Philip Morris
United States Moves Toward Iaq Regulations
Fields
- Type
- MAGA, MAGAZINE ARTICLE
- Site
- N925
- Area
- GOVT AFFAIRS/CARLSTADT
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- Named Organization
- Ashrae, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating + Air-Conditioning Engineers
- Hbi, Healthy Buildings Intl
- Niosh, Natl Inst for Occupational Safety & Health
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Hbi, Healthy Buildings Intl
- Author (Organization)
- Hbi, Healthy Buildings Intl
- Master ID
- 2074143969/4221
Related Documents:- 2074143969-4221 Bad Science A Resource Book
- 2074143980-3985 The Science Mob Fraud, Complacency, and Secrecy in the Scientific Establishment
- 2074143986 Untitled Document 2074143986
- 2074143987 Untitled Document 2074143987
- 2074143988-3989 Untitled Document 2074143988/3989
- 2074143990 A Crisis That Wasn't
- 2074143991-3994 Animal Tests As Risk Clues: the Best Data May Fall Short
- 2074143995 Using Lab Animals to Make Environmental Rules: Are Data Good Enough
- 2074143996-3999 Sea-Dumping Ban: Good Politics, But Not Necessarily Good Policy
- 2074144000-4001 How A Rebellion Over Environmental Rules Grew From A Patch of Weeds
- 2074144002-4009 Crisis in the Labs
- 2074144010 Meaner Growns the Greenery
- 2074144011-4012 Green Cassandras
- 2074144013 Southern California Edison Study Finds No Workplace Tie Between Cancer, Emf
- 2074144014 Eager to Star in the Clean Air Follies
- 2074144015 Junk Science in the Courtroom
- 2074144016 Science Pitted Vs. Popular Environmentalism
- 2074144017 Earth Summit Will Shackle the Planet, Not Save It
- 2074144018 Scientific Myths Ride in on Hurricane Winds
- 2074144019-4020 Scientists Urge More Cellular Phone Studies
- 2074144028-4029 Friday's Forest Summit: What's at Stake 4,600 Owls Vs. 32, 100 Jobs 'Theres's No Home for Salmon. Spotted Owl. Old Growth Forests.'
- 2074144030 Timber Summit to Attract 30,000 Peacemakers in War Between Loggers and Environmentalists
- 2074144031 Untitled Document 2074144031
- 2074144032 We Need An FDA Leader, Not A Regulatory Czar
- 2074144033 A Rat in the Ozone Scare?
- 2074144034 Scientists Ripped As Alarmists in Ecology Warning
- 2074144035-4037 Cancer Scare How Sand on A Beach Came to Be Defined As Human Carcinogen Tests Using Common Silica Spark A Scientific Clash Over Safety, Procedures Sounding Grass-Roots Alarm
- 2074144038 The Ozone Scare: Policy by Press Release
- 2074144039 Shift and Shaft Federalism
- 2074144040 Give Industry A Bigger Science Rol
- 2074144041 Following Sheep Over the Edge
- 2074144042 Shoot Shovel & Shut Up
- 2074144043-4054 FDA, Epa Mug Company with Bad Test, Then Demand It Fix the Test
- 2074144055-4061 Warming Theories Need Warning Label
- 2074144078 Untitled Document 2074144078
- 2074144079 Untitled Document 2074144079
- 2074144080-4082 Clearing the Air What Really Pollutes? Study of A Refinery Proves An Eye-Opener
- 2074144083 Epa Rule Could Send Water Rates Soaring
- 2074144084-4087 New View Calls Environmental Policy Misguided // Policy Now Costly Solutions Seeking Problems // the Path to Policy When Politics Mixes with Fear // A Case Study Making Dirt Safe to Eat
- 2074144088-4093 "You Can't Get There From Here"
- 2074144094 Epa in Sad Shape, New Boss Testifies
- 2074144095-4098 Epa Watch Vol 1 Number 5
- 2074144099-4102 Epa Watch Vol 1 Number 3
- 2074144103 Politicians Bowing to Environmentalists'
- 2074144104 Environmental Risk
- 2074144105 Great Hoax on Asbestos Finally Ends
- 2074144106 Hidden Risks of Pesticides Bans
- 2074144107 Bankrupted by Epa
- 2074144108 Though Risk Falls, Removing Asbestos Doesn't Guarantee Substance Is Gone
- 2074144138 The True Cost of Government
- 2074144139 Epa Leaves Toxic Waste of Overregulation
- 2074144140 Price Waterhouse Study Shows Business Would Be Hurt by A Smoking Ban
- 2074144142 Deadly Fallout of Too Many Rules
- 2074144143 Driving Costs of Oxy-Fuel Fakery
- 2074144144 Regulated. Out of This World
- 2074144145-4148 Local Governments Reeling From Costs of Epa Regulations
- 2074144149-4151 Legal Aspects of Sick Building Syndrome
- 2074144162 Untitled Document 2074144162
- 2074144163 Untitled Document 2074144163
- 2074144164 Tough Measure on Smoking in Berkeley
- 2074144169 Secondhand Smoke Danger Remains Unproved
- 2074144170-4173 Smoke Gets in Your Eyes
- 2074144174 Cigarettes, Politics and the Environmental Protection Agency
- 2074144175-4176 Is Epa Blowing Its Own Smoke?
- 2074144177-4183 Passive Smoking: How Great A Hazard?
- 2074144184-4187 Smoke Gets in Your Eyes
- 2074144188-4189A Washington, D.C. Experts Question Science Behind Health and Safety Regulations
- 2074144189 Epa's Smokescreen
- 2074144197-4221 Bad Science A Resource Book
- 2074144209 Poll Links Indoor Air to Office Workers' Ills
- 2074144210-4211 When Your Office Calls in Sick
- 2074144212-4217 Why Employees Are Sick of Indoor Air
- 2074144218 Using Tested Products May Provide Protection From Lawsuits
- Named Person
- Nisses, A.
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Date Loaded
- 04 Dec 2002
- UCSF Legacy ID
- zwc52c00
Document Images
0
~~~,~
POLI SUES
United States Moves Toward
IAQ Regulations
The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), in September
1991, began the ambitious task of obtain-
ing information on indoor air quality. Their
goal is to determine whether regulatory
action is appropriate and. if so, the extent
to which it is feasible to address issues rela-
tive to poor indoor air quality.'Ihe OSHA
request for information specifically tzr-
geted five broad areas: the definition of and
the health affects pertaining to indoor air
quality; monitoring and exposure assess-
ment; control mechanisms including ven-
tilation, filtration and source management;
local policies and practices and the sug-
gested content of potential regulations.
Health complaints related to indoor air
quality have increased significantly follow-
ing energy conservation measures insti-
tuted in the early 1970's. These measures
reduced the levels of outside air entering
the newly-designed airtight buildings, re
sulting in the accumulations of all forms
of airborne pollution inside the buildings.
OSHA pointed out that during the past
decade, the National Institute for Occupa-
tional Safety and Health (NIOSH) has con-
ducted over 500 health hazard evaluations
for indoor air quality.
These studies were
workplace investigations
conducted at the invita-
tion of the employers to
determine the presence
of health hazards and to
recommend measures
to remove them.
The main types of
problems encountered
in these investigations
involved contamination both inside and
outside the buildings. Inadequate venti-
lation was a major culprit, but the con-
taminants included microbes, emissions
from building materials and furnishings,
chemicals used inside the buildings and
some contamination from unknown
sources.
Specifically, OSHA requested informa-
tion on carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide,
bioaerosols, radon, tobacco smoke and
volatile organic compounds. With ten
years of practical experience in the field
of indoor air quality, HBI responded to
OSHA's request for information and fo-
cused on several important themes.
6 iuNiius\in,,,..N ~~,i.2 n, ,.-~
Building Systems Approach
The building systems approach to in-
door air quality is the most effective, prac-
tical and economic path to improved in-
door air quality in all types of buildings.
Adupting this approach begins with adopt-
ing a ventilation standard similar to that
established by the American Society of
Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Condition-
ing Engineers Standard 62-89,"/entilation
for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality." This
standard was developed and based on
"real-life" feedback from architects, engi-
neers, consumer organizations, health of-
ficials, medical researchers, building own-
ers and operators, and consumers. Their
experience showed that 20 cubic feet per
minute (10 f/sec) of outside air per per-
son in an office setting was effective in con-
trolling indoor pollutants. This standard
did away with the old two-tier standard
which differentiated between smoking and
non-smoking environments,
Another aspect of the building sys-
tems approach to indoor air quality is the
proper maintenance and selection of air
filters in commercial buildings. To main-
tain the proper maintenance and selection
of these filters, specific standards must
be developed for commercial offices. Un-
til then, however, the ASHRAE-recom-
mended 35 to 60 percent efficiency stan-
dard (by the ASHRAE 52-76 dust spot
test) should be adopted for commercial
buildings. These filters should also be
carefully fitted and routinely sen-iced.
Our research found that in more than 700
buildings examined over the past ten
years, 43 percent did not meet the
ASHRAI: filter recommendations and a

0
Respiratory Tract Infe<tions Are the Most Common
Infettious Illnesses Among Humans
Estimated to Annually Cause in the United States:
76 ~
Million ~\ ~ -
r Y _
r
further 16 percent of the buildings had
good filters that were poorly installed,
thereby reducing their efficiency.
If a decision is made to assure accepD
able indoor air quality in commercial build-
ings by the use of regulation, a compre-
hensive regulatory approach would neces
sitate 0S1iA to become involved with the
complete issue, including the development
of design guidelines and practices, a build-
ing commissioning practice, maintenance
standards, renovation procedures,and pos-
sibly standard-setting for indoor air qual-
ity technology,
Proactive Monitoring
Adopting preventive maintenance poli-
cies will avoid other inefficient, short-term
solutions to solving indoor air quality
problems. A proactive monitoring pro-
gram that measures indoor air quality
parameters every six months should also
take a detailed took at the heating, venti-
lation and air conditioning (HVAC) sys-
tem of the building. This detailed inves6-
gation determines how the system is
maintained and whether it is clean and
operating correctly. The results of these
investigations guides the buildings facili-
ties manager in achieving and maintain-
ing acceptable indoor air quality.
Proactive monitoring programs are
also a management tool that provides fa-
cilities managers with feedback on the
success of their operating philosophies.
These programs help to spot trends in a
building s air quality and allows manage-
ment to make changes in operations to
achieve and maintain acceptable indoor
air quality within the building and are ac-
Gvely managing it.
The Healthy Buildings Concept
This unique approach to building de-
sign and construction strives to create
good indoor air environments that ensure
comfort and productivity for employees by
using "environmentally friendly" materials
and innovative design concepts. The
healthy buildings approach has helped
property developers effectively market and
promote their buildings in the volatile
r'2Ce
COSZS
property management marketplace. An im-
proved environment for building tenants
leads to better productivity and yields sig-
nificant savings on costs associated with
employee absenteeism.
Two typical examples of these con-
cepts were described. The first was the
major renovation project of the Four
Millbank Building in London, England.
This project, undertaken by the Swedish
company, Anders Nisses, was outtined in
the July/August 1991 issue of this maga-
zine. The renovation involved the use of
a raised access floor for all the office ar-
eas coupled with an innovative underfloor
ventilation system.'Ihe result is an unusu-
ally high standard of indoor air quality
and a totally flexible design that can eas-
ily accommodate major changes in staff
occupancy rates.
The second example was the
Melbourne Tower project in the City of
Melbourne, Australia. This building, fea-
tured in the March/April 1991 edition of
this magazine, features a high tech pol-
lutant sensor feedback system. These
sensors, designed by Staefa Control Sys-
tems, provide real time monitoring of in-
~
_-rJ~'
~
door air quality and are integrated into
the ventilation system controls such that
the ventilation rates are automatically
adjusted for both temperature and air
quality conditions.
These examples. and many others.
demonstrate the practicality of a building
systems approach to achieving good in-
door air quality in the workplace. This ap-
proach is much more than simply an in-
crease in ventilation and is clearly the
most effective, practical and economic
path to better indoor air quality in all
types of buildings. If OSHA determines
that regulatory action is needed, their
approach should be pragmatic, effective
and not onerous to an already pressured
business community.
An inescapable conclusion remains:
With innovative technological develop-
ments, with well-developed proactive moni-
toring programs and with the building sys-
tems approach, OSHA has many options
which have a track-record of long-term
success. If 05t-fA regulates indoor air qual-
ity by simply setting standards on indi-
vidual pollutants alone, the outcome will
be much less predictable. .-=-11111h
HEALTHY BUILDINGSINTERNATa]NAI. Maeazine Vol.? No ' 7
E
2074144220
