Philip Morris
Tobacco Smoking
Fields
- Author
- Andersen, A.
- Dreyer, L.
- Pukkala, E.
- Winther, J.F.
- Dreyer, L.
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- MARG, MARGINALIA
- Master ID
- 2063633034/3485
Related Documents:- 2063633034-3485 Book 6 Tabs 1 - 39
- 2063633036-3041 Environment and Cancer: Who Are Susceptible ?
- 2063633043-3050 Risk Factors for Primary Lung Cancer Among Non-Smoking Women in Taiwan
- 2063633052-3058 Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Among Children with Asthmatic or Cough Symptoms
- 2063633060-3067 Human Cancer Syndromes: Clues to the Origin and Nature of Cancer
- 2063633069-3073 Genetic Testing for Cancer Risk
- 2063633075-3080 Oncogenic Transcription Factors in the Human Acute Leukemias
- 2063633082-3086 Nucleic Acid-Based Methods of the Detection of Cancer
- 2063633088-3093 Original Paper Vegetable and Fruit Intake and the Risk of Lung Cancer in Women in Ain Barcelona, Spain
- 2063633095-3098 P53 Mutations in Human Head and Neck Cancer Cell Lines
- 2063633100-3109 People, Places and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors: A Multilevel Analysis of the Scottish Heart Health Study Archive
- 2063633111-3116 Sex Differences in Up-Regulation of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Rat Brain
- 2063633118-3125 Risk Factors and Sex Differential in Coronary Artery Disease
- 2063633127-3135 the Causes and Prevention of Cancer Gaining Perspective
- 2063633137-3141 Socioeconomic Status, Number of Siblings, and Respiratory Infections in Early Life As Determinants of Atopy in Children
- 2063633143-3153 Biomonitoring Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (Ets) : A Critical Reappraisal
- 2063633249-3258 A Case-Control Study of Cytochrome P450 1a1, Glutathione S-Transferase M1, Cigarette Smoking and Lung Cancer Susceptibility (Massachusetts, United States)
- 2063633260-3266 Is Meta-Analysis A Valid Approach to the Evaluation of Small Effects in Observational Studies?
- 2063633268-3277 Childhood Asthma in Four Regions in Scandinavia: Risk Factors and Avoidance Effects
- 2063633279-3291 Lung Cancer
- 2063633293-3303 National Incidence of Smoking and Misclassification Among the U.S. Married Female Population
- 2063633305-3311 Fatty Foods and the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Case-Control Study From Uruguay
- 2063633353-3362 Smoking and Lung Cancer: Risk As A Function of Cigarette Tar Content
- 2063633364-3372 Tar Content of Cigarettes in Relation to Lung Cancer
- 2063633374-3378 Comments on : Law, M.R. Et Al., (970000) << Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Ischaemic Heart Disease: An Evaluation of the Evidence. >> Bmj, 970000, 315(7114) :980
- 2063633379
- 2063633380-3381 Comments on the Paper: 'environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Ischaemic Heart Disease: An Evaluation of the Evidence'
- 2063633382-3389 'secondhand Cigarette Smoke Affects Blood Platelets, in A Way Which Increases the Likelihood of A Thrombus.' (Page 10)
- 2063633390-3392 Stanton Glantz Claims
- 2063633393-3425 'environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Ischaemic Heart Disease: An Evaluation of the Evidence'
- 2063633426-3433 Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Ischaemic Heart Disease: An Evaluation of the Evidence. The Accumulated Evidence on Lung Cancer and Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2063633435-3471 Placental Toxicology
- 2063633472-3474 Placental Toxicology
- 2063633476-3484 Lung Carcinoma Trends by Histologic Type in Vaud and Neuchatel, Switzerland, 740000 - 790000
- Type
- PSCI, PUBLICATION SCIENTIFIC
