Product Design
Smoking Machine Parameters for Collection of Total Particulate Matter and Gases From Low Ignition-Potential Cigarettes
Abstract
Written by a consultant to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Discusses the details of the FTC smoking machine tests and compares them to the CORESTA method. Discussion follows on materials and methods of testing, samples, cost, and results. The document recommends using the FTC method in determining the particulate deliveries of low-yield cigarettes because the apparatus and methodology are flexible and can more closely conform to how smokers actually smoke.
Fields
- Author
- Pillsbury, H.C. Jr
- Hypothesis
- FTC machine testing and ratingsDesign changes to achieve altered FTC smoke machine tar and nicotine ratings, with or without measured changes in human intake.
- Mainstream constituent yieldsModification of selected mainstream smoke constituents in response to health concerns.
- Sidestream constituent yieldsModification of selected sidestream smoke constituents in response to health concerns.
- Keyword
- Smoke machine
- Ignition potential (IP)
- Named Organization
- Borgwaldt
- Coresta
- Cpsc, Consumer Products Safety Commission
- Filtrona
- FTC, Federal Trade Commission
- Harmonisation Task Force
- TI, Tobacco Inst
- Subject
- Fire Safe Cigarettes (Products)
- Transfer to Smoke (Measures)
- Smoke Delivery/Transport (Measures)
- Smoke Constituents
- Test/Smoke Machine (Testing)
- Test/Smoke Constituents (Testing)
Document Images
SMOKING MACHINE PARAMETERS FOR COLLECTION OF TOTAL
PARTICULATE MATTER AND GASES FROM LOW IGNITION-
POTENTIAL CIGARETTES
Harold C. Pillsbury, Jr.
13009 Magellan Ave.
Rockville, MD 20853
Under contract to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
#CPSC-S-92-5472
I
i
March 14, 1993
I
1
I
I
J
I

page 1
I
I
Introduction
The official Federal Trade Commission method (FTC, 1969,
1979, 1980) to determine tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide in
cigarette smoke is presented as a basis for the method of
collecting total particulate matter and gases from low-ignition
potential cigarettes. The FTC method is very similar to the
Centre de Cooperation pour les Recherches Scientifiques au Tabac
(CORESTA) Standard Method (CORESTA, 1968) used in Europe. One of
these two methods or a slight modification thereof is used in all
countries that test cigarettes.
Differences between the FTC and the CORESTA methods are
small. The environmental rooms under the CORESTA method are
maintained at 22 ±3 °C and 55-65% relative humidity. The FTC
method requires conditions of 75 ±2 °F (23.9 ±1.1 °C) and
relative humidity of 60,±2$. Under the FTC method, cigarettes
are smoked to a butt length of 23 mm or the overwrap plus 3 mm,
whichever is longer. Using the CORESTA method, cigarettes with a
filter length exceeding 15 mm are smoked to the length of filter
plus 8 mm and cigarettes with extra long filter tips are smoked
to the length of the tipping plus 3 mm.
The Filtrona-400: smoking machine used in the CORESTA method
requires an increased draft over the burning cigarette, whereas
the FTC method does not. The increased draft is not encountered
under normal smoking conditions. It causes the cigarette to burn
faster, reducing the number of puffs and lowering the yield of
total particulate matter (TPM) and gases. This air flow over the
cigarette is needed to match the results of the Filtrona smoking
machine to that of the Borgwaldt smoking machine. The Filtrona
and Borgwaldt are the only two existing commercial manufacturers
of smoking machines.
The following is a summary of the FTC protocol.
1
I
I
I
I
I
Materials and Methods
1) Environmental Room: A room where cigarette conditioning and
smoking is conducted. The room should be maintained at 75 ±2 °F
(23.9 ±1.1 °C) and 60% ±2% relative humidity.
2) Smoking Machine: The cigarette smoking machine should be
similar to the Filtrona machine used by FTC (Pillsbury, 1969).
This machine can smoke 20 cigarettes at one time, one in each
port. Each port can be fitted with a filter holder and filter
pad for the collection of TPM. Gases pass through the pad and
are collected in specially designed plastic bags (Filtrona).
I

