Product Design
Consumer Perception of Puff Count Changes
Abstract
Describes test developed to measure consumer perception of puff count changes. Recommends testing cigarettes varying in puff count from 9 to 6.5 puffs, while maintaining similar blend, resistance to draw, dilution levels, and tar per puff.
User-Contributed Notes
Fields
- Author
- Goodman, B.L.
- Hypothesis
- Measuring human smoking behaviorMeasuring the effects of changes in human smoking behavior on intake of nicotine and smoke constituents.
- Design changes over timeChanges in cigarette design over the past half century.
- Elasticity and Product Control
- Inhalation ProfileAre cigarettes designed to cater to individual inhalation profiles?
- Keyword
- Per puff deliveryPer puff tar, per puff nicotine, and per puff CO
- Additive
- Citrate
- Design Component
- Paper porosity (Natural permeability or NP)
- Filter efficiency (FE)
- Pressure drop (PD, Resistance to draw (RTD), Flow rate or Draft)
- Static burn rate
- Brand
- Merit (PM)
- Subject
- Test/Consumer Preference (Testing)
- Pressure Drop (Design)
- Puff Count (Measures)
- Tar (Measures)
- Ventilation (Design)
- Burn Rate (Design)
Document Images
PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE ~ Z C~-
oT
L. i. --
R`D
RICHMOND, YIRGINIA.
Subject: . Consumer Perception of Puff Count Changes
hr.:Yr_ g
Date: January 26, 1981
A meeting was held between representatives from SEF and New
Products to.discuss possible testing to answer questions raised in the
me."no to you from Dr. Seligman, dated January 15, 1981. The decision
was made to test the concept of consumer perception of varying puff
counts in several stages.
Initially, the level of tar per puff will be held constant, which
means the total'tar delivery will vary. After that, the total tar
delivery will.be held constant, allowing the tar/puff to change.
Using the Merit 85 and Merit Ultra Lights cigarette specifications,
we believe the puff counts can be varied in half puff intervals from
9 to 6.5 puffs. P1_ans are to first test a 1.5 puff difference, each
at two tar levels and then narrow the puff count range until the con-
sumers can no longer tell the difference.
The same blend will be used in each set of cigarettes, so that
static burn rate does not adversely affect the puff count. It is also
desirable to maintain a similar cigarette RTD (filter efficiency) on
all models, so.that the consumers will not change their average puff
sizes.from one cigarette to another. :As we know from Simulator studies,
that would change the number of puffs available on the cigarette. Varying
dilution levels more than a few percent would have a similar effect. Thus,
we are limited to using wrapper porosity and citrate levels as a means of
changing the puff count.
Small-scale models of all the candidates will be made and tested
subjectively in-house before any mailout tests are requested.
B. Goodman
BG/lad
JAN 27 1981
.cc
~
Dr.
Mr.
R.
P.
B. Seligman
N. Gauvin F-~
O
O
Mr.
Dr.
Dr. H.
W.
C. Spielberg
A. Geiszler
Levy
Ca
~
