Tobacco Documents Online

eie 3.S.i 2350 RUI'i-10-1998 18:49 RRKIN SCHAFFER & KfPLfaN 212 333 2350 P.03/03 tATHAM & Wh.TKINS Stanley S. Arkin, Bsq. August 10,1998 Page 2 You must recogsize, however, that the tequest that your firm and the Itas®witz fum be given wholesale access to privileged documents in our poaseasion foc the9r ovm unrestricted use while representing ' distinct ftom and adverse to the privilege ho3dets cannot properly be viewed by us as a request by the Jusriae Deparersent. In view of the various issues raised by our correspondence, perhaps it would be more appropriato if my fixm and I communicated ditectly with the government teptesentatives on this mattet. Very trtily yours, /9~ Walter P. Loup~ilitt I ; WPL:ps + .r TOTAL P.03

, 212 333 2350 RUG-10-1998 18:48 RRKIN SCHfaFFER & KGPLFIN 212 333 2350 P.02i03 06{R. R. NW1W W 11/60 • 10741 p41A 1ATM6w eP W -16'!4t /.MPfleo n.bne /LaR/ T9WeR. sORC 0999 OMiCd60. IL.L1M016 lOfO• ®bOKL 1]IY. /70•7760. Yax /07•9T®7 rn.a. eannr Oln6 rl.e0• OTa®va40 OmdKTCRCO ®amY ®VILn•c0 a 9Ci VOLYK ROS9 LLaTy9L. LpNG MpYp AM9NC a O/!•C993•WaBO. RAK /90/b®10 ` m0.,® n[Q" 6„e w CcO GOpRT LOMebN CGZR 9M. CNOL.Y9 nwONC ®la®, ia% iT4 e4/6 . em .nnc.Ye .. ..ZZ ®5/ WC/T hf1N {qRCiT! /uRL dG60 L91 aYOLt.Cj. OuIIORSIa leeT1.R007 IMONL i/I3/ aws-IC~®. IA%001•O]00 Me&t,w.,ass uliTY4 OASNLM. 7. irM PLOOM M09/oW 1850.7. Ac601e MMOYL 1 9•O®! ~Oa-.Zae- raK 7el.If3i YR, aAID[v a~ )~~r.~+ DM/ Y/wMY pCMTLR. IO.n ILOOR MCwARK. NCW JLR/CV Osle:.ylf4 MMOMC 1N7J1 ®i®•1C3a. I!% 0.19•)/®9 BY Fa% Stanley S. Arktn, Esq. Arkin Schaffer & Kaplatt LLP 1370 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 100194602 Deaaz Mr. Arkin. August 10,1998 nN.•e"t.p.+oerer //O TOwY ClYTLR ORIVC- su/TL 6uo0 e99e! NCOA. Ca4iORRle O/O/6•1®dR M1OMi (714. rws f66•OE00 swY a cwe n rlec 701 '/' /TRCCT. 4YITL 6100 f.0 WLOO. [wl/rpNpl4 9it01-0199 /MONC 101@I //O•11.74, lA1f ®OR.TaiO YpB MpNTVOMG~ 1R YMCSR ITL ~®®O !/.M rR/NOI/CO. LwL1I9RM1A /4~ILSOOd PnOne fei61 iO/V009. r6L i9/-®Oi6 D! wqLOw ROS/ M/YL9 NLRK. CaLIVORYU OaOLYN®p® YYOMC 1!/O\ SiF4000- A% 4®i-a®OC aru0a.0Y[ at'(j" 00 ctery a.MCCT. 9L6-0610/IO® TML L3CM4IIOL. fLY0aNOR6 040lCY ..: !•NONL.V b:/]aa10/. IAx950>II71 .eY.e er.mm INItN1 wM/aK4~ /•7•16• aYIyOnRa. MIMATO-41/ TOKY6107. J.VAN •NOYC w91]•i0/3'~070. /63 diei'iOfl VdYMIwOTEY. O.f. n/z1Cm IOW 6CRM/YLV•LY~a wY(.. Y.W.. BYRC IpOO vKpNla6ip0_ D.O. lOW4•L'JCn PMOML t/OL O/7•/600. !s sa>•LL9t This will respond to your recent correspondence, in which you repeat your request on behalf of Liggett/13rooke for access to documents, Including those which you acknowledge may be subject to various claims of privilege, and state that you regard any issue of our firm's cost in addressing this request to be irrelevant because your firm and the Kasowitz fimt'Svill be reviewing the doctunents for privilege purposes." Your letter crossed my desk at the saame time as the Wal1 Street 7ou:nal of 3uly 21, 1998, which attributes a statement, at page $17, coL 5, to Mr. Kasowitz to the effect that your client is committed to "nua over information and documents for use in suing" the companies who arc srnoeg the privilege holders whose interests are implicated by your request. In light of your client's apparent adversity to the privilege holders, it is difficult to understand how your &rm and the Kasowitz firm can perforns the function of `4eviewing the documents for privilege purposes." Manhattan Bank. N.A. v. T1= & Newhell. PLC- 964 F.2d 159 (] 992) (mandamus issued to prevent disclosure of docunnents subject to claims of privilege to counsel for adverse party). You also continue to ignore our request that your client reimbarse us for the considerable cost to us of collecting the large number of files covered by your request and culling from them the documents that are not covered by our attorney work product. Let me remind you that we have continually expressed our willingness to do the work necessary to retrieve the documents and prepare them for your review, consistent with the preservation of all applicable privileges and protections, provided only that you pay us for the work we believe we are required to do' - LATHAM & WATKINS ATTORNCYy AT LAW ~ aR® AT re7Mp, 6URC IOG® 345 tN1A® AVDNC NSSY Y®WK. NLW YOAK f=tA•6®OZ 76LLPMtyNC f2/2) GOd1@tb YAK tLl$1761-4®N