Philip Morris
Biological Mechanisms Accounting for the Purported Relationship Between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Adverse Cardiovascular Effects: A Response to Dr. Glantz
Fields
- Author
- Wu, J.M.
- Type
- SCRT, REPORT, SCIENTIFIC
- BIBL, BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Site
- R635
- Document File
- 2057837078/2057837447/Cal Epa Appendix III
- Master ID
- 2057837080/7446
Related Documents:- 2057837085 Increased Experimental Atherosclerosis in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbits Exposed to Passive Smoke: Taking Issue with Study Design and Methods of Analysis
- 2057837087-7093 Testimony in Response to OSHA's Identification of Cardiovascular Disease As A Hazard Resulting From Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in the Workplace
- 2057837107-7108 Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Issued by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration Addressing Indoor Air Quality in Indoor Work Environments
- 2057837109-7152 A Critical Examination of the OSHA Ets Risk Assessment
- 2057837153-7182 An Alternative Explanation for the Apparent Elevated Relative Mortality and Morbidity Risks of Spouses and Other Family Members of Smokers Associated with Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2057837186-7207 Curriculum Vitae Theodor D.Sterling
- 2057837218-7262 Cardiovascular Effects of Ets Exposure: Comments on Biological Plausibility of Proposed Mechanisms
- 2057837264-7278 Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Coronary Heart Syndromes: Absence of An Association
- 2057837281-7372 OSHA Posthearing Submission
- 2057837374-7377 Ischemic Heart Disease and Spousal Smoking in the National Mortality Followback Survey
- 2057837379-7386 Publication Bias in the Environmental Tobacco Smoke / Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiologic Literature
- 2057837388-7389 Sidestream Cigarette Smoke and Arteriosclerosis
- Litigation
- Ppla/Produced
- Named Person
- Foo, L.C.
- Gaskell, W.H.
- Glantz
- Jacobs, M.C.
- Larsson, P.T.
- Murohara, T.
- Vanjaarsveld
- Gaskell, W.H.
- Named Organization
- Milwaukee Cardiovascular Data Registry
- Area
- MCALPIN,LOREEN/OFFICE
- Date Loaded
- 27 Jan 2000
- UCSF Legacy ID
- eyl42d00
Document Images
I
BIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS ACCOUNTING FOR THE PURPORTED
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
EXPOSURE AND ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECTS:
A REPONSE TO DR. GLANTZ
By Joseph M. Wu, Ph.D.
''I
I
I
I
I
I
I. INTRODUCTION
Recognized as the primary cause of death in all
developed countries and in many developing countries, coronary
heart disease (°CHD") is believed to have a complex and
multifaceted etiology. Numerous risk factors for CHD have been
identified. These risk factors include both modifiable lifestyle
characteristics such as diet and weight, as well as non-
modifiable personal characteristics such as age, sex and family
history.
Risk factors are largely identified by means of
observational, epidemiological studies. Because such studies
lack the rigorous scientific controls characterizing many
experiments performed in the laboratory, these studies typically
cannot distinguish between the impact of one particular risk
factor and the confounding effects of other risk factors. This
is particularly true with respect to epidemiological studies
focusing on CHD because of the large number of suspected risk
factors for this disease. Accordingly, results of
epidemiological studies identifying CHD risk factors should only
be seriously considered when they are supported by biologically
plausible mechanisms that adequately explain the relationship
between the purported risk factor and the onset of CHD. ,.

'I
,
I
I
''I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Recognizing the importance of establishing a
biologica'lly plausible mechanism before labeling a particular
agent as a risk factor for CHD, Dr. Glantz has attempted to
identify biologically plausible mechanisms that account for the
purported association between environmental tobacco smoke ("ETS")
exposure and adverse cardiovascular effects, including CHD. The
biological explanations offered by Dr. Glantz, however, are based
on unsound and selective interpretations of existing data that
are lacking in scientific validity. As demonstrated below, when
the existing data are analyzed as a whole, it is clear that any
biological association between ETS exposure and adverse
cardiovascular effects is equivocal and remains to be
scientifically established.
II. DISCOBSION .
Dr. Glantz attempts to explain the biological
mechanisms for three distinct, adverse cardiovascular effects
purportedly associated_with exposure to ETS: 1) reduced delivery
of oxygen to the heart; 2) increased reperfusion injury following
myocardial infarction; and, 3) increased development of
atherosclerosis. None of the explanations offered by Dr. Glantz
finds compelling support based on current scientific data.
A. The Delivery of Oxygen to the Heart
Dr. Glantz claims that individuals have a reduced
ability to exercise after exposure to ETS and that this provides
evidence that ETS reduces the delivery of oxygen to the heart.
He asserts that ETS hampers the flow of oxygen to the heart by
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
increasing the amount of carbon monoxide in the body. Dr. Glantz
offers absolutely no substantive support for this claim, however,
and it amounts to little more than sheer speculation.
Dr. Glantz correctly notes that carbon monoxide
competes with oxygen for binding sites on red blood cells. It
would be predicted, therefore, that when carbon monoxide in the
body reaches a critical level, the delivery of oxygen to the
heart may be impaired. Dr. Glantz provides no evidence, however,
that exposure to ETS is associated with carbon monoxide
concentrations even remotely reaching such critical levels.
Lacking such data, Dr. Glantz has absolutely no empirical basis
for his assertion that carbon monoxide resulting from ETS causes
decreased oxygen flow to the heart.
Moreover, Dr. Glantz has completely ignored the data on-
vascular relaxation associated with greater reliance on anaerobic
metabolism that results from decreased oxygen flow during
exercise.- When the body relies on anaerobic metabolism, it
produces significant levels of a chemical called lactate, which
exhibits the potential to relax blood vessels. As early as 1880,
Gaskell already reported that lactate caused relaxation of the
arteries of the mylohyoid muscle of the frog (1). Other studies
have subsequently demonstrated relaxation by lactate in the
coronary vasculature (2, 3). Lactate levels in umbilical
arterial and venous blood have been reported to increase under
both physiologic and patholog'lcal conditions (4-7). The manner
by which lactate causes relaxation in human blood vessels has
3

recently been determined to involve an oxygen and cGMP-dependent
mechanism, through the generation of hydrogen peroxide (8, 9).
This tendency for lactate to act as a blood vessel relaxant means
that an increase in blood lactate levels may actually inhibit
constriction of blood vessels, thereby decreasing the prospect of
a heart attack resulting from a complete blockage of these
vessels.
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
1
B. Production of ATP
Dr. Glantz' claim that exposure to ETS compromises the
production of ATP in cardiac cells via a free radical-mediated
mechanism, particularly those damaged by reperfusion-induced
arrhythmias and by episodes of myocardial infarction is equally
vague and speculative.
The underlying mechanisms of reperfusion-induced
arrhythmias are not well understood. Indeed, multiple factors
are known to influehce the vulnerability of the heart to
reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. These include: (1) the duration
of the preceding period of ischemia, (2) the degree of ion
distribution, (3) the metabolic patterns of metabolites such as
fatty acids, (4) the activation level of adrenergic receptors and
the content of tissue cyclic AMP, and (5) the concentrations of
free radicals.
Additionally, although metabolic changes during
ischemia-reperfusion are known to be heterogeneous, they have
been shown to be stabilized (i.e., prevented from excessive
fluctuation) by substances such as adenosine whose release from
4

1
i
I
I
1
I
I
I
the heart is actually increased by nicotine (10). Similarly, as
discussed below, existing data suggest that ETS exposure may
actually reduce free radical concentrations. .
Finally, although energy has been proposed to play a
role in the ability of cells and tissues to defend against
oxidative stress, the ultimate antioxidant capacity of a tissue
is determined by the supply of reducing eqtiivalents. The
pathways involved in supplying reducing equivalents in response
to an oxidative stress remain unclear, although some data suggest
that energy is not a factor in the mechanisms by which reducing
equivalents are made available to neutralize exogenous oxidants.
The supply of reducing equivalents is not entirely oxygen
dependent. Glutathione (GSH), a major component of cellular
antioxidant systems, is maintained in the reduced form by
glutathione reductase. Although this enzyme is specific for
NADPH, the ability of intact cells, isolated mitochondria (which
are a major source of free radicals and contain antioxidant
systems independent of the rest of the cell), and whole tissue to
supply reducing equivalents and maintain normal levels of GSH
appear to involve NADH. NADH can be generated both by aerobic
and anaerobic biochemical reactions and hence are not entirely
dependent on the delivery of oxygen to tissues in the
cardiovascular system.
..
in sum, it is clear that additional research is needed
to gain a clear understanding of the mechanisms and the dynamics
5

I
I
,
,
I
I
I
of energy change in response to oxidative stress and the extent
to which these mechanisms are influenced by exposure to ETS.
C. Reperfusion Iniury
Dr. Glantz' argument that ETS exposure increases
reperfusion injury relies largely an the work of Van Jaarsveld et
al., who recently reported that rats exposed to ETS showed
decreased mitochondrial oxidative function and increased
myocardial sensitivity to ischemia/reperfusion (11). Van
Jaarsveld et. al. hypothesized that the impairment of the
mitochondrial oxidative function associated with ETS exposure
contributed to increased free radical concentrations, based on
elevated concentrations of low molecular weight iron (LMWI) and
reduced concentrations of a-tocopherol, which in turn caused the
enhanced reperfusion injury. .
The Van Jaarsveld et. al. data are of questionable
validity. The mitochondrial oxidative function was inadequately
measured using a glutamate substrate. Other substrates (e.g.,
succinate) should have been studied at different concentrations
(and in the presence of varying concentrations of ADP) to
determine more accurately the extent to which mitochondrial
oxidative function was impaired, if at all. Furthermore, no
attempt was made to measure the overall free radical scavenging
capacity of the ETS exposed rats. without knowing the overall
..
capacity of the rats' systems to neutralize free radicals, Van
Jaarvseld et. al. had no basis for concluding that increased free
6

1
'
,
1
.t
1
1
I
I
t
I
I
radical concentrations were related to their observations
following reperfusion.
Finally, without data on concentrations of superoxide
dismutase, glutathione peroxidase and catalase, the meaning of
the change in a-tocopherol is really unclear, particularly when
coupled with the fact that the LMWI content of the ETS-exposed
rats was actually statistically lower than that of the non-
exposed group. A lower LMWI level implies that the capacity for
generating potentially deleterious free radicals has been
reduced; which is an effect opposite to that claimed by Dr.
Glantz.
D. Atherosclerosis
Dr. Glantz attempted to demonstrate a biological
connection between ETS exposure and the development of
atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis refers to the formation of
fatty, cholesterol-laden atheromas in the tunica intima and media
of large and medium sized arteries, which are most commonly
encountered in areas of high blood flow such as coronary
arteries. Over time, the thickened vascular wall compromises the
vessel lumen, causing a reduction in cross-sectional blood vessel
size and hence decreased blood flow that may not take on
physiological significance until maximum flow is needed. This
"narrowing of the arteries" may eventually show itself in the
form of clinical symptoms.
Dr. Glantz asserts that ETS exposure contributes to
atherosclerosis in three ways; l) it damages the endothelium;
7
L

2) it increases the rate of cholesterol induced lipid
accumulation; and, 3) it promotes platelet aggregation and
thrombus formation. Each of these purported mechanisms will be
discussed in turn.
1. Endothelial damage
The endothelium consists of a thin layer of cells that
line the blood vessels. Through intensive study in the past
decade, it has been established that the endothelium plays an
important role in modulating blood vessel constriction, in
addition to serving as an antithrombcgenic surface (12). It is
also generally thought that structural damage to the endothelium
contributes to the accumulation of lipid deposits and is among
the earliest events in the atherosclerotic process (13).
It has been reported that smoking is associated both
with damaged endothelium (14-16) and ultrastructural changes of
the endothelium (17-19). Although studies in animals provide
data supporting an association of smoking with endothelial cell
changes (16, 17), the results of studies in humans are more
conflicting. One study found ultrastructural changes to the
endothelium in the umbilical artery of smoking mothers (20). By
contrast, another study failed to detect endothelial changes in
the iliac artery of smokers (16). Similarly, several in vitro
studies using human blood vessels and endothelial cell cultures
have demonstrated reduced levels of prostacyclin, a substance
produced by the endothelium. However, both reduced (21) and
increased (22) urinary levels of the prostacyclin metabolite,

f
I
I
I
prostaglandin FlQ, have been reported in smokers in vivo,
suggesting that ETS does not have any definitive impact on the
production of prostacyclin, or by extension, the function and
structure of the endothelium.
Jacobs et al. (23) recently studied ETS exposure in
relation to the functioning of the endothelium by observing
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the forearm of habitual
smokers and non-smokers. Jacobs et. al. used intraarterial
infusion of methacholine to cause vasodilatation. Methacholine
is a muscarinic-receptor agonist known to cause release of
endothelium dependent relaxant factors ("EDRF") from endothelial
cells (24). In the same study, endothelium-independent
vasodilatation was also investigated by intraarterial infusion of
sodium nitroprusside, a-chemical known to cause vasodilatation by
directly stimulating guanylate cyclase of vascular smooth muscle
cells. By measuring changes in bilateral forearm blood flow,
arterial blood pressure and forearm vascular resistance, no
difference in endothelium dependent vasodilation of the forearm
was observed between habitual smokers and non-smokers. These
experiments provide strong evidence that habitual smoking does
not result in permanent endothelial dysfunction in humans. It
seems therefore most unreasonable to expect that exposure to ETS
could elicit endothelial damage leading to CHD.
2. Cholesterol and lipid accumulation
Dr. Glantz asserts that ETS exposure also contributes
to atherosclerosis by promoting the rate of cholesterol induced
9
I

lipid accumulation. However, neither the relationship between
I
cholesterol and CHD, on the one hand, nor the relationship
between ETS and cholesterol, on the other hand, is completely
understood.
The influences of diet on cholesterol and lipoprotein
changes have been amply illustrated by population studies showing
that a high intake of antioxidant vitamins (a-tocopherol, 0-
carotene, vitamin C) may be associated with a decreased CHD risk
(25-30). Similarly, age has been shown to have a significant
impact on the observed association between cholesterol and CHD.
A recent analysis of 2544 white men, aged 25-84 years, who were
entered in the Milwaukee Cardiovascular Data Registry from 1977
to 1986 following coronary angiography (31), found that although
plasma cholesterol for all men was associated with an increase in
coronary artery occlusion, the association actually applied only
to the younger men. when stratified by age, the association
diminished to near zero in the oldest age group. Indeed, a
multivariate analysis of the negative association between
cholesterol and age in predicting CHD proved to be highly
significant. The foregoing data demonstrate that the specific
relationship between cholesterol and CHD is highly complex.
Moreover, in recent years it is been discovered that
what has traditionally been regarded as the danger of cholesterol
appears to Fie, more precisely, the danger of low-density
lipoproteins ("LDL") relative to high-density lipoproteins
("HDL"). When high total cholesterol reflects a
10

