Philip Morris
Healthy Buildings 88
Fields
- Author
- Petterson, B.
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Attachment
- 2501442913/2501442963
- Area
- BRUSSELS S&H/EU ARCHIVE
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Named Organization
- Natl Inst of Environmental Medicine
- Sml
- Swedish Inst for Building Research
- Who, World Health Org
- Cib Conference
- Healthy Buildings 88
- Sml
- Named Person
- Andersson, J.
- Johansson, C.
- Lindvall, T.
- Miljovanlig, H.M.
- N, D.
- Petterson, B.
- Sundell, J.
- Johansson, C.
- Master ID
- 2501442800/3320
Related Documents:- 2501442800-2806 Report of the Surgeon General's Advisory Committee on the Health Consequences of Using Smokeless Tobacco
- 2501442807-2808 the Thirty-Ninth World Health Assembly Geneva, 860505 - 860516
- 2501442809-2811 Seventy-Seventh Session Agenda Item 15 Tobacco or Health
- 2501442812-2817 Economic Data for Tobacco in Selected Countries
- 2501442818-2827 Comments on the Proposed Who Resolution Eb77/22 Add. 2 Dated 860111
- 2501442828-2829 Report on World Health Organization's Work Related to the Tobacco Industry
- 2501442830-2897 the World Health Organization (Who): Its Work Related to the Activities of the International Tobacco Industry
- 2501442898-2901 Zimbabwe and the World Health Assembly
- 2501442902-2905 Critique of Who Report Eb77/22 Add 1 Entitled 'the Adverse Health Effects of Tobacco Use'
- 2501442906-2907 Action Alert 860000 World Health Assembly
- 2501442908-2912 860000 World Health Assembly 860505 - 860516 Background / General Principles
- 2501442913 Healthy Buildings 880000
- 2501442914-2916
- 2501442926-2927 Cib Healthy Buildings 880000
- 2501442928-2930 A Guide to Future Healthy Buildings
- 2501442931-2940 Why Does Air Make People Sick?
- 2501442941
- 2501442942-2944 Energy Conservation Programs Have Made Matters Worse
- 2501442945-2947 More Fresh Air Makes for Healthier Buildings
- 2501442948-2952 Clear Indoor Air: A Trade Union Perspective
- 2501442953-2954
- 2501442955-2957
- 2501442958-2959
- 2501442960-2961
- 2501442962-2963
- 2501442965-3067 Cigarette Smoking and Cancer: A Scientific Perspective
- 2501443068-3119 Cigarette Smoking and Heart Disease
- 2501443120-3256 Smoking and Health 640000 - 790000 the Continuing Controversy
- 2501443257-3286 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Copd)
- 2501443288-3301 Cigarette Smoking and Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases: the Major Gaps in Knowledge
- 2501443302
- 2501443303-3320 Tobacco Issues Claims Vs. Facts
- Author (Organization)
- Organizational Comm for Healthy Building
- Swedish Council for Building Research
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Site
- E96
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- MISS, MISSING PAGES
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- jyh22e00
Document Images
Bertil Pettersson, Swedish Council for Building Research,
Chairmen of the organisational committee for
Healthy Buildings 88
Asbestes, mildew, plaster, radion, computer terminals, "day care center sickness," "office
sickness," etc. are all current
newsitems today. We speak of "sick buildings" - buildings which make people sick. These buildings
are to be found
everywhere in the industrialized world. The World Health Organisation estimates that almost 30
procent of all new or
renovated buildings are "sick." We do not have a clear picture of how great a problem this is in
Sweden.
We have a great deal of knowledge today why these problems arise. Knowledge that is based on
scientifically perform-
ed investigations; not only technical within construction, but also within chemistry, medicine, and
psychology. One
problem is that this knowledge is difficult to disseminate to those responsible for design and
construction.
Bertil Pettersson, section manager at the Swedish Council for Building Research, presents here a
picture of how far
research has come today and in which areas additional research is needed so that we can have sound
buildings to live
and work in.
During the last decade, interest in the questions relating
to building hygiene has grown after having long laid
dormant. The fundamental reasons for this growing interest
are first the number of health problems which have arisen
and secondly the evolution of the so-called sick building
syndrome. The rapid pace of development in the fields of
construction and interior decorating materials, as well as
incorrectly executed energy conservation measures, are often
seen as the causes of the problems which have arisen. The
public debate and the media have highlighted such concepts
as radon, formaldehyde, fungus and rot, asbestos, air ions,
dry air, day-nursery illness, office illness, self-copying
paper, work at VDU terminals etc. The
major emphasis in o
6-4
N
v

research in this area has been placed on investigations,
plotting of the problem building, and on specific problems
linked to individual factors such as radon, formaldehyde
emission from building materials, damp and mould damage or
self-levelling screeds.
The above problems are not specifically Swedish. According
to the estimations of the World Health organization WHO,
almost 30 per cent of all newly built or renovated buildings
are unhealthy. There is no overall picture available for the
Swedish building stock in this respect. However, various
studies have given a clear picture of the nature of the
problems. The health aspects which have come into prominence
relate to such matters as hypersensitivity.
The "groups at risk" (people suffering from allergies or
other medical hypersensitivity) who make up a considerable
proportion of the population of Sweden and may be estimated
at between 1.5 and 2.0 million individuals must, naturally,
be taken into account in designing the indoor climate.
Different requirements in different buildings N
cn
a
~
Those factors which primarily influence human climate ~
~
perception indoors are shown in Fig. 1. 140
~
m
If complaints and critical viewpoints on the indoor climate
are followed up, it can be ascertained that there are
different climatic factors which dominate the "complaint
profile" in respect of different types of activities. On the
basis of complaint frequencies and asseasments of how
seriously shortcomings in a certain climatic factor affect
the activity in question, it is possible to formulate a kind
of "problem potential" which gives a picture of the relative
importance of different climatic factors. Fig. 2 shows
examples of this.

The large potential for temperature problems in the second
and fourth columns are, of course, related to the fact that
the room temperature in these premises often tends to be
excessively high. Sensitivity to disturbing noise is
fundamentally high in dwellings. However, there is seldom
any appreciable risk of really disturbing noise from
installations in dwellings which are not provided with
ran-controllwa muPrly air.
Draughts in buildings normally derive from untight windows
etc. Draught in other premises may more readily be related
to the function of the supply air equipment.
Sweden well to the forefront
The awareness of climatic and environmental factors as a
growing problem area has increased in recent years. Sweden
is well to the forefront in certain of these areas at study.
This relates, for example, to air quality research where WHO
(partly on the basis of Swedish research results) has now
accepted the human nose as acriterion for judging air
quality indoors. The research carried out by the Swedish
Institute for Building Research (SIB) into people's
temperature requirements and the insulation capacity of
clothing is also of a high international standard. Today, we
possess dependable knowledge about radon and how radon-
affected buildings can be treated. The growth of fungus in
buildings - and particularly in such sites as bathrooms,
showers etc. - constitutes a serious hygienic and economic
problem. Research aimed at evolving methods for exposure
(mycological and chemical diagnosis criteria) and
registration of health effects has commenced. The purpose is
to establish a documentary basis for assessing the effects
which different measures for treating and renovating
fungus-damaged buildings will have. N
Cn
0
~
~
~
~
~
~_4
o

Energy conservation measures have resulted in tighter
buildings and reduced ventilation.flows. Mites, which need
an RH of more than 40 per cent, thrive in certain buildings
where the ventilation is insufficient. Studies have shown
that these tiny creatures are often the culprit in cases of
asthma and dust allergy.
Over the last decade, a new and rapidly expanding problem
has been visited on us, the so-called sick buildings. The
investigations which have hitherto been carried out have not
been able to pinpoint any individual factor as the cause of
this phenomenon, but rather a series of factors which affect
and together bring about this problem.
How are healthy buildings to be Gonstructed?
Research and discussion into how to build and administer
with a view to creating "sound" or "healthy" buildings are
gtill in their infancy. But sporadic attempts have so far
been carried out to test ideas in this field on full scale.
Nor has sufficient time elapsed to allow for an evaluation
of such experiments to a requisite degree. It is eas'y to
arrive at the conclusion that we quite simply do not know
how to build a healthy building other than in blindingly
obvious terms. In particular, it may appear difficult to
reach a consensus of opinion on those technical approaches
which give healthy or unhealthy buildings. The vast majority
of technical solutions may, in the right context, correctly
executed and correctly employed, give a fully satisfactory
end result. But some of these solutions are more sensitive
to the commonest faults which may be committed in
conjunction with planning, construction, running and use.
when such "risk solutions" are employed, the inspections
carried out at different stages of the project must be more
exhaustive. if these inspections cannot in all probability
be expected to be adequate, such "risk solutions" should be

avoided. Experience from the large number of problem
buildings which have been examined in recent years shows
that these problems have often been brought about simply
because "proven experience" had been disregarded.
One example of a BFR project in which different soZutions
are studied is a "user-healthy" day nursery in Skarpaby
which has been planned and constructed iii such a manner as
to minimize the risk of climatic problems. Evaluation of
ll.i... t_..~....1. 1- rii_La.tII lL lR.M +t.r t.iar iir nntiinrl
utatL tltitj 1ii nji. 11 1 4A7. Tr, t:hie proieast, tlse's btggionic #nd
thermal climate will bP thoroughly eva2uaGed.
Cd,,SLinuad A&D vital
pecFite the r4latizro1`r 1arr7a hrrKini7 frnm hnrh rhQ SwPdigh
Gvun4il fut suildinq Resaarch and other resr.nrch financ:c3ra,
improved knowledge is required to dcLtfLmi,ye the limits for
indoor temperature, air movement, air humidity and air
pollutants. Of particular importance is continued research
into simultaneous exposure to different physical
environmental factors. But research into individual
environmental factors such as formaldehyde, tobacco smoke,
smells and noise is also necessary. Specific research
efforts are also necessary to shed aome light on how
climatic and environmental knowledge is handled in the
planning and projecting process.
N
Healthy buildings - opportunities and obstacles in energy o
N
conservation measures ~
~
~
`o
N
The Government and the Parliament have established that ''~
measures to limit energy consumption and dependence on
finite energy gQUrce4 in buildings may not normally lead to
a deterioration in the living situation of the users.
Consequently, it is a vital necessity to attempt to map out
the social, medical and behavioural-dependent consequences

of energy conservation measures and the introduction of new
energy technology. Extensive knowledge is required of the
nature and level of the users' demands in order that
conservation measures do not become hedged in by
unnecessarily strict safety margins or misfire because of a
lack of knowledge about the users' value judgements and
behaviour. .
The Swedish Council for 8uilding Research strongly feels
that the requirement for healthy buildings need not conflict
with the requirement for efficient energy savings. However,
a fundamental condition is that the requirements for
qualified planning, careful building and competent running
and maintenance always be met. "Risk solutions", as well as
insufficiently tested materials, should be given special
attention. Of course, it is crucial that greater prominence
be given to health aspects than hitherto in the continued
energy conservation debate.
international conference on healthy buildings in Sweden
T1',IJIL vaLilt'14AtLt_Un;I ;~ S-8 ke-irte;;4e-t7; SwrJi:.: will be lI U5litI y a
world-wide CIB conference on "Healthy Buildinos". At the
conference - arranoed by the Swedish Council for Building
Research in cooperation with the National Institute of
Environmental Medicine (SML), a large numb:- of medical and
technical experts from all over the world will gather to
discuss how healthy buildings are to be constructed.
The conference has created much interest in Sweden as well as from other countries. The Swedish
construction indu-
stry supports "Healthy Buildings 88" with both financial support and active participation in
workshops, etc.. We have
the right conditions for an exchange of information, ideas, and experience from the conference.
N
"Healthy Buildings 88" will also be documented; both in the form of a general research report, and
even in various o
special documents where architexts, builders, construction managers, etc. present conclusions from
the conference from ,j
their respective areas of expertise. ~
10
N
N)
f

Literatures
Johansson C and Pettersson Bertil. Takvgrme - energif8r-
brukning och inomhusklimat (Roof heating - energy
consumption and the indoor climate), the Swedish Council for
Building Research
R1211984
t
Hult M. MiljBvgnlig barnstu$a (User-healthy day nursery),
the Swedish Council for Building Research
R94:1986
Dawidowic2 N, T Lindvall, J Sundell. Det sunda huset (The
healthy building), the Swedish Council for Building Research
G20:1987
Energi i byggd mi1jS - 90-talets mbjligheter (Energy in a
built-up environment - the possibilities of the nineties),
the Swedish Council for Building Research
G1b:1987

(Bildtext aid 10)
CLIMATE PERCEPTION
o Activity
o Air temperature
o Radiation
o Air apeed
o Clothing
o Damp
o Hygiene, radon, C02, formaldehyde, smell
Fig. 1. Different parameters which influence human climate
perception.
Air temperature
Outdoor temperature
Air humidity
"Smells"
Gases
Particles
Sound
Draught
Dwellings
Offices, Care centres
"Clinical rooms", Operating-theatres, Laboratories,
Electronics
Workshops, Manufacture
Problem potential
N
cn
0
Fig. 2. Examples of problem profiles for a few types of ~
~
activities. ~~
N
4~.
(aid 11)
Children's games are often noisy; sound-damping wall panels
and suspended ceilings give a better environment. Here, the
reverberation time in a playroom is measured using a
starting pistol, Photo: Johnny Andersson.

(Rutan sid 11)
I
I
f
The goals of the R&D activities ot the Swedish Council for
Building Research in the field of the indoor climate are to:
o achieve an interdisciplinary long-term build-up of
knowledge in which medicine, chemistry, behavioural
science, architeCture, construction and installation
engineering etc. make their own contributions.
o clarify how exposure to individual environmental factors
and combinations of environmental factors influence people's
health and well-being.
o develop methods to eradicate harmful environmental
factors and their effects on people and buildings.
o create, in cooperation with the other participants in
the construction process and building administration and
with researchers, a data bank for purposeful energy
utilization in Sweden's buildings.
