Philip Morris
Reconstituted Tobacco
Fields
- Author
- Baskevitch, N.
- Area
- R&D AUSTRALIA/ACTIVE FILES
- Alias
- LITZ0400071009/1014
- Type
- SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Site
- A77
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Stmn/R1-061
- Named Person
- Bush, L.P.
- Davis, D.L.
- Dontenwill, W.
- Schweitzer, P.J.
- Tso, T.C.
- Vaught, A.
- Document File
- 2504087575/2504087623/Press Book
- Named Organization
- Amer, American Tobacco
- American Machine + Foundry
- Congress
- Coresta, Coresta
- Frankenburg
- General Cigar
- Gerlach Borgwaldt
- German Assn of Cigarette Mfg
- Kimberly Clark
- Kimberly Clark Group
- Lm, Liggett & Myers
- Ltr Industries
- Pmusa, Philip Morris Usa
- Research Inst of the German Cigarette Mf
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Univ of Ky
- Zeitschaft Fur Krebsforschung
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2504087576/7600
Related Documents:
Document Images
Reconstituted Tobacco
by
Dr Nicolas BASKEVITCH
Director of Research
Speech delivered at the
BEIJING INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO EXHIBITION
Pekin, China
September 22-28, 1987

Reconstituted Tobacco
Reconstituted tobacco is an established component of not only American b/en-
ded cigarettes, but a/so the entire range of cigarettes manufactured around the
world. Today we%l/ook at this product, beginning with its history, and see how
it has become a technically advanced material which is used as an important tool
for cigarette design.
History
The concept of reconstitution is not a
new one. In the patent literature we can
find some bright inventors of the 1 9th
century who were already motivated by
the economical advantages of reclai-
ming the by-products of the tobacco
industry. It took a long time, however,
before this concept became a commer-
cial reality.
The tobacco reconstitution process
started with the mechanization of the
cigar industry. Until the 1950's, all
cigars were hand-made. The industry
had a need for a leaf-like tobacco pro-
duct in bobbin form to be used as a
cigar binder. Reconstituted tobacco was
first developed to meet this objective.
It did not take long before the cigarette
industry attempted to use reconstituted
tobacco in cigarettes as a way of reclak
ming otherwise unusable fines and
shorts.
The decade between 1950 and 1960
saw a big boom in the development of
reconstituted tobacco processes. These
developments started with Frankenburg
from General Cigar Company in 1952,
followed by American Machine and
Foundry in 1956. During the same
period, the U.S. cigarette manufacturers
R.J. Reynolds, Liggett and Myers and
American Tobacco were all working on
their own processes. Peter J. Schweit-
zer developed a reconstitution tobacco
process based on papermaking techno-
logy, which is used by Kimberly-Clark
in the US and by its affiliate LTR Indus-
tries in France in 3 of the largest
tobacco reconstitution mills in the
world. Kimberly-Clark and LTR Indus-
tries not only have considerably deve-
loped and improved this process, but
have also transfered its technology to
outside parties such as Philip Morris
USA, the Soviet Union and Korea.
In the meantime, other work was taking
place in Europe, particularly in the field
of casting and extrusion processes like
those patented by Gerlach and
Borgwaldt.
Since that era, reconstituted tobacco
has grown in importance. It was esti-
mated that in 1964 about 70,000
metric tons of reconstituted tobacco
sheet were used in cigarette manufac-
turing. Today estimates show that this
figure has increased and that over
200,000 metric tons are used world-
wide, most of it produced by the paper-
making process.
As already stated, reconstituted
tobacco was used for the recovery of
factory by-products. However, in an
effort to meet industry needs, scien-
tists' research work using specially desi-
gned reconstituted tobacco transformed
the product into a tool for modifying
smoke chemistry and cigarette physical
properties.
It was stated in the introduction that
reconstituted tobacco is an established
part of today's cigarette. As support of
this statement, the following figure
details the blend used in the most
recent reference cigarette developed by
the Tobacco Research Institute at the
University of Kentucky.
Blend for the 1 R4F Cigarette
Flue-cured 32.54 %
Buriey 20.04 %
Oriental 11.09 %
Maryland 1.08 %
Reconstituted 27.17 %
iKimberly Clark-process)
Glycerine
2.80 %
lsosweet 5.30 %
Source : D.L Davre, A. Vaught, T.C. Tso and LP. Bush,
CORESTA Congress-Vienna 119841
This reference cigarette, coded 1 R4F, .
was designed to yield tar and nicotine
deliveries near the U.S. sales weighted
average. It can be seen that the blend
contains about 27 % of reconstituted
tobacco, made by the Kimberly-Clark
process, used by LTR Industries.
2504087586
er4~~~b~#~~~fN
Sources
of Raw Materials
for Reconstitution
Basically, the raw materials for recons-
titution include all tobacco materials
which are, for one reason or another,
unsuitable for direct use in the cigarette.
This includes :
scraps from the threshing operation
dust and shorts from various pneuma-
tic systems (dryers, coolers, silos,
cutters)
stem winnowings from the cigarette
short stems, stem bits
loose leaves which have poor burning
characteristics
birds'eyes from roll-your-own
operations
whole tobacco plants specially grown
for reconstitution
The processing of stems for their incor-
poration into cigarettes blends poses
various problems during cigarette manu-
facturing. Since the physical structure
of cut stems is different from that of
strips, it is often difficult to obtain a
homogeneous blend.
There are two major processes availa-
ble which allow stems to be incorpora-
ted into a cigarette blend :
- conditioning, rolling and cutting,
known as Cut Rolled Stems (CRS),
often combined with puffing,
- reconstitution of stems.
The major drawback of the CRS pro-
cess comes from the need for a special
stem processing line, as well as a
second blending operation at the cut
tobacco stage. This can result in an irre-
gular tobacco blend containing rigid
stem particles which prevent maximum
production on modem high speed ciga-
rette makers.
Kimberly-Clark Reconstituted stems, in
comparison, require only one blending
operation. This method results in a very
uniform tobacco blend. The selection of
a reconstituted stem process eliminates
the substantial investment and opera-
ting costs that the sophisticated CRS
process implies.
As you can see, the amount of raw
materials available for reconstitution is
substantial. This explains the present
activity in this segment of the tobacco
industry.
13

Reconstitution Processes
A number of reconstitution processes
have been proposed in patents and
several have been put into industrial
practice.
Generally speaking, all processes can be
grouped into two general principles for
assembling tobacco particles. Either you
glue tobacco powder together with
adhesives or you intertwine tobacco
fibers on a papermaking machine.
Gluing Tobacco Powder
with Adhesives
In the first type of process, small
tobacco fragments are ground to a
powder uniform in size, and then mixed
with adhesives.
The solvent for the adhesive is usually
water, but a mixture of methylene chlo-
ride and methanol has also been
proposed.
The adhesive is either a natural gum
(like locust bean, tragacanth, arabic or
guar) or a chemical derived from starch
or cellulose (like hydroxyethyl amylose,
hydroxymethyl and hydroxymethyl cel-
lulose or sodium carboxymethyl cellu-
lose). Deriving the adhesive from the
tobacco itself by a treatment of the
stems has also been suggested.
The slurry of tobacco powder and adhe-
sive is formed into a sheet, using any
one of a number of techniques :
- In the casting process, the slurry is
cast on a moving stainless steel belt
which passes through a drying tunnel
to evaporate the water or solvent The
adhesive forms a film in which the
tobacco powder is imbedded.
- In the extrusion process, the slurry is
a thick paste which is pressed bet-
ween steel rollers at high pressure.
Once it has been formed into foil or
flakes, it is then dried. Another
method extrudes the tobacco paste
through a multi-orifice die to directly
form the tobacco shreds.
- In the rnpregnation process, the slurry
is used to impregnate a very porous
paper. The resulting product is dried
and calendered.
- The dust impingement process or
sandwich process does not use a
slurry. Instead, the sheet is formed by
spraying successively tobacco dust,
adhesive and again dust on a moving
stainless steel belt The resulting sheet
is then dried.
All these processes suffer from a com-
mon problem : the products are very
fragile and return to dust when
manipulated.
Natural Intertwining
of Tobacco Fibers Papermaking Process
The other principle for assembling
tobacco particles utilizes the natural
intertwining of the tobacco fibers
achieved on a paper machine. This
explains why this process is often cal-
led the papermaking process.
Two variations of the papermaking
process have been developed :
In the more simple version, a single-
step papermaking process, the raw
materials are dispersed in water. The
mixture containing the fibers and the
tobacco extracts is drained over a
moving screen. The drained water,
containing a large amount of solubles,
is recycled to homogenize the feed
raw materials. The sheet coming off
the screen is dried and cut into strips.
The second variation, a two-step
papermaking process, is the most
widely used around the world and has
been developed by Kimberly-Clark. It
consists of two main stages : Extrac-
tion and Recombination.
The raw materials are mixed with
water and then pressed to separate
the tobacco extract from the insolu-
a comparatively low transformation
cost attributed to the large output of
the Kimberty-Clark reconstituting
plants.
a reduced tar delivery combined with
a reduced biological activity of the tar
for the Kimberly-Clark reconstituted
product in comparison with the inco-
ming raw material. This result was
confirmed by the Institute of the Ger-
man Association of Cigarette Manu-
facturers in a study comparing diffe-
rent sheet making processes.
the third factor is the flexibility of the
Kimberly-Clark process, which allows
for a wide range of modifications in
the physical structure and in the che-
mical composition.
The potential for altering the burning
characteristics of the tobacco and for
selectively modifying the smoke com-
position is probably the major reason for
the development of the Kimberly-Clark
two-step papermaking process.
Now that we have reviewed the diffe-
rent tobacco reconstitution processes,
let's come back to the advantages for
CtGARETTE WEfGHT
(mg) PRESSURE
DROP
ImmWG3 PUFF
NUMBER TAR
(mg/cig)
Natural Tobacco Control 1 245 63 10.3 31.9
Dust Impingement
process 1 653 88 13.6 34.4
Extrusion process
between rollers 1 925 87 15.1 33.9
Reconstituted Slurry process
Tobacco with water 1 591 81 12.1 31.4
2 step papermaking
process (K-C/
LTR Industries) 1 245 75 7.9 15.6
Slurry process with
organic solvent 1 228 61 7.1 26.6
Source : W. Dontenwdl et al.- Zenschnh fur Krebsforschung Vol. 78 p 236-264 119721
ble fiber. It must be stressed that no
chemical additives are used in this
operation. The fibers are then disper-
sed in water and drained over a
moving screen to form a base sheet.
In the meantime, the tobacco extract
is concentrated and later added to the
base sheet. The resulting reconstitu-
ted tobacco is dried and cut into
strips.
The widespread use of the two-step
papermaking process developed by
Kimberly-Clark and LTR Industries
during the last 30 years is attributed
to three factors :
cigarette manufacturers to transform
by products into reconstituted tobacco.
These advantages can fall into three
categones :
- Economical considerations N
- Practical considerations C~
- Potential for cigarette design ~
O
00
J
~
00
J
'J1qIllI
1
14

Economical Considerations
7 -I
The economical incentive to recover factory by-products for an expensive com-
modity like tobacco looks obvious. However, we must go into more detail to see
exactly how reconstitution can be advantageous to the cigarette manufacturer.
The first subject
for attention is fil-
ling power. The fil- s~
ling power of
tobacco particles
decreases signifi-
cantly as their size
is reduced. This
relationship is illus-
trated in Graph I.
As a consequence,
their inclusion in a
cigarette adds
weight without fil-
ling the volume.
When we look at
the relationship
between the
weight of different
cigarettes made
from tobaccos
having various fil-
ling powers, we
can see in Graph 2
that an increase in
the filling capacity
of a poor filler
comes up to a lar-
ger tobacco
savings than when
the same increase
in filling capacity is
applied to a good
filler.
5 -~
3 -~
2-~
Relationship Between
Filling Power
&
Cut Tobacco Particle Size
1_~
0
~ r r
05 10 15
SIEVE MESH SIZE (mmi
FILLING POWER
Icm' gI
2504087588
05
CIGARETTE CUT TOBACCO WEIGHT igi
10
15
If we push this argument to the limit, we can say that the reconstitution of small
tobacco particles with a poor filling value can be more interesting economically
for the cigarette manufacturer than the expansion of good filling tobaccos.
Obviously this is true only if the resulting reconstituted tobacco has a good filling
power, and, if it does not desintegrate during cigarette processing.
It is clear that some reconstitution processes perform better than others in these
two areas.
IIiI~IVN'~i'i f ~III!II~I iu I'lll!IIII~'v~l~
NDUSTRIES
FILLING POWER
Icm' gi
Relationship Between
Filling Power
&
Cigarette Tobacco Weight
I
i
I
Practical Considerations
We come now to the practical conside-
rations. Reconstituted tobacco arrives at
the factory in strip form. It can be intro-
duced in the blend after vacuum humi-
dification, but some manufacturers pre-
fer to blend it directly.
Obviously, reconstituted tobacco does
not have to be threshed. This elimina-
tes the unavoidable losses which occur
during this operation.
The following sequence shows the ope-
rations involved to introduce reconsti-
tuted tobacco into a blend :
Storage of cases prior to use
Case is opened and ready to add
Case is turned for unloading into the
feeder
Strips being loosened
Reconstituted Tobacco is conveyed
and blended with Oriental tobacco in
a heated drum
This preblend is then distributed over
a stream of other tobacco types,
which is conveyed to the blending
silos
Leaving the silos, the blend of recons-
tituted and natural tobacco is very
homogeneous.
As far as casing and flavorings are con-
cerned, two possibilities exist. Recons-
tituted tobacco can pass through the
casing drum. It has been recognized that
Kimberly-Clark reconstituted tobacco
can be a very good absorber for casings.
Alternatively, casings can be applied
during the reconstitution process. This
has the advantage of giving a very
homogeneous distribution.
Aromatic additions are used to bring a
typical character to the cigarette smoke,
like Oriental or Burley notes and finally,
to harmonize the reconstituted tobacco
with the remainder of the blend.
Influence of Kimberly-Clark
Reconstituted Tobacco
on Cigarette Design
The last consideration which I would
like to cover is the potential offered by
Kimberly-Clark reconstituted tobacco
for cigarette design.
Numerous techniques, sometimes in
competition between each other, are at
the disposal of cigarette designers to
reach their objectives. The art in ciga-
rette design is to understand the utility
and the limitation of each technique.
The following examples demonstrate
how reconstituted tobacco can be used
as a tool for the cigarette designer.
It should be noted that the examples
which follow all use reconstituted
tobacco made by the Kimberly-Clark
two-step papermaking process and the
results will vary if material coming from
another type of process is used.
15

2504087589
Reducing Tar Delivery
The tar yield in reconstituted tobacco is primarily dependent upon its physical struc-
ture. Numerous studies, and particularly those of the Research Institute of the
German cigarette manufacturers association have demonstrated that substantial
reductions can be obtained by reconstituting tobacco with the Kimberly-Clark pro-
cess used at LTR Industries.
Influence of Reconstitution
on Tar Yields
When Kimberly-Clark reconstituted to-
bacco is blended in a cigarette, even
with introduction rates ranging from 10
to 30 percent, a substantial reduction
of tar yield can be reached.
A practical example, obtained on a non
filtered cigarette is shown in the follo-
wing table.
Natural Reconstituted Reduction
Tobacco Tobacco
mglcig mgicig %
Virginia 35.1 24.0 32
Burley 21.9 15.5 29
Dark
blend 20.5 15.7 23
German
blend 30.7 22.5 27
W Oontenwdl et al.
Zeitscnnfl fur Krebsforschung 85 141 153 (19M
Plain Cigarettes
(Flue-Cured Blend)
Blend with 20 %
Control without reconstituted tobacco
reconstituted tobacco LTR lndustries
Cigarette Weight (mg) 935 941
Pressure Drop (mmWG) 50 52
Puff Number 8.5 7.6
Tar (mgicig) 25.0 21.2
Nicotine (mgicig) 1.5 1.3
Now let us look at the more complica-
ted situation of nicotine versus tar.
Increasing Nicotine
In natural tobacco tar yields are generally proportional to nicotine yields in the
sense that a"high nicotine" tobacco will generally yield a high amount of tar.
The Kimberly-Clark paper process of reconstitution used by LTR Industries ena-
bles to increase nicotine rates up to the desired level without modifiying tar yield.
This result can be achieved either by inclusion of very high nicutine content tobac-
cos such as "Nicotiana Rustica", tobaccos in the blend to be reconstituted or
by the addition of nicotine salts.
The following table demonstrates that the introduction of a Kimberly-Clark recons-
tituted tobacco (KCRT) with a nicotine content of 2.7 % in a blend with a nico-
tine content of 1.76 % permits an increase of the nicotine delivery, and at the
same time a reduction in tar delivery.
Increasing Bum Rate
W hen tobacco is grown on a soil con-
taining chloride salts, as this is often the
case near the sea, it takes up chloride
in its leaves.
A high chloride tobacco has poor bur-
ning characteristics ; as a consequence
the puff number is high and so are the
tar deliveries. Sometimes, the tobacco
does not burn at all.
By developing a highly porous structure
during the reconstitution process, then
further by adding a burn-enhancing
additive, it is possible to transform a non
burning tobacco in a reconstituted
tobacco with very acceptable bum rate.
Static Bum Rate
Chloride mm/mn
Original 6.5 % does not bum
Tobacco
K-C RT 5.2 % 4.25
LTRI
K-C RT 5.0 % 5.26
LTRI + Bum
additive
Reducing
the Biological Activity of Tar
A large amount of work has been devo-
ted to the evaluation of the biological
activity of the tar delivered by
cigarettes.
For this evaluation, various research ins-
titutes have adopted the same techni-
que which is called "mouse skin pain-
ting". It consists in depositing a given
dose of smoke condensate on the skin
of a mouse, every day, during a period
of 6 to 18 months, and then by eva-
luating the number and the type of
resulting tumors.
Professor Dontenwill, Head of the
Research Institute of the German Asso-
ciation of cigarette manufacturers
published over a period of ten years bet-
ween 1970 and 1980, the results of his
"Experimental Studies on Tumorigenic
Activity of cigarette smoke condensate
on mouse skin".
"lJJI,JMm
Increasing the Nicotine to Tar Ratio
Nicotine fortffied 0 20 100
(KCRT) in blend (%1
Blend Nicotine l%/ 1.76 1.95 2.70
Smoke Nicotine (mgicig) 1.12 1.23 1.36
Tar (mgicig) 13.2 10.8 6.8
In one of the first publications he com-
pared different reconstitution processes
and found that there was only one pro-
cess which gave a significant reduction
in the bioactivity of the tar : this was
the Kimberly-Clark process used by LTR
Industries.
16

iillpyllylpf
Comparison of the tumorigenic activity
of condensates obtained from natural and reconstituted tobaccos
(Mouse skin painting test)
Cigarette Smoke condensate
(mgJcigf %
Anirtlals with tumours
Natural tobacco 33.3 23.6
Tobacco sheet EA 32.6 32.4
Tobacco sheet EB 35.2 36.0
Tobacco sheet ES 16.9 14.2
(LTR-Industries product)
Tobacco sheet EW 35.7 24.9
Source : Excerpts from W DONTENWILL et AL Zenschrrtt Fur Krebstorschung 78 236264 119721
Following this publication, many ciga-
rette manufacturers decided to start to
use reconstituted tobacco manufactu-
red by the Kimberly-Clark process used
by LTR Industries, or to switch from the
casting process that they were using to
the Kimberly-Clark process.
As a consequence, the production of
reconstituted tobacco at LTR Industries
increased by a large factor.
In another publication, Professor pon-
tenwill compared the tumorigenic acti-
vity for different types of natural tobac-
cos, and of the corresponding recons-
tituted tobaccos.
The following graph confirms that
reconstitution by the paper process
reduces the bioactivity of the tar by
about 50 %, for all types of tobaccos.
Carcnomes
at 40 mg Dose
Naturai
Tobacco
Carcunomes '.
aose level 40 m9
Cl
k
f Ki
b
l
ar
m
er
y-
Effect of Introduction o
Reconstituted Tobacco made by LTR Industries in a
on carcinogenic activity of condensate
30
20
100
0
so Natural Tobacco 0
so K-C Reconstituted Tobacco 100
Reconstituted Tobacco was originally
developed for economical reasons. This
is still the major reason for its use.
China produced 1.300 billion cigarettes
in 1986. We can estimate that over
100.000 tons of tobacco by-products
have been generated during the manu-
facture of these cigarettes. During the
same time China production of natural
tobacco has been over 2 million metric
tons. We can estimate that at least
100.000 tons of b y-products have been
generated at the various manipulation
stages in the forms and from the forms
to the cigarette plants. Reconstitution of
Blend
~
~
~
00
FleConslRUfetl
Tobacco
~
~
the by-products will have an obvious
economical interest either by allowing
to increase the amount of cigarettes
manufactured from the same quantity
of leaf tobacco, or by allowing to manu-
facture the same quantity of cigarettes
with a lower consumption of leaf
tobacco. Thus giving a larger potential
for leaf export.
On top of the economical interest,
Kimberly-Clark reconstituted tobacco is
nowadays an important tool for ciga-
rette design. The use of Kimberly-Clark
reconstituted tobacco can significantly
modify the smoke chemistry, burning
O
Effect of Reconstitution
by Kimberly-Clark Process
on Biological Activity
of Condensate
From Dontenwdt Z. Fur Kresoforch. 85 141-153 1976,
When reconstituted tobacco is introdu-
ced in a blend, the bioactivity of the
cigarette is reduced, and this true even
when the level of introduction in the
blend is moderate.
As a conclusion, we can state that the
introduction in Chinese cigarettes of
reconstituted tobacco made by the
Kimberly-Clark process used at LTR
Industries would result in an improve-
ment of the biological effect of cigarette
smoke.
and physical properties of cigarettes. It
can contribute to the manufacture of
cigarettes with better health charac-
teristics.
Within the Kimberly-Clark Group, LTR
Industries is keen on developing its busi-
ness relationship with China.
Toda y in Beijing were are at your entire
disposal to discuss cigarette design,
selection and testing of specific types
of reconstituted tobacco, direct supply
of reconstituted tobacco from LTR
Industries and future technological coo-
peration in China.
17
