Jump to:

Product Design

The Influence of Paper Additives on Cigarette Sidestream and Mainstream Deliveries

Date: 27 Jul 1987
Length: 47 pages
570365151-570365197
Jump To Images
snapshot_bw 0000954799

Abstract

Describes the effect on mainstream and sidestream smoke of adding chemicals to cellulose fiber cigarette paper. States that cigarette papers usually contain a burn additive. Uses sodium, potassium and magnesium salts of weak organic acids, phosphates, aluminum sulphate, citric acid, sodium carbonate and pectin as additives. Reports an increase in burn rate from most of the chemical additives, with potassium salts causing a greater increase than sodium salts. States that chemical additives tend to increase mainstream carbon monoxide delivery, but reduced puff numbers mitigates this. Finds that acidic burn additives reduce the sidestream nicotine emission.

Fields

Author
B.A.T. Industries, Ltd.
Defense
Dittrich, D.J.
Defense
Robinson, David P. (BAT GR&DC Aerosol Science)
Defense
*Baker, R.R. (use Baker, Richard R.)
Change Control
Recipient
Binns, Richard (BATCO GR&DC Dept. Head )
R. Binns was a BATCO Dept. Head. (N.M. Tobacco Companies Personnel List)
de Siqueira, C.J.P. (Scientist at BAT 1975-76)
Scientist at British-American Tobacco Co. Ltd.(?)in 1975-76.
Dunn, Patrick J. (ITC R&D, Montreal, Canada, c 1985-6)
Manager, Analytical Services and Director of Smoking Behavior Research at Imperial Tobacco, Canada. Went by "Pat" or P.J."
Gilderdale, R.F. (BATCO Central America & Mexico Caribbean Coordinator)
Defense
Heard, Alan L. (BAT GR & DC Programs Worldwide Coordinator)
Worldwide coordinator for British American Tobacco's Group Research and Development programmes, around the mid 1980s. BAT Group R&D Manager, Southampton, 1984.
Kausch, Erwin (BAT)
Hamburg
Massey, S.R. (Stewart), Dr. (BAT Canada R&D Manager)
Reynolds, Martin Lance (BW Director of Research)
Also served as Director of Product Development.
Rittershaus, E.
Thomsen, H. V. (BAT)
1994 Member of Coresta Task Force
Hypothesis
Sidestream constituent yields
Modification of selected sidestream smoke constituents in response to health concerns.
Mainstream constituent yields
Modification of selected mainstream smoke constituents in response to health concerns.
Use of additives
Modification of tobacco products through use of additives and measuring effects on dependence, behavior, and toxicity.
Keyword
Burn rate control
Burn rate is controlled through use of burn additives, density, paper, etc.
Sidestream smoke
Sidestream visibility
Irritation (Attribute measure)
Additive
Sodium acetate
Potassium chloride
Magnesium carbonate
Citric acid
Aluminum sulfate
Sodium carbonate
Smoke Constituent
Nicotine
Carbon monoxide
Design Component
Low sidestream paper
Paper permeability
Subject
Paper (Design)
additives
secondhand smoke

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
i~ ~ /! ~iiiiiii,iiii:i/:I¸ ~7 Research and Development Centre Southampton England B.A.T (U.K. AND EXPORT) LIblITED A Member of tile B.A~T Group t 5'703G 5~-5~ This repm~ mist no[ ~ copied o r shown to OIT~OK hori~d pe r ~)n~. ~ --
Page 2: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
B.A.T (B.K, & Export) Ltd., Research & Devel0pmen~ Centre, SOIJTIAAMRTOR. DJD/JMW/46M THE INFLUENCE OF PAPER ADDITIVES ON CIGARETTE SIOESTREAM AND MAINSTREAM DELIVERIES REPORT NO. RD.2086 27.7.1987 R~D-LO44-87 c.3 AUTHORS: 0.3. Dittricb SECTION EEADER: O.P, Robinson ISSUED BY: R.R. Baker DISTRIBUTION: Dr. R. Binns Mr. A.L. Heard Mr. M.L. ReW~old$ Dr, P,J. Dann Dr. S.R. Massey ~r. ~.G. RicRoII5 Herr E. Rit~ersh~us Dr, E. Kau$ch Dr, C-~.?, de Siqueira Mr. H.V. Thomsen Mr. ~.R. Gflderdale Library Copy No, i 2 3, 4 5 6 7,5 9 10 11 12 13 i˘, 15 COPY NO, ~.~ 57036515 @ 1981 B A T IU K ~n4 El~mp Llm,˘~ This r~pom mn~E a~ ~˘ copied or Shown ~o unluthen~ ~tr~ns
Page 3: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
B.A.~ (D.K. & Export) LtdI, Research & De~el~p~n% Gen%re, SOUTHAMPTON. DJD/JMW/46M 27tR July~ 1987 THE INFLUENCE OE PAPER ADDITIVES ON CIGARETTE SIDESTREAJ~ AND MAINSTREAM DELIVERIES REPORT NO. RD.2086 R&D-L044-87 c.3 SUMMARY This Report describes the effect of applying chemical additives to cigarette papers on the mainstream and sidestream smoke cha~ac%eris%i~s of cigarette~. Cohventional cigarette papers are made from natural cellulose fibre, filler (normally calcium carbonate) and in most cases a burn additive. The cigarette papers to which chemical additives were applied in this study were a conventional paper, a high basis weight pager c~ntainin~ magnesium hydroxide as gar% Qf the filler, and also a paper with titanium dioxide as the main filler. The chemical additives chosen, sodium, potassium and magnesium salts of weak organic acids, phophates, aluminium sulphate, citric acid, sodium carbonate and pecti~, were ones likely to give good reductions in ViSible sidestream frem earlier work. Application of most of the chemical additives examined Caused the bur~ rate of the cigarette to incre3~e, the potassium salts causing a greater increase in the burn rate than the sodium salts. Addition of chemical additives to cigarette paper %~nds %~ i~cr~ase ~ain~%rea~ cB~b~n ~n~x~e delivery i~ percentage vo]ume/volume terms, but because of the reduue~ 570365153
Page 4: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
R&D~L044-87 c.3 puff ~umbers of the cigarettes, the delivery of carbon monoxide per cigaretze (mg) does not necessarlly increase. Acldic burn additives in the ciBarette payer reduce the sidestream aic~ti~e emission of the cigarette by a simil~r amount as the rest of %he partl~late ~ha&e. This is ~t achieved with ~her additives where the reduction of particulate matter (~ater and nicotine free) is much ureater t~an the nicotine reductlon. KEY ~OR~S Low Sidestream Cigarettes Cigarette Paper Additives Burn Additives Cigarette Paper Cigarette DesiBn Sidestream VislbiTity Mainstream Smoke P~fi ~umi~er Static Burn Rate Smoke Deliveries TNA PMWNF Irritation -ii- 570365154
Page 5: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
CONTENTS i. INTRODUCTION R. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD 2.1 Bobbin Application 2.2 Spill Application 3. CIGARETTE SPECIFICATION 3.1 Paper Specification 3.2 Tobacco Type 3.3 Cigarette Construction 4. RE-REEL STUDIES: RESULTS 5. RE-REEL STUDIES: DISCUSSION 5.1 Influence of Potassium TartraLe Additive Level 5.2 Effect of Sodium Acetate Addition 5.3 Effect of Potassium Lactate Addition 5.A Effect of Magnesium Citrate/Citric Acid Addition 5.5 Acidic Burn Additives 5.5.1 Effect of Aluminium Sulphate Addition 5.5.2 Effect of Ammonium Oihydrogen Orthophosphate Addition 5.5.3 Effect of Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate Addition 5.5.4 Effect of Citric Acid Addition 5.6 Effect of SoGium Carbonate Addition 5.7 Effect of Pectin Addition 6. SPILL APPLICATION:RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Spill Application of Potassium Dihydrogen Phosphate 6.2 Spill Application of Sodium Lactate 6.3 Spill Application of Sodium Oihydrogen Phosphate 6.4 Spill Application of Disodium Hydrogen Citrate 6.5 Spill Application of Sodium Dihydrogen Sulphate 5.6 Spill Application of Sodium Carbonate 6.7 Spill Application of Sodium Tarcrate 7. CONCLUSIONS N. REFERENCES TABLES 1-6 FIGURES i-6 1 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 6 5 5 10 11 11 12 13 14 14 15 15 17 17 18 lg ig 20 2O 21 22 23 25 -iii- 5703G~155 ]gs7 BA T (UK a~o E,~:Lir~.e˘ Th=~ Tepon nusl ~oE b~ c~phcd~r ~ho~n t~unlutho~sc~j persons
Page 6: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
-1- i. INTRODUCTIQN Cigarette paper consists of natural cellulose fibre, filler (normally calcium carbonate) and in most cases a burn additive. The fibre is the basic constitueng of the paper and forms the ~web~ (a structure of interwoven fibres). The filler is added primarily go increase the opacity of the paper, amd to improve its appearance. The burn additive is used mainiy as an ash conditioner (to improve the ash appearance) and also hag a second major role in congro]ling the burn rate of the cigarette. Reductions in sidestream emissions from cigarettes can be produced by chan~es in the cigarette paper specification. The main paper parameters which offer Control over the sidestream emissions of cigarettes are: filler type and level {1), inherent permeability (2), basis weight and the type and level of chemical burn additive used (3, 4). The above four parameters are inter-related, for example increasing the chalk filler content of the paper wiil tend to increase permeability aild basis w~igh~ if other factors are kept ConsbanP. The objective of ~he present study was tQ assess tbe effect, on the mainstream deliveries and Sidestream emissions of cigarettes, of the addition of various chemical additives to a number of different base paper types. The purpose of the investigation was to obtain a greater understanding of the influence of additive level oa the paper, and the effect of changing base paper type. The additives chosen were ones likely to give a good reduction in visible sidestream from earlier work (5). 570365:156 @ 19g7BAT IUK J~d Ex~fl~LJmLl~d ThJxr~nmu~lno~C~pledor~howntounlut~n~td~on~
Page 7: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
-2- 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD Burn additives were applied to the cigarette papers in the laboratory by two methods, bobbin and spill application, described below. 2.1 Bobbin Application The de-reeler Applicator {6) has been used to produce small bobbins, approximately 500 m in length, of the cigarette paper with chemical applied. The Re-ree~er Applicator is a reel to reei device which applies an aqueous solution of the chemical via pickup and transfer rollers from a bath. The wet treated paper is then dried as it passes between two heater plates, prior to being re-wound onto a bobbin core. 2.2 Spill Application In the second method, the burn additives were applied to the cigarette spill after the tobacco had been removed. The tobacco was b]uwn out of the cigarette using the Cigarette Refabrication Unit (7). ]he burn additive was applied in solution to the empty cigarette paper spill via the Cigarette Spill Applicator (8), and the excess w~ter evaporated from the spil] in situ via a compressed air supply. After the burn additive had been applied to the spills, tobacco was hlnwn back into them from cigarettes of the s~me construction, using the Cigarette Refabrioation Unit. In this manner sufficient cigarettes were produced in order to carry out the required mainstream and siGestream smoke analyses. 5703S5157 i~7 B A T i U K in~ E~nl LL~ILed Thl~ te~ mu~t no~ ~ cop~ed of ~n %o un~u~ ~on~
Page 8: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
