Jump to:

Philip Morris

Jury Rules in Favor of Tobacco Industry

Date: 19960824/P
Length: 1 page
2077409656
Jump To Images
spider_pm 2077409656

Fields

Type
NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
Master ID
2077409565/9739
Related Documents:
Site
N922
Litigation
Mile/Produced
Author (Organization)
Associated Press
Richmond Times Dispatch
Named Person
Anderson, D.
Clinton
Hardy, D.
Holland, C.W.
Ohlemeyer, W.
Rogers, R.
Surgeon General
Area
PURCELL,CLARE/CARLSTADT
Named Organization
Amer, American Tobacco
Bat Industries
Brooke Group
Lig, Liggett
Philip Morris
Philip Morris Cos
RJR Nabisco Holdings
RJR, R.J.Reynolds
Date Loaded
18 Feb 2003
UCSF Legacy ID
zox60c00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: zox60c00 Log in for more options!
RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH Section A Page 8 Saturday, 8/24/96 Saturday, August 24, 1996 2077409656 SMOKE UNDER FIRE Jury rules in favor of tobacco industry Ccmipanies, found jwt responsible in smaker's death Ttu> AssocuitD PRESS are dangerous," Anderson added. rNtaahnrous - A jury yesterday found ciga- jette companies not responsible for a smoker s cancer death, a break for a tobacco industry that lost a similar lawsuit this month. - After deliberating 16 hours, the Indiana jury rejected claims from the widow of Richard Rogers that the companies were to blame for his smoking pddiction that began at age 5 and ended with his death in 1987 at 52. The Rogers verdict, coming on a day when President Clinton approved historic limits on the marketing of cigarettes to children, took on ex- treme importance as the industry wondered whether the 6de of opinion in America's court- rooms has turned against it. "We seem to do a little better in courtrooms than in newspapers and on te{evision," Bill Ohle- meyer, an attorney for co-defendant Philip Morris Cos., said after the verdict - Tobacco lawyers said Rogers chose to smoke, Earlier this . month, a Florida jury awarded despite warnings of the potential risks. ,$750,000 to a man who got lung cancer after 44 •"We were very strong in our feeling that per- years of smoking. It-was only the second time a sonal responsibility is very important," said jury jury has ruled against the industry: The first ver- foreman David Anderson. dict was overturned on appeal. "This case is not a case of whether cigarettes In closing arguments of the Indianapolis lawsuit, which sought at least $424,000 in damages, plain- tiff's attorney C. Warren Holland told jurors Rog- ers was addicted to cigarettes even before the 1964 surgeon general's warning about smoking, and that tobacco companies were aware all along that their product was "unreasonably dangerous." But the tobacco companies said Rogers had continued to smoke willingly, and was up to three packs a day, despite a public perception of dangers heightened by the surgeon general's report on smoking and then by cigarette warning labels. When asked shortly before his death by a tobac- co executive why he hadn't stopped smoking ear& er, Rogers had said, "I really didn't want to quit," Philip Morris lawyer David Hardy told jurors. The other companies involved in the lawsuit were R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., a unit of RJR Nabisco Holdings Co.; American Tobacco Co., owned by BA.T. Industries PLC; and Liggett Group Inc. of Brooke Group PLC. 0 0 0

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: