Jump to:

Philip Morris

Date: 17 Nov 1995
Length: 1 page
2048280335
Jump To Images
snapshot_pm 2048280335

Fields

Author
Helms, J.
Mcconnell, M.
Warner, J.
Area
WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
Type
LETT, LETTER
Recipient (Organization)
OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
Named Person
Hollings, F.
Recipient
Dear, J.
Document File
2048280245/2048280868/Ets Congressional Research Svce. (Crs)@ 2048280246/2048280600/Ets Crs Compilation 940000 - 960000
Author (Organization)
US Senate
Site
N403
Litigation
Stmn/Produced
Request
Stmn/R1-048
Master ID
2048280248/0599
Related Documents:
Named Organization
Congress
Congressional Research Service
Epa, Environmental Protection Agency
OSHA, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
Date Loaded
05 Jun 1998
UCSF Legacy ID
utr65e00

Document Images

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size:

Page 1: utr65e00 Log in for more options!
'Hnfted ~*tates *nate November 17, 1995 WASHINGTON, DC 20510 Mr. Joe Dear Assistant Secretary Occupational Safety and Health Administration Frances Perkins Building, Room S-2315 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20210 Dear Mr. 13ear: The Congressional Research Service (CRS) has just completed a report entitled "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Risk". The report concentrates on possible health effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). The report represents a detailed examination of the ETS issue, raising serious issues about reports by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) which have advocated strong antismoking measures. CRS research specialists conclude: there is no scientific justification for smoking bans, defacto bans, or regulatory actions such as the proposed rule issued (April 5, 1994) by your agency. The study challenges critical assumptions mado by your agency to support your proposed smoking ban in all U.S. workplaces. CRS also notes that if OSHA had conducted an analysis of all of the available studies on smoking in the workplace, it would likely have found no increased cancer risk due to ETS. The report states, "Hac? nSHA performed a meta-analysis, it seems likely that it would have found no increased lung cancer risk from occupational ETS exposure." As you know, CRS provides objective and impartial research and analysis for Members of Congress. We are interested in your views on this important research study and its implication5 fur all forced smoking bans by the Federal government. Sincerely, I;U

Text Control

Highlight Text:

OCR Text Alignment:

Image Control

Image Rotation:

Image Size: