Philip Morris
Quit and Win Wales: An Evaluation of the 900000 Pilot Content
Fields
- Author
- Catford, J.
- Roberts, C.
- Smith, C.
- Roberts, C.
- Type
- PSCI, PUBLICATION SCIENTIFIC
- ABST, ABSTRACT
- Area
- WORLDWIDE REG AFFAIRS/LIBRARY
- Attachment
- 2048252199/2048252525
- 2048252387/2048252418
- Site
- N403
- Request
- Stmn/R1-048
- Master ID
- 2048252379/2524
Related Documents:- 2048252379 Requested Papers
- 2048252380
- 2048252381-2386 Evaluating the Quality of Articles Published in Journal Supplements Compared with the Quality of Those Published in the Parent Journal
- 2048252387 Preventing Alcohol and Substance Abuse in Minority Youth Recent Results From Asap Training and Demonstration Programs. Prevention Works: Trends in Drug Abuse Education 760000 - 900000. Long Term Prevention of Tobacco Use Among Junior High School Students Through Classroom and Telephone Interventions. Misuse of the Scientific Literature by the Tobacco Industry.
- 2048252388-2391 Appendix Coding Definitions for Article Content
- 2048252392-2402 Tobacco Industry Response to A Risk Assessment of Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048252404-2406 Inappropriate and Appropriate Selection of 'peers' in Grant Review. Public Bias and Public Policy
- 2048252407-2414 Sponsored Symposia on Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048252415-2418 Publication Bias and Public Health Policy on Environmental Tobacco Smoke
- 2048252419
- 2048252420-2421 Taking Money From the Devil
- 2048252422
- 2048252423-2429 the Publication of Sponsored Symposiums in Medical Journals
- 2048252430-2431 Tobacco Industry Funding of Biomedical Research
- 2048252432
- 2048252433-2438 Ethical Issues Relating to the Conduct and Interpretation of Epidemiologic Research in Private Industry
- 2048252439
- 2048252440-2445 Independent Investigators and for-Profit Companies Guidelines for Biomedical Scientists Considering Funding by Industry
- 2048252446
- 2048252447-2450 Source of Funding and Outcome of Clinical Trials
- 2048252451
- 2048252452-2456 Sounding Board Avoiding Bias in the Conduct and Reporting of Cost-Effectiveness Research Sponsored by Pharmaceutical Companies
- 2048252457
- 2048252458-2465 Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals
- 2048252466
- 2048252467 Editorial Conflict of Interest Policy
- 2048252468
- 2048252469-2471 New Requirements for Authors: Signed Statements of Authorship Responsibility and Financial Disclosure
- 2048252472
- 2048252473-2475 Commentary Conflict of Interest and Scientific Publicati
- 2048252476
- 2048252477-2479 Dealing with Conflicts of Interest
- 2048252480
- 2048252481-2482 New 'information for Authors' - and Readers
- 2048252483-2491 A Study of Manufacturer - Supported Trials of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the Treatment of Arthritis Reporting and Documentation of Efficacy and Toxicity
- 2048252492
- 2048252493-2497 Sounding Board Physicians' Conflicts of Interest the Limitations of Disclosure
- 2048252498
- 2048252499-2501 Commentary Conflict of Interest the New Mccarthyism in Science
- 2048252502
- 2048252503-2505 Researchers Try to Separate Smoking Fact From Fiction
- 2048252506-2507
- 2048252508-2513 Influence of Design Characteristics on the Outcome of Retrospective Cohort Studies
- 2048252514
- 2048252515-2519 Conflict of Interest Dilemmas in Biomedical Research
- 2048252520
- 2048252521-2524 When Researchers Accept Funding From the Tobacco Industry, Do Ethics Go Up in Smoke? the Research Game.
- Document File
- 2048252198/2048252525/Bero Barnes (Ciar)
- Author (Organization)
- Health Promotion Wales
- Inst for Health Promotion
- Tobacco Control
- Inst for Health Promotion
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Characteristic
- MISS, MISSING PAGES
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- dfq92e00
Document Images
Tobacco Control 1993 ; 2 : 114-119
Health Promotion
Wales, Ffvnnon-las,
Ty Glas Avenue,
Llanishen, Cardiff
CF4 SDZ Wales, UK
C Roberts
C Smith
Institute for Health
Promotion, Ffynnon-
las, Ty Glas Avenue,
Llanishen, Cardiff
CF4 SDZ Wales, UK
J Catford
Quit and Win Wales : an evaluation of the 1990
pilot contest
Chris Roberts, Christopher Smith, John Catford
Abstract
Objective - To assess the effectiveness of
the 1990 pilot Quit and Win contest held
in South East Wales (UK) in reducing
smoking prevalence.
Methods - Follow-up surveys of the 687
entrants were conducted after four
months and one year through postal self-
completion questionnaires. The question-
naires covered demographic background,
smoking history, the methods used to
quit, and the role of the contest in the
quitting process. In addition, a short
questionnaire was sent to a sample of
those who did not enter the contest
despite requesting an entry form.
Results - The data indicate a quit rate
among participants of 30 % at one year,
and that other smokers were stimulated
to quit, even though they did not formally
enter the contest. Analysis of significant
differences (p < 0.01) between successful
and unsuccessful participants showed
that the quitters tended to be older, to be
heavier smokers, to have made fewer
previous attempts to quit, to have
stopped smoking straight away rather
than to have cut down gradually, and to
have received more support from their
family and friends. Four-fifths of the
non-quitters expressed an interest in a
future contest.
Conclusions -Quit and Win contests ap-
pear to be a cost-effective approach to
smoking cessation initiatives in Wales,
though they need to be supported by
more intensive methods to help the most
resistant group of smokers who would
like to give up. A number of refinements
are recommended to improve impact in
any future contest.
(Tobacco Control 1993 ; 2: 1 14-1 19)
Introduction
In recent years smoking prevalence has been
declining in Wales. Between 1985 and 1990,
the proportion of adults aged 18-64 smoking at
least occasionally fell from 41 ;;, to 35 " for
men and from 33 " to 29 °.,, for women.'
Nevertheless, the level of smoking in Wales
continues to pose a major threat to public
health. As a recently published report makes
clear, "smoking is the largest single cause of
premature death and preventable ill health in
Wales "." It is estimated that 4200 men and
1600 women die annually from smoking-
related diseases, and that the hospital costs to
the National Health Service (NHS) in Wales
in treating smoking-related illness total some
L27M per annum. Smoking prevention thus
remains high on the agenda of health pro-
motion workers, as witnessed by the targets set
in the Health for All in Wales strategy for a
continued decline in the level of smoking.'
A wide variety of smoking cessation pro-
grammes are available to those wishing to quit
tobacco smoking, such as self-help leaflets and
books, counselling from health professionals,
stop-smoking groups, and a range of specific
treatments including drugs and acupuncture.'
In addition to these strategies, which deal
mainly with small groups or individuals, are
mass media initiatives which have the potential
for reaching large audiences cost effectively.
One such initiative is the Quit and Win contest.
This paper is concerned with a pilot Quit and
Win contest run by Heartbeat Wales, the first
national demonstration programme for heart
disease prevention in the United Kingdom
(UK). Results from four-month and one-year
follow-up surveys of participants and a survey
of non-participants are used to evaluate the
long-term effectiveness of the contest.
QUIT AND WIN: THE BACKGROUND
The Quit and Win contest was first developed
as a smoking cessation strategy by workers on
the Minnesota Heart Health Programme in
1982, and has since been incorporated into
programmes developed to reduce smoking
prevalence elsewhere in the USA and in
European countries such as Finland, Sweden,
and England.- '-` Quit rates achieved at 30-day
follow-up have exceeded 60 ".,,, while rates in
excess of 20 ";, have been recorded at six- and
12-month follow-ups. This suggests that,
although there is a fall in the proportion of
successful quitters over time, Quit and Win
contests can be effective in the longer term.
Whilst Quit and Win contests may vary
according to the specific needs of smoking-
cessation programmes in various locations,
certain key features appear to be common to all
contests. Firstly, Quit and Win contests use
communitv-based mass media to attract as
many participants as possible. As a result
entrants are less likely to feel isolated in their
attempt to quit, with potential support not
only from family and friends but also from a
