ................... 0.05
0.3
Chloroacetyl chloride
[79-04-9] .................. 0.05
0.2
Chlorabenzene (108-90-7]
(Monochlorobenzene).... 75
350
a-CMorobenrylidene
malononitrile
[2698-41-1 ] - Skin .....
C 0.05
C 0.4
Chlorobramomethane
(74-97-51........
200
1,050
250
1,300
2-Chloro-1, 3-butadiene,see F Chloroorene
nna Am. Conf. rna. Hyg, VoL r r U984)
375
ADOFTEO VALUES
TWA STEL
Substance [CAS #1 ppm"' mg/ma0/ ppm" mglill
Chlorodi0uaromethane
[75-05-6] .................. 1,000 3,500 1,250 4,375
Chlorodiphenyl (42%
Chlorine) (53469-21-9]
-Skin ..................... - 1 - 2
Chlorodipherryl (54%
Chlorine) (11097-69-1] r
-Skin ..................... - 0.5 - 1 t
1-Chloro, 2, 3-epoxy-propane, see Epichlorohydrin
2-Chloroethanol, see Ethylene chlarohydrin
Chloroethylene, see Mnyl chloride
$Chloratorm [67-66-3]..... 10, A2 50, A2 (50, A2) (225, A2)
bis-Chbromethyl ether
[542-88-1] ................. 0.001, 0.005,
Ala Ala
Chloromethyl methyl ether
[107-30-21 ................. A2 A2
1-Chloro-l-nitropropane
[600-25-97 ................. 2 10
Chloropentafluoroethane
[76-15-3] .................. 1,000 6,320 - -
Chloropicrin (76-06-2]...... 0.1 0.7 0.3 2
p-Chloroprene [126-99-8]
-Skin ..................... 10 45 - -
o-Chiorostyrene
(1331-28-81 ............... 50 285 75 430
o-Chlorotoluene [95-49-8I. 50 250 75 375
2-Chloro- 6-(trichloromethyl) pyridine, see Nitrapyrin
Chlorpyrifos [2921-88-2]
-Skin ..................... - 0.2. - 0.6
Chromite ore processing
(Chramate), as Cr........ - 0.05. Ala
Chromium [7440-47-3]
Metal ....................... - 0.5 -
Chromium (1]) compounds,
as Cr ....................... - 0.5
Chromium (III)
compounds, as Cr........ - 0.5
Chromium (VI)
compounds, as Cr
Water soluble ............. - 0.05
Certain water insoluble .. - 0.05, Ala
Chmmy] chloride
[14977-61-81 .............. 0.025 0.15
Chrysene (218-01-91........ A2 A2
Clopidoi[2971-90-61........ - 10
Coal tar pitch vo1a01es
[8007-05-2], as benzene
sclubles .................... - 0.2, Ala
$Cobart (7440-08-4], as Co
metal, dust & fume ...... - (0.1)
Cobalt carbonyl
[00000-00-01, as Co..... - 0.1
Cobalt hydrocarbonyl
[16842-03-8], as Co..... - 0.1
Capital letters A, 8, 0 & E refer to Appendices; C denotes ceiWng 6mit,
tSee Notice of Intended Changes.
d) Lint-free dust as measured by the vertical elutriator cotton-dust
sampler desaibed in the Transac6ons of the National Conrernce on Cot-
tan Oust, p. 33 by J. R. Lyndt, (May 2. 1970).
20
ftse ns

Transactions - 1984
Chlorornethyl methyl ether -
Chromates of lead and zinc, as Cr 0.05 mg/m3
Chrysene
3, 3'-Dichlorobenzitline - Skin
Dimethylcarbamyl chloride
1, 1-Dimethyl hydrazine - Skin
Dimethyl sulfate - Skin
Ethylene dibromide -Skin
0.5 ppm
0.1 ppm
$Ethylene oxide 1 ppm
Formaldehyde 1 ppm
Hexachlorobutadiene 0.02 ppm
Hexamethyl phosphoramide -
Skin -
Hydrazine -Skin 0.1 ppm
4, 4'-Methylene bis
(2-chioroaniline) - Skin 0.02 ppm
t4,4-Methylene dianiline 0.1 ppm
Methyl hydrazine -Skin C 0.2 ppm
Methyl iodide - Skin 2 ppm
2-Nitropropane 10 ppm
N-Nitrosodimethylamine - Skin -
N-Phenyl-beta-naphthylamine
Phenylhydrazine - Skin
Propane suitone
5 ppm
beta-Propiolactone 0.5 ppm
Propyleneimine - Skin 2 ppm
o-Tolidine -
#o-Toluidine - Skin 2 ppm
tp-Toluidine - Skin 2 ppm
Vinyl bromide _ 5 ppm
Vinyl cyclohexene dioxide 10 ppm
For the above, worker exposure by all routes
should be carefully controlled to levels consis-
tent with the animal and human experience data
(see Documentation), including those sub-
stances with a listed TLV.
* * *
THE COMMITTEE GUIDELINES FOR
CLASSIFICATION OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL
CARCINOGENS
The following guidelines are offered in the present
state of knowledge as an aid in classifying substances
in the occupational environment found to be carcin-
ogenic in experimental animals. A need was felt by
the Threshold Limits Committee for such a classifica-
tion in order to take the first step in developing an
appropriate TLV for occupational exposure.
Determination of Approximate Threshold of Response
Requirement. In order to determine in which category
to classify an experimental carcinogen for the pur-
pose of assigning an industrial air limit (TLV), an ap-
proximate threshold of neoplastic response must be
determined. Because of practical experimental diffi-
culties, a precisely defined threshold cannot be at-
tained. For the purposes of standard-setting, this is of
t 1984 Addition.
t19e4 Adoption.
little moment, as an appropriate risk, or safety, factor
can be applied to the approximate threshold, the
magnitude of which is dependent on the degree of
potency of the carcinogenic response.
To obtain the best 'practical' threshold of neoplastic
response, dosage decrements should be less than
logarithmic. This becomes particularly important at
levels greater than 10 ppm (or corresponding mg/ml).
Accordingly, after a range-finding determination has
been made by logarithmic decreases, two additional
dosage levels are required within the levels of "ef-
fect" and "no effect" to approximate the true thresh-
old of neoplastic response.
The second step should attempt to establish a me-
tabolic relationship between animal and man for the
particular substance found carcinogenic in animals. If
the metabolic pathways are found comparable, the
substance should be classed highly suspect as a car-
cinogen for man. If no such relation is found, the sub-
stance should remain listed as an experimental an-
imal carcino gen until evidence to the contrary is
found.