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Site
- R530
- Litigation
- Iwoh/Produced
- Author (Organization)
- Apmis
- Apmis Suppl
- Cancer Registry of Norway
- Danish Cancer Society
- Finnish Cancer Registry
- Inst of Cancer Epidemiology
- Munksgaard Int Publ
- Apmis Suppl
- Area
- CARCHMAN,RICHARD/OFFICE
- Date Loaded
- 07 Jun 1999
Document Images
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
I
i
I
I
I
TOBACCO SMOKING
TABLE 2.10. Proportions and numbers of cases of oesophageal cancer avoidable among men in
countries 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco srnokin~ were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%•
per 100,000
of new eases
Nordic countries, I980 541 4.9 59
Denmark 111 4.4 62
. Finland 107 4.6 66
Iceland 4 3.5 64
Norway 83 4. I 58
Sweden 236 5.7 55
Nordic countries, 1990 672 5.9 57
Denmark 191 7.5 58
Finland 128 5.3 59
Iceland 10 7.8 61
Norway 114 5.4 57
Sweden 229 5.4 54
Nordic countries, 2000 693 5.9 55
Denmark 194 7.5 58
Finland 103 4.2 59
Iceland 6 4.3 60
Norway 96 4.4 57
Sweden ° 294 6.7 51
the Nordic
Avoidable
number
325
70
70
3
50
130
380
110
75
5
65
125
385
115
60
4
55
150
Population attributable risk percent
TABLE 2.11. Proportions and numbers of eases of oesophageal cancer avoidable among women
countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco srnokin~ were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%"
per 100,000
of new cases
Nordic countries, 1980 305 2.7 38
Denmark 68 2.6 46
Finland ~. 121 4.9 37
Iceland 2 1.8 53
Norway 26 1.3 32
Sweden 88 2.1 34
Nordic countries, 1990 301 2.6 44
Denmark 74 2.8 49
Finland 88 3.4 37
Iceland 4 3.2 53
Norway 40 1.9 42
Sweden 95 2.2 47
Nordic countries, 2000 332 2.7 44
Denmark 75 2.8 52
Finland 108 4.1 37
Iceland 6 4.3 54
Norway 44 2.0 48
Sweden 99 2.2 43
in the Nordic
Avoidable
number
115
30
45
1
10
30
125
35
30
2
15
45
145
40
40
3
20
40
• Population attributable risk percent
ly 500 eases among men and 350 eases among
women in 1990 (34-44).
Relationship with tobacco smoking
Tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption
are known to be important risk factors for these
turnout types, particularly when practised in
combination (77, 78). Chewing of tobacco pro-
ducts is also a risk factor (11). The risk esti-
mates from the available studies (Fig. 2.5; 56,
57, 77-82), show a rise with the number of ciga-
rettes smoked with relative risks of 1.7, 2.3, 3.7
19

DREYER et al.
Relative risk
40:
2o! ........................ ~---+ ......
t ,V' ,-"
5; • -{- - - ..--:'- ; -'-
0 10 20 30 40
No. of cigarettes/day
and 6.3 associated with daily smoking of 5, 10,
20 and 40 or more cigarettes. This corresponds
to an excess relative risk of 0.13 per cigarette
smoked per day. Former smokers have a relative
risk of 2.0 and smokers of pipes and cigars only
one of 3.5 (Table 2.4).
The epidemiological characteristics of can-
cers of the oral cavity and tongue are given in
Tables 2.14 (men) and 2.15 (women). As seen
for cancer of the pharynx, the crude rate among
men increases while that of women is almost un-
changed. Particularly high rates were registered
in Danish and Norwegian men and in Danish
women. About 50% of cancers of the oral cavity
and tongue in men and 40% in women are
20
Fig. 2.4. Case-control
studies: cigarette smok-
ing and pharyngeal can-
cer, adjusted for alcohol
consumption.
caused by smoking, which corresponds to an ex-
pected annual total of about 500 cases around
the year 2000.
Pancreatic cancer (ICD-7: 157)
Pancreatic cancer is moderately frequent on a
worldwide basis and in the Nordic countries
(32). In 1990, about 1400 cases were seen in men
and 1700 in women (34-44).
