RJ Reynolds
Prototype Development Request.
Fields
- Type
- FORM
- Site
- Mdd
- Mdic
- Attachment
- 6239 -6264
- Author
- Murphy, D.H.
- Unk
- Box
- Rjr2335
- Request
- Minnesota
- 1rfp93
- Date Loaded
- 27 Feb 1998
- Brand
- Salem
- Salem Lights Menthol 100
- Virginia Slims
Document Images
/
\ ..
l_t i; i
Prototypo Development Request Datc~ i
'rojeet M-2 .
riginated By:
Name: D. II. Murphy
Reference Number: 81-001
(check one) 0 Initial Request
[] Change/Previous Reference No.
Department: Brand Mark "_ "; D,ct__
OBJECTIVE: ~ New Product
To develop a successful SALEM line extension by integrating [p Brand Extension
a unique, young, and exciting user image with the superior
SALEM Family product heritage. D Product Modification
(check one)
RATIONALE:
The SALEM Family needs a line extension targeted primarily to 18-24
fcntn3cs to curb the growth of Virginia Slims Lights Menthol within
this category, and bring net business to the Family.
I. PRODUCT ACTION STANDARD :
1. Superiority versus Virgiriia Slims Lights Box Menthol among 18-34
year old female smokers of competitive low tar 100mm menthol brands,
with at least 6 mg. tar.
2. Parity versus Virginia Slims Lights Box Menthol among female smokers
of SALEM Light 1.00's.
V. COMPETITIVE TARGET BRANDS: Virginia Slims Lights Menthol
V. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS:
Total Length:98 _~mm
Filter Length: 31 mm
Tipping Length: 3 5 mm
Circumference:2 2 . 5 mm
Filter Type: C/A
/I. PROPOSED TARGET DATES:
Max. . Min. Desired
Tar Delivery: 8 mg./ 7 mg./ mg. per cigarette
Nicotine: " mg./ - mg./ mg. per cigarette
Tipping Color: white Package Style: Rp~;
Paper Color: wh it- 0- Visible.Tipping Perforations:
Name Placement: arnlnd CL
chrette,
on tipping
Prototypes available TBD
Consumer Tests (NFO)
ll. ESTIMATED MARKETING OBJECTIVES/COST BENEFITS:
@ No objection [] Not desired
0 Test Market
Introduction (0 Nationai
(Check One) .
Incremental Unit Volume Objective 3 , 7 1 R mm Incremental Cost Savings (Category/Amount):
Market Size. - Units 623 , 500 mm - $ - M
- Share Objective ~'t 96
Segment Size - UnitsFFLT 7 F, , 20Q__mm
- Share Ob~ptpwm i2.6 %
TOTAL
- M
- M
- M
M
Ill. ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS (By BRAND R&D) $ TBD M
IX. Was request identified as an action program in the 6] Operating Ptan C3 Revised Oper. Plan U
Neither.
RequestincLDepartment
Si~nature
7N4
Head Cur. Brands
I RPSP,1rrh Mnnve
I Manager 6,
~
.
nr _
y Rran Bana
r
_
~
_ _
Date
V c
' i .
- /.
R&D
Mfg.
Mktg.
EVP, Mktg.
~
0
0
t,n
m
'PROVED COPIES TO: Di/rtor, Brand R&D-Director, t]uatity Assurancef Director, Prod. Pianning & Info.
Svcs.-Comptrotrers Dept.-Originator