Proposed Classification of Experimental Animal Car-
cinogens. Substances occurring in the occupational
environment found carcinogenic for animals may be
grouped into three classes, those of high, intennedi-
ate and low potency. In evaluating the incidence of
animal cancers, significant incidence of cancer is de-
fined as a neoplastic response which represents, in
the judgment of the Committee, a significant excess
of cancers above that occurring in negative controls.
EXCEPTlONS: No substance is to be considered an
occupational carcinogen of any practical significance
which reacts by the respiratory route at or above 1000
mg/m3 for the mouse, 2000 mg/m3 for the rat; by the
dennal route, at or above 1500 mg/kg for the mouse,
3000 mg/kg for the rat; by the gastrointestinal route
at or above 500 mglkg/d for a lifetime, equivalent to
about 100 g T.D. for the rat, 10 g T.D. for the mouse.
These dosage limitations exclude such substances as
dioxane and trichlorethylene from consideration as
carcinogens.
Examples: Dioxane - rats, hepatocellular and nasal
tumors from 1015 mg/kg/d, oral
Trichloroethy(ene - female mice, tumors
(30198@ 900 mg/kg/d), oral
A. Industrial Substances of High Carcinogenic Potency
in Expefimental Animals.
1. A substance to quality as a carcinogen of high
potency must fulfill one of the three following
conditions in two animal species:
ta. Respiratory. Elicit cancer from (1) dosages
below I mg/ma (or equivalent ppm) via the
respirato ry tract in 6- to 7-hour daily repeat-
ed inhalation exposures throughout life-
time; or (2) from a single intratracheally ad-
ministered dose not exceeding 1 mg of
particulate, or liquid, per 100 ml or less of
animal minute respiratory volume;
Examples: bis-Chloromethyl ether, malignant
tumors, rats, @ 0.47 mg/m3 (0.1
ppm) in 2 years;
Hexamethyl phosphoramide, nasal
Payt Iae ' Ann. Artt Conf. lnd: Nyg. VoL 1 f(1981)
372

1
PULMONARY FUPICTIOPI TESTS
OBSTRUCTIVE DISEASES
RESTRICTIVE DISEASES
7ests o1 Pulmonary Function
i _ .. _. '"._.....
~
~ Lwqvelum.r ....'~F-. . -~ .. _, ..,.-.. ~7 ~Obatruetloq
.J:.:,
, am1 aPaNXes !p ~
Vital apUly..'~`J..
-
. Inspiratory ppaeilK'`?
..:
~ Fxpfntcry ieeerve.~ ; ,
vdum~ .
TWal.l~ol,~lm.S:
.. ..~.. _... .
FundlonaGreaidW uiC^. Y~a> 5 r. `Hi dlfutbn ..
,.- . ur bcdY' ,
F It ; II F:---,.,?A I I IvtMM1WPJ )-TLC
__
Reeidual voh3ma;';. ~ t '. RV' : FRC-ERV ~
Tolel lungeapaUry _'? TLC' t VCiflVOr FRC+iC i_ ., - J L.:i
J u .~~JJ `. -~JJ
tiaplratory flow rFlaa
Force, ezpiratory
volUmt in f second
:
in 1 secands :
~
FEF,
reauceo
or normal
. _ , .
r
- 3 2 I 0 5 < 3 2 1
Time Isee/ Time Iseel
. . FEV,rFVC. o >70 FEV./FVC.°
, . FEV,rFVC.o >95 FEVr/FVC': Decreasee
FEF,rr,. wiee range
FEF_s.a.
-------------------------------------------------
M
MVV is reduced in both obstruetive and restrictive
disease. In both cases it is proportional to FEV,
FEV, rt 40 approximates MVV). Useful a5 test of
consistency of patient pErformarlcG. Ia very
-12 sec-ri dependent on patient effort and cooperation
..,_~ .,: ._.,._., _. ._...... --------------------------------
----=-ei l~ -----
-_
~ ' Normal I,~ Obstrumion I~ Restritl
pon
Maximal vuluntary' ~ '` braathes as hard~
ventilation or ~' and as rapidly
as
Masimal breathing
MBC PosslblC for 12 sec
capacity . ' Tohl vol. noted I
- - ~ _
Maximal exPirateryd racprdag of IIGw
.. . i : - .' ya volume
-
flow at 75 ,x M D.., n.. w.Gilegraten ~ VCr V"~' Pnelimctechograph'
25J ' a e
Lung elasticity
Slatlc recoit
pressure
Atlway rMlslanCe..
Statip compllaic.r
Pleura/ pressure
' is recorded with
' efophageal balloon
while aidlow is
arreited at
. dfRerent Iung
. wNUmes:,changes
Csla' ~in'lung volume
ratorded w1!1
. , ep4cmtler or
. :' pnaumaaChograCh
.
apply
. ~plamysmograph
: to determine
9ar ~ alveolar pressure
z aM' prieumc- .
' tatMgraph to
° meaaun sirlfow
Dinusug aapaidlr . . ' ' : . . 1'°W eonpc. tmnon
D00 of CO inhaled:
., axplr.d'gu
.. . . _...._._._,-. ,_ ._.~_an°flaatl /ar CO
aaw
:m Hr0/
sect
Normal
356
.ung vol. Il)
Obatrr3oUon
0
Restriction
Restriction
Ft,J.: FVC.`S
anc
FEVsi FVC.v'%
usually
normal
Slalic elastic recoil of lung is
increased and static compliance
reduced in diseases such as
pulmonary fibrosis. Conversely
in emphysema static lung
comotiance R Inereased and
elastic recoil is reduced
In bostr:chve lung disease aitway
~Obshudlon remstance is mereased. II
obstruc[non Involves Gnlv small
\ ~ Euways (<2 mm ditmcyq, only
\`\ ~ResPldlon minimal changes ' o'~ rall
' resistance may re /It, n
t NCrmal restrictive Sa
'rdE 3. s2'anca is
Ir°°ge ohe^ reduc-d becau-: of
me: esad traction or mtrathoraac
mnvly waps
7f1tL-ng caGacrty is reduced when aneolar wai s are cesuoyed ;no pmmonary capillaries
re Obliterated by empnysema anc xnen alveolar-capolary memb'ane 5 thlGkened by edema.
corsolidalwn, or.hbrosis

1984-85 TLVs
l
Notice of Intended Changes Dust
Substance TLV
SlLICA, Si02
Crystalline
t Quartz ................0.1 mg/m', Respirable dust
[14808-60-7]
tCristobalite.......... 0.05 mg/m3, Respirable dust
(14464-46-1]
tTddymite ............0.05 mg/m3, Respirable dust
[15468-32-31
Silica, fused.........Use quartz value.
(60676-86-0]
Tripoli ................0.1 mg/m3of contained quartz,
,
ro
[1317-95-9] respirable dust water insoluble
Amorphous compounds ..............
t Diatomaceous earth Coal tar pitch volatiles ....
(uncalcined) ...... 10 mg/m3, Total dust
[60676-86-0] Nickel sulfide roasting,
Precipitated silica 5 mg/ma, Respirable dust ~ fume & dust .............
and si6ca ge1.....10 mg/m3, Total dust Vinyl chloride ..............
SILICATES and OTHER DUSTS (< 1% quartz)
t Barium sulfate ......10 mglma, Total dust
[7727-43-7]
Graphite (natural)...2.5 mg/m3, Respirable dust
(7782-42-5] 5 mg/ms, Total dust
tGraphite (synthetic) 10 mg/m3, Total dust
t Mica (12001-26-2] .3 mg/m3, Respirable dust
t Perlite ................10 mg/ma, Total dust
tPortland Cement.... 10 mg/m3, Total dust
Soapstone........... 3 mg/m3, Respirable dust
6 mg/m3, Total dust
Talc (containing Use asbestos TLV. However,
asbestos fibers)..should not exceed 2 mg/m3
respirable dust.
tNuisance particulates (see Appendix D)
10 mglm3l^' of total dust < 1% quartz
COAL OUST
If > 5% quartz, use respirable quartz value.
Generic Listing
All mppcf values for mineral dusts will be eliminated
in favor of equivalent respirable mass or total mass val-
ues, i.e., Appendix F.
Footnote:
m) Containing < 1% quartz; if quartz content > 1%,
use quartz value.
Appendix A
Cancinogens
The Committee lists below those substances in in-
dustrial use that have proven carcinogenic in man, or
have induced cancer in animals under appropriate ex-
perimental conditions. Present listing of those sub-
stances carcinogenic for man takes two forms: Those
for which a TLV has been assigned (la) and those for
which environmental conditions have not been suffi-
ciently defined to assign aTLV (lb).
Ann. Anc Con/. !rsd Hyg., VoL 11(IA94J
377
Ala. Human'CarcinogensSubstances,orsu
associated with industrial processes,
nized to have carcinogenic or cocarcin
potential, with an assigned TLV:
Asbestos
Amosite ..................
Chrysotile ................
Crocid olite ...............
Other forms .............
0.5 fiber > 5µm/cc
2 fibers > 5µm/cc
0.2 fiber > 5p.mlcc
2 ~fib r'Um/cc
0.001 ppm
0.05 mg/m3, as Cr
0.2 mg/m3, as
benzene solubles
1.0 mg/ma, as Ni
5 ppm
Atb. Human Carcinogens. Substances, or sub-
stances associated with industrial processes,
recognized to have carcinogenic potential with-
out an assigned TLV:
4-Aminodiphenyl (p-Xenylamine) - Skin
Benzidine -Skin
{3-Naphthyfamine
4-Nitrodlphenyl '
For the substances in 1b, no exposure or con-
tact by any route - respiratory, skin or oral, as
detected by the most sensitive methods - shall
be permitted. The worker should be properly
equipped to insure virtually no contact with the
carcinogen.
A2. Industrial Substances Suspect of Carcinogenic
Potential for MAN. Chemical substances or sub-
stances associated with industrial processes.
which are suspect of inducing cancer, based on
either (1) limited epidemiologic evidence, exclu-
sive of clinical reports of single cases, or (2)
demonstration of carcinogenesis in one or more
animal species by appropriate methods.
r/bis (Chloromethyl) ether
Chromite ore processin
(chromate) ..............
certain
Ch
mium (VI)
tAcrylonitrile - Skin 2 ppm
"Amitrole -
Antimony trioxide production* -
Arsenic trioxide production -
Benzene 10 ppm
Benzo(a)pyrene -
Beryllium 2.0 µg/m3
t1, 3-Butadiene 10 ppm
Cadmium oxide production -
Carbon tetrachloride - Skin 5 ppm
Chloroform 10 ppm
"See No6ce of Intended Changes.
t 1984-1985 Addition.
f 1984-1985 Pdoption. ' Cigarette smoking can enhance the incidence of respiratory cancers
from this or others of Ihese substances or processes.
?age 2W
,

Tests of Pulmonary Function (continued)
rrMNttad , ~ . . . .. .. . ..., .:. ~ - .
Tests fa'small 30i Small Normal
afrwaY dh:sw.'. I airway
Maximal expiratory ' OY,we a; Spirometer or
flowvolume curve , , pneumdaphograph
breathing 80% He ' to record flow
and 20% 0, ' V aw r/ and vcfume
t
Gas eacMnge
Partiai pressure
in
of 0'
artanal bleod
Pano: ^ _._
of COr in ~
arterial blood
Arterial blood pH
lionrinqa fYll
Inspiralloe of 01 a Vi
the 0xpired iurq . :n
velume frgm TLC ' expired
k'lb qV is pk.:ed air
}'against the N,
~Conc.ntrMion .
l`6mPNageN
~ ballcon to
; mees ve Dleural
~ pres_:.ro and
spirometer or
pneumetaelwgrapn
to record vefume
Artedel blcod
^ppa . anaarobicaliy,.
heparinized
TLC 5
Airways in lower lung zones close
at low lung volumes and only those
alveoli at too Cf lungs continue to
empty. Since conceniranon of Np
alveoli of upper zones .: tigFer.
slope of curve abruptly +creases
(phase IV). Phase IV beglns at
larger lung volumes in individuals
with even minor degree5 of airway
obstruction increasing both CV
and CC
_ Lung vol. (1)
___________ _____________________-__-_
Fiow
iU 6ee)
dlsaase__~
NpnnaFlow Smag airway disaaae
He-0r (I/sec172 -He-0a
CVuw 8 _
fI ~ Air 6V.,., m
d
~V iao V
.-V isc ~'
00 50 0 too 50
Vpl. f% VC) VGI. (% VC)
Ounng a maximal expiratory maneuver. resistance to airllow q normally due to turbufence
and convective acceleratlon. Breathing He, nllieh is less dense than air. lowen resistance
and increases flow at all but lowest volumes. In small airway dbease resistance to lammar
tWw makes up larger portion of total resistance and aidlow, ,is relatively independent of gas
eensity. tncrease in expiratory flow at 50 : of VC while breathing He-Oa faV.., tn1 wdl be
:eis, and volume at wllich flows while breathing He-0e and while breathing air are identical
IV iso V) will be higher in patients with small airway disease than in normal individuals
' NamN
1.0
i
C`tv°-O.Si '~Y dlaase
Cvar
15 30 <5 e0 75 90
Breathing Ireguenay (breaths/min)
Oynamic comptlance is determined
irom changes in lung volume and
difference in pleuml presaure at
end-inapiration and end<xpirafion.