disproportionately high LDL, then high total cholesterol is
associated with increased heart disease risk. If, on the other
hand, total cholesterol is high because HDL is high, then it does
not have this association with increased heart disease risk.
The process by which LDL contributes to atherosclerosis
is not entirely clear. It is believed that LDLs are oxidatively
modified during the development of atherosclerosis, resulting in
alteration of their gross physical structure and chemical
properties (32). This may be caused in vivo by free radical
attack of the polyunsaturated free fatty acids which proceeds via
a chain reaction (33). The extent of oxidation appears to be
influenced by the ratio of lipid components and antioxidant
levels in the LDL of the individual and is thought to occur in
three phases: an initial lag phase when endogenous LDL
antioxidants such as vitamin E are consumed; a propagation phase
with rapid oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids to lipid
hydroperoxides; and a decomposition phase, when hydroperoxides
are converted to reactive aldehydes (e.g., malondialdehyde and 4-
hydroxynonenal) (34). Interaction of these aldehydes with
positively charged epsilon-amino groups of lysine residues in the
apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B-100) moiety renders the LDL more
negatively charged, resulting in decreased affinity for LDL
receptors and increased affinity for scavenger receptors (35),
which in turn allows delivery of an excess of cholesteryl esters
to target cells via a receptor-independent mechanism. This
process, coupled with the fact that oxidized LDLs are cytotoxic ~
~
11 ~
05
~

,I
.I
as well as chemotactic for monocytes, probably explains to some
degree how L'DL contributes to atherosclerosis (36-38).
Although it has been suggested that cigarette smoking
contributes to oxidation of LDL by releasing free radicals (39-
42), a contrary result has recently been demonstrated
experimentally. Specifically, an aqueous cigarette smoke extract
was reported to have antioxidant properties that actually
inhibited the oxidative modification of LDL resulting from
incubation with either copper or 2,21-azo-bis(2-amidinopropane)
hydrochloride (43). These data are in the opposite direction
from that predicted on the basis of the claim that ETS exposure
contributes to lipid formation and atherosclerosis resulting from
oxidation of LDL.
Before any definitive conclusions can be drawn about
whether ETS exposure is related to LDL, however, further analysis
is required of other LDL subgroups as well as the influence of
external factors on LDL levels. Many studies report greater
,
proportional elevations of inean apolipoprotein B (apo B) than LDL
cholesterol ("LDL-C") in patients with clinical coronary heart
disease (44, 45). This suggests that specific apolipoproteins,
such as apo B, may be more strongly associated with
atherosclerosis than LDL-C. Additionally, numerous studies have
reported that HDL and LDL levels can be affected by diet, alcohol
consumption, and physical activity (46-49). In one recent study,
treatment of hypercholesteremic rats with ascorbate was
associated with reductions in both HDL-C and LDL-C (50).
12

i1
I
Accompanying the decrease in the cholesterol, triglycerides, and
protein content of all plasma lipoproteins in ascorbate-treated
rats was a marked modification of the apoprotein pattern of all
lipoprotein classes, with an increase in apo E in LDL and a
decrease of C, AI and B in VLDL-IDL and of apo C in LDL. By
contrast, it was found that ascorbate induces an increase in C
apoproteins and a decrease of E.and B apoprotein in HDL
fractions.
The need for further study is highlighted by the animal
studies that Dr. Glantz invokes in support of his claim that ETS
:. _ ..
exposure contributes to atherosclerosis by promoting cholesterol
induced lipid accumulation. Unrealistic and stressful exposure
conditions in these animal studies introduce numerous confounding
problems. Thus, these studies provide no insight into the
biological connection, if any, between ETS exposure and lipid
accumulation. Furthermore, these studies used either fresh
sidestream smoke or aged mainstream smoke rather than ETS. As
noted below, different forms of cigarette smoke are not
comparable, particularly with regard to potential associations
with effects on the cardiovascular system. Finally, these
studies used unrealistically high doses of smoke. This is
particularly significant given that CHD is a chronic disease with
long latency periods and the studies investigated only short term
exposure. The significance of cardiovascular measurements and/or
changes as part of a short-term response to unrealistic
13

environmental exposures in relation to the eventual manifestation
of CHD is open to serious question.
In sum, there is little question that additional
research needs to be performed before any definitive conclusions
can be drawn about the relationship, if any, between ETS exposure
and cholesterol in promoting atherosclerosis. Accordingly, Dr.
Glantzf claim that ETS contributes to atherosclerosis by
promoting cholesterol induced lipid accumulation is, at best,
premature.
3. Platelet aggregation and thrombus formation
11
I
Finally, Dr..Glantz contends that ETS exposure
contributes to CHD by increasing platelet aggregation and
thrombus formation. However, although it has been suggested that
spontaneous and induced increases in platelet aggregability may -
contribute to CHD, attempts to relate the effects of smoking to
changes in platelet function have produced only conflicting
results. Some investigators have reported a positive association
between smoking and platelet adhesiveness and aggregability (51,
52) while others have failed to demonstrate any differences
between smokers and non-smokers (53, 54).
Moreover, those studies reporting positive associations
suffer from experimental defects which render their results
highly suspect. First, the studies did not control for diet.
Plasma or serum lipids have been associated with changes in
platelet aggregability. Vitamin E has an inhibiting effect an
the platelet release reaction (55) and may also play an indirect
14

i
!
I
role in platelet function by influencing prostacyclin (56) and
thromboxane (57) production. Foo et al. (54) recently studied
habitual smoking in relation to whole blood platelet aggregation
and production of prostacyclin and thromboxane AZ in young adult
males under controlled dietary conditions. According to their
data, the mean platelet aggregation was significantly lower in
smokers than non-smokers. These results suggest that smoking
does not directly enhance aggregation and may be associated with
a reduction in platelet aggregability when diet is taken into
account.
Second, the few studies reporting positive associations
between ETS exposure and platel:et aggregability were generally
performed in vitro. Substantial differences have been observed
in platelet aggregability, however, depending on whether
reactions were performed in vitro or in vivo. Larsson et al.
(58) studied platelet aggregability in healthy volunteers during
mental stress and low- and high-dose..adrenaline infusion using ex
vivo (filtragometry) and conventional in vitro (aggregometry)
methods. Results of their experiments show that the conventional
in vitro techniques are not representative of platelet
aggregability in vivo.
This difference between the results of in vitro and in
vivo studies is likely due, in part, to the selection of less
sensitive platelets in in vitro'studies, owing to greater loss or
artifactual activation of platelets during blood sample
preparation. Additionally, the difference in experimental
15

1
I
I
I
results may also be related to the failure of in vitro studies to
account for all of the complex processes that regulate platelet
aggregability in vivo. For example, as noted earlier, it has
been claimed that ETS exposure may impair the oxidation of LDL in
the body (43). Recent studies suggest that oxidation of LDL may
be one of the primary mechanisms contributing to platelet
aggregation (59). Secause the in vitro studies fail to account
for any influences on platelet aggregability by indirect
mechanisms such as that involving LDL, they do not accurately
reflect platelet function in vivo. When properly analyzed by
using in vivo studies that control for dietary effects, an
association between ETS exposure and platelet aggregability has
not been reported.
Finally, Dr. Glantz completely omits any discussion of
the potential vasodilatory effects of ETS that may completely
offset any vascular constriction resulting from increased
platelet aggregation. NO, a cigarette smoke constituent (60),
has recently been established as a key EDRF having a pivotal role
in endothelial cell function_and in signal transduction. It is
thus of interest that the inhaled gas phase of cigarette smoke
has been reported to relax the pulmonary circulation in pigs in
almost an identical fashion as NO (61-63).
To a lesser extent, vasodilatory responses have also
been associated with the particulate phase of cigarette smoke.
In a recent study, the vasodilation was assessed during/following
continuously administered cigarette smoke in concentrations
16

''I
I
I
I
1
II
relevant to normal smoking (64). The relative importance of
nicotine versus other particulate phase constituents of cigarette
smoke in counteracting the gas-phase induced pulmonary
vasodilation was also examined. The study reported that
unfiltered cigarette smoke induced variable responses in the
pulmonary circulation whereas inhalation of filtered smoke was
consistently associated with pulmonary vasodilation. The major
part of the vasodilatory response was attributed to NO. This
apparent effect of NO was partially opposed in the unfiltered
smoke by the particulate phase (but not by nicotine) presumably
through a mechanism involving the induction of sympathetic
reflexes. In a somewhat related study, Murohara et al. (65)
studied stable contraction of pig coronary artery rings,
incubated in organ chambers with prostaglandin FZa, in the
absence or presence of cigarette smoke extracts (CSE). They
reported that CSE induced an initial contraction followed by a
relaxation of the coronary artery rings. They proposed that the
initial contraction may be, at least in part, mediated through
the degradation of basally released EDRFs by superoxide anions
derived from CSE.
Taken as a whole, these studies suggest that if ETS
exposure has any relationship with vascular tone, it is highly
complex and poorly understood. Dr. Glantz' uncritical and
oversimplified claim regarding a vasoconstrictive effect of ETS
exposure, therefore, reflects a clear bias and lack of scientific
candor that is incompatible with accepted scientific procedure.
17
I

III. CONCLUSION
I
I
It has been suggested on the basis of epidemiological
studies that prolonged exposure to ETS may increase the risk of
CHD. Nonetheless, studies focusing on this issue fall far short
of providing conclusive evidence for a causal association.
Potential confounders may account for spurious positive results
and the multifactorial nature of CHD often makes it difficult to
determine which confounders are likely to be the most important.
For this reason, examining and identifying the
biological mechanisms that could account for the association, if
any, between ETS exposure and CHD is of critical importance.
Only in this way can scientists gain an accurate understanding of
the potential significance of ETS exposure as a risk factor for
this disease.
As the discussion in this comment demonstrates,
researchers are beginning to explore the biological processes
which might be relevant to an association between ETS exposure
and the cardiovascular system. Such studies may eventually
enable us to appropriately evaluate whether there is a biological
relationship between ETS exposure and adverse cardiovascular
effects. At present, however, the results of these studies'are
equivocal at best, with the findings varying both in direction
and magnitude of association. Accordingly, whether ETS exposure
has an adverse impact an the cardiovascular system and
contributes to CHD is a question that can not be scientifically
resolved on the basis of the data currently available.
18
I

i
I
I
I
I
References
1. Gaskell, W.H. (1880) On the tonicity of the heart and blood
vessels. J. PhysiQl. 3, 48.-75.
2. Hilton, R. and Eichholtz, F. (1925) The influence of
chemical factors on the coronary circulation. J. Physiol.
59, 413-425.
.
3. Mohme-Lundholm, E. (1957) Mechanism of the relaxing effect
of adrenaline on bovine coronary vessels. Acta Physiol.
_
Scand. 38, 255-264..
4. Low, J.A., Pancham, S.R., Worthington, D. and Boston, R.W.
(1974) Acid-base, lactate and pyruvate characteristics of
the normal obstetric patient and fetus during the
intrapartum period. Am. J. 12, 862-867.
5. Suidan, J.3. and Young, B.K. (1984) Outcome of fetuses with-
lactic acidemia. Am. ,7. Obstet. Gynecol. 150, 33-37.
6. Soothhill, P.W., Nicoliaides, K.H., Rodeck, C.H.'and
Clewell, W.H. (1987) Relationship of fetal hemoglobin and
oxygen content to lactate concentration in Rh isoimmunized
pregnancies. Obstet. Gynecol. 69, 268-270.
7. Marconi, A.M., Cetin, I., Ferrazzi, E., Ferrari, M.M.,
Pardi, G. and Battaglia, F.C. (1990) Lactate metabolism in
normal and growth-retarded guman fetuses. Pediatr. Res. 28,
652-656.
8. Omar, H.A., Figueroa, R., Tejani, B. and Wolin, M.S. (1993)
Properties of lactate-induced relaxation in human placental
arteries and veins. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 169, 912-918.
19
I

''I
fi
I
I
9. Omar, H.A. Mohazzab, H., Mortelliti, M.P. and Wolin, M.S.
(1993) 0, dependent modulation of calf pulmonary artery tone
by lactate: potential role of HzOZ and cGMP. Am. J. Physiol.
264, L141-L145.
10. Fenton, R.A., Dobson, J.G.J. (1985) Nicotine increases heart
adenosine release, oxygen consumption, and contractility.
Am. J. Physiol. 249:H463-469.
11. van Jaarsveld, H., Kuyl, J.M., and Alberts, D.W. (1992)
Exposure of rats to low concentration of cigarette smoke
increases myocardial sensitivity to ischemia/reperfusion.
Basic Res. Card'iol. 87, 393-399.
12. Vanhoutte, P.M. (1989) Endothelium and control of vascular
function. Hypertension 13, 658. . 13. Ross, R. (1986) The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. An '
update. N. Eng.L. J. Med. 314, 488-500.
14. Bierenbaum, M.L., Fleischman, A.L., Stier, A., Somol, H.,
Watson, P.B. (1978) Effect of cigarette smoking upon in vivo
platelet function in man. Thromb. Res. 12, 1051-1057.
15. Davis, J.W., Shelton, L., Eigenberg, D.A., Hignite, C.E. and
Watanabe, I.S. (1985) Effects of tobacco and non-tobacco
cigarette smoking on endothelium and platelets. Clin.
Pharmacol. Therap. 37, 529-533.
16. Pittilo, R.M. (1990) Cigarette smoking and endothelial
injury: a review. Adv. Exp'. Med. Biol. 273, 61-78.
0
~
20 ~
~
~
W
~

17. Booyse, F.M., Osikowicz, G., and Quarfcot, A.J. (1981)
18. Effects of oral consumption of nicotine on the rabbit aortic
endothelium. Am. J. Pathol. 102, 229-238.
Pittilo, R.M., Rowles, i.J., Machin, S.J. and Woolf, N.
19. (1982) Effects of cigarette smoking on the ultrastructure of
rat thoracic aorta and its ability to produce prostacyclin.
Bondjers, G., Hansson, G., Olsson, G., and Patterson, K.
~
20. (1990) Smoking, catecholamines and their effects on
endothelial cell integrity. Adv. Exp. Med. Bio1. 273, 51-59.
Asmussen, I. and Kjeldsen, K. (1975) Intimal ultrastructure
of human umbilical arteries. Observations on arteries from
new-born children of smoking and non-smoking mothers. Cir.
Res. 36, 579-589.
21. Velasco, J.S. and Horton, R. (1983) Cigarette-
Nadler
J.L.
,
,
_.
~ smoking inhibits prostacyclin production. Lancet i, 1248-
. -
~ 22 1250.
G.A.
and Fitzgerald
J
A
Oates
J
J
Murra
J
N
k
. ,
.
.
,
.
.,
y,
.,
owa
,
~ (1987) Biochemical evidence of a..chronic abnormality in
platelet and vascular function in healthy individuals who
smoke cigarettes. Circulation 76, 6-14.
23. Jacobs, M.C., Lenders, J.W., Kapma, J.A., Smits, P. and
Thien, T. (1993) Effect of chronic smoking on endothelium-
dependent vascular relaxation in humans. Clin. Sci. 85, 51-
55.
I
I
I
21

24.
25.
26.
~
27.
~
~
28.
~
~ 29.
I
~
30.
i
~
31.
I
Furchgott, R.F. and Zawadzki, J.V. (1980) The obligatory
role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial
smooth muscle,by acetylcholine. Nature 288, 373-376.
Stampfer, M.L., Hennekens, C.H., Manson, J.E. et al. (1993)
Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease
in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 328, 1444
Rimm, E.B., Stampfer, M.J., Ascherio, A. et al. (1993)
Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease
in men. N. tng1. J. Med. 328, 1450
Burr, M.L., Pehily, A.M., Gilbert, J.F. et al. (1989)
Effects of changes in fat, fish and fiber intakes on death
and myocardial reinfarction: diet and reinfarction trial
(DART) Lancet ii, 757
DeLorgeril, M., Renaud, S., Mamelle, N. et al. (1994)
Mediterannean a-linoleic acid-rich diet in secondary
prevention of coronary heart disease. Lancet 343, 1454
Manolio, T.A. et al. (1992) Cholesterol and heart disease in
older persons and women. Review of an NHLBI Workshop. Annals
of Epidemiology 2, 161-176.
Iso, H. et al. (1989) Serum cholesterol levels and six-year
mortality from stroke in 350,977 men screened for the
multiple risk factor intervention trial. N. Engl. J. Med.
520, 904-910.
Jacobsen, S.J., Freedman, D.S., Hoffmann, R.G., Gruchow,
H.W., Anderson, A.J. and Barboriak, J.J. (1992) Cholesterol
22
I

and coronary artery disease: age as an effect modifier. J.
Clin. Epidemiol. 45, 1053-1059.
~
~
~ 32.
33.
34.
5. Esterbauer, H., Rotheneder, M.D., Waeg, G. and Jurgens, G.
(1990) Chem. Res. Toxic. 17, 77-92
Bruckdorfer, K.R. (1990) Curr. Opin. Lipid 1, 529-535
Esterbauer, H., Jurgens, G., Quehenberger, Q. and Koller, E.
(1987) Autooxidation of human low density lipoprotein: loss
of polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E and generation
of aldehydes. J. Lipid Res. 28, 495-509.
Brown, M.S. and Goldstein, J.L. (1983) Lipoprotein
metabolism in the macrophage: implications for cholesterol
deposition in atherosclerosis. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 52, 223-
36. 261
Steinberg, D., and Witztum, J.L. (1990) Lipoproteins and -
atherogenesis. Current concepts. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 264,
3047-3052.
37. Cathcart, M.K., Morel, D.W., and Chisolm, G.M., III (1985)
~ Monocytes and neutrophils oxidize low density lipoprotein
making it cytotoxic. J. Leuk. Biol. 38, 341-350.
38. Berliner, J.A., Territo, M.C., Sevanian, A., Ramin, S., Kim,
~ J.A., Bamshad, B., Esterson, M., and Fogelman, A.M. (1990)
Minimally modified low density lipoprotein stimulates
monocyte endothelial interactions. J. Clin. Invest. 85,
1260-1266.
39. Harats, D., Ben-Naim, M., Dabach, Y., Y., Hollander, G.,
Stein, 0., and Stein, Y. (1989) Cigarette smoking renders

j
LDL susceptible to peroxidative modification and enhanced
metabolism by macrophages. Atherosclerosis 79, 245-252.
40. Scheffer, E., Wiest, E., Woehrle, J. et al. (1992) Smoking
influences the atherogenic potential of LDL. Clin. Invest.
70, 263
41. Frei, B., Forte, T.M., Ames, B.N. and Cross, C.E. (1991) Gas
phase oxidants of cigarette smoke induce lipid peroxidation
and changes in lipoprotein properties in human blood plasma.
Biochem. J. 277, 133
42. Andrews, B., Burnand, K., Paganga, G., Browse, N., Rice-
Evans, C., Sommerville, K., Leake, D. and Taub, N. (1995)
Oxidisability of low density lipoproteins in patients with
carotid or femoral artery atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis
112, 77-84 -
43. Chen, C. and Loo, G. (1995) Cigarette smoke extract inhibits
oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein.
Atherosclerosis 112, 177-185.
44. Kauppinen-Makelin, R. and Nikkila, E.A. (1988) Serum
lipoproteins in patients with myocardial infarction.
Atherosclerosis 74, 65-74
45. Genest, J., Jr, McNamara, J.R., Ordovas, J.M., Jenner, J.L.,
Silberman, S.R., Anderson, K.M., Wilson, P.W., Salem, D.N.,
Schaefer, E.J. (1992) Lipoprotein cholesterol,
apolipoprotein A-1 and B and lipoprotein(a) abnormalities in
men with premature coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll.
Cardiol. 19, 792-802.
24

46. Wilson, P.W., Garrison, R.J., Abbott, R.D., and Castelli,
W.P. (1988) Factors assobiated with lipoprotein cholesterol
i.
I
and Silberuer, K. (1986) Platelet sensitivity to
prostacyclin in smokers and non-smokers. Chest 90, 34-38.
52. Davis, J.W., Sheldon, L., Watanabe, I., and Arnold, J.
(1989) Passive smoking affects endothelium and platelets.
Arch. Int. Med. 149, 386-389.
levels. Arteriosclerosis 3, 273-278.
47. Williams, P.T., Krauss, R.M., Wood, P.D., Albers, J.J.,
Dreon, D., and Ellsworth, N. (1985) Association of diet and
alcohol intake with high-density lipoprotein subclasses.
Metabolism 34, 524-528.
48. Manttari, M., Koskinen, P., Manninen, V., Tenkanen, L., and
Huttunen, J.K. (1991) Lifestyle determinants of HDLZ- and
HDL3-cholesterol levels in a hypercholesterolemic male
population. Atherosclerosis 87, 1-8.
49. Houmard, J.A., Bruno, N.J., Bruner, R.K., McCammon, M.R.,
Israel, R.G., and Barakat, H.A. (1994) Effect of exercise
training on the chemical composition of plasma low density-
lipoproteins. Arterioscler. Throm. 14, 325-330.
50. Santillo,.M., Mondola, P., Santangelo, F., Gioielli, A.,
Iossa, S., Basilisco, A. and DeMercato, R. (1995) Changes in
apoprotein distribution between lipoprotein classes of
hypercholesterolemic rats treated with ascorbate. Int. J.
Biochem. 27, 257-262.
51. Burghuber, O.C., Punzengruber, C., 3inzinger, H., Haber, P.,
25
I

1
~
~I
I
53. Siess, W., Lorenz, R., Roth, P. and Weber, P.C. (1982)
Plasma catecholamines, platelet aggregation and associated
thromboxane formation after physical exercise, smoking and
norepinephrine infusion. Circulation 66, 44-48.
54. Foo, L.C., Roshidah, I. and Aimy, M.B. (1991) Platelets of
habitual smokers have reduced susceptibility to aggregating
agent. Thromb. Haemostats. 65, 317-319
55. Steiner, M. and Anastasi, J. (1976) Vitamin E: an inhibitor
of the platelet release reaction. J. Clin. Invest. 57, 732-
737
56. Chan, A.C. and Leith, M.K. (1981) Decreased prostacyclin
synthesis in vitamin E-deficient rabbit aorta. Am. J. Clin.
Nutrit. 34, 2341-2347. _
57. Hamelin, S. and Chan, A.C. (1983) Modulation of platelet
thromboxane and malonaldehyde by dietary vitamin E and
linoleate. Lipids 18, 267-269. 58. Larsson, P.T., Hjemdahl, P., Olsson, G., Angelin, B. and
Hornstra, G. (1990) Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 20, 398-405
59. Ardlie, N.G., Selley, M.L. and Simons, L.A. (1989)
Atherosclerosis 76, 117-122.
60. Norman, V. and Keith, C.H. (1965) Nitrogen oxides in tobacco
smoke. Nature 205, 915-916.
61. Frostell, C., Fracacci, M.D.,Wain, J.C., Jones, R., and
Zapol, W.M. (1991) Inhaled nitric oxide. A selective
pulmonary vasodilator reversing hypoxic pulmonary
vasoconstriction. Circulation 83,2038-2047.

.1
62. Luscher, T.F. (1990) Endothelial control of vascular tone
and growth. Clin. and Exper. Hyper.- Theory and Practice
A12, 897-902.
63. Alving, K., Fornhem, C., Weit2berg, E., and Lundberg, J.M.
(1992) Nitric oxide mediates cigarette smoke-induced
vasodilatory responses in the lung. Acta Physiol. Scand.
146, 407-408.
degradation of EDRF. Am. J. Physiol. 266, H874-H880.
64. Alving, K., Fornhem, C and Lundberg, J.M. (1993) Pulmonary
_ ,.... _
effects of endogenous and exogenous nitric oxide in the pig:
relation to cigarette smoke inhalation.
65. Murohara, T., Kugiyama, K., Ohgushi, M., Sugiyama, S. and
Yasue, H. (1994) Cigarette smoke extract contracts isolated
porcine coronary arteries by superoxide anion-mediated
27