page 2
3) Smoke Collection Trap: The polyacrylic plastic holders
(Wartman, 1959) can be obtained from the manufacturer of the
smoking machine (Filtrona).
4) Filter Disks: Filter disks (pads) are made from a fiberglass
sheet pre-cut to a diameter of approximately 44 mm. The filters
collect at least 99.9% of all particles larger than 0.3 um in
diameter (Ogg, 1964). The filter disks fit into plastic holders.
The particles collected on the pad are referred to as total
particulate matter (TPM).
5) Standard solutions:
A) Extraction solution: This solution contains extractant
and internal standards- 2-propanol containing 1 mg anethole
(p-propenylanisole, 1-methoxy-4-propenylbenzene) per mL as
an internal standard for nicotine and 20 mg ethanol per mL
as an.internal standard for water.
B) Moisture content: Standards are prepared by adding
measured amounts of water into measured volumes of
extraction solution. A standard curve is constructed from
the ratio of peak heights of the water to the peak height of
ethanol against the amount of water added to the extraction
solution, after correcting with a solvent blank.
C) Nicotine: A stock solution contains 2.500 g nicotine in
100 mL of extraction solution. Working solutions are made
from 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mL of the stock solution diluted and
brought to 100 mL volume with extraction solution. A
standard curve is constructed as with moisture content.
6) Carbon monoxide: Gases from the plastic bags in the smoking
machine are passed into an infrared detector. The detector is
calibrated using a carbon monoxide gas standard.
7) Gas chromatograph:
A) Moisture content analysis: The 6 ft x-1/8 (1.8 m x 0.32
cm) diameter column is packed with 80-100 mesh porous polymer
(Porapak Q). Operating temperature for the column is set at 200
°C, injection port at 240 °C, and thermal conductivity detector
at 210 °C. The helium carrier gas flow is about 100 mL per
minute.
B) Nicotine analysis: The 6 ft x 1/8" (1.8 m x 0.32 cm)
diameter column is packed with 2% KOH and 10$ polyethylene glycol
(Carbowax 20M) on 45-60 mesh acid washed diatomaceous earth. The
column temperature is set at 165 °C, and the injection port and
the flame ionization detector are set at 200-250 °C. Helium
carrier gas flow is about 40 mL per minute.
/+

I
page 3
i
i
i
I
j
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
!
8) "Monitor" cigarettes: These are cigarettes with known tar,
nicotine and carbon monoxide yields. Monitor cigarettes serve as
"standards" to ensure that the smoking machine is operating
properly. True standard reference cigarettes are mentioned in
Dr. Gairola's chapter on Short-term Toxicity Tests. No fewer
than four ports should be used for monitors per 20 port machine
on each run.
9) Run: This is a complete smoking of 100 cigarettes- five of
the same type in each of the 20 ports (4 monitor and 16 test
cigarettes).
Samples
Cigarette quantities: A minimum of 150 cigarettes and
preferably 200 cigarettes of each type are needed for the FTC
specified tests. This would ensure that at least 100 cigarettes
of each type were succesfully smoked for one run. Typically,
some test pads are discarded due to cigarette lighting failures,
port leaks, or other technical problems.
Sample preparation and selection: Store all cigarette samples
and monitors in an environmental room or chamber for not less
than 24 hours before marking or smoking. Cigarettes should
remain in the environmental room until they are smoked. Select
only cigarettes without physical damage. Cigarettes should be
marked to either a butt length of 23 mm or the overwrap plus 3
mm, whichever is longer. The insertion depth of about 9 mm is
also marked. Mark the perforations for easy identification by
the technician during placement into the holder. The
perforations must not be occluded or compressed by the holder
since this would affect the smoke yield.
Machine Smoking of Cigarettes
1) Puff volume: 35 mL # 0.5 mL
2) Puff duration: 2 sec ± 0.2 sec, measured under actual
machine smoking conditions. Resulting draw velocity is about
17.5 mL per sec.
3) Puff frequency: One puff per 60 sec ± 1 sec.
Weigh the filter assembly to the nearest 0.05 mg and connect
it to the smoking machine so that the cigarette and filter
assembly are held horizontally. Test the smoking apparatus and
filter assembly for leaks. Insert a cigarette through the hole
in the rubber membrane until the butt end is inserted
approximately 9 mm, such that the butt end does not contact the
filter disk. Light the cigarette at the beginning of the first