Normally Cayn closely approxfmates
Cnat and remains essentially
unchanged as breathing freouenry,
increases
Small airway disease is characterized by patchy increases in airway resistance. Ounng ouim
breathing, ventilation may be evenly distributed througnout lung but as breathing beouency
increases. alveoli will fill and empty unevenly and asynchronously as air tends to go to these
areas which otfer least resistance. Change in pleural pressure for a given change in lung
voNme increases ano pynamm compliance talis
Normal values AbnerrmaliBea
60 to 100 mm Hg
bleathing ropm air Hypoxemia indicative of ventilation-perfusion abnormalities. shuate.
at sea level. Falls dilfusion defectt alveolar hypoventliation
slightly with age
_ ___
_: :C 44 mm Hg Pa<pr proponbnal to mefabolic rate (COr production) and
==v=rs=1y related to volume of alveolar ventilation
-_
7 i5 to 7.45 pH
Acidosis (pH <7.35)
Respimtory (inatleguate alveolar ventilationl
Metabolic (gain of acid and/or loss of base)
Alkalosis (pH > 7.45) ~ Sw+
Respuatory (excessive alveolar vemilationi ,~y ~dl~
Metabolic (gain ol base or loss of acidl
Alveolar-anerial ps '. <t0 mm Hg Primarily reflects mismatching of ventilation and pertusion and/ar
0, difference ,~ MaO p
s AaPOS ,.breathing room air shunts May aleb be affected by diffusion derebts
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Oeed spacetidal OetermfhiG Imm Elevated ratio indicates wasted ventilation: i.e that volume ot gas
: Vp/VT artmtat and mixF : <0.3
vbfume . which does not take part in gas exchange
retb . . aDirad Pcos.
. ______ _________. __-_________-_____- - __-
' ~' Delermined Im- Elevatron Indicates inareased amount or mixed venous blood entenng
Shunt fraction ba/4uT P302 after systemic circulatwn without coming into contact with alveolar air.
a piod of <5°° either because of shunting of blood past lungs to left side of heart or
breathing te0". r~. perfusion of regions of lung which are not ventilated
I
357

1984-85 TLYs
limit values for mixtures, and methods for their develop-
ment, amplified by specific examples are given in Appen-
dix C.
Nuisance Particulates. In contrast to fibrogenic dusts
which cause scar tissue to be formed in lungs when in-
haled in excessive amounts, so-called "nuisance" dusts
have a long history of little adverse effect on lungs and
do not produce significant organic disease or toxic ef-
fect when exposures are kept under reasonable control.
The nuisance dusts have also been called (biologically)
"Inert" dusts, but the latter term is inappropriate to the
extent that there is no dust which does not evoke some
cellular response in the lung when inhaled in sufficient
amount. However, the lung-tissue reaction caused by in-
halation of nuisance dusts has the following characteris-
tics: (1) The architecture of the airspaces remains intact.
(2) Collagen (scar tissue) ls not formed to a significant
extent (3) The tissue reaction is potentially reversible.
Excessive concentrations of nuisance dusts in the
workroom air may seriously reduce visibility, may cause
unpleasant deposits in the eyes, ears and nasal passages
(Portland Cement dust), or cause injury to the skin or
mucous membranes by chemical or mechanical action
per se or by the rigorous skin cleansing procedures nec-
essary for their removal.
A threshold limit of 10 mg/m3, or 30 mppcf, of total
dust < 1%quartz, or, 5 mglma respirable dust's recorn-
mended for substances in these categories and for
which no specific threshold limits have been assigned.
This limit, for a normal workday, does not apply to brief
exposures at higher concentrations. Neither does it
apply to those substances which may cause physiologic
impairment at lower concentrations but for which a
threshold limit has not yet been adopted. Some nuisance,
particulates are given in Appendix 0.
Simple Asphyxiants -"lnerf" Gases or Vapors. A
number of gases and vapors, when present in high con-
centrations In air, act primarily as simple asphyxiants
without other significant physiologic effects. A TLV may
not be recommended for each simple asphyxiant be-
cause the limiting factor is the available oxygen. The
minimal oxygen content should be 18 percent by volume
under normal atmospheric pressure (equivalent to a par-
tial pressure, p0z of 135 mm Hg). Atmospheres deficient
in Ox do not provide adequate warning and most simple
asphyxiants are odorless. Several simple asphyxiants
present an explosion hazard. Account should be taken of
this factor in limiting the concentration of the asphyx-
iant. Specific examples are listed in Appendix E.
Physical Factors. It is recognized that such physical
factors as heat, ultraviolet and ionizing radiation, humid-
ity, abnormal pressure (altitude) and the like may place
added stress on the body so that the effects from expo-
sure at a threshold limit may be altered. Most of these
stresses act adversely to increase the toxic response of a
substance. Although most threshold G'mits have built-in
safery factors to guard against adverse effects to moder-
ate deviations from normal environments, the safety fac-
tors of most substances are not of such a magnitude as
to take care of gross deviations. For example, continu-
ous work at temperatures above 90'F, or overtime ex-
tending the workweek more than 25%, might be consid-
ered gross deviations. In such instances judgment must
be exemised in the proper adjustments of the Threshold
Limit Values.
Unlisted Substances. Many substances present or
handled in industrial processes do not appear on the
TLV list. In a number of instances the material is rarely
present as a particulate, vapor or other airborne conta-
minant, and a TLV is not necessary. In other cases suffi-
cient informatidn to warrant development of a TLV, even
on a tentative basis, is not available to the Committee.-
Other substances, af low toxicity, could be included in
Appendix 0 pertaining to nuisance particulates. This list
(as well as Appendix E) is not meant to be all inclusive;
the substances serve only as examples.
In addition there are some substances of not incon-
siderable toxicity, which have been omitted primarily be-
cause only a limited number of workers (e.g., employees
of a single plant) are known to have potential exposure
to possibly harmful concentrations.
,
Trade Names. Because many chemtcal substances t
are marketed under several trade names, the trade t
names have been replaced with their generic equivalent
in the alphabetical listing. Appendix H was created to
ease this transition and the CAS number appears with
the generic name to aid identificatlon.
Operational Guidelines: The ACGIH Board of Direc-
tors has adopted operational guidelines for the Chemical
Substances TLV Committee. These guidelines prescribe:
charge, authority, policies, membership, organization,
and operating procedures. The policies include the ap-
peals procedures. Copies of the guidelines d,ocument are
available from the Publications Office at a cost of $5 per
copy.
Threshold limit values and short-term
exposure limits adopted byACGIH for
1984-85
ADOPfED VALUES
TWA sTE[.
