Abstract
Summarizes support to Project XB. Research focuses on the effects of levulinic acid and other acids on the olfactory nerve response to nicotine, the perception of nicotine and the response to odorants. Describes levulinic acid and nicotine mixture experiments underway, justifies significance of research and indicates areas of future study. Indicates pigeon testing continues and two human subjects who have lost the sense of smell [anosmic] have been recruited as a "means of assessing the relative roles of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves in the perception of odor and irritation". Notes RJRT scientists responded to EPA claims regarding environmental tobacco smoke [ETS] and the author has published a chapter in a book regarding odor perception in humans and animals. Indicates these data in support of Project XB is an effort to clarify the relationship of smoke perception, smoke chemistry and sensory nerve stimulation.
Page 1: yiw04d00
JW0110.92
Jim Walker
Support to XB - Effect of Levulinic and other Acids on the
Perception of Nicotine -
Status: Jim Walker and Roger Jennings spent the day at the lab of
Dr. Don Warren at UNC-CH to conduct practice sessions in which
mixtures of levulinic acid and nicotine were presented.
Olfactometer modifications and changes needed to conduct the
mixture experiments had been accomplished and several minor
problems with the software had been corrected. These mixture
experiments, in which the effect of three different levulinic acid
concentrations (one just below threshold) on the perception of a
range of nicotine concentrations are being quantified, were
commenced and are now 1/3 complete.
Significance: This research on the effects of levulinic and other
acids on the intensity and/or pleasantness of sensations from
nasally presented vapor phase nicotine is an important part of our
effort to understand the sensory properties of nicotine in smoke.
Next Steps: Over the next 5-6 weeks, the mixture studies will be
completed.
Contacts: Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200)
Support to XB - Effect of Levulinic and other Acids on the
Olfactory Nerve Response to Nicotine
Status: Jim Walker assisted Roger Jennings in the preparation of a
presentation summarizing progress to date on the pigeon olfactory
nerve electrophysiology experiments. Results of mixture and pre-
treatment experiments, conducted investigate the effects of
levulinic acid on nicotine perception, will be summarized and the
rationale for future experiments will be outlined.
Significance: This work is part of a systematic effort to
understand the relationships between smoke chemistry, sensory nerve
stimulation and perception of smoke. A key part of this effort is
an understanding of the relative importance of nicotine (versus
other smoke components) as a stimulus for different parts of the
upper airway (from nose to tracheo-bronchial region).
Next Steps: To elucidate the basis (e.g. nerve fatigue vs. change
in pH of mucus) of the finding that levulinic acid pre-treatment
reduces olfactory responses to nicotine, we will determine the
effect of amyl acetate pre-treatment on responses to nicotine.
Contacts: Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200)

Page 2: yiw04d00
Product Understanding - Olfactory/Trigeminal Roles in Responses to
Odorants
Status: Dr. Amelia Drake, an ENT physician at UNC-CH with whom we
collaborate, has recruited two "new" anosmics for testing at BGTC.
Both of these individuals have sustained apparently complete loss
of olfactory connections between nose and brain as an unavoidable
consequence of medically necessary surgery.
Significance: Testing of subjects that have lost olfactory
connections by non-traumatic means provides a concrete means of
assessing the relative roles of the olfactory and trigeminal nerves
in the perception of odor and irritation. With these subjects we
plan to present somewhat higher odorant concentration ranges, to
ensure that we obtain more suprathreshold irritation ratings than
in earlier testing.
Next Steps: Permission to conduct this research will be sought at
the next HRRC meeting.
Contacts: Tom Guy (5175), Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200)
Miscellaneous
An up-to-date collection of over 50 papers on publication bias,
collected by Mr. Roger Jennings, were barcoded and entered into the
R&D publication database by Ms. Nell Sizemore. These publications
were used recently by RJRT scientists in their response to claims
by the EPA on the adverse health affects of ETS.
A book, titled "The Human Sense of Smell", has been published which
contains a chapter by Jim Walker and Roger Jennings titled
"Comparison of odor perception in humans and animals." The chapter
describes the olfactory prowess of a variety of animals and
presents the latest information on ability of humans to detect
odorants and to perceive the strengths of suprathreshold
concentrations and to discriminate qualitatively between odorants.
JW0124.91
Jim Walker
Support to XB - Effect of Levulinic and other Acids on the
Perception of Nicotine -
Status: Dr. Don Warren's laboratory completed almost all of the
testing of 8 subjects in response to a range of nicotine
concentrations in the presence or absence of a concentration of
levulinic acid that, for each subject, was of low to moderate
perceptual intensity. That is, odor and perceived nasal irritation
ratings of response to nicotine alone were compared to those of