-g- 3. CIGARETTE SPECIFICATIONS 3.1 Paper Specifications The cigarette papers used in this exercise had the following nominal specifications. (a) 556NC - chemical free, 25 CORESTA units (e.g.) permeability, conventional weight of 23 g m-2. (b) 12-˘GACO - chemical free, 12 C.U. permeability, with 111% magnesium hydroxide filler measured as the oxide at a high bosis weight of 40 g m-2. (c) 12-4C10 - 12 E.g. permeability, with 10% tripobassium citrate burn additive, at a high basis weight of 40 g m-2. (d) 12NO - chemical free, 12 C.U. permeability, conventional weight of 27 g m-2. le) (f) 3-21 CTTgCU - 9 C.U. permeability, with 15% titanium dioxide filler, conventional weight of 24 g m-2. 55C - 3.5 C.U. permeability, with 10% tripotassium citrate burn additive, low calcium ˘arbonaze filler level {15%), at a high basis weight of gO g m-2. (g) 12-40ACI0 - 12 C.U. base paper perforated to a final permeability of 80 C.U., containing 10% tripo~assium citrate burn additive, 10% magnesium hydroxide filler measured as the oxidep at a nigh basis weight of 40 g m-2. The 12-4 GACO, 12-4 CIO and Ig~C (papers b, c and d) were selected in order to show the effect of chemica~ addition be cigarette paper at the same air permeability, on papers conbdini~g magnesitzm ~ydrnxide filler, high citrate level 570365158
Page 9: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
-4- and conventional chalk filler respectively, 3-21 CTTgCU (paper e) was used for the addition of the acidic burn additives because of the neutral nature of the titanium dioxide fi]ler, a]lowing the pH of the paper to be reduced more easily than with papers containing basic chalk and magnesium oxide fillers. The S5C (paper f) was used as a high citrate paper similar to the 12-4CIg but at a much lower air permeability. The additional control gaper in the exercise was the 12-4 DACIO (paper g}, as an example of a low visibility sidestream paper made by Papeteries De Mauduit. The 556NC (paper a) was used to ascertain whether the addition of pectin had any effect on a conventional cigarette paper. Table I gives the cigarette paper analysis for bhese base papers prior to the addition of chemicals via the ge-ree]er Applicator or the Cigarette Spill Applicator. Table 2 gives the ci~areLte code, the base paper used, the additive type and level plus the final permeability of the paper, in CORESTA units, of the cigarette papers to which chemicals were applied using the Re-reeler Applicator. It can be seen from Table 2 that a range of potassium tartrate levels (3 for each paper) were added to the 12-4GACO, 12-4CI0 and 12 NC papers. A range of levels of potassium tartrate additive was included in order to evaluate the effect on the emission of various smoke components in the mainstream and sidestream smoke. In order to maintain a reasonably sizem experimental design it was not possib1~ LO consider the influence of additive level and typ~ on all the base papers. However, sodium acetate, potassium citrate and magnesium citrate/citric acid were evaluated a~ one level on three of the cigarette pagers 12-4GACO, 12-4CI0 and 12 NC. 570365159 [g~7 B A T ~U K mn,~ Expos) Limited Thls rein m=~ no~ be ˘,)picd or sho~ to vnlut~nscd ~ns
Page 10: 0000954799 Log in for more options!
-5 g.g Blend 188 Virginia type with 8% expanded tobacco inclusion. TNA 2.07%, reducing sugar 15.8% and total sugar 20.3% on a dry weight basis. Cuts per inch = 30 3.3 Cigarette Construction Tobacco rod length - 64 mm Tobacco rod circumference - 24.25 mm Tobacco density - 250 mg/cc Filter length = 20 mm Filter circumferencB = 24.05 mm Filter type cellulose acetate ref. No, 85F29 4. RE-REEL STUDIES: RESULTS Tables 3 anm ˘ give the mainstream and sidestr~am smoke results for the cigarettes. The cigarettes were smoked to a filter plus 8 mm butt mark For mainstream with an 8 port scrambled smoking on a 14odel 300 Filtrona smoking engine. Sidestream smoke results were obtained by the standard fishtail method (D221), the cigarettes ~eing smoked to the same filter plus 8 mm butt mark. 5. RE-REEL STUDIES: DISCUSSION 5.1 Influence of Potassium Tartrate Additive Level Increasing the level of potassium tartrate on the chemical free, ]gNC, and the magnesium hydroxide. 12-4GACO, cigarette papers gave a reduction in puff number of the cigarette. $70365160

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: