Philip Morris
Jury Rules in Favor of Tobacco Firms, Not Smoker
Fields
- Author
- Wyman, T.P.
- Type
- NEWS, NEWS ARTICLE
- Area
- PURCELL,CLARE/CARLSTADT
- Litigation
- Mile/Produced
- Characteristic
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Site
- N922
- Named Organization
- Amer, American Tobacco
- Bat Industries
- Brooke Group
- Lig, Liggett
- Philip Morris
- Philip Morris Cos
- RJR Nabisco Holdings
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Author (Organization)
- Associated Press
- Pittsburgh Post Gazette
- Named Person
- Cipollone, R.
- Clinton
- Hardy, D.
- Holland, C.W.
- Rogers, R.
- Master ID
- 2077409565/9739
- 2077409566-9567 Statement of Charles R. Wall Senior Vice President, Litigation Philip Morris
- 2077409571 Brown & Williamson Statement Regarding Rogers Verdict Louisville, Ky., 000823
- 2077409572-9597 Philip Morris Gary Black Conference Call on Rogers Verdict
- 2077409602-9603 Mo: Rogers Win Important, FDA's "Regulations" Begin Legislative Process
- 2077409611-9613 Philip Morris: Rogers Verdict Brings Sigh of Relief
- 2077409615-9616 Dwr: Rogers Trial, Plaintiff Request $2.6 Million in Damages
- 2077409617-9618 Tobacco - Rogers Closing Statements, Excellent Defense
- 2077409622-9624 Rogers Lawsuit Nearing Completion
- 2077409629-9631 Reuters Tv / Rogers Suit 960000 Win Version 5th Draft 960823
- 2077409632-9633 Tobacco Stocks Rise After Indiana Verdict
- 2077409634 Untitled document 2077409634
- 2077409635 Cigarette Makers Win Verdict in Suit by a Smoker's Family
- 2077409636 Untitled document 2077409636
- 2077409637 Widow Loses Tobacco Suit
- 2077409638 Cigarette Firms Win Suit Over Death of Smoker
- 2077409639 Untitled document 2077409639
- 2077409640 Tobacco Firms Not at Fault, Jury Decides
- 2077409641 Cigarette Firms Held Not Liable in Death
- 2077409642 Jury: Cigarette Firms Not Liable for Cancer Death
- 2077409644 Jury in Indiana Finds Tobacco Firms Not Responsible for Lawyer's Death
- 2077409645 Jury's Verdict Favors Cigarette Companies
- 2077409647 Jury Decides Tobacco Firms Not Responsible for Death
- 2077409648 Jury Finds Tobacco Companies Not Responsible for Man's Death
- 2077409650 Industry Is Cleared in Smoker's Death
- 2077409652 Cigarette Firms Win Verdict in Lawsuit
- 2077409655 Indiana Jury Finds for Tobacco Companies in Cancer Death Suit
- 2077409656 Jury Rules in Favor of Tobacco Industry
- 2077409657-9658 Tobacco Firms Win Cancer Suit
- 2077409663-9668 Transcript Inside Opinion
- 2077409669-9670 Transcript 4 News at 10
- 2077409671-9672 Transcript Fox 59 Nightcast
- 2077409673-9674 Transcript Wrtv 6 News at Six
- 2077409675-9677 Transcript Eyewitness News at 10
- 2077409680-9681 Transcript Business Day
- 2077409684-9686 Transcript News
- 2077409687 Transcript Eyewitness News at 10
- 2077409688-9689 Transcript Wrtv News at 5:30
- 2077409690-9691 Transcript News Channel 13 Tonight
- 2077409692-9693 Transcript News at 10
- 2077409696 Transcript News 8 at Noon
- 2077409697-9700 Transcript it's Only Money
- 2077409701 Transcript Newschannel 13 Tonight
- 2077409702-9703 Transcript News 8 at Five
- 2077409707-9708 In Tobacco Trial, Tobacco Foes Vow to Continue Fight
- 2077409715 Apf 08/26 1815 Tobacco Stocks
- 2077409716-9717 U.S. Tobacco Verdict Seen as Skirmish in Big War
- 2077409718-9719 Apn 08/24 0211 Tobacco Trial
- 2077409720 Indiana Jury Rejects Widow's Claim, Sides With Tobacco Makers
- 2077409723-9724 Tobacco Companies Win Suit Brought by U.S. Smoker
- 2077409725 Tobacco Firms Win Liability Suit
- 2077409727 Tobacco Verdict Comes in Third Wave of Suits
- 2077409728 Indiana Jury Sides With Tobacco Makers
- 2077409729-9734 Indiana Jury Finds for Tobacco Firms in Smoker's Suit ( Update2)
- 2077409735-9736 Indiana Jury Finds for Tobacco Industry in Liability Case
- 2077409737-9738 Tobacco Cos. Win Ind. Liablity Trial-2
Related Documents:
Document Images
2077409653
PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE AUG 2 4 1996
°:Jury iules.i*n favor of
o'tobacco firms, not smoker
+ By Thomas P. Wyman Nebisco Roldings Co; Co.,
~ I ine nssa~a,ed Press PI~ ~ owjred b E.A T
INDIANAPOLIS - A jary yesl~day found ~ 1p p(~t -
,n dzaretle firms not responsibk fora sm°ker's Rogera was hi
34ikt
es
o
s r
p
ns
y.
ry' cancer death - a break for the tabacco Tfie Rogeis case, similar to the many other '
T indhstry, which los t a similar lawsuit this heaith-ielated tobacco suits; took on exlreme
cc i month and faces new fedeml regulations. importanceastheindustrywonderedwhether
°~ nton in iJS. courtrooms has :
i The estate and widow of Richard Rogers ~~°f
~
had sought at least; 424,006 (rem fourtobacco turn~ ~u'°' it. Cigarette makers had long
companiees for lost earnings and medical boasted that they have never paid a cent in
expenses. Rogers, whose sneaked smokes at -'- ~ surts broupht by smokers.
age 5 grew into a three-pack-a-day habit, died A~0" jniy earlier this month awarded
at lung cancer in 1907 at the age ot 52. ;750,000toinutnwhogotlungcancerafter44
The suit, filed s hortly before his death, ~~ ~~ang. It was only the second time
claimed that Rogers, an atlarney, was addict- al~ ~^rled a inst the industry. The first
0 to cigarettes and that smolang caused his verdictwai * um°n appeal, and the
canror. Florida case is being appealed now.
Tobacco stocks,plunged after the Florida
The l°bacco compazties - Phil( Monis verdict and have faded to recover, unlike with
Cos; RJ. Revndds Tobacco Co., a untt past legal setbacks
0 0
I the lndiars verdiet, after 15 Iwm-s. at .
I deliberations fronrthe Marion Coun~ jmy,
came on the same day that President C'linton
announced his crackdown on tobacco market-
ing to keep young people from laking up
smoktng. -
(n dosing aigwnents, plaintifPs attomep C.
Warren Holland told jurors .that Richald
Rogers was addicted to cifarettes even befare
I the 1965 surgCoo general s warning, and that
tobacco companies were aware all along that
'heir product was"unreasonablydangerous."
I l°Pland atso said the companres should be
I, °Id resNnsible tor making cigarettes addic-
li%e. '"rhis is not just a habit"
Shdthelahsccoc°m aniessaidRagersbad
c'miinncd to smeY^ willingly. d;spite a public
percepliou °F dangers heightened by the
surge°n gen°ra s report and then by ciga-
rette warning iabels.. _.
Shmtty before Rogers' dealh, when lie was
I asked by a tobacco executive why he hadn't
stopped smoking earlier, he responded, 'I
really didn't want to quit," Philip Morris '
lawyer David Hardy told jurors
in the Florida case, lawyers were able to
introduce tobacco company documents link-
ing nicotine and addiction, but these records
were barred from the Rogers case because it
was a retrial, and the judge limited evidence
to that introduced the fitst bme. Ttre earlier
hial ended with a mistrial when the jury
couldn't decide ifRogers smoked voluntarily.
Re(ore the Florida case, the only other
damage award returned against tobacco mak-
ers, $400,00 to the family of Rose Cipollone of
New Jersey in 1988,. was overturned on i
appeal. The lawsuit was later dropped. I