Relationship with tobacco smoking
Tobacco smoking is the only environmental
factor that has been consistently associated with
an increased risk (22), and the risk appears to
rise linearly with the number of cigarettes
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

TOBACCO SMOKING
i
I
TABLE 2.12. Proportions and numbers of cases of pharyngeal cancer avoidable among men in the Nordic
coun-
tries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smokinf, were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%•
Avoidable
of new cases per I00,000
number
Nordic countries, 1980 270 2.4 57
150
Denmark 61 2.4 61
35
Finland 39 1".7 61
25
Iceland 3 2.6 63
2
Norway 35 1.7 56
20
Sweden 132 3.2 54
70
Nordic countries, 1990 347 3.0 54
190
Denmark 99 3.9 57
55
Finland 51 2.1 55
30
Iceland 1 0.8 61
1
Norway 53 2.5 55
30
Sweden 143 3.4 51
75
Nordic countries, 2000 456 3.9 52
235
Denmark 129 5.0 55
70
Finland 54 2.2 55
30
Iceland 1 0.7 57
1
Norway 83 3.8 54
45
Sweden ° 189 4.3 47
90
Population attributable risk percent
TABLE 2.13. Proportions and numbers of eases of pharyngeal cancer avoidable among women in the
Nordic
countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 i/tobacco smokin~ were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%a
of new cases per 100,000
Nordic countries, 1980 132 1.2 34
45
Denmark • 34 1.3 43
15
Finland 30 1.2 32
10
Iceland 2 1.8 49
1
Norway 21 1.0 28
5
Sweden 45 I.I 31
15
Nordic countries, 1990 124 1.1 40
50
Denmark 34 1.3 46
15
Finland 27 1.1 33
10
Iceland 0 0.0 -
-
Norway 16 0.7 38
5
Sweden 47 1.1 42
20
Nordic countries, 2000 121 1.0 41
50
Denmark 42 1.6 47
20
Finland 17 0.6 33
5
Iceland I 0.7 49
0
Norway 22 1.0 44
I0
Sweden 39 0.9 38
15
Avoidable
number
I
I
• Population attributablerisk percent
smoked per day (Fig. 2.6; 2, 45, 46, 51, 83--91).
Thus, by increasing the number of eighrettes
smoked daily to 5, 10, 20 and 40 or more, the
risk increases by 1.2-, 1.4-, 1.8- and 2.5-fold, re-
speetively, over that of "never-smokers". This
corresponds to an excess relative risk of 0.04 per
cigarette smoked per day. Former smokers (2,
83) and smokers of pipes and cigars only (91,
92) do not have a detectable increase in risk
(Table 2.4).
21

DREYER et al.
• Fig. 2.5. Case-con-
Relative risk trol studies: ciga-
40 r---'--------- ~ ~ rctte smoking and
~ | cancers of the oral
~ / cavity and tongue,
[ | adjusted for
alcohol
:35 t ................................. ....[ consumption.
0 1 0 20 :30 40
No. of cigarettes/day
Tables 2.16 (men) and 2.17 (women) give Cancers of the lower urinary tract (ICD-7: 181,
the key figures for pancreatic cancer in the 180 partly)
Nordic countries. The crude rate for women The,,. term "cancers of the lower urinary"
increases between 1980 to 2000, but no clear tract includes both cancers and bemgn papil-
trend is sccn for men. As the association with lomas of the urinary bladder, renal pelvis,
cigarette smoking is weaker than that for ureter and urethra. Cancer of the bladder is
cancers of the respiratory trac~, the PAR% for
pancreatic cancer is about 17% in men and
10-12% in women, corresponding to an
annual, expected number of 550 pancreatic
cancers in men and women around the y~ar
2000.
