Philip Morris
Mortality Patterns Among U.S. Veterans Who Smoke Occasionally: A Preliminary Analysis
Fields
- Author
- Enstrom, J.E.
- Type
- SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
- ABST, ABSTRACT
- Document File
- 2065122056/2065122258/Missing Illegible
- Site
- N868
- Author (Organization)
- Univ of Ca
- Master ID
- 2065122110/2127
Related Documents:- 2065122110-2127 Proposed Research on Passive Smoking
- 2065122111 Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer in Nonsmoking Women: A Reanalysis
- 2065122112 Passive Smoking and Mortality Among A Sample of the United States Population
- 2065122114 Mortality Trends Among Smokers and Nonsmokers in the United States: 660000 - 860000
- 2065122115 Fax Cover
- 2065122116
- 2065122117 Manuscript Criteria and Information
- 2065122118 Top Five Environmental Policy "Myths" of 950000 to Be Released by Science and Environmental Policy Project
- 2065122119-2121 Top Five Environmental Policy "Myths" of 950000 to Be Released by Science and Environmental Policy Project
- 2065122122 Sepp - Environmental Myths of 950000 - Smt Participant Broadcast Details
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Area
- BERLIND,MARK/SEC'Y FILES
- Date Loaded
- 08 Nov 2001
- UCSF Legacy ID
- dik17d00
Document Images
MORTALITY PATTERNS AMONG U.S. VETERANS WHO SMOKE OCCASIONALLY:
A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS
James E. Enstrom, Ph.D., M.P.H.
School of Public Health
University of California
Los Angeles, CA 90024
January 24, 1996
ABSTRACT
The relationship smoking-related mortality to five levels of
occasional smoking is examined in a cohort of 245,000 U.S.
veterans followed from 1954 through 1979. Proportional hazards
regression analysis has been used to compare men who used tobacco
occasionally with those who never used tobacco with respect to
mortality from several causes of death. There does not appear to
be a consistent relationship between the level of occasional
smoking and mortality. This suggests that there may indeed be a
threshold below which tobacco use is not related to total
mortality. The nature of the relationship with lung cancer is
harder to classify because of large statistical fluctuation, but
there is no clear dose-response. These patterns need to be
examined in other cohorts.
