Philip Morris
A Proposal for Qualitative Research to Develop A Lexicon of Japanese Consumer Language Related to Smoking
Fields
- Area
- MARKETING SERVICES PMKK/STORED FILES
- Type
- MREP, MARKET RESEARCH PROPOSAL
- Site
- A52
- Request
- Stmn/R1-095
- Stmn/R1-096
- Stmn/R1-097
- Stmn/R1-096
- Named Person
- S, J.M.
- Recipient (Organization)
- Pmai, Philip Morris Asia Inc.
- Document File
- 2504018041/2504018153/Japan - Market Research
- Author (Organization)
- Asi Market Research Japan
- Named Organization
- Focus Group
- Gcs
- Image Oriented Groups
- Pmi, Philip Morris International
- Taste Oriented Groups
- Asi Market Research Japan
- Gcs
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- CONF, CONFIDENTIAL
- Master ID
- 2504018067/8078
Related Documents: - Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- zly32e00
Document Images
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL
r1i
Ln
G
Submitted to: -~
- ~
A PROPOSAL FOR'QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
TO DEVELOP A LEXICON'OF
JAPANESE CONSUMER LANGUAGE RELATED
TO SMOKING
- ~
oa
Philip Morris Asia Inc. - - - ~o
C
Date:
REC~~Y~~D--
March 3, 1983
File to: /MZ-
ASI MARKET RESEARCH (aAPAN), INC.

INTRODUCTION
As part of its continuing effort to obtain a fuller understanding of
Japanese smokers:' mentality, PHILIP MORRIS has commissioned ASI MARKET
RESEARCH to prepare a lexicon of Japanese'consumer language related
to smoking. The results of_this project will be used to incorporate
appropriate consumer language into the quantitative questionnaires
.used for the benchmark survey, taste tests and pack tests. Also the
11
consumer language obtained should prove quite heTpful in_ developing
.advertising copy.
The specific objectives of the study are to ascertain the following.
The different attributes (desirable and undesirable) which
smokers perceive in cigarettes, and the words and phrases they
themselves use to describe these attributes.
(ii) The differences between these various types of cigarettes, as
seen by smokers, e.g., domestic, imported, regular, menthol,
: etc. What competes with.what, for which purposes, in what
respects?
(iii) The smokTng`situations for cigarettes -- more especially the
types of ctgarettes considered appropriate for the occasion,
the mode and amount of use, etc.
(iv) What is the likely importance of the_'pack. -- what does it/
should it convey about the characteristics and quality of
the product?

(v) Consumer language in regard to the taste, strength, aroma
smoothness, etc.
(vi) Consumer language relevant to the enjoyment of cigarettes
. -- i.e., intangible aspects.
The details of the proposal are set out in the.pages.that follow.
2.

3.
M.ETHOOOLOGY
It is recommended that the following sample composition of focus
group discussions be used in generating'tlie lexicon.
No: of groups
i) Males; 20-mid 30's
heavy smokers
, 1
~ (2 packs and over per day)
ii) Males, 40-late 50's, heavy smokers
1
(2 packs and over per day)
iii) Males, 20-mi.d 30's, light smoke.rs
1
(up to one pack per day)
iv), males, 40-late 50's, light smokers
1
(up to one pack per day)
v).femaies, 20-early 30.'s, light/medium smokers
1
vi) one group of male smokers who are 'wordsmiths'
i.e. their work is intimately involved with
the use of Japanese language, eg, authors,
1
editors, teachers of Japanese language to
Japanese in high schools,..universities, etc.
6
The types of consumer language we will be identifying can be broadly
divided into two categories - image related language and taste/tactile
related language. There is of course overlap between the two, but
initially two separate discussion flows will be used. As some of the
definitions become clearer,parts of the discussion flows may be merged.

Because of the difficulty- of describing certain words such as flavor,
aroma, etc, we will also be making use of color association techniques
in the group sessions.
As will be seen on the following pages, there is quite a lot of ground
to cover in the study, and it may not be possible to complete all of
the objectives with one project. We would therefore request that
PHILIP MORRIS executives select those words/attributes in particular
that they wlsh to have thoroughly covered in this initials.tudy.
4.

