RJ Reynolds
What's Not A Risk?
Fields
- Date Loaded
- 21 May 1999
- Site
- R&D
- Biochem Biobehavioral-Sci Affairs
- Nystrom Cw
- Master Scientist
- Type
- PUBLISHED DOC
- Attachment
- 6876 -6926
- Author
- Lyon, D.G.
- David, G. Lyon
- Printers Ink
- Request
- Cordova
- 1rfp29
- Barnes
- 1rfp17
- Texas
- Initial
- Disclosure
- Rogers
- 1rfp1
- Named Person
- Ti
- Public Health Div
- Berkson, J.
- Mayo Clinic
Document Images
BEE
Danville, Virginia
July 1, 1963
Another Attack Brewing
Reports that the government is preparing to issue
through its Public Health Division a new and formid-
able attack on tobacco is causing the industry some
concern, because it now appears to be. a vindictive
assault which can only do harm to one industry which
pours tax money into the treasury.
Tobacco Institute, which is looking after the in-
dustry's inlerests, reminds us that the theory about cig-
arette smoking and health has been repeated so often
that many have forgotten it is still just a theory lack-
ing clinical and laboratory verification.
The public should not ignore the opini0n of Dr.
Joseph Berkson, head of medical statistics at Mayo
clinic, that "statistical studies must be confirmed by
experimental studies and other different types of in-
vestigation--and this has not happened. The fact is
there is a dispute among scientists as to the causes of
lung cancer and heart disease and much more must be
learned before it will be known whether any of the
factocs now under study has a role in causation."
That the industry is sincerely interested in plumb-
ing the depths of smoking and health, is indicated by
the fact that more than six million dollars in research
funds has been made available for independent medical
and scientific research.
PRINTERS' INK
June 28, 1963
Accurate, but not right
The Tobacco Industry Research Committee has
offered an impressive answer to the American
Heart Assn.'s recent anti-smoking resolution. Un-
fortunately, it is not an answer to the points the
Heart Assn. raised.
With the technically precise logic that has mark-
ed most of its recent statements, the TIRC declares
that "statistical association does not prove causal
relationship." This is quite true and it is also
irrelevant. The Heart Assn. didn't claim any "cau-
sal relationship" between smoking and heart dis-
ease. What it did claim was that the available evi-
dence - admittedly circumstantial - is sufficient
cause for concern, especially when it comes to
smoking by teenagers and "high-risk" individuals.
The TIRC had better shake off the notion that.
to be technically accurate is to be right. It is not '
facing a scientific seminar, but mounting alarm.
PRINTER' S INK
New York, New York
July 1,9, 1963
What's not a risk?
Westport, Conn.
Why do you pick on the tobacco
industry (editorial, June 28)?
It's a theory that smoking too much
gives you lung cancer. It"s a proven
fact that eating too much cake makes
you too fat. And overweight is America:
greatest single health menace. People
who sell calorieS shouldn't throw stones!
Who is the better. health risk?
The man who smokes too much?
The man 'who drives too fast?
The man who eats too much?
The man who drinks too much?
The man who works too hard?
Ask your doctor-or your own common '
sensel
Perhaps we should ban cake-mix ad-
vertising from media exposed to mid-
dle-aged women-insist that TV com-
mercials show automobiles operated on.
the basis of Safety Council standards-
prevent susceptible children from being
hooked by the candy habit.
And where will it all end?-DwID C.
LYox, president, DwID. C. Lvox Inrc.
