Philip Morris
Council of State Governments Resolution Relating to Consumer Excise Taxes
Fields
- Type
- REGU, REGULATION
- Area
- IRASTORZA,HECTOR/SEC'Y FILES
- Site
- W18
- Characteristic
- DRFT, DRAFT
- EXTR, EXTRA
- Document File
- 2048597374/2048597531/PM - RJR Tobacco Task Force 930706
- Master ID
- 2048597375/7530
- 2048597375-7414 PM / RJR Tobacco Task Force
- 2048597405-7406 Proposed Policy Position on Federal Excise and Energy Taxes
- 2048597408-7409 Proposed Policy Position on Federal Excise and Energy Taxes
- 2048597410 Smoking Ban in All Restaurants and Hotels Councilmembers 426 C.V.G. - Smokers
- 2048597411
- 2048597412 Policy Position Federal Excise and Energy Taxes
- 2048597415-7439 PM / RJR Tobacco Task Force
- 2048597440-7441
- 2048597442-7530 PM / RJR Tobacco Task Force
- 2048597448 Resolution
- 2048597480-7487 Fet / Ets Audience & Message Point Development
Related Documents:
Document Images
~ COUNCIL OF STATE GOVERNMENTS
RESOLUTION R.LLATtNG TO
CONSUMER EXCISE TAXES
~
WWREA.S, President Mton fs promoti.ng an aggressive agenda for the
United States, i.n the areas of deficit reduction, economic and socW poliCies;
YaMRF.A.S, the President has called for an historic increase In fncome and
energy taxes on individuats and bushaesses In the United States; and
WMR,PA.S, the President's recommended policies will have a profound
impact on the administration and financing of gove.rnment services at a11 leveis;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE.IT R.ESOLVED that, the Council of State Covernments
stroagly opposes the Inclusion of federal consumer excfse tax Increases in future
, Presidential and congressional policies, for the reasons stated below;
I. An increase In consumer excise taxes wi11 further delay economic
recovery In the United States, by adversely impactin'g job growth (As many as
P t}00 jobs may be lost due to policies currently under consideration by the
~. ~utive branch.); -
2. An increase In consumer excise taxes will result in a reduction of tax
competf tjon between the federal government and state and local governments,
(state and local governments could lose as much as $2.8 billion in,tax revenue.);
3. According to several studies conducted by government agencies and
private institutions, consumer excise taxes place a disproportionate and unfair
burden on the least affluent fam.ilies; and
4. According to a recent study completed by the Council of State
C~over:aments, consumer excise taxes, more specificatly those identffled as taxes
on "sin", f.e. tobacco, alcohol, motor fuel, etc., have been shown to be Inadequate
and tuzreliable revenue sources for vital services, such as, coverage of lxadfgent
he.atthl care.
R7OW, THEREFORF,13i3 IT FURTHER RFSOLVF-D that, the Covnd of State
Governments believes that federal tax policy should be fair, balanced, and
promote economic prosp,erity. FedeiA policies should not Impair, bu t facilitatG
tbte ability of state and local governments to adopt sound and equitable economic
;V tax Nl1cles to meet the conum.itrne.nts to Its shared Co,nstituencies.
AdOp te<L*
. Director's or Sponsor's Name
.--''
. Sponsor's titie