TOPICS TO BE COVERED
Given below is a suggested list of topics to be covered in the focus
group sessions. The final.list of topics to be covered will be con-
firmed after discussions between PM and AS'I executives.
I. Image Oriented Groups
Brand of cigarette 'smoked regularly.
Why do you smoke that brand (unaided)? Anything else?
What attributes are you looking for in a cigarette - in your own
words,-how-would you define.
- a good cigarette
- a poor cigarette
,
What differences do you see between different cigarettes types/brands?
In your own words, how do.you classify different types/brands of
cigarettes. Which types/brands tend to go together as a
.category/group. How would-you define that group (unaided).
On what occasions/times of day do you smoke cigarettes? Are there
some occasions/times of day when you smoke more than at other times.
or when you smoke different brands? Does what you are looking .
for in a cigarette vary depending upon the situation. -What brands/types
fit what occasions/times of day. How? why?, in what way? ~
(unaided)

6.
And what about packaging. Do you distinguish between-brands/types
on the basis of packaging. How, in what way. What does the pack
say about the characteristics/quality of the product?
- do different pack colors have different connotations e.g.
for taste, quality, price, status.
= what is an attractive pack or alternatively an unattractive pack.
- hard pack (flip top box) vs soft pack.' which is-preferred?
why? what are the perceived advantages/disadvantages of each.
~ (If not already mentioned), what differences do they see between
the following attributes, and how they describe the differences.
Which brands/types fall into each attribute.
- filter vs non filter
- foreign vs domestic
- expensive,ys inexpensive
- for-younger people vs for older people
.
- for men vs for women
- for people who live in the city vs for people who live in
the country
- for modern~people vs for traditional people
- low tar and nicotine vs high tar and nicotine.
- brand which is suitable.to gi.ve as a-gift vs brand which
is not suitable to give as a gift
V
~
~
~ - regula.rr vs.menthol C
.~
- charcoal fliter vs non-charcoal filter CO
~
-.~
- Japanese flavor-vs American flavor ~
little harm-to health vs considerable harm to health

7.
II. Taste Oriented Groups
Brand off cigarettes smoke regularly. Why do you smoke that brand.
Anything else?
Which other brands have you smoked in the past 12 months. Why
haven't you continued to smoke these other brands?
What was the ini.tial reason/trigger why you tried your regular/these
other brands?
What attributes are you looking for in a cigarette - in your own
words, how would you difine.
- a good cigarette
- a poor cigarette
I now want to discuss different taste related attributes. 'For each
attribute I want to talk general ly -about it first and then I want you
to smoke a couple of different cigarettes and while smoking them dis-
cuss each of the attributes as they relate to these.cigarettes.
'Good taste'
First of all, when you think of 'good taste' what sort of
words/associations come to mind. Any others.
what words do you consider to be synomyns for 'good.taste'.
How, why?
what words do you consider to be the opposite of 'good taste'.
How, why?
what other words, if any, would you use to describe the 'taste'
of the cigarette you are now smoking.

8.
'Mi ld'
- what sort of words/associations come.to mind with 'mild'
- what words are synonymous/similar to 'mild'
- what is the difference, if any, between 'mild' and 'light'
- what is the antonyms/opposite of 'mild'
- what other words/associations would you use to describe
-the 'mildness' of this cigarette
(For some groups 'light' would be mentioned before 'mild' to avoid
order bias).
'Poor Flavor'
- what sort of words/a5sociati'ons come to-mind with 'poor flavor'
- what words are synonymous/similar to 'poor-flavor'
- what is the difference b.etween 'poor flavor' and 'poor aroma'
- what are the antonyms/opposite of 'poor.-flavor'
- what other words would-you use to describe the 'flavor' of
this cigarette
(For some groups; 'aroma' would be mentioned before 'flayor' to
avoid order bias). ,
Repeat above process for following words/associations (if not al-
ready mentioned).
- richness
- sweetness
- feeling of smoke in.the mouth after inhaling (e.g. smoke 'hot',
'cooi', etc) "
- have a.1ot of taste
- feeling of dryness in mouth and throat after smoking

9.
- soothing feeling when you smoke
- smoothness of taste
- effecti.ve filter
- speed of burning of the cigarette
- degree of firmness of packing of the tabacco
- draw of the cigarette .
- the smoke on each puff (e.g. light and airy, rich full)
- the affect of smell of the smoke on other people
~

TO.
TIMING
The groups will be held from 8-15 March, with a final report available
on 9May. The results of the groups,,however, will be incorporated
into the GCS.survey.in April.
-COSTS
The cost for the..study as outlined in the proposal is ~3,360,000.
Terms are 50% upon approval and 50% upon submission of the final
English language report.
Four copies of the finalrepo,rt will be provided, with additional *
O
Ln
~
copies avai.la e at cost.
bl '~
~
~
~
OD