Substance [CAS #1 ppm"' mg)m;p1 ppm°, ml
Acetaldehyde (75-07-01..... 100 180 150 270
Acetic acid [64-19-7] ....... 10 25 15 37
Acetic anhydride
(108-24-7) ................. C 5 C 20. - -
Acetone [67-64-11........... 750 1,780 1,000 2,375
Acetoniuile (75-05-8] -
Skin ........................ 40 70 60 105
Acetylene [74-86-2] ......... E - - -
Acetylene dichlaride, see 1, 2-Dichloroethylene
#Acetylene tetrabromide
[79-27-6] .................. 1 15
Acetylsa8cylicacid
(Aspirh) [50-78-2].......
-
5
Acrolein [107-02-81......... 0.1 0.25
Acrylamide (79-06-1 ] -
Skin ........................
-
0.3
Acrylic acid [79-10-71....... 10 30
'AcryloniVile [107-13-11-
Skin ........................
2, A2
4.5, A2
$Aktrin[309-00-21-Skin.. - 0.25
(1.5) (20)
- -
0.3 0.8
- 0.6
- (0.75)
a) Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of cantaminated air by volume
at 25°C and 760 mm Hg pressure.
b) Approximate milligrams df substance per cubic meter of air.
tSee Notice of Intended Changes.
-1984-1985Addition.
Capital letters A, 8 D & E refer to Appendices: C denotes ceiling Gmit.
.+z,..Ux. con,S Jna mJ9, vn[ tl (1984) 3 73 Page 373
~-----'

BEIs
who agree that hippuric acid is elevated only if the TLV is
greatly exceeded, and that excretion of large amounts of en-
dogenous hippuric acid makes it unsuitable as a biological
exposure index.
Determination of the ratio of mandelic acid to
phenylgtyoxylic acid, and determination of the sum of the
two acids were also recommended for biological monitor-
ing of exposure.a62t) Since the kinetic constants of these two
metabolites are not the same and depend on exposure con-
centrations, the interpretation of the sums or ratios require
sophisticated pharmacokinetic analysis. We do not recom-
mend them as a BEt.
References:
1. Fiserova-Dergerova, V.: Gases and Their Solubility: A Review
of Fundamentals. Modeling of Inhalation Exposure to Vapors:
Uptake, Distribution, and Elimination, Vol. 1, pp. 3-28. CRC
Press, Boca Raton, FL (1983).
2. Wigaeus, E., A. Lof, R. Bjurstram and M. Byfalt Nordqvist: Ex-
posure to Styrene. Uptake, Distribution, Metabolism and Elimina-
tion in Man. Scand.l. Work Environ. Health 9:479-488 (1983).
3. Fiserova-Bergerova, V. and J. Teisinger, Pulmonary Styrene Vapor
Retention. Ind. Med. Surg. 34:620-622 (1965).
4. Bardodej, Z. and E. Bardodejova: Biotransformation of Ethyl
Benzene, Styrene and Alpha-Methylstyrene in Man. Amer. Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. 1. 31:206-209 (1970). ' .
5. Dutkiewicz, T. and H. Tyras: Skin Absorption of Toluene, Styrene
and Xylene in Man. Brit.1 Ind. Med. 25:243 (1968). -
6. Engstrom, J., R. Bjurstrom, I. Astrand and P. Ovrum: Uptake,
Distribution, and Elimination of Styrene in Man. Concentration
in Subcutaneous Tissue. Scand.l. Work Environ. Health. 4:1-9
(1978).
7. Astrand 1.: Effect of Physical Exercise on Uptake, Distribution,
and Elimination of Vapors in Man. Modeling of Inhalation Ex-
posure to Vapors: Uptake, Distribution, and Elimination, Vol.
2, pp. 107-130. V. Fiserova-Bergerova, Ed. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL (1983).
8. Landry, T.D., R.R. Miller, M.J. McKenna et al: Applications of
Pharmacokinetic Principles to Problems in Inhalation Toxicology.
Ibid., pp. 39-65.
9. Ohtsuji, H. and M. Ikeda[The Metabolism of Styrene in the Rat
and the Stimulatory Effect of Phenobarbital. Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 18:321-328 (1971).
10. Stewart, R.D., H.C. Dodd, E.D. Baretta and A.W. Schaffer:
Human Exposure to Styrene Vapor. Arch. Environ. Health
16:656-662 (1968).
11. Ikeda, M, T. Imamura, M. Hayashi et al: Evaluation of Hippuric,
Phenylglyoxylic and Mandelic Acids in Urine as Indices of Styrene
Exposure. tnt. Arch. Arbeitsmed. 32:93-101 (1974).
12. Gotell, P., O. Axelson and B. Lindelof: Field Studies on Human
Styrene Exposure. Work Environ. Health. 9:76-83 (1972).
13. Harkonen, H., P. Kalliokoski, S. Hietala and S. Hernberg: Con- -
centrations of Mandelic and Phenylglyoxylic Acid in Urine as
Indicators of Styrene Exposure. Ibid. 11:162-169 (1974).
14. Bardodej, Z., E. Bardodejova and I. Gut: Metabolism of Styrene
in Rats. Ceskosfovenska Hygiena 16:243-245 (1971).
15. Ikeda, M. and T. Hirayama: Possible Metabolic Interaction of
Styrene with Oraganic Solvents. Scand.l- Work Environ. Health
4 (Suppl. 2):41-46 (1978).
16. Ikeda, M., H. Ohtsuji and T. Imamura: In vivo Suppression of
Benzene and Styrene Oxidation by Co-administered Toluene in
Rats and Effects of Phenobarbital. Xenobiotica 2:101-106 (1972).
17. Wilson, H.K., S.M. Robertson, H.A. Waldron and D. Gompertz:
Effect of Alcohol on the Kinetics of Mandelic Acid Excretion in
Volunteers Exposed to Styrene Vapour. Brit.1. lnd. Med. 40:75-80
(1983).
i8. Dossing, M.: Antipyrine Clearance During Occupational Exposure
to Styrene. lbid. 40:224-228 (1983).
19. Poggi, G., M. Giusiani, U. Palagi et al: High-Performance Liquid
Chromatography for the Quantitative Determination of the
Urinary Metabolites of Toluene, Xylene, and Styrene. Int. Arch.
Occup. Environ. Health 50:25-31 (1982).
20. Sollenberg, J. and A. Baldesten: Isotachophoretic Analysis of
Mandelic Acid, Phenylglyoxylic Acid, Hippuric Acid and
Methylhippuric Acid in Urine After Occupational Exposure to
Styrene, Toluene and/or Xylene. /. Chromatog. 132:469-476
(1977).
21. Slob, A.: A New Method for Determination of Mandelic Acid
Excretion at Low Level Styrene Exposure. Brit. l. /nd. Med.
