Jump to:

Philip Morris

Organisation of Whitecoat Project - An Eema Perspective

Date: 22 Feb 1988
Length: 1 page
2501254704
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2501254704

Fields

Author
Ware, K.
Area
REIF,HELMUT/BASEMENT
Attachment
2501254704/2501254708
Request
Stmn/R2-038
Type
MEMO, MEMORANDUM
Document File
2501254211/2501254724a/Handouts No.2 Master Copies
2501254669/2501254724/Eec + Eema Ca Plan 870000, 880000, 890000
Recipient (Organization)
PM-Eema, PM-Eema
Site
E5
Master ID
2501254704/4708
Related Documents:
Copied
T, W.
C, Lcc
D, G.
D, S.C.
H, M.D.
R, J.B.
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Author (Organization)
PM-Eema, PM-Eema
Named Organization
C+B
Nma
PM-Eec, PM-Eec
PM-Eema, PM-Eema
Recipient
Gaisch, H.
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
UCSF Legacy ID
zsj32e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: zsj32e00 Log in for more options!
PHILIP MORRIS E.E.M.A. CASE POSTALE - 1001 LAUSANNE INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Dr. Helmut Gaisch February 22, 1988 DATE: Keith Ware LCC, GD, SCD, MDH, C.C.: JBR, WT Organisation of Whitecoat Project - an EEMA Perspective Attached is my draft proposal as a contribution to the organisation of the Whitecoat Project. It draws upon discussions recently held, and my view of the current issues and problems at this early stage in the Project as seen from the EEMA perspective. These I list below since they need to be addressed in the final organisation:- 1.i~ The precise objectives of the Project are not adequately defined nor, therefore, fully understood by key players. 2., There is confusion over the respective roles of S&T and C&B. C&B ~ has no direct accountability today to anyone within PM EEMA/EEC management. 3.1 There is no direct S&T accountability to PM EEMA management for Project activities within or impacting on the EEMA Region. This affects all aspects of planning, resource allocation, budgeting, expense charging, progress monitoring, and implementation control. 4. Budgeting, resource allocation, and expense charging processes are obscure. C&B legal and non-legal expenses are submitted to the appropriate Region, with the non-legal expenses being forwarded to S&T for settlement. S&T carries authority to budget and spend on the Whitecoat Project. This expense is ultimately charged to the PM EEMA and EEC income statements through the R&D expense allocation formula; i.e., PM EEMA management has no control over the level or allocation of budget, and the ultimate charge does not necessarily reflect expenses incurred on behalf of the EEMA Region. 5. No other companies have yet been recruited into the Project, and it is not clear how other companies and NMA's would be easily incorporated - in terms of funding, management role, etc. I would be grateful for your response to this proposal so that we can progress towards establishing a clear, practicable organisation for this Project. Best regards,

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: