RJ Reynolds
No Ttl
Fields
- Type
- LETTER
- Site
- Roemer Hc Jr
- Rjri
- Law
- Special Counsel
- Copied
- Barger
- Request
- Minnesota
- 1rfp5
- 1rfp32
- Recipient
- Bacon, J.L.
- Rjri
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Named Person
- Puck
- Rjri
- North
- Trudeau
- Cooper
- Medical College, O.F. Pa
- Sticht, P.
- Barger
- Creutz
- Box
- Rjr3386
- Author
- Seitz, F.
- Rockefeller Univ Hospital
- Characteristic
- Marginalia
Document Images
i
t.0V ~%1,]
.1.
L ~ lqoi `~
S
o Rock~f~~-r M
o Un~versicy ,,~
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
1230 1URK A%'FNUE tiEW YORK. hN 100.1 - 6399
October 4, 1984
Mr. John L. Bacon
Director-Corporate Contributions
R. J. Reynolds Industries, Inc.
World Headquarters
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
Dear John:
This is an update on some of the tasks for which
I assumed responsibility.
First, I have spoken with Dr. North informing him
about the fact that the next meeting of the policy com-
mittee on research grants would take place at the end
of November rather than prior to November lst. I also
suggested that he not be too apprehensive since the
committee had a good opinion of his work. I have also
asked him to prepare a brief abstract, understandable to
non-specialists, and to provide us with an account of
sources of funding for the specific program of interest
other than that obtained from R. J. Reynolds. He agreed
to comply promptly. I gave him your telephone number so
he may call you as a double check. In the meantime, I
have appended to this letter my own statement of the
essence of the program at Trudeau in which we are
interested.
Second, as we agreed, I called Dr. Cooper at the
Medical College of Pennsylvania. He regards the proposal
provided to us last January as one that might be acted
upon, although there have been great changes in the pro-
gram in the intervening period including the departure of
the leading investigator. From the discussion I conclude
that he has been completely preoccupied with other matters
during the last year as a result of his heavy new adminis-
trative duties. Somewhere along the way he concluded that
it was unlikely that support would be continued and he
recommended that the residue of the research group attach
itself to another research team which was prepared to
absorb some of their activities in what might be called a

Mr. John L. Bacon
October 4, 1984
Page 2
lower key way. As I mentioned on the telephone, the next
step is probably up to us. Since Dr. Cooper evidently did
not discuss the matter with Mr. Sticht duri,ng the summer
it probably would not be inappropriate to terminate the
program at the Medical College of Pennsylvania. If so,
one of us should write a letter although you may wish to
discuss this with Paul Sticht first.
Third, I called Dr. Barger's office and informed them
of the need to have the team up there be prepared to back
up Dr. Barger in connection with a proposal for a three
year renewal. Mrs. Creutz stated that she would take this
in hand as best she can. Dr. Barger is not due back until
the first week in November but I suspect that things will
get pulled together somehow. I will follow up my discus-
sion with Mrs. Creutz with a letter that will furnish some
guidance, mentioning both the abstract and the summary of
other support for the program.
Finally, I called Dr. Puck yesterday. He was out
of town for the rest of the week, however, his secretary
called me this morning to state that he will be available
to meet with us on the afternoon of Monday, October 29th.
I will call him again when he is back home to discuss the
background for ourr visit.
Best regards,
~~~
Frederick Seitz