30:390-393 (1973).
22. Guillemin, N. and D. Bauer: Human Exposure to Styrene. II.
Quantitative and specific gas chromatographic analysis of urinary
mandelic and phenylglyoxylic acids as an index of styrene ex-
: posure. 7nt. Arch. Occup. Ehviron. Health 37:57-64 (1976).
23. Flek, ). and V. Sedivec: Simultaneous Gas Chromatographic
Determination of Urinary Mandelic and Phenylglyoxylic Acids
Using Diazomethane Derivatization. Ibid. 45:181-188 (1980).
24. Bardodej, Z.: Styrene Metabolism. Ceskolovenska Hygiena
9:223-239 (1964).
25. Ohtsuji, H. and M. Ikeda: A Rapid Colorimetric Method for the
Determination of Phenylglyoxylic and Mandelic Acids. Its Ap-
plication to the Urinalysis of Workers Exposed to Styrene Vapor.
Brit. l. Ind. Med. 27:150-154 (1970).
26. Guillemin, M.P. and D. Bauer. Human Exposure to Styrene. Ill.
Elimination kinetics of urinary mandelic and phenylglyoxylic acids
after single experimental exposure. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ.
Health 44:249-263 (1979).
i
27. Sedivec, V., J. Flek and M. Mraz: Urinary Excretion of Mandelic
and Phenyiglyoxylic Acids After Human Exposure to Styrene
Vapours. Pracov Lek. 35:365-373 (1983).
28. Ikeda, M., A. Koizumi, M. Miyasaka and T. Watanabe: Styrene
Exposure and Biologic Monitoring in F.R.P. Boat Production
Plants. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. f-Ihh. 49:325-339 (1982).
29. Engstrom, K., H. Harkonen, P. Kalliokoski and J. Rantanen:
Urinary Mandelic Acid Concentration After Occupational Ex-
posure to Styrene and Its Use as a Biological Exposure Test. Scand.
1. Work Environ. Health 1:21-26 (1976).
30. Engstrom, K., K. Harkonen, K. Pekari and J. Rantanen: Evalua-
tion of Occupational Styrene Exposure by Ambient Air and Urine (.n
Analysis. Ibid., Suppl. 2:121-123 (1978). ~
31. Van Rees, H.: De Respiratoire Opname Van Niet-inerte Gassen Q
en Dampen. Proefschrift, Leiden (1964). -
32. Droz, P.O. and j.G, Fernandez: Effect of Physical Workload on Un
Retention and Metabolism of Inhaled Organic Solvents. A Com- yrn
Ann. Am. Conf. Ind. Xyg., VoL 11 (t9&il 385 . rage 117

Transactions - 1984
ing than those based on physical impainnent. There is
increasing evidence that physical irritation may initiate,
promote or accelerate physical impairment through in-
teraction with other chemical or biologic agents.
Time-Weighted Average vs Ceiling Limits. Time-
weighted averages permit excursions above the limit
provided they are compensated by equivalent excursions
below the limit during the workday. In some instances it
may be permissible to calculate the average concentra-
tion for a workweek rather than for a workday. The rela-
tionship between threshold limit and permissible excur-
sion is a rule of thumb and in certain cases may not
apply. The amount by which threshold limits may be ex-
ceeded for short periods without injury to health de-
pends upon a number of factors such as the nature of
the contaminant, whether very high concentrations -
even for short periods - produce acute poisoning,
whether the effects are cumulative, the frequency with
which high concentrations occur, and the duration of
such periods. All-factors must be taken into consider-
ation in arriving at a decision as to whether a hazardous
condition exists.
Although the time-weighted average concentration
provides the most satisfactory, practical way of monitor-
ing airborne agents for compliance with the limits, there
are certain substances for which it is inappropriate. In
the latter group are substances which are predominantly
fast acting and whose threshold limit is more appropri-
ately based on this particular response. Substances with
this type of response are best controlled by a ceiling "C"
Nmit that should not be exceeded. ft is implicB in these
definitions that the manner of sampling to determine
noncompliance with the limits for each group must
differ a single brief sample, that is applicable to a"C'
limit, is not appropriate to the tim,e-weighted limit; here,
a sufficient number of samples are needed to permit a
time-weighted average concentration throughout a com-
plete cycle of operations or throughout the work shift.
Whereas the ceiling limit places a definite boundary
which concentrations should not be permitted to exceed,
the time-weighted average limit requires an explicit limit
to the excursions that are permissible above the listed
values. It should be noted that the same factors are used
by the Committee in determining the magnitude of the
value of the STELs, or whether to include or exclude a
substance for a "C" listing.
Excursion Limits. For the vast majority of substances
with a TLV, there is not enough toxicological data avail-
able to warrant a STEL Nevertheless, excursions above
the TWA-TLV should be controlled even where the eight-
hour TWA is within recommended limits. Earlier editions
of the TLV list included such limits whose values de-
pended on the TWA-TLVs of the substance in question.
While no rigorous rationale was provided for these
particular values, the basic concept was intuitive: in a
well controlled process exposure, excursions should be
held within some reasonable limits. Unfortunately, nei-
ther toxicology nor collective Industrial hygiene experi-
ence provide a sogd basis for quantifying what those
limits should be. The approach here is that the maximum
recommended excursion should be related to the varia-
billty generally observed in actual industrial processes.
Leidel, Busph and Crouse,' in reviewing large numbers
of industrial hygiene surveys conducted by NIOSH, found
'Leidel. N.A., K.A. Busch and W.E. Crouse: Exposuri Measurement, Action -
Lavd and Oawpfiana! Environmental Varia0lAty. NK1SM Pub. No. 76~131
(December 1975).
that short-term exposure measurements were generally
log normally distributed with geometric standard devia-
tions mostly in the range of 1.5 to 2.0.
While a complete discussion of the theory and prop-
erties of the log normal distribution is beyond the scope
of this section, a brief description of some important
terms is presented. The measure of central tendency in a
log normal distribution is the antilog of the mean loga-
rithm of the sample values. The distribution is skewed
and the geometric mean is always smaller than the arith-
metic mean by an amount which depends on the geo-
metric standard deviation. In the log normal distribution,
the geometric standard deviation (sd,) is the antilog of
the standard deviation of the sample value logarithms
and 68.26"/0 of all values lie between m,/sd, and m, x sd,.
If the short-term exposure values in a given situation
have a geometric standard deviation of 2.0, 5% of all val-
ues exceed 3.13 times the geometric mean. If a process
displays a variability greater than this, it is not under
good control and efforts should be made to restore con-
trol. This concept is the basis for the new excursion limit
recommendations which are as follows:
Short-term exposures should exceed three times the
TLV-TWA for no more than a total of 30 minutes dur-
ing a work day and under no circumstances should
they exceed fNe times the TLV, provided that the TLV-
TWA is not exceeded.
