Product Design
Phenyl-Methyl-Oxadiazole (pmo) As a Tobacco Additive
Fields
- Author
- BEVEGARD, S
- DALHAMN, T
- Named Organization
- KARRDAL,L
- Subject
- additives
Document Images
/I ~ ~~ ~/~ i/j 7
,
PEENYI, - METHYL - 07CADIAZOLE (Pt40) hS A TOBACCO~ADDZTIPE'
Clinical and spirometric evaluation after six weeks smoking.
Bg
St'nre Bevegird andiTore 3Ia'1hamn
From the Department of Clinical Physiology, Sodersjukhuaet,.
100 64 Stockholm 38 and the Institute of Hygiene, University
of Uppsala.
.

2
Phenyl-Methyl - Oxadiazole (PMO) has in extensive tosting on
animals showed:oonsiderable anti-infl'amnatorr properties on
the upper air-ways. Longt'esm~oral admini.stration of the drug
to man has not revealed any toxic effects. The anti-inflammatory
properties of PMO could thus be of clinical value for treatment
of patients with upper air-way'disease, such as chronic
bronchitis. In a recent study (Bevegdrd and h+h1hamn, 1976)
the effects of inhalation of PMO'and:menthol on pulmonary
function we.s evaluated. Inhalation of PMO per se caused no
changes in pulmonary function as evaluated from dynamic
spirometri and blood gases determined in arterial'ized blood.
In ths present study Y,:O has been used as a:tobacco additive
and its clinical and spirometric effects has been studied on
ten healthy cigarette smokers. Ten healthy cigarette smokers
constituted a control group.
Material-
Twenty healthy subjects, all cigarette smokers, were included in
the study. There were eleven women and 9 men in the group.
Ten subjects smoked cigarettes containing PMO and ten subjects
smoked non-prepared cigarettes during a period of six weeks.
dll subjects were smokers and smoke&between sixty and two hundred
and fifty cigarettes per week.
L

I4ethods and procedure:
All subjects were examined with dynamic spirometri before
~
and after the six week period of smoking. The tests were
performed on an Ohio-842 spirometer. Each subject was questioned
about subjective symptomaduring the smoking period. Each subject
got a week supply of cigarettes in advance and all the fag-ends
were colleoted for later analysis of remaining PP10 content
and as a check of the cigarette consumption6
Results:
Effect sn s irome~ tric v~alue~s:'All subjects except two in the
control group had essentially normal spirometria values both
before and after the smoking period. In the control group
case number 15 and 20 had a slight to moderate ventilatory
restriction of restrictive type. The values for vital capacity,
expiratory and inspiratory flows and maximal voluntary ventilation
are given in table I. There were no significant differences
concerning the spirometric values before and after the six week
period of smoking cigarettes containing Pt40: In the control
group the vital capacity, the FEV1.0 and the M9V 40 were slightly
higher after the smoking period. The differences were small.
Subjective s toms: Some subjects felt improved after the six week
aaavs~aa~aa~
period both in the PMO and in the control group. Some subjects
noted that the cigarettes had a bad taste but there was no
difference between the PNlO and control group. In general there
was no difference concerning subjective remarks between the
Pi40 and control group.

4
uonotusions.
In a group of ten subjects smoking cigarettes containing PM0
for six weeks (~70 to 201 cigarettes per week) there wera no
significant differences concerning subjective symptoms or
spirometric values before and after the period. In the control
group of ten subjects smoking non-prepared cigarettes (60 - 253
cigarettes per week),vital capacity, FEP1.0 an&r1FV40 were
slightly higher at the endiof the periods. In such a small
material the occurrence of a slight upper air-way infection
at the first occation could easily have such effects on the
spiromet'ric values. There were no significant differences
concerning subjective symptoms.

I
/(,m Ltm
Case no. 9C m 1.0 FEV% FIV 1,0 YIV% M7v 40 Mvv free
With YMO B A~A B A B A B A B A B A B A
1. I.S. 3.40 3.80 3.00 2.92 86 77 3.10 2.53 89 67 92 94 86 1o6
2. J.K. 4.70 4.98 3.90 3.80 83 77 3.90 4.13 83 83 125 117 120 128
3. A.G. 4.68 4.89 3.96 3.91 .84 80 4.18 4.62 88 94 133 139 161 147
4. R.B. 3.91 4.57 3.08 3.47 79 76 3.08 4.48 79 98 116 117 116 132
5. J.K-E. 4.75 4.95 4.25 3.74 89 76 4.50 4.18 95 84 125 121 118 130
6. W,K. .5,42 5.83 4.20 4.51 77 77 5.05 5.61 93 96 158 177 185 179
7. A.U. 4.55 4.84 4.05 4.24 89 87 4.50 4.79 99 98 129 147 139 144
8. B.M. 4.51 3.69 3.36 3.47 75 83 4.07 3.47 9o 83 108 93 116 T01
a 9. B.A-C. 3.85 4.02 3.25 3.30 84 82 3.74 3.69 84 92 107 103 123 103
1o.,A.A.
Mean 5.90
4.57 6.33
4.80 4.50 4.73
3.76 3.81 76
82.2 74
78.9 5.50 5.67
4.16 4.32 93
89.3 89
88.4 131 162
122.4 127.0 176
134.0 178
134.8
SD 0.74 0.85 0.54 0,56 5.18 4.01 0.77 0.95 6.06 9.56 18.0 28.5 310 2a.I
B-A -0.23 -0.05 3.30 -0,16 0.90 -4.nq -0.80
SD 0.40 0.26 5.56 0.59 11.22 14-13 13.92
t -1.81 -0.66 1.88 -0.82 0.25 -.1.03 -0.18
n.a. n.s. n.s. n.s. n,s. n.s. n.s.
I eVC9soou
2

I
I
Case no. VC FEV 1.0 Fm FIV 1.0 Y.[V% Mw 40 Mvvfree
Without PMO B A B A B A B A B A B A B A
11. M.G 5.78 6.00 4.84 4.84 81 78 5.83 6.11 98 98 156 159 172 173
12. s.R-M. 4.30 4.73 3.30 3.47 75 72 4.10 4.46 93 93 105 116 114 111
13. S.c. 4.65 4.95 3.80 4.02 82 81 4.40 4.73 95 96 120 130 119 130
14. B.K. 3.85 4.29 3.36 3.41 85 79 3.85 4.07 97 95 116 117 125 125
15. A.N. 3.30 3.30 2.30 2.26 70 68 2.45 1.93 74 58 75 75 87 86
16. K.L. 4.90 5.45 4.00 4.32 84 79 4.70 4.95 96 91 123 127 117 126
17. E.B. 3.63 4.48 3.30 3.41 91 76 2.20 3.19 61 71 103 102 122 111
18. A.M-L. 4.46 4.68 3.14 3.63 70 78 4.13 4.26 93 91 116 123 125 131
19. R.rf. 4.07 4.62 3.74 3.82 87 83 4.13 3.93 96 85 1o9 114 131 121
20. B.E. 2.60 2.64 1.70 1.71 64 58 2.30 1.93 87 66 52 61 55 52
Mean 4.15 4.51 3.35 3.49 78.9 75.2 3.81 3.96 89.0 84.4 107.5 112.4 116.7 116.7
SD 0.89 0.97 0.87 0.92 8.72 7-.44 1.17 1.31 12.1 14.2 28.0 27.9 30.06 31.48
~ B-A -0.36 -0.14 3.70 -0.15 4.60 -4.90 0.10
SD 0.26 0.16 5.66 0.43 907 4.25 7.29
t -4.41 -2.71 2.07 -1.08 1.60 -3.64 0.04
nc x n.e. n.e. n.s. xoc n.s.
11
6vE96v00

PMO
2fl1 st/vecka
0 problem {{AA-o
Marita Boberg
Annie-Britt
Dr~ 1 Mot.Aof hs~ t rr"f 4
k 'i munnen
~~.~
~~ ur ~ «*r+~-u
70 st/ve'dka
SvedA 1 mun och c~h hals
~ 4-c~ u~ . c vd T
76 st/vecka
_Andningen lattare
140 st/vecka
-0-problem
i .
68 st/vecka
,pV,7+IJ2.,~
Torr "~ ha1 en Rethosta eft
175 st/ve
a
Smakar brand film
133 st~ka2 v
Sveda pa tungan forsta veckorna.
Rokhosta forsta veckorna.
ju r wvy ~+s.~-y a, -f vw.~.,t f., `~ yvax~. .
181 ~st~/veAa l
Dalig doft av fimparna. Smaken bra.
Oftare roksugen. Rokhosta som tidigare
aret okat. Cig. gar att av.
kbe
R
~
..
', ~~tx[~ ?~- '
179 st/vecka
fc.k EcSr"!
SvArfimpade. Hostan pa morgonen uteblivit.
Mindre slem i halsen.
Dc_
V~Q
F .
EV ,~rue-d ~,v~pc~ ,v~Cuu,e_
1` r U
-/

,,.
. 0-,gr-uP2en_
i 1. Mona-Lisa Andersson 179st/vecka
~
' "
Smakar parfym. IngPn
rokbaksmalla
.
2.
Lena Karrdal ~- ,Svarf impade. Ln1kta ~ i~, RCikt m~era.' ~~
/`~ ~ er~- : No rro~w~ r"!~4
129 st/vecka
.
Nils Andersson Smakar illa. Rethosta (efter 8.l.i.)
163 st/vecka
Luxtar e) Ztta. Tungbrostaa'. smakar battre men
lukta (vectk~ 4). Askan ramlar av.
~,._. :f---~---~
. Gunilla Sandler 129 st/vecka
T 5. Rose-Marie Sigrell
Y
. Ketty Berger
~ 7. Elof Bjorkman
Y
a
'1' kl ' 1 k d kh t
t
K
t
Torr~ h~ps~ta bland (efter d.l.i.)
~ vf f A"/ Ihf .`
164 st/veck a
Latt rethosta sista veckan
60 st/vecka
0 problem
140 st/vecka
Bnl. frun bA'ttrg jraga om rokhosta
Birdie Hasselstr8m 84 st/vec?fa '
6 veckors torrhosta. Smakar ej tobak.
orr i halsen. Magen p$verkad (diarrd i tre dagar)
A..ic-74,,vd l-.tt. .
Goran Melinder 253 st/vecka
Otack mak i munnen -
Y 101. Marianne Rosander 175 st/vecka
aen e ro os
.
Fami jen agar pa u
en.
vars
Latt illamaende_ Mindre torr i munnen.
Smakar pyton. Inf. i tandkottet.
~-
~