page 4
puff. Smoke five cigarettes per pad. If the cigarettes are very
low in tar, more cigarettes may be smoked per pad providing the
pad does not wet through. The cigarettes should be protected
from drafts, other than normal convection, during smoking.
Results
After five or more cigarettes are smoked in each port, each
pad is extracted with the extraction solution. The extracted
material is analyzed for moisture content and nicotine levels.
Other extracted materials, such as described in the Analyses
chapter, may also be analyzed. Part of the gas phase, which has
been accumulated in the bag, is passed through an infrared
detector for the determination of carbon monoxide. Although not
required by.FTC, nitric oxide may be measured by a
chemiluminescent detector designed by Filtrona, specifically for
the smoking machine. The gas may also be analyzed for substances
indicated in Dr. Hoffman's Analysis chapter. Tar, nicotine and
carbon monoxide are reported as mg per cigarette.
TPM (total particulate matter): Immediately after smoking the
cigarettes disconnect the filter assembly from the smoking
machine. Record the weight gain of the filter assembly to the
nearest 0.05 mg and divide this by the number of cigarettes
smoked to determine TPM per cigarette.
Extraction: Immediately after weighing, place the filter pad in
a dry, rubber-stoppered 25 mL flask. Wipe out the filter
assembly with one-fourth of an unused pad and place this into the
flask. Add 10.0 mL of extraction solution and shake for 30
minutes.
Water: A 1-10 uL aliquot of the extract is withdrawn through the
stopper and injected into the chromatograph. Compare the
resulting peak against the standard curve to determine the
moisture content.
Nicotine: A 1-10 uL aliquot of the extract is withdrawn through
the stopper and injected into the chromatograph. Compare the
resulting peak against the standard curve to determine the
nicotine content.
Carbon Monoxide: The gaseous phase collected in the plastic bag
is passed through an infrared detector for the determination of
carbon monoxide.
Tar: Tar is the TPM minus the water and nicotine. This is
sometimes referred to as "FTC tar" to distinguish it from other
definitions of "tar".

page 5
Discussion
1
I
I
i
I
I
i
i
The Filtrona smoking machine can be modified by installing a
collection funnel at each port to collect sidestream smoke, which
may have different constituent levels (Johnson, 1973; see also
discussion in Dr. Harris' Overview chapter). Filtrona'a 8-port
smoking machine is more easily modified than the 20-port model.
The filter assembly can be replaced with a cold trap if this
technique for collecting condensate is desired.
There may be a wide range of variability in smoking
behaviors due to cigarette design, physiological, psychological,
and pharmacological factors (see Dr. Burns' Topography chapter;
Guyatt, 1989a,b; Kolonen, 1991, 1992; Nil, 1989; Zacny, 1988).
Although the present testing methods are designed to produce
comparative.results, the smoking machine could be set up as
closely as technically feasible to reflect future data on smoking
behavior. The machine has sufficient range to acommodate
possible changes, for example, puff frequency from one puff per
minute to six puffs per minute or volume from 20 mL to 50 mL
puffs. The draw velocity would also change since it is related
to the frequency and volume.
A high degree of replicability for tar, nicotine, and carbon
monoxide was found in parallel testing between FTC and most other
laboratories over a period of 20 years. Unfortunately, all the
data from these tests were destroyed when FTC closed the
laboratory in 1987. Attached to this chapter is a typical graph
from my files that illustrates the close correlation of tar
levels found by the FTC and a private laboratory.
Cost
i
i
The approximate cost of machine smoking and analyses for
tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide for one run with a 20-port
machine would be $3,000-$4,000 (4 monitor ports + 16 test ports =
20: monitor cigarettes + 80 test cigarettes, minimum). The
current capacity of the Tobacco Institute Laboratory is six runs
per day.
Recommendations
~ The FTC method should be used as the basis for the smoking
machine setup in the collection of gases and total particulate N
_ matter for low ignition-potential cigarette testing. The 0
~ apparatus and methodology is adaptable to changes that may be N
indicated by new and future data on human smoking behavior and r
smoke exposure. The FTC method is replicable and well- ~
~ established among the US industry.
N
. ~
J