The approach is a considerable simplification of the
idea of the log normal concentration distribution but is
considered more convenient to use by the practicing in-
dustrial hygienist. If exposure excursions are maintained
within the recommended limits, the geometric standard
deviation of the concentration measurements will be
near two and the goal of the recommendation will be
accomplished. -
When the toxicologic data for a specific substance
are available to establish a STEL, this value takes prece-
dence over the excursion limit regardless of whether it is
more or less stringent.
"Skin" Notation. Listed substances followed by the
designation "Skin" refer to the potential contribution to
the overall exposure by the cutaneous route including
mucous membranes and eye, either by air borne, or
more particularly, by direct contact with the substance.
Vehicles can alter skin absorption.
Little quantitative data are available describing ab-
sorption of vapors and gases through the skin. The rate
of absorption is a function of the concentration to which
the skin is exposed.
Substances having a skin notation and a low TLV may
present a problem at high airborne concentrations, par-
ticularly if a significant area of the skin Is exposed for a
long period of time. Protection of the respiratory tract,
while the rest of the body surface is exposed to a high
concentration, may present such a situation.
.Biological monitoring should be considered to deter-
mine the relative contribution of dermal exposure to the
total dose.
This attention-calling designation is intended to sug-
gest appropriate measures for the prevention of cutan-
eous absorption so that the threshold limit is not invali-
dated.
Mixtures. Special consideration should be given also
to the application of the TLVs in assessing the health
hazards which may be associated with exposure to mix-
tures of two or more substances. A brief discussion of
basic considerations involved In developing threshold
1
flgt 272 372 An2 Am. Conf. lnd. Hyg Vot 1111984)

NIOSH/OSHA
POCKET GUIDE TO CHEMICAL HAZARDS
Editors
Frank W. Mackison
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
R. Scott Strcoff
Lawrence J. Partridga, Jr.
A. 0. Little, Inc.
U.S. OEPAATb.~- . ' OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF tABOR
Public Health Service Occupational Safery and Health Administration I
.
Center to Di3ea6e Control
Nationat )netitute for Occupational Safety and Health
eQa'el 4 ,% TJ F% ~ Yo,f's'I%U~ EJ' September 1978
e,d t oHIo. frzz6
EUtyl elhw oiatltyl aewr, EMyi ®da: 400 ppm 19,c00 ColaAeaa Fquid wilh MW: 74
EOUr,Oq0lyl ok,d~ (1200 mglmy pqo a duractelisec, BP:95 F
C.M,OC}i. SWMC esnr sweK ether ador ~,7-5 9 F
Pemqs~bfe IOLN PnyviN Oea.alpsar etlamreal and Pbyalr~l Neanpaaeinee tHa!unrsn
NOalt~is d ~~ Enppve.linit level Pmpntls 1AWwdand
Famda SN (Sa.
Ta_^4 1)
Eelyl tamute ENmeUVma1« Fara6c 100 PPm 6,000 Cdatesa Atpid wilh MW:74
aad e61y1 nlar (300 ngNny ppm a Inoy ader aP: 170 F
NCOOC.l4
Bq: 13.6%
RP.-4F
98 ENyt mxnptae ECCanNMOh, Ethyl 10 ppm cea 2,500
suleqdraN (25 mp/m0) ppm
6N.SX
i
I
EMyt aFUte
(G,N,).Si7
EOrylarwne
C.H,Pai,
Pa.emr' PrWectipn and Sanitalion
(Sia Tabie f}
Rpql
aaOnQ
Gog
WN
Char.ge: NA
RemawcAnywetaened(Aamm)
qett»g: i.apeat prpWng
Gcgglet Rusqn preb
WarJY PnorrrylN uppn wet
Ounge NA
Aanprs Ary enet snmed (namm)
Cpewxj Repeat acbng
Goggks Reason prab
Wavts Romplly uppn contam
Cnarge: NA
Remove: Aiq wet immed (namm)
(ACGM)
0.5 ppn
TN traNmyl n,~'sn~rSAEe (650 ~m7 plow
Pm
pN06JiCalY,
Telrae111piysdarN
Eyyynwy. nilytltalK 70 ppm 4000
AemweMfana~ (1 a ing/mq ppm
Mprnelhyl~
Resp'rata S.kcopn
Upqr L]nit Oerlcas Pamkn.d (See
Tabte 71
1000 ppnr CCROV
4000ppm:SA/SCBA
19,0q0 ppnc GMOV/b/SAF/SCaAF
Eswpe:GMOV/SCBA
1000 ppnx CCROVF
5000 ppm: GMOV/SAF/SCBAF
e000 ppm: SAF:PO,PP,CF.
Esrape GMGY/SGBA
100ppm:SA/SCBA
S00ppm:SAF/SCBAF
2500 ppm: SAPD,PP.CF
Esrape: GMOV/SCBA
Gobrtess [qufd w:N MW: 62
a sewg akwrkGke aP. 85 F
ador Sub 11%
RP:-55F
ColtMlnss Iiquid wilh MW:20e
amld.swwt BP.= F
a1mlaFpk.cda Sd:ne.cb
RP:g9F
Gpbdesiquidn MW:45
gaa wiM n strag BP: 62 F
ammeniakke odd Sol: MrssrEle
RP.<0F
RaAe Symptcmalq 4) (Sae
_ _ Tab . _
Ola, drowsy. beaa
exiled, narpave: ruq
vaml: krn eyes, upp.r
esp; skin
IM Imt eyes, nsp sys;
Ing rtarccsn
Can
Haatlh Nat.rds
VP. 442 mm Stnang midrars Qur,
FP,-160 ~ aprate:
UEC96% F
LEl L9%
VP. 194 mm NtratH, strpq CTr,
Mv-110 muduars.atray, tS:
F aeul~abagaab GC
UEL- 16% U
LEL. 26%
VP.442mm Strongmfdpan
MP: -234
F
UEL 16%
tEL 2.8%
VP: 2 mnt SOdg ~dt.n, wawr Resrq
MP, -121 CS:
UELI7% . 5
lEL 1.1%
VP. 1.1e
atm
MR-114
F
UEL 14%
tEL 93%
Sp+rs ~g N.60,
11s .aK
K
Frat Aid (Sae TatJe 5) Target Organs
Eye h immad
Skue Water wa>A
promplly
BreaM Mresp
Swalbwc Salt water, vpma
CNS, skkl, resp
sya, eyes
Eyr. Rr irnrned Eyes. resp sys
Skae Waler Ilush immed
Breatll: A6resp
Srallo,r. Salt water, vonit
IrJI Head, nau, irrit muc Eye: Irr immetl
Ing msm.b, tMCaC In arYmels: Sk'vr Saap wash immed
Con tncpaGnatime para: pWm Breath: Art resp
anC kver, kdney tlama9e Swalbw Satt water, vomM
Rasp,y.V wnya: 99
in animalc f,ver,
kidmys
Goerng: F::w,aat prplong 1000 ppm: CCR0VF/GMOV/SAF/SCBAF IM Irrit eyes, nase
Gqg:es: Rea+Gn pmn Esrape: GMOV/SCaA Irg
; Wasb: FrrpPyuxnwet CeI
` Gunge: NA
R~: tay wet enmed (namm)
CbMrg: Reascn p.ob
GeggwY hy coss
Wash: Irve,.! upon eontam Charga: NA.
