Philip Morris
Anti-Tobacco Industry Plan
Fields
- Named Person
- Banzhaf, J.
- Bonilla
- Borelli
- Daragan, K.
- L., D.
- L., H.
- Meyer, M.
- Pertschuk, M.
- Named Organization
- American Cancer Society
- American Lung Assn
- Coalition for Tobacco Free Kids
- Common Ground Database
- Fec Database
- Hhs, Dept of Health and Human Services
- Irs
- Steering Comm
- US House
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Litigation
- Feda/Produced
- Site
- N848
- Area
- GOVT AFFAIRS/MILFORD OH COMPUTER FILES (CRAWFORD)
- Date Loaded
- 15 Oct 2003
- UCSF Legacy ID
- byg53a00
Document Images
12
Strategy 4: Divide Ranks
Our Fourth Strategy focuses on efforts to cause dissention within
the ATI.
1) As the tobacco company that is seeking "reasonable solutions to
complex problems" we want to reach out to members of the ATI
where we can potentially establish Common Ground -- such as on
the issue of preventing youth access to tobacco products.
2) We also want to enhance internal conflicts that already exist
within the ATI -- and possibly encourage some new ones.

1
Anti-Tobacco Industry Plan
We have spent considerable time discussing the importance of
developing a response to the anti's. We like to call them the
Anti-Tobacco Industry because they have the economic and political
resources to deserve to be called an industry.
Today, I'd like to present you with a plan that will coordinate
company and external resources to diminish the effectiveness of the
Anti-Tobacco Industry.
Our plan also seeks to moderate the ATI's impact on the policy
process so that we can reestablish our credibility through the
initiatives that we are developing.
After we have implemented these initiatives we must continue to
keep pressure on the ATI so that we can restore and maintain
balance in the political process and with the media.
Just as importantly, we need a plan with obtainable goals and
performance measurements that can be tracked over time.

10
Activities to Advance Strategy 3
Nh,YKNitfh PM-~sh1AY+ftnunicatiwtsaude+tf
and i[niiTement a,cominun~atIbns~itanfa'~:-
~ ChnI1p13~rtMnc7pEY6Fttfj~oFlNeMTG
Pub,/,icae ~71 i~cs Yp:1~ie Platufrffs;B2r
E%(lUSEW39t6'~lTH~tlu5@4tp41Al16'~htltCti ~:
, c,tison 3oleTanc,e~farLie,s,5~7e 3re'edams;
We will work with PM-USA Communications to implement a plan to:
1) Challenge the credibility of the ATI:
2) Publicize ATI's involvement in the agenda of the Plaintiffs Bar
3) We also want to expose waste and abuse of publicly funded anti-tobacco
programs, as well as encourage questions about the actions of Voluntary
Health Organizations like the American Cancer Society and the American
Lung Association.
4) Lastly, we have a real opportunity to advance the focus on tolerance for
life-style choices and freedoms.

11
Strategy 3 Process Measurements
We will work with Karen Daragan and her team to implement a plan to:
1) Challenge the credibility of the ATI:
- The John Banhzaf s and Matt Meyer's of this world claim they don't support
prohibition. But statements that they've made in the past contradict these claims --
we want to make sure the media and legislators know this. - And whenever an
anti-tobacco advocate makes an "eroneous statement" in public, we want a "truth
squad" to call them on it. (Discuss Borelli's experience with "3,000'kids' a day...")
2) Mike Pertschuk's SWOT analysis from 1993 showed that the ATI was clearly
uncomfortable with its ties to the plaintiff s bar. But, since 1993, this relationship
has actually gotten stronger. It's important that we draw attention to this relationship
and force the anti's to respond.
3) In terms of funding abuses, since 1988 the six states that have excise-tax funded
tobacco control programs have spent $1.4 billion. Yet, youth smoking is on the rise.
What have they done with all this money? This question is important as we are
pursuing the only course of action that everyone agrees works when it comes to
youth and smoking -- preventing youth access. Its important that we continue to
draw the distinction that AAA and other programs are achieving results, but the
anti's are wasting money...We will express this point directly and we want to
identify other groups that share our views.
r1a
0
4) Lastly, by raising awareness of tobacco prohibitionism, as well as funding abuses, w
we have an opportunity to expand the debate over tolerance for life-style choices W
and freedoms -- this message has proven particularly appealing to Gen-Xers. ~

Strategy 2: Limit Funding
QI`}gdlF4~f~(lltdlk3j., ~'
ertnt~WHat is ~ccepts::
igis t w~sis and aDUS~ oi
H leg~slaaorss
Our second strategy focuses on limiting funding available to the ATI:
We want to identify opportunities to:
1) Limit or redirect federal and state funding. - However, to do this, we
also need to first decide what types of anti-tobacco programs are
acceptable to us, e.g. youth education, public advertising campaigns,
preventing youth access, etc.
2) In order to accomplish this effort, we will have to highlight waste
and abuses in publicly funded programs. - Our primary focus will be on
legislators, but we'll also have to generate media stories in order to
reinforce this message.
3) We already know that the ATI receives a minimum of $600 million
a year from public and private sources. This is hardly small change at
a time when a number of social activists are competing for a shrinking
pool of public funding.
The ATI has reached the level of funding where they should be
considered fair game by other social activists -- if these other activists
knew just how much the ATI was receiving.
Naturally, we want to make this information available. However, we
also want to identify the right groups to provide this information.