page 6
References
CORESTA Standard Method No.10 (Sept. 1968)
Federal Trade Commission, Federal Register Vol.45 No.134
pp 46483-46487 (Thursday July 10, 1980)
Federal Trade Commission, Federal Register Vol.44 No.13
pp 3777 (Thursday Jan. 18, 1979)
Federal Trade Commission, J. Assoc. Official Analytical Chemist,
Vol. 52, No. 3 1969
Guyatt, Andrew R.; Kirkhan, Andrew J.T.; Baldry, Andrew G.;
Dixon, Michpl and Cumming, Gordon "How Does Puffing Behavior
Alter During the Smoking of a Single Cigarette?" Pharmacology
Biochemistry and Behavior Vol. 33 pp 189-195 (1989a)
Guyatt, A. R.; Kirkham,A. J. T.; Mariner, D. C.; Baldy, A. G. and
Cumming,
Low Tar G.
and "Long-Term Effects of Switching to Cigarettes
Nicotine Yield" Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 99 With
pp
80-
86 (1989b)
Johnson, W. R.; Hale, R. W.; Nedlock,J. W.; Geubbs, H. J.and
Powell, D. H. "The Distribution of Products Between Mainstream
and Sidestream Smoke" Tobacco Science Vol. 17 pp 141 (1973)
Kolonen, Sakar; Tuomisto, Jouko; Puustinen, Pekka and Airaksinen,
Mauno M.. "Smoking Behavior in Low-Yield Cigarette Smokers and
Switchers in Natural Environment" Pharmacology Biochemistry and
Behavior Vol. 40 pp 170-180 (1991)
Kolonen, Sakar; Tuomisto, Jouko; Puustinen, Pekka and Airaksinen,
Mauno M. "Puffing Behavior During the Smoking of a Single
Cigarette in a Naturalistic-Environment" Pharmacology
Biochemistry and Behavior Vol. 41, pp 701-706 (1992)
Nil, Rico and Battig, Karl "Separate Effects of Cigarette Smoke
Yield and Smoke Taste on Smoking Behavior" Psychopharmacology
Vol. 99 pp 54-59 (1989)
Ogg,C.L., J. Assoc. Official Analytical Chemist 47, pp 365-362
(1964)
Pillsbury, H.C., Bright, C.C., O'Connor, K.J. and Irish, F.W. J.
Assoc. Official Analytical Chemist 52, pp 458-462 (1969)
Wartman, et al, Analytical Chemistry 31 pp 1705-1709 (1959)

page 7
I
I
I
I
I
i
j
i
I
I
I
Wegner, John R. and Thaggard, Neil A. "Gas-Liquid
Chromatographic Determination of Nicotine Contained on Cambridge
Filter Pads: Collaborative Study" Vol. 62 No. 2 (1979)
Zacny, James P.and Stitzer, Maxine L. "Cigarette Brand-Switching:
Effect on Smoke Exposure and Smoking Behavior" J. Pharmacology
and Experimental Therapeutics Vol. 246 No. 2 pp 619-627 (1988)
I

2ozis~l~1
l
~
.
,
~
,
II t
~
I
j~
. I ,
. t I
, I I
,
.
t
~{
,
.,
;
,.
,
.
.
.
I
~
,
; .
.
.
.~i
.
.
ll
;
~
t
I
!
10
I !
. ~
~~
~.
. ,
, .
;
t ~'
a,~
li, T
, }t
~
~ I:''
1 M I
1 I i