Remo.e: Nm anr wet/conlam nommp
Rp.as Ere.ash, quwk dranch
500 ppnc SAF/SCBAF
4000 ppm: SAF PD,PP,CF
Esr,pe: GMS/SCBA
Eye: Irr Immed Reap ays. I~,
Skm: Snap wesh k,Lneya, b:aud.
Bmath Art~resP 56m
swalipw, WaGx,vonut
1M Irrrt eyas, bum skln; rasp Eye: Irr immed Resp syR e}as,
Abs mt: d'crm Skin: Waler Ilysh immad skin
6reath: Art resp
tr 9
n
Bwalkw.: Walar, *Omil

BIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE INDICES
Notice of Intent to Establish
Preface
Biological Exposure Indices (BEis) represent warning levels
of biological response to the chemical, or warning levels of
the chemical or its metabolic productfs) in tissues, fluids, or
exhaled air of exposed workers, regardless of whether the
chemical was inhaled, ingested,_or absorbed via skin. In
troduction of the BEI is a step in the evolution of the concept
of TLVs. The BEI provides the health personnel with an ad-
duionai tool to provide protection fa the worker. Use of body
fluids and appendages such as hair or nails for measuring the
absorbed amount of a substance has long been a standard
practice for certain substances. Lead is a classical example
of a substartce for which blood cancentratians have long been
considered theaiticai value in determining "safe" veisus "utr
safe" exposures. Two problems hindered the wider use of
biological measurements as indicators of "safe" environmen
tal exposurcs: 1) the relatively wide range in individual
response to a substance and the wide range of "nomul' that
has to be considered; and 2) the lack of simple specific
analytical methods of sufficient sensitivity. Both problems are
capable of solution, and we believe that sufficient progress
has been' made to begin utilizing selected BEB which can
be used as a guide to "safe" exposures to toxic dhemicais.
The BEI is considered supplementary to an airbome TLV.
TLVs are intended to provide the industrial hygienist wlth '
an additional measure to aid in the design of engineering con-
trds or for temporary use of personnel protective equipment
which will protect almost all exposed workers from untoward
effects of chemical exposure. In principle, TWMTLVs are
designed to prevent exposures which may cause acute or
chronic adverse effects. They are also intended to avoid at-
tendant deterioration of normal physiological function. This
approach is based on the assumption that for nearly all
workers there is a tolerable exposure limit and a tolerable
body burden o(airbome materiaf. If this assumption is valid,
there should be a range of safe biologically insignificant
changes of various measures of body funtxion.
TLVs are a measure of the composition of the external en-
vironment surrounding the worker. BEts are a measure of the
amount of chemical absorbed into the body. The concept
of the BEI is particularly useful in evaluating exposures to
substances with significant absorption through the skin. -
The biological determinant on which the BE1s are based
can fumish two kinds of Information useful in the control of
worker eaposure; 1) measure of the worker's individual
response, and 2) measure of the worker's individual overall
exposure. Measurements of response fumish an estimate of
the physiological status of the worker and can be made by,
a) detennining dunges in thearnpxu of a critiai biochemical
constituent, b/ determining changes in activity of a critical
enzyme, and U determining dianges in a physiological furic-
tion. Measurements of exposure can be made by, a) deter-
mining the chemical in exhaled air, urine, blood, hair, nails,
body tissues and fluids, b1 determining the rnetaboiite(s) of
the chemical in tissues and fluids, and rJ determining the ex-
tent of specific biochemical and physiological changes in-
duced by the chemical.
Recommended values of BEIs are based on data obtained
in epidemiological and field studies or determined as bio-
equivalent to a TLV by mearas of pharmacokinetic analysis
of data from controlled human studies. Must chemicals Gn-
duding organic solvents) are initially absorbed and eliminated
fairly rapidly - usually with initial ftaif-life values measured
in a few hours or even minutes. Rapidly changing cortcert-
uations in body fluids complicate the Interpretation of data
and the average body burden of a chemial attained during
a work shift can easily be over-predicted or urder.predicoed.
Furthermore, biological measuremeftts fail in most instartoes
to detEtt transient periods of over2xposure during the work
shifL Because elimination of chemicals and their metabolic
products, as well as biological changes induced by exposure
to the chemical, are kinetic events, the listed BEIs are strictly
related to 8fiour exposures and to the specified timing for
the collection of biological samples.
Them are other factors to be considered when the BEI is
applied. Among the facrors which must be consideteed in us-
ing BEIs are: a) changes induced by strenuous physical ac-
tivity; b) changes induced by environmental conditions
(al6tude, heat, diet, etc.); d changes induced by water in-
take; dl changes in physiological functions induced by preex-
isting disease or congenital variation; e) changes in
metabolism induced by congenital variation of metabolic
pathways; and N changes in metabolic pathway induced by
simultaneous administration of another chemical (induction
or inhibition of activity of a critical enzyme by medication
or by preexposure or coexposure to another chemical).
For BEIs based on urine analysis, a simple measurements
of concentrations can provide sufficient information on ex-
posure; but in many instances, measurements of elimination
rates provide more precise information. Urinary concentra-
tions related to creatinine represent a reasonable compromise
between the accuracy of the information ard the technical
means of obtaining the data.
Some BEIs are not protective of an identificd population,
or are nonspecific, or the correiation between the exposure
and biological determinant is weakened by variables hmaduc-
ed by large interindividual variation in response to the
chemical or by timing and fluctuation of exposure concen-
tration. In such ases the BEIs arry Ihe following notations:
"R" Notation. Indicates that an identifiable population
group might have an increased susceptibility to the efk*ct of
the dterrtical which kaves it unprotected by the recommerd-
ed BEI. The specific documentation should be consulted for
detailed information.
"" Notation. Some determinants are nonspecific, since
different chemicals may bear the same biological response.
AOL Aa. Ge/. W Mq. ttd 1I ftilN/ . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ "P Its
380
