Philip Morris
Statement of Taylor M. Quinn Submitted to the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment House Energy and Commerce Committee
Fields
- Author
- Quinn, T.M.
- Type
- TRAN, TRANSCRIPT
- Area
- NICOLI,DAVID/OFFICE
- Attachment
- 2046942392/2046942537
- 2046942407/2046942419
- Request
- Stmn/R1-072
- Named Organization
- Batf, Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco and Firearms
- Bureau of Foods
- Division of Regulatory Guidance
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration
- Taylor Quinn Consulting
- Bureau of Foods
- Recipient (Organization)
- Energy + Commerce Comm
- House
- Subcomm on Health + the Environment
- House
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2046942409/2419
Related Documents: - Site
- W6
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Brand
- Marlboro
- Merit
- UCSF Legacy ID
- hfb62e00
Document Images
T
I
STATEMENT OF TAYLOR M. QUINN
SUBMITTED TO THE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT
HOUSE ENERGY AND COMMERCE COMMITTEE
MARCH 25, 1994
Mr. Chairman, members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the
opportunity to submit this statement addressing the issue of nicotine in
the processing and manufacturing of cigarettes - an issue which has
recently been the subject of considerable attention.
I retired from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1985 after
34 years of service. My FDA experience includes 10 years as an
investigator conducting comprehensive field investigations of food, drug
and cosmetic manufacturing facilities. These inspections included the
review of ingredients and additives as well as material balance
evaluations. I held the position of Director, Division of Regulatory
Guidance, Bureau of Foods, from January, 1970 through September,
1976, and served as Associate Director for Compliance, Bureau of Foods
from September, 1976 until my retirement on February 1, 1985. Since
1985, I have been President of Taylor Quinn Consulting Inc., conducting
inspections and audits of manufacturing facilities in the food industry for
quality control procedures, good manufacturing practices, contamination
problems and material balance evaluations.
Philip Morris U.S.A. recently engaged me to conduct an
independent investigation concerning nicotine in their tobacco processing
and manufacturing practices, and I am appearing today at their request.

7
Page 2
In the course of conducting my independent investigation I inspected
Philip Morris facilities in the Richmond, Virginia area including the two
plants where reconstituted tobacco sheets are prepared, the Flavor
Center responsible for the ingredients added to cigarettes and the
Cigarette Manufacturing Center.
I wish to emphasize that I had complete autonomy in conducting
the investigation and directed that I be given access to comprehensive
information and data regarding Philip Morris tobacco processing and
manufacturing. My investigation focused on several key questions:
(1) nicotine in tobacco processing;
(2) what processing aids and ingredients were being added
during the various stages of tobacco processing and
manufacturing;
(3) determining which processing aids or ingredients contained
nicotine and, if so, how much;
(4) the nicotine content in various finished products; and
(5) how much of the nicotine in the finished product came
from the raw tobacco and how much nicotine, if any was
added.

Page 3
During the course of my investigation I randomly requested data
with respect to brands and time periods, and all of the information
requested was provided. For example, while I reviewed all of the
ingredients used in the manufacture of Philip Morris cigarettes I
randomly chose three brands - Marlboro, Merit Regular and Merit
Menthol - and was provided with a list of flavors and processing aids for
each brand. I also requested this information for randomly selected time
periods and was provided with this information for all three brands
currently as well as six months and one year ago. Similarly, data
regarding nicotine content for all three brands for all three time periods
was produced at my instruction.
I was permitted to ask any question of any Philip Morris employee I
chose, and all inquiries were readily answered. Also, all records that I
requested were readily provided.
The conclusions of my investigation can be summarized as follows:
1. There is nothing I observed in the processing of tobacco or
the manufacture of cigarettes at Philip Morris that would
materialiy increase the nicotine in their products above what
naturally occurs in the tobacco.
2. The denatured alcohol used as a processing aid by Philip
Morris contains nicotine in the form of nicotine sulfate (SDA-
4) as approved by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms and 27 C.F.R. ยง 21.38. Denatured alcohol contains

Page 4
nicotine in amounts so small that it would be undetectable
in the tobacco in the finished cigarette considering the much
larger amount of nicotine from the tobacco. This is
confirmed by my calculations demonstrating that the
nicotine contribution from SDA-4 denatured alcohol is
0.0006 to 0.0008 milligrams of nicotine per Marlboro
Regular cigarette, 0.0011 to 0.0015 milligrams of nicotine
per Merit Regular cigarette and 0.0012 to 0.0023 milligrams
of nicotine per Merit Menthol cigarette. The level of total
nicotine in these cigarettes ranges from approximately 16
milligrams to approximately 13 milligrams. So the amount
contributed by the SDA-4 could not be measured against
this naturally occurring background.
3. The commercial tobacco flavoring commonly referred to as
"tobacco extract" was used by Philip Morris in 1993 in its
Merit Menthol cigarette. This extract contains naturally
occurring nicotine in small amounts. No other flavor used
by Philip Morris contains nicotine and this flavor was used
only in Merit Menthol. The nicotine contribution from
tobacco extract to the finished cigarette in which it was used
is so small that it does not measurably change the level of
nicotine in the cigarette. For example, the maximum
possible contribution of nicotine from tobacco extract in
Merit Menthol is about 0.0029 milligrams of nicotine per
cigarette by my calculations. When this is combined with
the nicotine contributed by SDA-4, it would result in a

Page 5
maximum of approximately 0.0052 milligrams of nicotine per
cigarette. Again, considering the total nicotine in the
cigarettes, the nicotine contributed by these two sources
could not be measured against the naturally occurring
nicotine.
4. My extensive investigation into the Philip Morris processes of
preparing reconstituted tobacco resulted in the conclusion
that no measurable nicotine is being added.
As an experienced investigator, I was satisfied with the cooperation
and candor of all Philip Morris personnel during my inspection of their
facilities. I observed no evidence that would support any allegation that
Philip Morris adds any measurable level of nicotine to cigarettes over and
above the amount of nicotine naturally found in tobacco.
Thank you.
