Philip Morris
Fields
- Type
- OUTL, OUTLINE
- Area
- PLANNING RYEBROOK/BOARDROOM
- Request
- Stmn/R1-004
- Named Organization
- Ec
- Fao, Food and Agriculture Org
- Heritage Foundation
- Infotab, Infotab
- Inst of Policy
- Iocu
- Itga
- Meta
- Ngo
- Nma
- Unitab
- Who, World Health Org
- Awg
- Document File
- 2500103966/2500104127/Missing
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2500103967/4126
- 2500103967-3968 Boca Raton Plan: Status Report for the Period Ending 890131
- 2500103969-4056 Boca Raton Action Plan: Status Report Period Ending: 891131
- 2500104057 Appendix F
- 2500104058-4076 Appendix F the E.T.S. Battle the 890000 Programs for Balancing the Beliefs
- 2500104077 Appendix G
- 2500104078-4083 Appendix G Ets Marketing
- 2500104084 Appendix H
- 2500104085-4087 New War Cry Against Smoking in the United States Enough Is Enough, Reply the Producers Appendix H
- 2500104088 Nouveau Cri De Guerre Contre La Fumee Aux Etats-Unis Cela Suffit, Repliquent Les Producteurs
- 2500104089-4091 the Smoking Habit Persists in Spite of the Warnings
- 2500104092 El Habito De Fumar No Cede A Pesar De Las Advertencias
- 2500104093-4094 Women, the Poor and the Young Smoke in the U.S.A.
- 2500104095 Naiset, Koyhat Ja Nuoret Tupakoivat Usa:Ssa
- 2500104096 'enough Is Enough' Usa : Tobacco Lobby Reacts
- 2500104097 Genug Ist Genug
- 2500104098 Tabakindustrie Geht in Dle Offensive
- 2500104099 US - Tabakindustrie in Der Offensive
- 2500104100 Genug Ist Genug
- 2500104101 Trop C'est Trop
- 2500104102 Telefax Transmission Cover
- 2500104103-4104 Anti-Smokers Are Attacked by the Tobacco Industry
- 2500104105 Anti-Rygere Angribes Af Tobaksindustri
- 2500104106 Smoking Bans Not Supported
- 2500104107-4109 Interview with Gary Miller, US Tobacco Institute Assistant President, Regarding the Institute's Campaign Which Claims Smokers Are Victims of Harassment and Discrimination
- 2500104110 Appendix I
- 2500104122 Appendix J
- 2500104123-4124 Appendix J Boca Raton - Follow Up
- 2500104125 Appendix K
- 2500104126 Appendix K International Smokers' Survey: Status Report
Related Documents:
Document Images
i,-,: 49 t;arDz' HE.
J; ~G~i ?~i.:a~ . . C~
bFl`tON 1 -- nobilinr f31aDc+1 xqra-LOhby
1.1 PitUGikAM'ML GOALS I.1.2. GrelEte tJlobal prgdTtiah"tiRn
1.1.2. QrganiRa regianml i.ryhbits
1.1.3. Fund central exeatative
1.1.4. Set C*mrn.unicOtiong agendti
1.9..5. Create pz'opaganda material
1.1.6. Manage po2iticsl *ducation
1.1.7. Develop Third World econoraic
caiCg
1.3..8. Link egricu]ture lobby with
other prograimmoa
0
1.2 1'06SI8LE STxuOTiiREs 1.2.1. Intot&b sub-graup
1.2.2. T.x.c.A.
1.2.3. UNiTAIt + reqiorig
1.2,4. Tradar/praceaaor grouping
1.2.5. Istdividual coxnp&nfetk
ExtGrr,ei canaultanttt
1.3 BENErIT57 1.3.1.. Purity of agra-Xabby
1.3.2. Power of egra-:::.n~xftuc~s,c
1. ~.3. usetul fihixd-wox-ld bieN
1.3.4. 8'rbodagu nx mesaage dclivlrry
1.3.5. Weak t1ynk ;f W.H.0.
1.3.6 . F.A,.t7. support
1..4 NEGAT1vFiS~ 1.4,1. k1i*Ku#e of xjrtjw"r powar
1.4.2. P'riction at industry interface
i,,4.3. ~tegir~nall divrtrtsity ~
0
0
~
~
~
~

It IFD1tiB
4PxIbN 2 - ManhRe j.A.Q. Lobby
2.1 PROOnAMM9 coALS 2.1.1. Split F,A.e.frV.H.O.
2.1.2. Unite diviaicna3l thinking
2.1.3. Piamote 'beat praati.ce,
2.1.4. baak new publiclgtions
2.1.5. Derstroy crop sUbstitt,utSon mythg
2,1,6. Focus on Third World
2.1.7. Link with other prograwuies
2.2 PQi~saBLa sTkUGTUREs 2.2_1. infotab sub-group
2.2,2., T.T.f3.A.
2.7.3. iltiiTAB t regiQno
2.2.4. Extigrnal cansultdritx
2.3
aENE!"iTg? 2.3.1. Counter W.H.o. crop prapaganda
2,3.2. Gain credit for ~best practicer'
2.3,3. support lsconomic argumQnts
2.3.4. Sponsor favourable resalutivn s
2.3.5. Separate supply fxotn +demasnd
2.3.6. Arld credibility to regi*n%1
Ci1; lIE
2,4 NEGAmxVLfiS? 2.4.1. ResiBtance to RlU7.t.in&riOxtalC
2.4.2. complaxity of organ9.ooticn
!
~ -
'r- .

I°IFDT~iB
OPTION 3- Attack W. H. 4.
!i1 '5n3 ?«3.1 F'. 35
3.]. PROGRAMMf GOALS 3,1.1. CritiCS se budget manaqer:mcnt /~
3.1.2. Addreest health pri¢ritieg
3.1.3,. Expose roaource bleckmail
3.1.4. HiqhZl.qht rsqitonal failuras
3.1.5. Attmck ~bshaVicsurismr
3.i.b.
~.1.7. Counter on publl.c issuss
niecredit actiuiirts' credentie.ls
3.I.A.
3. ~. 9. Enpaqe in statiaticsl warfare
lnrrest in preas rel.etionc
3.1.10. Show impoct of Iduokao`
orqtrnisati.ox7s
:~.2 YOSSI9LE 5TRUCTURES 3.2.1. TnfotaY, with new resources
3.2.2. Now industry orgenfsetion
3.2,3. Fxtarnel consultents
3.2.4. xridivi.dud1 companies
3.2.5. sponsqretl publicatiorte
3.2.6. Atmslength medical institutl.ono
3.2.7. 7t .T. G. A. f sgii o-1 obby
3.3 BENKFxT&? 3.3.1. Ftetl3,eve preeA:ure on govarnmrxxts
3.3.2. Raduce 'Arntis' r¢sourcer
1.3.3. Correct modie imbezance
3.~.4. yrotect product integrity
3,3.5. rut down sotia]l pK+stlrur'es
3. 3.6. x.i ft industry/stAoker iaorale
3.3.7. Promote qenuine heaith
3,4
NEGk,'S`ZVLS?
3. 4.1. pri.oriti*z
lrisk of bounc+c--batck
3.4.2. Credenti~l~
3.4.3. Funding aomplsxity
3.5.4. 'Prejucliws to other optinns

'-Xt-=t1-1:4c,9 1C~-~ I'IF ~THE
pPTTON 4 - Ne9otibte witri W.K.O.
01 569 f'4J3,] r'. Dh
4.1 PROGRAMrsE GOALS 4.1.1. Reduce dialectic tilt
4.1.2. DefUge peripheral z+oC.ivistK
4.1.3. CrrrBte climate of 'pragressr
4.1.4, ReinforGe health priority
dS.rections
4.1.5. icase r.qiUne1/natianal preesure
4.1.6. Comfort A1-litrs
4.1.7. Kajor on reei i.esu+ew
(*.g, children)
4.2 T'05SIBLF STRUCTURES 4,2.1. Infvtab
4.2,2. Tksird-paxt.y institutioxl.
4.2.3. ExternnS. annoultnnts
4.2.4. tndependenl: ecorx8mists
4.A BENEY'IT57 4.3.1. Countez 'behaviouriumy
4.3.«. Correct long-korm aoc:ir,1 trend
4,3.3. Keduod rQgional/nmtianal corltrol
4.3.4. Improve industry irnmger
4.4 NEC,A2IVESy 4.4.1, Hard to ffnd caMunon graund
4.4y2. Riak of aCtivist dietartion
4.4.3. Uncertainty *var role of W.x.O.
4 .4. 4. Slow
,-}. - ..
.p
H
~
-tb.

= f-i1-].38-:~ 1:--,.:4 @~ I'll"llHl"
Li'i _~b_ c-q ~-:, ~ k1~~Z
Angeridix I
nEtAFT 4
iNFOTpt 3anunry
Ti7.SCU5SIbN PAPER
Rrb-aative Opxions
!'{?SSInLE MENU
Mobtlise G1obb1 Agro-Lobby
r[anaga F_A.o. hobby
.
N*goti4 ta with w.H.a.
pirect G~obal E.T.S. Pxayramme
~~ ~ t~ck w,a o
N.
~, B.
Publ;Eah industry Magbzine
Cttgariise Defence - COmimerp3a1 lFreecioms
Attack I.O.C.U.
Ymprove Nmti.ozstel h5aociati.c,rx Qualit,y
Strengthen Retgiprta1 Dafonc Mechenf smb
0

,_'i'-l_:1'.L-1`~i_°9 1r-~IIaFCitHE; ~~I ~~~~L; F'.07
4D OPTION 5 - Direct Global ETS pragr*rarna
5.1 PROGRAMME GOALS 5.1.1. Coordinate industry scionce
5.1.2. Manage external science
5.1.3. Rackage scientifia material
5.1.4. Devise media plans
5.1.5. Qr anise special-interest
br?ef ings
5.1.6. improvg marketing of research
findings
5.1.7. Drive N.M.As s to counter-attack
5.1.8. Expnse 'antla' misuse of data
5.2 POSSIBLE STRUCTURES 5.2.1. Yafotab sub-group
0 5.2.2. External consultants
5.2.3. Regional/national associations
5.2.4. Pn specialists
5.3 BENEFITS ? 5.3.1. Counter restrictive trend
5.3.2. Correct media imbaleinc*
5.3.3. Good science givaa credibility
5.3.4. Eaue social f~ i~ctiUns
5.4 N4GATIVES? 5, 4,1. Programme hard to manage
5.4.2. Cost
5.4.3. N.M.A. resistance

,~, ~J_ ~t -
-4t1 1~ 1~;1_i'La 1IIh_i-lH~~ ~_i ~> ,1 ``tLi "i 7._ P. ~~~
c,FTrim 6 -- Publish lnductr Ha azine
6.1 PROGFtAMME Gt7ALS 6.1.1. #dc9ress pcrli.tiaal targets
6.1.2. support smoker universe
6.1.3. Correct madia imbalance
6.1.q. tnform special-interest groups
6.1.5. LxpYtas industrX vi*wpainta
6.1.6. Explain scientific facts
6.1.7. Link with other programmes
6.2 POSSIBLE STRUCTURES 6.2.1. xnfQtdb editorial sub-group
6.2.2. New industry arqani sation
6.2.3. External consultants
0 6.2.4. National assoniationa
6.2.5. Regional associations
6.2.6. I.T.V.Jf
6.3 SZk3SPiTS? 6.1.1. influertae target opinian--leadars
6.3.2. Reassure smokers
6.3.3. Reinforce social values
6.3.4. Support for natianul/reqion&l
associations
6.3.5. backing for other optlons
6,41 NEGATIVES? 6.4.1. Cost
6.4.2. Creative risks
. 6.4.3. Difficulty of target definition
6.4.4. Multilingual minefiald
6.4.5. Hard to please N.M.h.s

_3_i--LIi L,_~: .:_ >.t4i-U irit;
0
aPx'XoN 7 - Organige Qefence of Commeraiml_ Fr_eedams
7.1 PROGRANtME GOALS 7.1.1.
7.1.2.
7.1.3.
7.1.4.
7.1,5,
7.;L.6.
7.1.7.
7.1.6. Define industry obj*ctives
Identify available resources
Clarify information/
communication inteXests
Test 'Libertad' derivatives
Soperat* sponsorship issues
Arbft charter for sport
Analyse worth of ai.liarices
Explore third paLi.y
7.2 POSSIBLE STRUCTURES 7.2.1. Infotab sub-group
7.2.2. Ne'w industry organisation
~ 7.2.3. Third-party 'Libertad' regi.ons
7.2.4, National associations
7.3. BENEFITS? 7.3.1. goliticaal influence
7.3.2. New alliance structures
7.3.3. Ad agency thrust
7.3,4. St rong media interest
7.3.5. Support for other options
7.4 NEGR'l' IV'ES? 7.4.1. Cost
7.4.2. Resolution af 'allies'
7.4.3. Hard to cantrol
7:4.4, Risk of woolly tnrge'kfng o

.
0
r
OPTION 8 M Attack I.p.C.U.
8.1.1.
8.1 PROGRAMME GOALS
8.1.2.
$.1.3.
8.2 P'OSSIaLE $TRUCTVAPP B t2 .1.
a.2.2.
$.2.3.
8.2.4.
8.3 BENEFITS? 0.3.1.
8.3.6.
8.4 NEC3ATIVU? 8.4.1.
8.4.2.
8.4.3.
Re,ri*Ve NGV pressure on W.m.o.
Expose activists' "credentiels"
Counter' behavi.our i c t'
regulation
Correct enti-buri.ness slant
Oppose ' dtr-marketing' of tobacco
Loy foundation for Perth 1990
infotAb sub-grvup
Link with Heritage fQundatiori
Other third party institution
National associations
imp rove W,H.O. negotiating
climate
aiecrediitt key individuals
Correct media bias
Defend private sector
Weaken Instituts of Policy
Studies
Reduce pressure at nationr,Y
level
Rik sk of bounoe-»back
Credantiels/leederehip
Funding compl*xity

2 7 --41 1-1 +--":3 1t,: 11 1 I dFi_iTHU G_tl
is
0
OPTION 9 - xmprorre Ndti,onal Association 2ualit~r
_.~.~... ~ - _ . . -
9.1 PROGRAMME GOALS 9.1.1. Data mantrgament training
9.1.2. Support on projacts/issuas
9.1.3. Motivbtion
9.1.4. Assist with thxaat analysis
9.1.5. Assist with planning
9.1.6. Assess resource needs
9.1.7. Pazfc+rmar<nce audit
9.1. e. Xnd+sperndant advi+ca to companfes
9.1.9. Study central fundinq/contxoi
9.2 POSSIBLE STRUCTURES 9.2.1. Infot*b
9.2.2. New audit group
9.3 BEteEFITS? 9. 1'.1. better national tactics
9.3.2. Enhanced manaqament performance
9.3.3. Diplomatic approach - evaluation
9.3.4. Greater company confidence
9.3.5. Results-oriented actions
9.3.6. Valua-based funding
9.4 ritE+GATXVES?
9.4.1. Risk of demotivation
9.4.2. Loss of confidence in Intotab
9.4.3. Le-ok of sensitivity
9.4.4. Interference with local
eomponi*s
