Potential Reduced Exposure Products
Book 53 Tab Number 1 - 53 Low Tar and Disease
Fields
- Author
- Benowitz, N.
- Bross, T.D.
- Brown, C.C.
- Carcino, E.
- Darby, S.C.
- Devesa, S.S.
- Diamond, L.
- Ebikryston, K.L.
- Frogatt, P.
- Gillis, C.R.
- Harris, J.E.
- Hecht, S.S.
- Hirayama, T.
- Hoffmann, D.
- Holbrook, J.H.
- Holland, W.W.
- Horm, J.W.
- Jaffe, J.H.
- Jarvis, M.J.
- Kannel, W.B.
- Kozlowski, L.T.
- Lee, P.N.
- Lenfant, C.
- Loeb, L.A.
- Luoto, J.
- Parkin, D.
- Peto, R.
- Richmond, J.B.
- Rickert, W.S.
- Samet, J.M.
- Schmidt, F.
- Shiffmann, S.M.
- Speizer, F.E.
- Stellman, S.D.
- Stephen, A.
- Tomatis, L.
- Wald, N.J.
- Weisberg, R.L.
- Winkelstein, W.
- Wynder, E.L.
- Named Organization
- Federal German Republic
- Hunter Comm
- Natl Conference on Smoking + Health
Document Images
BOOK 53
TAB# 1-53
LOW TAR AND DISEASE
2063628OOO
t

TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2063628001

Tab #
Author's Name
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Lee, P.N.
Stellman, S.D.
Peto, R. '
Koziowski, L.T.
Peto, R.
Benowitz, N.
Winkelstein, W.
Peto, R.
Hoffmann, D.
Horm, J.W.
Schmidt, F.
Holland, W.W.
Int Agency Res Cancer
Work Group Eval Carcino
Peto, R.
Kozlowski, L.T.
Bross, T.D.
Weisberg, R.L.
Parkin, D.
Brown, C.C.
Frogatt, P.
Stephen, A.
Benowitz, N.L.
Froggatt, P.
Hecht, S.S.
Darby, S.C.
Ebi-Kryston, K.L.
Jarvis, M.J.
Kozlowski, L.T.
Shiffmann, S.M.
Harris, J.E.
Speizer, F.E.
Kozlowski, L.T.
Lung Cancer and the 'Safer' Cigarette
Tobacco (A Major International Health Hazard (Cigarette Yield
and Cancer Risk (Evidence from Case-Control and
Prospective Studies)))
Tobacco-Related Diseases
Less Hazardous Tobacco Use as a Treatment for the 'Smoking
and Health' Problem
Lung Cancer (Causes and Prevention (Chapter 1 Keynote
Address (The Control of Lung Cancer)
Is There a Future for Lower-Tar-Yield Cigarettes
Some Ecological Studies of Lung Cancer and Ischaemic Heart
Disease Mortality in the United States
The Value of Preventive Medicine (Control of Tobacco-Related
Disease)
Tobacco (A Major International Health Hazard (V Smoking.
Current Research Issues...))
Falling Rates of Lung Cancer in Men in the United States
Smoking (The Position in the Federal German Republic)
Low-Tar Cigarettes Put to the Test
Tobacco Smoking (Tobacco Smoking (Epidemiology Studies
of Cancer in Human (1 Introduction (2 Cancer of the Lung)))))
Tobacco ( A Major International Health Hazard (IV Health
Effects of Low-Tar, Low-Nicotine...))
Less Hazardous Smoking and the Pursuit of Satisfaction
Crimes of Official Science (A Casebook)
Smoking and Health 1987 ( A World Report (Trends in
Cigarette Consumption in the USA))
Surveillance in Health and Disease (Part 2 Practical
Applications of Surveillance (13 Surveillance of Cancer))
Projections of Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States...
Nicotine, Smoking and the Low Tar Program
Nicotine, Smoking and the Low Tar Programme (111 Smoking
Yields and Consumption (8 Estimating the Extent of
Compensatory Smoking))
Health and Public Policy Implications of the 'Low Yield'
Cigarette
Determinants of Policy on Smoking and Health
The Relevance of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines to Human
Cancer
Nicotine, Smoking, and the Low Tar Programme (11 Smoking
Habits and Related Mortality in the UK...))
Predicting 15 Year Chronic Bronchitis Mortality in the Whitehall
Study
Comment on the Hunter Committee's Second Report
Have Tar and Nicotine Yields of Cigarettes Changed
A Safe Cigarette (Session 5 Behavioral and Economic Issues
(Diminished Smoking, Withdrawal Symptoms, and Cessation)))
A Safe Cigarette (Session 5: Behavioral and Economic Issues
(Public Policy Issues in the Promotion of Less Hazardous...)
Epidemiology of Respiratory Diseases (Task Force Report
(Smoking))
Smokers, Non-Smokers, and Low-Tar Smoke

33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
5O
51
52
53
Holbrook, J.H.
Holbrook, J.H.
Kannel, W.B.
Jaffe, J.H.
Hirayama, T.
Richmond, J.B.
Hoffmann, D.
Benowitz, N.L.
Luoto, J.
Lenfant, C.
Rickert, WoS.
The Changing Cigarette
National Conference on Smoking and Health (Developing a
Blueprint for Action)
Update on the Role of Cigarette Smoking in Coronary Artery
Disease
Low Tar Cigarettes Flunk the Test
Epidemiological Aspects of Lung Cancer in the Orient
Ending the Cigarette Pandemic
Human Carcinogenesis (VIII Laboratory Epidemiology Studies
(33 Tobacco Carcinogenesis (Metabolic Studies in Humans)))
Smokers of Low-Yield Cigarettes Do Not Consume Less
Nicotine
Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking - A Progress
Report
Are 'Low-Yield' Cigarettes Really Safer
A Comparison of the Yields of Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon
Monoxide of 36 Brands of Canadian Cigarettes Tested Under
Three Conditions
Rickert, W.S.
Wynder, E.L.
Wald, N.J.
Devesa, S.S.
Loeb, L.A.
Samet, J.M.
Wald, N.J.
Tomatis, L.
Diamond, L.
Gillis, C.R.
Yields of Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide in the
Sidestream Smoke from 15 Brands of Canadian Cigarettes
Demographic Aspects of the Low-Yield Cigarette
(Considerations in the Evaluation of Health Risk)
Relative Intakes of Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide from
Cigarettes of Different Yields
Lung Cancer (Causes and Prevention (Chapter 3 Trends in
Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the U.S.)
Smoking and Lung Cancer (An Overview)
Less Hazardous Cigarettes and Disease of the Lung
Cancer Risks and Prevention (3: Smoking)
Tobacco (A Major International Health Hazard (Foreword))
Augmentation of Elastase-lnduced Emphysema by Cigarette
Smoke (Effects of Reducing Tar and Nicotine Content)
Cigarette Smoking and Male Lung Cancer in an Area of Very
High Incidence (11 Report of a General Population Cohort...)

2063628004

CONTROVERSY
Lung cancer and
the 'safer' cigarette
PETER N LEE MA
Consultant in Statistics and Honorary Research Fellow, Divison of Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer
Research, London
years ago, when
the evidence relating
cigarette smoking to lung
~cer first started to appear,
nearly all British smokers
Smoked unripped (plain)
Narettes with a tar yield of
Today, more than
of cigarettes smoked have
and average tar yields are
15rag. Even the tar yields
cigarettes have declined
~y so that hardly any
garettes nowadays are above
le 'middle tar' (17 to 22rag)
~nge while 'low tar' (0 to 10mg)
lter cigarettes have captured
rare than 15% of the market in
~last ten years. Similar trends
~e OCcurred in most developed
.a developing countries (Lee,
~3). Although this suggests a
~uCtion in 1~ r'~neer c~uld
l~u~(the tar ~ cffrcinouenic) it is
~h Considering a ~mber of
.~ ~i,Rant~N points "sk of lung
~.~N~~ ~-$i~t, since the n dent on
~r is strongly depen
~--~d2tion of smoking (Doll and
~~, 1981), past exposure to
~~ettes is relevant, so that the
~~i~re of the effect of lower
tar cigarettes is likely to take
many years to emerge; early
findings are likely to under-
estimate the true benefit.
Second, it does not necessarily
follow that halving the dose of tar
received by the smoker from
each cigarette has the same effect
on risk as halving the number of
cigarettes smoked per day. Only
for the. latter dose-response
relationship is good evidence
available.
Third, changes in cigarette de-
sign have resulted in chang6s in
tar 'quality' as well as tar quanti-
ty. Studies by Wynder and Hoff-
man (1979) have shown that the
mouse skin carcinogenicity of tar
per unit dose has been steadily
reducing.
Fourth, reductions in risk will
only be expected if smokers do
not increase the number of
cigarettes they smoke to 'com-
pensate' for the reductions in
nicotine yield that tended, at
least until about ten years ago
(Lee, 1976), to occur con-
comitantly with the reductions in
tar. Although consumption of
.cigarettes per smoker has in-
creased nationally, some studies
suggest that changes in con-
sumption are in fact essentially
independent of changes in the
tar/nicotine yield of the brand
smoked (Garfinkel, 1979; Wald
et al., 1980). Given that people
currently smoking low tar
cigarettes consume ten to 15%
fewer cigarettes than middle tar
smokers (Lee, 1983), the rise in
consumption seems di~e to other
causes such as lighter smokers
giving up, or changes in price.
Smokers may possibly
compensate by altering the way
they smoke their cigarettes, so
the amount of tar they receive
may bear little relation to the
published yields, which are based
on machine smoking under stan-
dard conditions. A number of
studies have investigated the
relationship between machine
nicotine yield and nicotine up-
take. None of these studies is of
the large, long-term 'within-
smoker' type needed to provide
reliable conclusions, and there is
considerable variation in their
findings, but all are consistent
.with the theory of 'partial corn-
September 1983 Vol. 227 1459
0
0

TOPICAL
FUCIDIN
sodium fusidate fusidic acid
rapidly effective
ih'sscTlbing Information Fucidin H Gel orgamsms. Fucidin hypersensmvn~,
Fucidm Cream 0043/0065. Fucidin
2% fusichc acid with 1% hydrocorusone Avoid extensive use of hydrocomsone m
Ointment 0043/5005. B~sic N.ILS. P~ice
acetate, Fucudin Cream 2% fumdic acicL pregnancy and mf~tts. Do no~ use/n or 10 g Fucidm H Gel
£1.70, Fucidin Cream
Fucid./n Oinn'nent 2% sodium fnsidat e, ne~ eyes. Adverse reacti~ms Occa~onal £ 1,55. Fucidin
Ointment £ 1,41,
Contra-indication~/precaution~ hvDersenmu~ary reacnons, Product
Longw~ck Road, Princes

CONTROVERSY
that is a person smok-
a reduced nicotine brand
~educes his nicotine intake,
t~0ugh not proportionately by so
large a factor. Russell et al.
11980) claimed support for the
mnflicting viewpoint of corn-
but re-analy-
by Kozlowski et al.
I1982) showed a clear trend to-
wards reduced blood nicotine
Nels in those smoking lower
arettes.
~, now at the epidemiol-
0gy, four prospective and five
~ective studies have speci-
investigated the relation-
between lung cancer and
smoked. Of the
Separate comparisons made
studies and sexes, 19
smokers of lower tar or
clgarettes to have a lower
lung cancer than smokers
~er tar or plain cigarettes,
eXception being a non-sig-
increase based on a re-
small sample. Overall,
reduction in mortal-
25 to 30%. It should be
that in all these studies
COmparison was between
of the old high tar plain
and smokers of filter
of the middle or mid-
tar group, typical of
some vears ago.
bach et a'l. (1979) com-
legree of lung changes
dying in 1955-60
dying in 1970-77 and
the results show a marked differ-
ence. If the lesions he studied are
directly related to lung cancer,
one cigarette of the past seems to
be equivalent {o perhaps three or
four modern cigarettes and life-
time exposure to lower tar
cigarettes may involve markedly
tess risk than lifetime exposure to
higher tar cigarettes.
The changes in national mor-
tality rates seem superficially
rather unpromising, with male
rates fairly static and female rates
rising quickly. However, study of
trends in total lung cancer rates
gives a deceptive picture because
in old men and in old and
middle-aged women the average
number of years smoking is sub-
stantially greater now than for
men and women of comparable
age in earlier years. Since risk is
related to the fourth or fifth
power of duration of smoking,
this increased duration will over-
whelm any reduction in risk per
cigarette smoked.
To gain a more valid picture of
potential benefits of tar re-
ductions it is necessary to look at
young and middle-aged men and
young women, where changes in
duration of smokir~g will not
confound the picture. Over the
last 20 years risk in men has fallen
at all ages below 60 and has been
halved in those aged 45 or less,
and risk in women has fallen at
ages below 45, and has been
halved in the 30 to 34 age group.
Although it is possible that
reductions in air pollution fol-
lowing the Clean Air Act are
partly responsible, the magni-
tude of the fall is too large to-be
wholly due to this. Since average
cigarette consumption per head
has changed relatively little over
the period, the trends are all
consistent with tar reduction
being the major factor. The fall
in the lung cancer rate could be
greater in years to come with
cigarettes having even lower tar
levels.
References
Auerbach O, Hammond EC, Garfinkel L.
(1979): 'Changes in bronchial epithelium in
relation to cigarette smoking 1955-1960 vs.
1970-1977". N Engl J Med. 300, 381-386.
Doll R, Peto R. ( 1981 ): 'The causes of cancer:
quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of
cancer in the United States today', J Natl
Cancer lnsr 66, 1191-1308.
Garfinkel L. (1979): "Changes in the cigarette
consumption of smokers in relation to
changes in tar'nicotine content of cigarettes
smoked', Am J Pub Hlth. 69, 1274-1276.
Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Lei H. (1982):
"Nicotine yields of cigarettes, plasma nico-
tine in smokers and public health'. Prev
Med, I1,240-244.
Lee PN. (1976): Statistics of smoking in the
United Kingdom. Tobacco Research Coun-
cil Research Paper I, 7th ed.
Lee PN. (1983): Lung cancer incidence and
o'pe of cigarette smoked. Int Lung Cancer
Update Conference, New Orleans.
Russell MAH, Jarvis M, Iyer R, Feyerabend
C. (1980): 'Relation of nicotine yield of
cigarettes in blood nicotine level of smok-
ers', Br Med J. 280, 972-976.
Wald N J, Idle M, Boreham J, Bailey A.
(1980): 'Inhaling habits among smokers of
different types of cigarette', Thorax, 35,
925-928.
Wynder EL, Hoffmann D. (1979): 'Tobacco
and health: a societal challenge', New Engl
J Med, 30t1, 854-903. 0
The Practitioner 1461
~0
o
0~
o~
o
o

2063628008

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER
A
TOBACCO:
MAJOR INTERNATIONAL
HEALTH HAZARD
Proceedings of an International Meeting organized by the IARC
and co-sponsored by the All-Union Cancer Research Centre
of the Academy of Medical Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, USSR
held in Moscow,
4-6 June 1985
EDITORS
D. G. ZARIDZE R. PETO
IARC Scientific Publications No. 74
INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER
LYON
1986