22
relatively common, ranking eleventh on a glo-
bal basis (32). Cancers of the lower urinary
tract arc particularly common in the Nordic
countries, with approximately 4150 new
cases in men and 1550 in women in 1990 (34-
I
I

TOBACCO SMOKING
TABLE 2.14. Proportions and numbers
in the Nordic countries in
Country and year Annual no.
of new cases
of cases of cancer of the oral cavity and tongue avoidable among men
1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smoking were elimi hated
Incidence PAR%~ • Avoidable
per 100,000 number
Nordic countries, 1980 388 3.5 57
220
Denmark 86 3.4 61
55
Finland 52 2.3 61
30
Iceland 3 2.6 63
2
Norway 83 4.1 56
45
Sweden 164 4.0 54
90
Nordic countries, 1990 449 3.9 54
245
Denmark 139 5.5 57
80
Finland 65 2.7 55
35
Iceland 6 4.7 61
4
Norway 86 4.1 55
45
Sweden 153 3.6 51
80
Nordic countries, 2000 611 5.2 52
315
Denmark 191 7.4 55
105
Finland 74 3.0 55
40
Iceland 4 2.8 57
2
Norway 130 5.9 54
70
Sweden ° 212 4.8 47
100
• Population attributable risk percent
TABLE 2.15. Proportions and numbers of cases of cancer of the oral cavity and tongue avoidable among
women
in the Nordic countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smokin$ were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%•
Avoidable
of new cases per 100,000
number
Nordic countries, 1980 268 2.3 34
90
Denmark • 70 2.7 43
30
Finland 48 1.9 32
15
Iceland 0 0.0 -
-
Norway 54 2.6 28
15
Sweden 96 2.3 31
30
Nordic countries, 1990 341 2.9 40
140
Denmark 85 3.3 46
40
Finland 72 2.8 33
25
Iceland 1 0.8 49
0
Norway 51 2.4 38
20
Sweden 132 3.0 42
55
Nordic countries, 2000 363 3.0 41
145
Denmark 108 4.1 47
50
Finland 50 1.9 33
15
Iceland 5 3.6 49
2
Norway 77 3.4 44
35
Sweden 123 2.7 38
45
• Population attributable risk percent
Relationship with tobacco smoking
The predominant risk factor for these can-
cars is cigarette smoking, but industrial ex-
posures also play an important role in de-
veloped countries. In Africa and the Eastern
Mediterranean, schistosomal infection is of
particular importance (32). There is some vari-
ation in the magnitude of the reported risk for
moderate smokers in particular, as illustrated
in Fig. 2.7 (2, 45, 46, 50-52, 93-101). AI-
23

DREYER et al.
Relative risk
40~
Bouohardy et al (83)
Car=lenten et =! (45)
C, uzlck at al (~4)
Doll et al {2)
Engholm et al (46)
Falk ~ at (85)
F=rrow ~ al (86)
MacMzhon ¢ zl (88)
McLlughltn mal (51)
Sl~e~m~ ¢ ~1 (82)
~Wynder = 11 (~)
+Zheng = =L 1~3 (91)
~Our estimate
Fig. 2.6. Cohort
and case-control
studies: cigarette
smoking and pan-
erratic cancer.
0 10 2O 3O 4O
NO. of cigarrets/day
though most of the studies cited do not in-
clude papillomas of the lower urinary tract,
the smoking habits of patients with these neo-
plasms appear to be similar to those of pa-
tients with invasive bladder tumours (102,
103). For equal levels of tobacco smoking, the
relative risks are generally higher for cancers
of the renal pelvis and ureter than for those of
the urinary bladder (11). Overall, by increasing
the number of cigarettes smoked per day to 5,
lO, 20 and 40 or more, the risk for cancers in
the lower urinary tract increases by 1.5-, two,
thr~e and fivefold, respectively, over that of
"never-smokers", corresponding to an excess
24
relative risk of 0.10 per cigarette smoked per
day. Smoking of pipes and cigars only also in-
creases the relative risk for bladder cancer (45,
103-104), but at lower levels, most likely
around 1.5 (Table 2.4). The group of former
smokers was allocated an average relative risk
for cancers of the lower urinary tract of 1.5
(Table 2.4).
The rates of cancers of the urinary tract
have and will increase during the last decades
of this century (Tables 2.18 and 2.19).
Denmark has remarkably high incidence rates
in both men and women, that in men are pre-
dicted to exceed 50 new cases per 100,000 per
(
[
I
i
I
!
I
I
!
0
0~,
!
I
I
I
I
I

I
l
i
l
l
l
i
I
I
I
TOBACCO SMO~LINO
TABLE 2.16. Proportions and numbers of cases of pancreatic cancer avoidable among men in the Nordic
countries
in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smokin8 were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%=
Avoidable
of new cases Per lO0,O00
number
Nordic countries, 1980 1588 14.3 18
280
Denmark 407 16.1 17
70
Finland • 254 11.0 28
70
Iceland 15 13.0 19
3
Norway 268 13.2 17
45
Sweden 644 15.6 14
90
Nordic countries, 1990 1389 12.2 17
230
Denmark 311 12.3 16
50
Finland 280 11.6 20
55
Iceland 18 14.1 15
3
Norway 246 11.7 16
40
Sweden 534 12.6 15
80
Nordic countries, 2000 1814 15.4 17
315
Denmark 376 14.5 20
75
Finland 423 17.1 22
90
Iceland 18 12.8 20
4
Norway 307 14.0 17
50
Sweden ° 690 15.6 14
95
Population attributable risk percent
TABLE 2.17. Proportions and numbers of cases of pancreatic cancer avoidable among women in
countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smoking were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%=
per 100,000
of new eases
Nordic countries, 1980 1489 13.0 9
Denmark , 389 15.0 12
Finland 287 11.6 I0
Iceland 14 12.4 18
Norway 220 10.7 8
Sweden 579 13.8 7
Nordic countries, 1990 1670 14.2 13
Denmark 359 13.8 14
Finland 404 15.8 10
Iceland 13 10.2 16
Norway 267 12.5 12
Sweden 627 14.5 15
Nordic countries, 2000 2030 16.7 12
Denmark 417 15.7 18
Finland 464 17.7 9
Iceland 16 11.5 18
Norway 340 15.2 14
Sweden 793 17.5 10
the Nordic
Avoidable
number
135
45
30
3
15
40
215
50
40
2
30
95
245
75
40
3
45
80
Population" attributable risk p~rcent
year before the year 2000. The low incidence
rate in Finland may well re, fleet less reporting
of benign and borderline papillomas of the
bladder. In 1990, about 41% of the male cases
and 32% of the female cases were attributed to
tobacco smoking, corresponding to more than
2000 cancers of the lower urinary tract in the
Nordic countries combined. More than 2,500
25

Relative risk
40!
No. of cigarettes/day
cases are expected to occur in 2000 due to
smoking in these populations.
Renal cancer (ICD-7:180 partly)
Cancers of the renal parenchyma, mainly re-
hal-cell carcinomas, show moderate geographic
variation, but the incidence rates in Eskimo
populations and in the Scandinavian countries
are among the highest in the world (32). In the
Nordic countries in 1990, about 1500 cases were
recorded in men and 1000 in women (34-44).
Relationship with tobacco smoking
Tobacco smoking is a risk factor for renal can-
cer, but occupational exposures may also play a
26
Fig. 2. 7. Cohort and
case-control studies:
cigarette smoking
and lower urinary
tract cancer.
role (32). The previously reported dose- response
curves for cigarette smoking and cancer of the
kidney (2, 45, 46, 51, 52, 105-112; Fig. 2.8) all
show a modest increase, with overall relative risks
of 1.2, 1.3, 1.6 and 2.2 for smokers of 5, 10, 20
and 40 or more cigarettes per day, respectively,
when compared with the rates in neversmokers.
This corresponds to an excess relative risk of 0.03
per cigarette smoked per day. Smokers of pipes
and cigars only and former smokers have no
measurable increase in risk (Table 2.4).
The crude rates of renal cancer in the Nordic
countrics have increased slightly since 1980 and
will apparently continue to increase in the years to
come (Tables 2.20 and 2.21). The recorded rates
[
!
!
[
1
!
I
[

TOBACCO SMOKING
TABLE 2.18. Proportions and numbers of cases of lower urinary tract cancer avoidable among men
countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smokinf, were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%•
per 100,000
in the Nordic
Avoidabl~
of now cases number
Nordic countries, 1980 3329 30.0 42
1410
Denmark 1054 41.7 43
455
Finland 364 15.8 53
195
Iceland 27 23.5 46
15
Norway 637 31.5 42
270
Sweden 1247 30.3 38
475
Nordic countries, 1990' 4146 36.4 41
1695
Denmark 1204 47.5 41
490
Finland 576 23.9 45
260
Iceland 36 28.1 43
15
Norway 794 37.9 41
330
Sweden 1536 36.3 39
600
Nordic countries, 2000 5067 42.9 41
2060
Denmark 1409 54.5 43
610
Finland 735 29.7 46
340
Iceland 49 34.9 45
20
Norway 980 44.7 41
405
Sweden " 1894 42.9 36
685
• Population attributable ri/s, k percent
TABLE 2.19. Proportions and numbers of cases of lower urinary tract cancer avoidable among women in
the
Nordic countries in 1980, 1990 and 2000 if tobacco smoking were eliminated
Country and year Annual no. Incidence PAR%=
Avoidable
of nvw eases per 100,000
number
Nordic countries, 1980
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Nordic countries, 1990
1238 10.8 26 315
389 15.0 31 120
146 5.9 25 35
13 11.5 41 5
211 10.2 22 45
479 11.4 22 110
1534 13.0 32 495
451 17.3 34 155
232 9.1 25 60
10 7.9 39 4
258 12.0 29 75
583 13.5 34 200
1867 15.3 32 600
554 20.8 38 210
264 10.1 25 65
17 12.2 41 5
333 14.9 34 I 15
699 15.5 30 205
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Nordic countries, 2000
Denmark
Finland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Population attributable risk p~rc~nt
are highest in Sweden. The PAR% for renal cancer
and smoking is about 14% in men and 10% in
women, which reflects the moderate relationship
seen between cigarette smoking and this type of
cancer. Owing to the relatively high incidence of
renal cancer in the Nordic countries, however, an-
nually almost 400 cases per year can be attributed
to the current smoking habits of the popula-
tions.
For all the cancer sites described above the
27

DR.EYER et el,
Relative risk
40~
0 10 20 30 40
No. of cigarettes/day
Benhamou et al (I05)
Brownson et al (106)
Carstensen et =I (45)
Doll et ad (2)
Engholm et all (48)
Hlatt et =I (107)
"~'McLaughlin et al
McLaughlin et al (109)
Musoat et =I (110)
Weir et el (52)
"'Wynder et el (111)
et =1 (112)
~"Yu
"I~" °ur
Fig. 2.& Cohort and.
case-contro] studies:
cigarette smoking
and renal cancer.
!
I
I
I
I
I
!
i
!
I
I
!
i
cause-effect relationship with tobacco smoking
has been confirmed; however, for the following
sites a causal relationship has only been suspected.
Lip cancer (ICD-7: 140)
Lip cancers are not common in most popula-
tions, although high rates are seen in Canada
and in latitudes near the equator. High risks are
also observed among persons living in rural
areas and those with outdoor occupations (32).
In 1990, about 500 cases were registered among
men in the Nordic countries and 100 among
women (34-44).
28
Relationship with tobacco smoking
Data from epidemiological studies are con-
sistent in demonstrating a causal relationship
between exposure to sunlight and cancers of the
lip (32). The effect of tobacco smoking on the
risk for lip cancer has been investigated in only
one cohort study; no association was found
(50). Most case-control studies (ll, ll3), how-
ever, have reported an increased risk for lip can-
cer among pipe smokers, while the association
between cigarette smoking and lip cancer has
been less consistent (1 l, 56, 114).
In this review, the risk for lip cancer has been
I
I