9
Strategy 3: Weaken Credibility
ne'ss:aF7lTiprosrant;
Our Third Strategy Focuses on weakening the Credibility of the
ATI :
We want to:
1) Hold the leadership of the ATI accountable for their statements
and identify those anti-tobacco activists who either by words or
actions are clearly pushing for tobacco prohibition.
we wanz an~accampasn :;:~
cpose dTl,edbacatECS w3wsi
2) We also want to challenge the sincerity and the effectiveness of
ATI programs..

15
Next Steps
In order to implement our plan we must now do the following:
1) Our plan calls for the establishment of a steering committee
consisting of Senior Management along with specific project teams that
will move forward on implementing strategies 2-4 (Limit funding,
Weaken Credibility, Divide Ranks). These project teams will draw on
expertise throughout PMMC and PM-USA Corporate Affairs as well as
select business functions and consultants.
- We are in the process of defining the steering committee as well as
the individual project teams at this time.
2) In addition to our own research budget needs, we are also in the
process of assessing plan implementation costs for 1997.
- We envision the need for additional funds in order to engage the
assistance of outside legal counsel, as well as provide support for third
parties and other key constituencies.
- For the most part, we believe that our budgetary demands will be
manageable for the remainder of 1997, particularly because we will
seek opportunities to draw on 501 (c)3 contributions and utilize
additional administrative funding only to cover any costs beyond what
we've already budgeted.
While the budget will to a certain extent depend on what the Project
Teams decide to do, I would conservatively estimate that we would
probably want to reserve an additional $500,000 for 1997 to cover
implementation of the plan.

8
Strategy 2 Process Measuremeni
For 1997, we will accomplish the following:
ur3~e attt[Ifs am~ Im1Y51iga[3tylts :'
:emudel disclosurEtey3slatioa
Ify DpRorEUni[C2'STnn[Sanye Fci,fera[`.
aaEe gudi[ap~[aVerslgM.$y~<I@f[ries
,
kFy4rgamzaF[u[isw[3llctiq Ir~ coinpr<fi
;i.ea~kfo,ruiiltc[und~ . ,.
1) The I RS is investigating the Coaltion for Tobacco Free Kids and
the HHS Inspector General is auditing the ASSIST program (at the
request of Congressman Bonilla [R23-TX]).
- We will identify opportunities at the federal and state level to
encourage additional investigations of ATI programs.
- Retailers have already attempted to challenge the ASSIST program
in Washington, Maine and Minnesota -- however, these programs
were not successful. We want to understand why not and implement
a strategy that will rectify this situation.
2) Many of you may be aware that the U.S. House recently adopted a
rule that require groups receiving federal funds to disclose this
information when they appear before congressional committees.
- We plan to draft model federal and state language based on the
House rule and work with Howard L... and David L... to assess
opportunities for further action.
3) In addition, based on the outcome of our analysis of how federal
and state audit procedures and guidelines apply to the ATI, we will
determine the feasibility of revising these requirements through
model federal and state legislation.

14
Strategy 4 Process Measurements
For 1997, we will:
7atgetsi~'.:
~2tttiiy g;fl
Re,7ch ouE.2a,AIE grouj
& Laaai3y' ~ _
1) Complete the process of comparing the company's positions
with anti-tobacco control advocates.
2) We also want to see a measurable increase in the number of
legislators at the federal, state and local levels who publicly endorse
AAA and our Federal Initiative.
3) When we've made measurable advances on these two steps, we
will then reach out to groups and individuals where Common
Ground is possible.
- Combined with our advances on our second and third strategies,
we have an opportunity to increase pressure on the ATI, which can
be used to cause additional divisions within the ATI.
- We expect, that as their funding is squeezed and investigations
are launched on potential violations of state and local lobbying laws,
some ATI advocates may think pragmatically about accepting our
offer to work together to address the youth issue as well as other
issues where we can arrive at a concensus.
~
This effort will cause further dissention between those anti groups ~
that seek prohibition at any cost and those who are truly concerned W
about achieving reasonable solutions. ~
~

2
Strategies
mtt undragsaurces'
ava~tah3e3a;3he kTl... .
+Nes~en creiBb~Trtp afi ~TI `..
Otv~deaankswAthm the Ii Cf
There are four strategies to our plan.
We want to:
1) Limit public funding sources available to the ATI -- ultimately
make the ATI more accountable for both the private and public
sources of revenue that its members receive.
2) Weaken the ATI's credibility by challenging their so-called "white
hat" image with elected officials and the media.
3) Put the ATI on the defensive to enhance internal conflicts and
cause divisions among its leadership regarding strategies and
tactics -- this is a natural outgrowth of our first and second
strategies.
4) Conduct a comprehensive competitive intelligence effort on the
ATI to better understand its strategies and long-term goals -- just as
we would address any other business adversary.
Let me discuss our fourth strategy first.
