Philip Morris
Fields
- Author
- Helms, J.
- Mcconnell, M.
- Warner, J.
- Mcconnell, M.
- Area
- WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
- Type
- LETT, LETTER
- Recipient (Organization)
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Named Person
- Hollings, F.
- Recipient
- Dear, J.
- Document File
- 2048280245/2048280868/Ets Congressional Research Svce. (Crs)@ 2048280246/2048280600/Ets Crs Compilation 940000 - 960000
- Author (Organization)
- US Senate
- Site
- N403
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Master ID
- 2048280248/0599
Related Documents:- 2048280248-0249 Congressional Research Service Reports on Ets and Lung Cancer
- 2048280250 1
- 2048280251-0329 Crs Report for Congress Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk
- 2048280330 2
- 2048280331-0332
- 2048280333 Ford Calls for Reopening of OSHA Hearings on Smoking Bans
- 2048280334 Epa / OSHA Findings on Passive Smoking
- 2048280336-0337 Proposed Ban on Smoking in the Workplace
- 2048280338 3
- 2048280339 Philip Morris Statement on the Congressional Research Service Report on 'environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk'
- 2048280340-0341 Overview of the Crs Report on Ets and Lung Cancer Risk
- 2048280342 3
- 2048280343 A Conversation with Mike Wallace
- 2048280344 Second Smoke's Dangers Doubted Report Critical of Epa, OSHA
- 2048280345 Editorial Up in Smoke
- 2048280346-0347 Epa Watch
- 2048280348
- 2048280348A-0349 Study Prompts Call for OSHA to Reopen Hearings on Rule Over Secondhand Smoke
- 2048280349A Study Prompts Call for OSHA to Reopen Hearings on Rule Over Secondhand Smoke
- 2048280350 Sinister Smoke? Prove It
- 2048280351 Nra Backs Report Questioning Epa Smoking Study
- 2048280352-0353 Secondhand Smoke Danger Relies on Wisps of Evidence 9500029108
- 2048280354-0355 Indoor Air Review
- 2048280356-0358 Anthology of 950000's Environmental Myths
- 2048280359-0360 Doctors and Scientists in the Anti-Smoking Crusade Stub Out the Facts
- 2048280361 Scientific Proof Eludes Those Who Damn Second-Hand Smoke
- 2048280362-0363 New Congressional Study Shows Minimal Health Effects From Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048280364 Cato Environmental Expert Available to Comment on Secondhand Smoke Study
- 2048280365 Cancer Risks for Thee, But Not for Me
- 2048280366-0367 Here's News
- 2048280368 Report on Tobacco Smoke Is Good News for Farmers
- 2048280369-0370 Nam Calls on OSHA to Revise Stringent Air Quality Standards Following Crs Study of Second Hand Smoke
- 2048280371 New Study Questions OSHA Attack on Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048280372-0373 Assumptions on Second-Hand Smoke Not Holding Up Under Scientific Scrutiny
- 2048280374-0375 Selected Quotes From Crs Report on Ets
- 2048280376 New Study Demonstrates OSHA Excesses on Regulations
- 2048280377 5
- 2048280378-0381
- 2048280382-0384
- 2048280385-0403 Epa Comments on Crs Draft 'environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk'
- 2048280404-0406
- 2048280407 Comments on the Crs Report 'environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk'
- 2048280408 6
- 2048280409-0412
- 2048280413 7
- 2048280414 Even Congressional Research Service Now Reluctantly Admits:Tobacco Smoke Causes High Levels of Cancer in Nonsmokers
- 2048280415 Congressional Research Service Also Concludes Tobacco Smoke Causes Lung Cancer in Nonsmokers
- 2048280416 Crs Says Tobacco Smoke Kills Nonsmokers But Overall Report Is Flawed and Misleading
- 2048280417 Letters Being Near A Lit Cigarette Has Risks - Whether You're Smoking It or Not
- 2048280418 8
- 2048280419-0488 Crs Report for Congress Cigarette Taxes to Fund Health Care Reform: An Economic Analysis
- 2048280489 9
- 2048280490-0496 Discussion of Source of Claims of 50,000 Deaths From Passive Smoking
- 2048280497 10
- 2048280498-0519 Hearing to Discuss the Possible Health Effects to Non-Smokers of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Wednesday, 940511 9:30 A.M. Hart Senate Office Building, Rm. 216
- 2048280520 11
- 2048280521-0536 Statement of Dr. Jane G. Gravelle Senior Specialist in Economic Policy and Dennis Zimmerman Specialist in Public Finance Congressional Research Service Before the Subcommittee on Clean Air and Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate 940511 on Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048280537 12
- 2048280538-0553 Cigarette Taxes to Fund Health Care Reform
- 2048280554 13
- 2048280555-0557
- 2048280558-0572
- 2048280573 14
- 2048280574-0582 Comments on Congressional Research Service Assessment of the Health Risks of Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048280583 15
- 2048280584-0598 Comments on the Workshop Draft of Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer
- 2048280599
- Named Organization
- Congress
- Congressional Research Service
- Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
- OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
- Congressional Research Service
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- utr65e00
Document Images
'Hnfted ~*tates *nate
November 17, 1995
WASHINGTON, DC 20510
Mr. Joe Dear
Assistant Secretary
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
Frances Perkins Building, Room S-2315
200 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20210
Dear Mr. 13ear:
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has just completed a
report entitled "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer
Risk". The report concentrates on possible health effects of
environmental tobacco smoke (ETS).
The report represents a detailed examination of the ETS issue,
raising serious issues about reports by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) which have advocated strong antismoking
measures. CRS research specialists conclude: there is no
scientific justification for smoking bans, defacto bans, or
regulatory actions such as the proposed rule issued (April 5,
1994) by your agency.
The study challenges critical assumptions mado by your agency to
support your proposed smoking ban in all U.S. workplaces. CRS
also notes that if OSHA had conducted an analysis of all of the
available studies on smoking in the workplace, it would likely
have found no increased cancer risk due to ETS. The report
states, "Hac? nSHA performed a meta-analysis, it seems likely that
it would have found no increased lung cancer risk from
occupational ETS exposure."
As you know, CRS provides objective and impartial research and
analysis for Members of Congress. We are interested in your
views on this important research study and its implication5 fur
all forced smoking bans by the Federal government.
Sincerely,
I;U
