Philip Morris
Introduction
Fields
- Author
- Martonick, J.
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Master ID
- 2063104795/5283
Related Documents:- 2063104795-5283 Proceedings of Workshop on Asbestos: Definitions and Measurement Methods Proceedings of A Workshop on Asbestos Held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 770718 - 770720
- 2063104803-4820 History of Asbestos - Related Mineralogical Terminology
- 2063104821-4835 Fibrous and Asbestiform Minerals
- 2063104836-4849 the Crystal Structures of Amphibole and Serpentine Minerals
- 2063104850-4864 the 'asbestos' Minerals: Definitions, Description, Modes of Formation, Physical and Chemical Properties, and Health Risk to the Mining Community
- 2063104865-4870 General Discussion of Mineralogical Aspects
- 2063104871-4893 Epidemiological Evidence on Asbestos
- 2063104894-4918 Measurement of Asbestos Retention in the Human Respiratory System Related to Health Effects
- 2063104919-4930 Epidemiologic Evidence of the Effect of Type of Asbestos and Fiber Dimensions on the Production of Disease in Man
- 2063104931-4940 Pathophysiology in Relation to the Chemical and Physical Properties of Fibers
- 2063104941-4949 the Carcinogenicity of Fibrous Minerals
- 2063104950-4958 Niehs Oral Asbestos Studies
- 2063104959-4973 Epa Study of Biological Effects of Asbestos - Like Mineral Fibers
- 2063104974-4985 A Study of Airborne Asbestos Fibers in Connecticut
- 2063104986-4995 General Discussion of Relationship Between Chemical and Physical Properties and Health Effects
- 2063104996-5015 Identification of Selected Silicate Minerals and Their Asbestiform Varieties
- 2063105016-5029 An Overview of Electron Microscopy Methods
- 2063105030-5043 Identification of Asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy
- 2063105044-5064 Mineral Fiber Identification Using the Analytical Transmission Electron Microscope
- 2063105065-5074 Transmission Electron Microscopical Methods for the Determination of Asbestos
- 2063105075-5088 Statistics and the Significance of Asbestos Fiber Analyses
- 2063105089-5106 Selection and Characterization of Fibrous and Nonfibrous Amphiboles for Analytical Methods Development
- 2063105107-5117 Asbestiform Minerals in Industrial Talcs: Commercial Definitions Versus Industrial Hygiene Reality
- 2063105118-5131 the Detection and Identification of Asbestos and Asbestiform Minerals in Talc
- 2063105132-5146 Misidentification of Asbestos in Talc
- 2063105147-5155 Ambient Air Monitoring for Chrysotile in the United States
- 2063105156-5167 Environmental Protection Agency Interim Method for Determining Asbestos in Water
- 2063105168-5171 Inter-Laboratory Measurements of Amphibole and Chrysotile Fiber Concentration in Water
- 2063105172-5177 the Standard for Occupational Exposure to Asbestos Being Considered by Astm Committee E-34
- 2063105178-5193 Identification and Counting of Mineral Fragments
- 2063105194-5202 Practical Aspects of Talc and Asbestos
- 2063105203-5210 General Discussion of Analytical Methods
- 2063105212-5219 the Mining Enforcement and Safety Administration - Regulations and Methods
- 2063105220-5229 Occupational Safety and Health Administration Methods
- 2063105230-5236 FDA Projects and Methods
- 2063105237-5238 Cosmetic Talc Powder
- 2063105239-5248 Cpsc Regulation of Non-Occupational Exposure to Asbestos in Consumer Products
- 2063105249-5255 Impact of Asbestos Regulations on the Mining Industry
- 2063105256-5265 General Discussion of Regulatory Aspects
- Area
- SOLANA,RICHARD/CENTRAL FILES
- Named Organization
- Congress
- General Accounting Office
- Natl Bureau of Standards
- Workshop on Asbestos
- General Accounting Office
- Author (Organization)
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Litigation
- Fali/Produced
- Characteristic
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Site
- R545
- Date Loaded
- 20 Sep 1999
- UCSF Legacy ID
- mmp52d00
Document Images
National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 506. Proceedings of the Workshop on
Asbestos: Definitions and Measurement Methods held at NBS, Gaithersburg, MD, July 18-20,
1977. (Issued November 1978)
INTRODUCTION
John Martonick, OSHA - Chairman
I would like to make brief comments to put the aspect of regulatory
agencies into perspective. First, I think that if we reflect on the
information that has been presented over the last 2-1/2 days, we could
conclude that there is a considerable amount that we do know about asbestos,
with which we can all agree. From this information which we do know about
asbestos, the regulatory agencies must constructively formulate their
regulatory postures. Their interpretation of this information must be
practical in the sense that the job has to be performed and it has to be
performed now in many cases. The regulatory agencies don't necessarily have
time to reflect on which path they might take, or which path might be better to
take. The uncertainties in measurement and health effect that have been
discussed thus far must be put into perspective and this perspective must
reflect the goals and objectives that a particular agency has.
My second point is: How does an agency defermine its goals? Each agency
has a defined rule, defined by Congress when they mandated that the agency
take certain action. In order to assure that the intent of Congress is being
met, the Congress has the General Accounting Office periodically investigate
regulatory agencies to see whether or not they are performing as Congress
intended. In addition, the public has a great deal of influence on the
regulatory agencies. They influence us in all aspects; they influence the
Congress, they influence the President, and they have direct influence on the
regulatory agencies; through meetings like this, through public hearings, and
through general day-to-day interactions. Finally, the courts make decisions
which direct the agencies and their activities. If agencies get out of line
and assume too much authority, the courts will hopefully bring them into
perspective.
These are the introductory comments I wanted to make. If you listen to
the papers presented today, you will see that action has taken place, and that
certain types of consideration are being made to everyone involved. It would
be unfortunate if some of the individuals being regulated feel that the
regulatory agencies are insensitive.
421
M+
