Product Design
C.P. Harshness and Taste Level Evaluations
Abstract
Reports on results of subjective smoking tests for harshness of a controlled-profile cigarette. Uses an "11 point judgement scale." Used Winston cigarettes as a control. Concluded that harshness and taste level increases are subjectively discernible from the first to the last quarter (of the rod) in the Winston but no such evidence in the C.P. cigarette.
Fields
- Author
- Dunn, William L., Jr., Ph.D. (PM Smoker Psychology Principal Scientist 1970s-80s)Principal scientist at PM during the 1970s and 1980s, nicknamed the "Nicotine Kid." Supervised Victor DeNoble, Paul Mele, Carolyn Levy and others. Led "smoker psychology" programs for PM.
- Guffey, B.
- Recipient
- Seligman, Robert B. (PM VP of R&D c. 1976-82)Vice President of Research and Development at Philip Morris Richmond, VA 1976-1982. Reported to Senior Vice President of Operations. In 1982 transferred to tobacco technology group. Wanted to share ammonia and other tobacco technology with PM International companies.
- Hypothesis
- Introduction of new/unconventional productsResearch and development of novel nicotine delivery devices and experimental tobacco designs.
- Low-yield cigarettesModification of low yield products to assure that adequate levels of nicotine delivery are maintained, and effects of yield changes on toxicity and dependence.
- Measuring human smoking behaviorMeasuring the effects of changes in human smoking behavior on intake of nicotine and smoke constituents.
- Smoke Control
- Keyword
- Controlled profile
- Operation/Project
- Controlled profile cigarette (selective constituent delivery)Controlled Profile cigarettes were designed to deliver to the smoker higher amounts of total particular matter within the first few puffs of a cigarette, and then less TPM in the latter part of the cigarette.
- Technology/Method
- Controlled Profile Cigarette
- Subject
- Irritation (Effects)
- Smoothness/Harshness (Effects)
- Brand
- Winston (RJR)
Document Images
0
6
f
.. .To :
FroT:
Subj ect: .
,.
6 mm 19 mm
Harshness
Taste Intensity
32 mm
>
,
45 mmi
C.P. W C.P. W C.P. W C.P.
4.17 3.46 4.46 3.33 4.58 3.87 .5.00 3.79
.84 1.02 1.016 .65 .83 .67 1.01 ::.94 ;
2.75 5.05 2.75 3.17
<.0'2 <.001 <.02 , <.01
, . .
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
RICHiMOND, YIRGIINIA
Dr. R. B. Seligman
W. L. Dunn, Jr. and B. Guffey
C.P. H'arshiness and Taste Level Evaluations
Using the same methodology as outliined in the previous
memo on the same subject (July 7, 1970), further testing of
the "CP B21 paper"'cig,arette has been completed.-The results'
are herein tabu!1!ated. The table entries represent mean values
.on 11-point jud~gmental scalies for both harshness and taste
levels for six descriptive panelists with replication-for aa
total of 12 judgments per cell. Column headi!ngs indicate the
length of rod burned prior to presentation for a judgment. ~'
The signifiicance of the differences between pairs of means was
testedi with a "t" test formula for paired scale ratings (df=11l
in all cases). The Wiinston cigarette (W) was used as a contro;
~
Meani 4.33 3.63' 4.67 3'.71 4.71
Stanidard!
Deviation, .98 1.03 1.15 .59
2.48 3.62
p. <.05 <.0i1
It is apparent that the subjective differences in both
harshness and taste level are real between the Wlinston and the
C.P. at all four points along the rod.

A more relevant q,uestion,'however,'is whether or not change
occurs in these measures from the first quarter to the last
quarter of the consumable rodifor each cigarette. We reasoned
that if discerni'ble change is occurring there shoul'd be a f~
significant difference between the means obtained for the first
quarter and the means obtained for the last quarter of the: 4; -N
cigarette iniquiestion.
Mean First Quarter
Mean Last Quarter
Difference
Between Means
11til
p.
One can conclude that harshness and taste level increases
from the first to the last quarter are subjectivelly discernible
in the Winston. There is no evidence that these chaniges are
discernible in the C.P. cigarette.
NOTE: Taste level is defined as the intensity of the taste
senisation. It is a property to be distinguished from flavor.
Taste intensity does not connote an hedonic evalluation as does
flavor.
/ jihi
cc: H. Wakeham
R. Thomson
R. Saleeby
J. Osmalov
R. Tamol

t- _
..----
_-- -- __
~--
---_
1
I
- . . ._ -
_-.--- - ~ ' ~ ~- - - -
_
-- _ _ ~
~ -- --
- _ ~
~
~~
-
- --
-
-
-
--
-
- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- --
-- -- --
--
- --
--
- --
-- --
-- -
1 --
- -- -- -- - -- - - - - -
~
t
t
-
-
- ~
-
1
-
-
-
-- '}
~
-
-
~
-
- . - - .
- -
_ ~
--- - - - -- --f - ~ ~-
..- -_.-
_ .
_
-
~ - , _. _
- -- -
+ - -- -
--
- -
I ~ ~ --
--
~ -- --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
- -
-~
-
~
-
-
~-~
-
~
~'iv
~ .
_
~
. .
. -
---
- -.
.. _.
-
--
-
-
_
-
-.-
_ - -
- --
-1- ---
- -
+
i-
.
}
--
~ --
-- -- ~
'
}
-
~'
1
-
-
i
_-
_
-
----
-
_
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
- --
- , t
-
-
, ~
~
-
-- -
4
11
-- _
-
-
- -- -
-
_
-_ .
1
t
-
~
-
-
-
~ ~
1 ~
~
-
- - _- - - _
~ {
- ~
-
+
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
<
'
;
,
i
~_
~
-
--
- ,
~
-
--
--
- _ --
-
-
-
-
- ~
- --
-
- - - -- --
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
;
,
~
; _
-- -r
t
- {
~
-
-
-
_
-
--
-
'
-
- _
-
~
-~--
_
-
_ - -- , _ ~ ~ -- ,_ - -- _
-
-
-
- - --
, -
-
, +- -
~ -
-
-
--
, -
--
-- - -- -
-
- - --
~
,
-
-
-
--
--
- - 1
--
-- ,
._
_-
. -_
-
1-
i:r_
-
-
--
-
._
-
- i
-- - -
~
~
-1]a'.r+
'OO N70ZI71G 7N70f17 '
O I H7N1 tl3d OI X OI
:
d]tlYJ HdYtlO N7Ci1710 OlltC 'ON
.
, .. L, . . ~ . .. ... .. . _ _ _ .... ... .~a......
o-
0
~
Z
J

a
jr,
10002~1050`
..._.--.-_
_ _ _
- -- - -------- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------- --- ----- -- - T --- --------- I ------------ -
+Tt
7D- i
-.
4-4
- - - - - - - - - - -- - -
_.
'
INi
k
t
CO9 H70Z.UIQ iNiuRi ~
N7N1+l3eOt %01 . .q~y `.r yy,
d`Id~IdY~O N70i1710yOlttf'6N~ GI
a
,
i

~r s
I b ~
D p ~
I O u', D
IY-'
/
y 1
~
O
l
3:
`
,~
. . . Q.. ~1. ~ I ~ ~ u a
A - ~
i 3 5
0 5 G S S
S
I ~,I b
,
3 , - o o . ~S 5, 1 0
~,
~
5 3 0
fl
- - u, o 3' S ~ o 0 S 1
~ ~,
5 D I
~
.
y
~
r
~
d~
a
I
~
o
-
S1J
-
~
,d
/
o
S D
S
I D oL
~ _
~
o
'a
o
d
D, i I
~ :
~
...
i.
,
~^ S~
~ --- - -- --
,
z.
-
N

.
fl
Sa G.'bY.
3. ' o a
V
i
I
/~J-I'v, --s
-Ir
SD
Sr
3,0
a, 5 3
0
0
b
o
3 _7 3 ~ 5 i 3,I
~ d a
~ d: 'D D, D~~e D, ~0 0 D %-~
s
S~ 0-V l. 3 I a.
RC 58'
0