Page 3: yiw04d00
levulinic acid-nicotine mixtures.
Significance: This research on the effects of levulinic and other
acids on the sensations arising from nasally presented vapor phase
nicotine is an important part of our effort to understand the
sensory properties of nicotine in smoke.
Next Steps: Upon completion of all of the test sessions with this
mid-range levulinic acid concentration, the data will be summarized
and submitted to Walker and Jennings. Then the final, and highest,
levulinic acid concentration will be used in this same mixture
paradigm.
Contacts: Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200)
Support to XB - Effect of Levulinic and other Acids on the
Olfactory Nerve Response to Nicotine
Status : Roger Jennings and Tom Guy prepared the pigeon facility for
upcoming electrophysiology experiments. The olfactometer was
reconfigured to deliver amyl acetate instead of levulinic acid. In
a test run, the olfactometer was checked for accuracy.
Significance: This work is part of a systematic effort to
understand the relationships between smoke chemistry, sensory nerve
stimulation and perception of smoke. A key part of this effort is
an understanding of the relative importance of nicotine (versus
other smoke components) as a stimulus for different parts of the
upper airway (from nose to tracheo-bronchial region). The pigeon
model was developed to provide basic information on how levulinic
acid affects nerve activity resulting from the presence of
nicotine. The mixture study essentially duplicated the molar ratio
of nicotine-to-levulinic acid in mainstream smoke to determine if
the smoothing effect observed by smokers could be due to a general
reduction in nerve traffic to the brain. Another means by which
levulinic acid could cause a smoothing effect in cigarette smoke is
by protonating nicotine that is deposited in the mucus overlying
sensory receptors. Use of the pre-exposure paradigm with the
pigeon olfactory nerve model offered a valuable way to evaluate
this mechanism.
Next Steps: To elucidate the basis (e.g. nerve fatigue vs. change
in pH of mucus) of the finding that levulinic acid pre-treatment
reduces olfactory responses to nicotine, we will determine the
effect of amyl acetate pre-treatment on responses to nicotine.
Contacts: Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200)
Support to XB - Critical Review of Biological Basis of

Page 4: yiw04d00
Sensory Stimulation by Cigarette Smoke
Status: Tom Guy completed most of the ordering of research papers
needed by Jim Walker and others for the preparation of an internal
critical review paper of the literature on sensory stimulation of
the respiratory airway (from the nose to the lung) by cigarette
smoke. Bibliographic information on all of these papers are being
entered into the BASIS system on the VAX by Sandi Ingram.
Significance: This work is part of a systematic effort to
understand the relationships between smoke chemistry, sensory nerve
stimulation and perception of smoke. A key part of this effort is
optimum use of the available information that others have gathered
concerning the stimulation of sensory surfaces, in both humans and
animals, by whole smoke or smoke components.
Next Steps: For each part of the airway, available information will
be summarized. For example, the extensive amount of published data
on the pharmacological and neural mechanisms underlying the
responses of the nose to nicotine and other smoke components will
be illustrated. A draft of this review will be completed during
May ' 92 .
Contacts: Roger Jennings (5569), Jim Walker (2200), Tom Guy (5175),
Sandi Ingram (0995)
Product Understanding - Sensory Properties of Cigarettes with
and without Nasal Stimulation
Status: Jim Walker met with Harvey Gordin, Dan Kurtz, Millie Wong,
Joyce Miller, and Cindy Stewart to evaluate a ballot to be used in
an experiment to examine the role of nasal stimulation by smoke in
the sensory properties of cigarettes. A few minor changes in the
ballot were suggested by this group, based on the smoking of a
Salem Lights product with and without nose "clips".
Significance: This experiment is a joint Biobehavioral Division-
SED-Flavor Division effort to better understand the basis of the
"taste" of our cigarettes. We want to understand which attributes
are most dependent on nasal (olfactory and/or trigeminal) input and
relate that learning to information about smoke composition and
sensory properties of individual smoke components. Initially, the
focus will be on understanding the role of "smell" for nicotine and
menthol.
Next Steps: In approximately three weeks, the first experiment in
this area will commence. A pair of products differing primarily in
menthol level and a second pair differing primarily in nicotine
level will be smoked with and without nose clips. Ballot ratings
will be analyzed to determine the effects, on different sensory
attributes, of preventing nasal stimulation.
Contacts: Jim Walker (2200), John Reynolds (4390)
