RJ Reynolds
John T. Ross, Plaintiff, -Vs- Philip Morris Company, Ltd., Defendant. Supplemental Transcript of Proceedings. Re Depositions of Witnesses: Dr. Kenneth D. Devine;Dr. Edith M. Parkhill
Fields
- Site
- Rjri
- Law
- Alias
- CN 9494
- Type
- DEPOSITION
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Box
- Rjr4125
- Request
- Blanchard
- 2rfp13
- Minnesota
- Letter
- Request
- 19970311
- Rogers
- 1rfp1
- 2rfp13
- Author
- Devine, K.D.
- Unk
- Parkhill, E.M.
- Unk
- UCSF Legacy ID
- dre29d00
Document Images
IN THE UNIT!:D STATES LIS_~RICT COURT FOR THE
WES-J'ERN D ISTRICT JF MISSOURI
i.'ESTERN DliriSlO.*~
JOHN T. ROSS,
Plain tiff,
R
-vs-
PHILIP MORRIS COTMPANY, LTt7.,
a corporation, .
Defendant.
11o. 9494
SUPPLEMENTAL TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
RE DEPOSITIONS OF WITINIESSES:
DR. KENNETH D. DEVINE
DR. EDITH M. PARK}iILL
VOL. 5-A
T3I~:I:I'T. L. Fi\LI;Y
Otf"IC~:~'. CURl t3F7 --.:TER. CiViSION NO. 2
'~~ ~aS , y n. `In
J~ : V 1_ rt 2-6068
I

I N D E X
.r ... ... ..~ w
Direct Cross Reclireet Recrow
Depoaition ofs
Dr. Kenneth D. Devir,e 579(2) 579(63)
Dr. Edith N. i'al~khi11 579(224) gi79i2~'A)
i~ X H I B I T 5
579(95
575(1e+)
579(222)
57~;:.'iv'1
Marked
579(111
579(210
579(291
Received
.~ ....,r...,........_..
Defendant's Exhibit Kt 579(146) 579(146)
( Ylaintiff's Exhibit 49 579(233) 579(233)
Plaintiff's Exhibit 50 57;(244)
Plaintiff's Exhibit 51 579(250) 579(251)

SUPYLEhiEidTAL 'l'RA1dSCRxPT OF PROCEEDINGS
of June 21 and 25, 1952
(See Volume 5, Page 579)
MR. FIELD: (Reading)
"In the United States District Court of the
Western District of Missouri, Western Division.
John T. Rosa, Plaintiff, versus Philip Morris & Company,
Ltd., a corporation, defendant.
"Appearances: Mr. Lyman Field and Mr. Charles
Carr, of the law firm of Rogers, Field, Gentry & Jackson,
Kansas City, Missouri, for the Plaintiff.
"Mr. John W. Oliver, of the law firm of Caldwela,
Eastin, Blackwell & Oliver, Kansas City, Missouri, and
Mr. John V. Hewitt, of the law firm of Conboy, Hewitt,
O'Brien & Boardman, New York, New York, and Mr. James C.
Wilson, of the law firm of Watson, Ess, ;rarshall &
Enogas, Kansas City, Missouri, for the defendant.
"Deposition of Dr. Keraieth D. Devine, a witness
of lawful age, taker, on behalf of the plaintiff in the
above entitled cause, wherein John T, Ross is the
plainti.ff,. and Philip Moa ris & Co., Ltd., a corporatioi~,

YT1s4
9
(!t~
that is correct, is it not? i--_---'--_`- ~ _
"AnSW,Rt Yes, sir. .
vT' s'
"~'~:~?IOhs And, T)r. Dwines how long did y .
?eilowship with the ?'ayo ?ovndation last?
' y
"AN^M= F`rom Jvlys 14'439 to Janvsryy 191+7.
"^'n'Si'IU;ts l+nd as a pellov of the "ayo ':lin
.~4.i.
did you speciatize in any of t'~e ~,qny branc':es of medi-
cine that are practiced here?
"Ai' SUMRt N)-r Fe2lowship wRs cbnfined to the s'
of diseases of the head and nc3ck. V(- call it hore n
Fellowsl1p in plastio surgary. .
"Q?^nsTXO?ds Dr. 3)Ovine, when 3id you beco.*.e a
me-nber of the pe~anent staff of the 'fAyo Tnstitution?
"Ai;sWRs 19'-+7s January the 1At.
"QIIESi'213;'s And in what cs,pacity were you on
the staff?
"AfiSWrRs t,'e21 s if you want to know what ny
duties wcr a-- I svspect thet i s w hat t??c q-mestAon mear,s?
"c;;IS;TIO't't wells I nean what specialty, a
certain department or division.
"A,dSaERs tde called it then the departnent of
Iaryncolovys orat r+nd plastie avrgery. ;
~
"MSa"xON .4n.d have fcsu contimel on the stAi'f;
of the 'fP4yo Clinic ever since?
1~ ~~; ;bf~;Rs Yes.
.
v
V
v
O

Vi1 s2
U
p
5?9( ?)
is the dofer.dant, *- * pimsuant to thA r.ot3c3 hereto
annexed and tho stipulations hfroinafter set fflrthw
before 3ohn n. Carney, a notary public in nnd for the
County of 61mRtedl State of T'fnnesotat at the Vxyo
Clinic, '=.eyo ~3uildinQj rochester, !{1r_r_esotat on the
25th day of t'.Arch 1959"
T'o need to read the stipulation on the
hospital rQCords --
MR. ?:QFtIYYs r%of no need for ts!at.
'iR. FIFLDs - 2 wi21 go f.hem directly to ?'age 4.
MR. Hki?Ul's Inigyt ju~t state that Plaintiff's
Exhibit 1 wQs the Vayo hospital rocords that were ident-
ii'ied there.
M PIMDs "Qi~F.STIC1? Oy Y,r. Field) s h'ould
giva your full nano to the Court and 3vey, Dr. :hNvine
"AFtS'.,nE'7ts Kenneth r,niel T"x-ne.
school
"Q'SESTIA'1t Dr. Devins$ of %,,hf.t sahoo2x And
coliegds are you a rrFltill$tA4
'' J'sAI ;;d::Rt Universi ty of lowa in 191+1 1 medi ca1
' ;L~~ i ICR't And did yov also obtain your colleg
ed>>cACi.on at that institution?
"A`I'V-21?lS "o, X went to pre-nndicAl sa?nool at
the 1tate College, vo cr311 It r:m, of Totira!. q+- ameQ.
'~ ~J :~,: ric~'~ ~
D
~
0
0
4rA .yhen dl.d ymi obt ain yotjr
~
--- - -- - -v~
V
~

v rl sb
i
I
,79(6)
nationAidQ Qocieties dealing 14ith your specialty?
"Afi1-4uRs Well # I wqx certified in 19514, by the
Araerican Board of Plastic S')rgeryt An+: in 1;55 by the
fu4ericmn Soaxd of S;:oiary:igoiagy.
"^i1LS'c'ICNs And would yo-i o?cplain to the jury
what otolaryngology i e?
"A::!7Wi:R= 6°eZl9 it is ehiefly the study and
care of dises.ses that deal with the earsq nose and throat
"Q~1-?,5TIO;~'s A.hd` Poctorq from a viewpoint of
nn xr,g it clear to the -Iar:~,ans to the jurors, the sig-
nificance of your beine certified by the national hoardi
would you give for the record a brief explanation of what
these national boards arQ and what theX nean within the
nedical profession in terna of standing and professional
competence and so forth?
K ANS'r:k:R= Well s all the certif icAtion r.g©ans is
that the individual who has been certified h<3s studied
vnder certain a.uspice3 for a certa-in Ier,gth of timei and
he has presented himself to a group of specialists in
the field and has been axa°Aned by them Pnd found to be
qur,2ified to prac+:ico in tL,ie narticular field.
"0,T5TIQ?i: And that cm.a*-;naticn! is t?hat con-
ducted on a na.*.ior:uiso basis within the specialty by a
national board?
rl ~~l`it~i;Rt Yf's, It Is.
-ob

Yr% 1a.5
0
a
5710}
doctor had discovered t`at ?io had a cancer in his throat.
He presented hir:self here for arn opinion Pbo1it how he night
get well.
"^DgSTIC~?s Did he mention thR nanis of the
doctor in Kansas City?
".ANSWgRs YPs, Dr. John Knight, YAncas ^itpt
Vissouri, who removed a bit of tissve fron his throat,
and according to our records this was perfor^iod on ?Rbru-
ary 9, 1952. This tt ssue was obtained and or.anined by our
pathologist at t?:e C1inAc, and a diabmogis of cancer was
madQ.
" CUES i I C3: t Dr. Devin o, thi s Dr. John Kni ght
that you r!entionodg is he Imown to you within the r.,edical
profession7"
l'R. HATR1MJunt a*:omont. If the Court piease$
I object to that qveation for the same reasons given by
~
i;r. Piold in objecting to tz:y inqAring of Dr. Y,night i
about other doctors. It i s not proper to have one doetor
pass on the quslifications of e.r,other, as Irecaxl,
2iT? COURN Yes, I think thnt is xtQht. Objectio
,
:ustained.
4ft. FI1SaDs (Rea.Qi ng) !
Dnctor, when the pAfiient noss cR'ne
to t?_:e Clinic thusq with this story and this hi.story, what
Exa^~ination :,ras initially conductPd on tiin?

..._. ._.. _.__. ;.:~: .~.. . _ :~.. .
5?9(14)
..
on it.
.it. OLZV SR s Doctor, I t.a`-ce it when you Qay ' WQ'
"'1
you arv describing «-?
A tea-n of pcople, but I e-n eperil-i.ng of
myself.
""~~~ . OLI'1::Rt You were personally present?
"WITr:E.",.3"= Yes.
" . bLIVSRs I thought you were, butI Ys,nted
to be sure.
"WZT;7sSSt Yes.
n=S:'IO?;t hoctor, would you tRll the Court
and Jury what you and tho tes.m) so--to-sporiks i'oiind when
thi s vi sual exa^iination was conducted after he had boon
01
given an anesthetic?
"A?:31r,R: WclLs we could sFe this cnncFr in his
throat in a pe.rticulAr place in Ms throaa. It 1hy to
the one side of the Mouth of t'1e swnllo*ving pipes and the
nouth of the tirindpipe. You co,ald call it the voice box,
if you like, or the laryn_X. It is in a particul.ar place
in the throat that we call the pyriform sinus.
r~. ~ PIOi?: And, Doctor, raforrine to that
portion of the hospital record on tho big sheet" -- this
boing }ho r lotov tat of it -- "and I a-i now roferring to
I ' 11 what --z
I
,
"_A?j~, T"Mi :'he t'.:vs ter '''hnet.

tiTTi 93
10
Degree?
"A?y-IMERt 1941.
i
i
"M,SiIQ11s rol3rn+ring your gradvarion framrt.hat I
medic1l school s where did you hRve any NrtbQr p eriod of
study, research or praetice kithin your profession?
."A'NVEF.s 'e11 ) let' s seop in 1941 I went to
RcchestAr, Nc-w York for a two year IntArnship, from '41
to "+3.
Yor'k.
r' ~L~ESTIC~;4f At what institution?
"A?:SWERs At Highland P:ospitals Ftochegter, 1'ev
"~,,rp,SPInRs A:nd did you specializa in any bronch
of the nedical profession or wR4 that fust an internship
gon©rallq'1
"A`,Vr.Rs 'i''~e last year was spc;nt on A surCtoal
residency.
rr,
"qT3ESixO1't And from that ingtitution where did
yr,=s Co g Dr. Ucv ir, e?
"Ahrstrio. At I entered the t'.ayro Fo'mdatSon on a
FeXlowship in 191+3.
"(jJ~: S','TiC?; s ".nd bqve you contirn)ed at the !Tayo
Clinic eLer sirce, Dr. Devi,ne?
"mn4m: Since 0431 without tnt,,~r7tispti on.
"f4,'S".'"IT 'r 'nd we are ta'-e{ng t.his Aepr,si tion
today here fn Toci~Pstcr, ''irncsc,+.at n.t +.het t 'a.:o ^1lnics

5^9C9>
YLIs9
tr;etl, in Add.ition to :5o-ne rasia tests
which uc like to get, nuch as a c`iesh x-ray .qnd blood test
urinaZysis, ph;/sScal s?san.i,nat,ion, aQ exa?ninPd, hi s*,hroat .
by Mear;s of cirect larynCoscopy. This i.s n Mot?:od whore-
by-we.,aro able Lo look into the throat with bright Lights:
and at tr.is exa?dn3ti.on we saw Lho cancer In his ttiroat.
"Q,Uf:S,cI4TT: Is that exanination one that you can
do arhile Vio FcttiQnt 4.8 coilScZ ou:3f boctor?
"A`: SN',R: It can be done either way.
"QUns T'I0'Xt How was i*t done In this insLance?
"A?tMdF.Aa In this inntance, he was put to sleep.
"OU9S;X017i hnd wou],d you report to the Court
and the iuryt raking xoferonae to any portions of tha
hosnitAl record that you desire to, vlliat vas found when
this visual exgninaticm wss conducted on Mr. Rosx after
he had been given an anesthetic?
"ANSUMI: 'First, I wotld like to say ti.is cancer
was seen In the Clinic In the office wi.th the patient
s+ ttinU in a c!~air ~ri th a little tiny *:irror. We wished
to have hin come to the hospitat so that we could ma'ke
a better cxamination, so we could doter-aine the ax}ont of
it, the zize, so that we TnigY:t deaide wl:nthor this shou'td
be operatod on or whether he s':ould rpcoivA coMQ o:her
typa of traAtment, and so the exaninnaion congisted In
t1:e nain of dcveriininU whettsr or not w,? nho»td onnr-at;o
