Philip Morris
Fact Sheet Perceptions and Facts About Youth Smoking
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- CHAR, CHART, GRAPH, TABLE, MAPS
- Area
- NICOLI,DAVID/OFFICE
- Site
- W6
- Named Person
- Difranza, J.
- Fischhoff, B.
- Hams, L.
- Henke, L.
- Mizerski, R.
- Pechmann, C.
- Salzman, M.
- Surgeon General
- Viscusi, K.
- Fischhoff, B.
- Named Organization
- Advertising Age
- American Academy of Advertising
- American Academy of Advertising Conferen
- American Psychologist
- Bkg Youth
- Ca Dept of Health Services
- Carnegie Mellon Univ
- Centers for Disease Control
- Duke Univ
- Fl State Univ
- Hhs, Dept of Health and Human Services
- Intl Journal of Advertising
- Journal of Risk + Uncertainty
- Journal of the American Medical Assn
- Marketing Science Inst
- Oxford Univ Press
- RJR, R.J.Reynolds
- Univ of Ca
- Univ of Mi
- Univ of Nh
- US Education Dept
- American Academy of Advertising
- Request
- Stmn/R1-025
- Stmn/R1-072
- Stmn/R1-092
- Stmn/R1-093
- Stmn/R1-072
- Document File
- 2046926828/2046926925/Briefing Book - Response to Surgeon General's Report on Smoking Released on 000223 - TI, RJR Talking Point.
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Master ID
- 2046926829/6924
Related Documents:- 2046926829 Surgeon General Response
- 2046926830-6831 Ama Media Briefing
- 2046926832-6835 Clearing the Smokescreen Tobacco, Public Health and Public Policy
- 2046926836-6837 Passive Cigarette Smoke Found in Fetal Hair
- 2046926838-6840 Minors in Minority Neighborhoods Sold Single Cigarettes
- 2046926841-6842 First Two Weeks Crucial in Efforts to Quit Smoking
- 2046926843-6845 Tobacco Ads Worked Well to Get Young Girls to Smoke
- 2046926846-6847 Battle to Get America to Stop Smoking No Basis for Optimism
- 2046926848
- 2046926849
- 2046926850
- 2046926851
- 2046926852
- 2046926853
- 2046926854
- 2046926855
- 2046926856 TI Comments
- 2046926857-6858 Why Young People Begin Smoking
- 2046926859-6860 Incidence of Youth Smoking
- 2046926861-6862 Cigarette Industry Initiatives Against Youth Smoking
- 2046926863-6864 Cigarette Advertising and Youth Smoking
- 2046926865 Our Comments
- 2046926866-6869 Tobacco Products and the Myth of 'underregulation'
- 2046926870-6880 Tobacco Products and the Myth of 'underregulation'
- 2046926881-6883 Ets Talking Points
- 2046926884-6885 Study on Trace Nicotine Levels in Fetal Hair
- 2046926886-6888 Why Do Young People Begin Smoking?
- 2046926889-6890 How Advertising Works: Competition in A Mature Market
- 2046926891-6895 International Experience with Cigarette Advertising Bans
- 2046926896-6898 Cigarette Advertising and 'targeting'
- 2046926899-6902 Promotional Activity by Cigarette Manufacturers
- 2046926903-6908 Preventing Youth Access to Tobacco Products
- 2046926909-6916 Social Issues Addiction
- 2046926917 RJR Comments
- 2046926918-6919 Response to the Surgeon General's 940000 Report
- Characteristic
- ILLE, ILLEGIBLE
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- Brand
- Camel
- UCSF Legacy ID
- jen65e00
Document Images
Fact Sheet
S
Perceptions and Facts about Youth Smoking
=~cepticn. ;:uth smo,ung ts incregsin~ uecause of cigarette advertising,
~,Jsernment oata inoicate tne reverse: youth smoking has steadily declined since
; -5. C~ en tnouen ir.~:iustrv a(lvertising has increased. Reiearch shows that peer
vluence and parenral examcie are the reasons why youth smoke, not advertising.
ms c"%_% c_ . r.s% c smokcd cigarettes c Centen fcr D;sease Control (the
?9 "__nage Ar.:n_ocs e:.a i%-ecc:ces Suney) shows that 69 5% of i24-to-17 yeara olds have
a%~ ::garette: 16 6% expenmcr.ted at some po.nt, but don t smoke.
-_ L c.a..-...,, c. r:eLt_-. !--%s Se.rv,ces annuai survey w-ith 1',"100 high-schooi seniors,
-..__ _.. _-- -.ti r. s::. :::" : ::gan s L,,titute for Sociai Researcn, shows tiiat over the
a__. .: o; smoxLng in e% crv category c:tiev measure.
' S% decitne
? 50'o deciine
decitne
;2 0°'o decitne
4
-. ~. __. ,..__.. .. . _... . yy i ara 1993
in t«v surnel s ccad,_cted oei:a}f of
_..:. ......eSa _. ~-.._. _: .-,:: ence L: t^.e aec,s:cn :o smoke «as peC7 rressure and
_....~ . __..c_ , - ;cspcncciits ... 1993) Ad%ert:s.ng \sas asced'oN I°', in i991. ;t was
ev ; 492 , wcortcd that thc tna,)or reasons for 1 Cth graaers
.cg:rn,rg :c sr-;ehe wero c r.ctcc,ai nonns and peer nressure Adverttstng was not
ed.crta:rg, e auti:or stated. tilere been new tobacco
..e^:s:nQ .a~ pa ens ar,c sc;ne oe^;ograpn,c changes, :here is no basts tor believtng that
easont for s;t:c~,.ng r.s% e crangea among SaOICSCCnts.
~ outh stnoking, reported in the Uternahonel Icurnai of
:a~e^:s:ne ; 93!, c nc: ces. 7e:e :s no evidence in any ot"t,'te srsdtos t_ suggest that, if
oua .^.:axe tlie Ieast difference tn the propensit~, of children to
smoko
a.n anaiN sis of 3r,nuai tobacco :cns=ption in 22 countr.es assessing the likely effect of a
::garotte aa~ertising ban cn consu:rptton tndicatns that a ban may have the opposite desired
e:rect -:: may increase censu-.p';on The authors suggest in the international Jotu-nal of
,~dverttstng i i 993) a piausibie :n:erpretatton may be that without cigarette advertising, health
"arntng labe!s have reduced exposure.
.; 1992 stuav b%, Dr ~:l ard ".`,zerski (Florida State University) presented at the American
.ycademy of Ad.ers:ng ,n :993 found that among 3-to-6 ytar oldr, the older the ctuld, the
:-,igher the Ie~e', of c;garene adNeriising recognition and the greater the dislike for smoking.

-2-
?erccprion: Cigarette advertising targets children in order to replace adults leaving the market.
i hat's why there is a high prevalence of smoking among the younger age groups.
~icts: The number of adult smokers has been declining for more than a decade. Still, one in
four saults smokes. Each cigarette manufacturer has a more than adequate market
;pportunirv to grow by taking share from competitors. That's the purpose of tobacco
aavertis,ng: to retain a orands current adult smokers and to give adult smokers of
~ompeutise brands a reason to switch. (See enclosed chart on smoker switching.)
not smoke naa been acrnciy supported by tndustry
; regrarr,s ter cecaces E, en c gi: y cuth smok;ng has declined, we beiieve more can be done
~ ~cC.e,erate t:e decitnc.
.
=r~:r :._ . ~ids :...nk sTching s g arnorcus because of cigarette ad, ertiSing.
+cts ~dtie.^.:s ng aces nut .^.2nge ycutn's overwhelming neEative opinions about smokinQ.
; i 991 i^.:e> b~ Dr ;-rc nkc (T~ntvcrstty of New Hampshire), 4irich Nti,it be presented to
:.;e i y9,: a.rrtcr,can Acndc:nv cf ,=,dNerttstng conference, found tha: despite high cigarettt
aaticrrs,ng r~..cgn,rten rates, y5°'o of children disliked cigarettes, 9'0% reponed cigarettes are
::a fc: % ~.: an_- n.,.,_ .,, .._ _n:i dren tnought cigarettes ~xere appropriate ior children
e c:::: rc:a:,. claca4ona; ar.e parental rnaurials to address youth smoking issues. Our
ccce C:.::ata .^a; b;'lboards will not be located within 500 feet of a school or
e~ 3 cu .o s c^,s::,g :s ;.a ;ed eniy t,n oublicattons directed ptimanls to readers 21 years of
.. acs ....at :e and appear to be at least 25 ycars of age.
:e^-!ces indicate that -~ou:n smoking t; dxlmtng. T;,e Centers
:°dtcatcs that cnlv 1: 89% of all 1::-to-1 ?~ ear olds smoke
. a en _ r-;nci s,~c ,._:ir,:uon of one cigarette in tite past month (e g 12 cigareRes a
fy^,her tndicates that the ~ounger the age, c::e less
.csearc b, Dr Ccmet:a Pechmann (Graduate School cf'vtanagement, t,'niVersttv
u:.dcr s grant frorn the state's anti-tobacco progzani, ':o assist
coit~~-a! ers an,: healt'ti g; oups n designing and implementing adNertictng strategies that are
.;:ost l;heiy to dctcr -,ou:i;s _`-cm startrng to stnoke," concluded in a paper published by the
Varkenng Sc;encc inst r~;e 'Xe found that the cigarette ads failed to anhance perceptions of a
smoker 7ese nr.dings suggcst that boosttng anti-smoking advertising is preferable to further
r esmcnng cigarette adremstng "
jdvernstag Age magazinc co,^lmtssioned a 1992 survey by research finn BKG Youth, which
found that despite h:gh recognt:tcn of cigarette advertising, 90% ef elementary/ntiddle schooi
3tudents t'rink smoking ;s 'gross "We'd have to interpret this to say tl~at cigarette advertising
:s certatnly reaching the ey-es of `oung children, (but) I don't know how you could argue.,.thnt it
:auscs thcrn to smoke," said Marian Sa;rsnan, 8KG Youta president.
~r ;cseph DiFr~nza, n research for his 12/91 J urnal of the American Medical Association
article on Car.tei, found -- hut did not report that among high school students who thought
:oo Calnci sds are 'ccol, 94% indicated smoking does not make you popular; 95% indicated
smoking makes you unattracuve.
. HHS (L'nivernR of 'viichigan) finds that 80.6% of 8th graders, 76.5% of 10th graders and
0.6% of higl: school senuon disapprove of smoking.
7

-3-
'~rcepuon: The tobacco indusm is the heaviest user of billboard advertising and places a
disproporttonate amount ef that advertising in inner cities, which affec*s vulnerable
i black youth.
ictl. Because the industry is restricted from broadcast advertising, billboards and
publications are the oniv medla available for product messages. Billboard locations
are dictated by local zontng ordinances. Therefore, they tend to be concentrated in
commercial areas within cities and along highways.
Nonetheless. the percentage of underage African-American youth smoking is
substantiallv loaer than tne nzrcentige of underage whites smoking;
:.^,can .~^ encc^, 5 0°,%
'.Vhitc ; 7.4%
~-sca-::% s-_c.es h.a~e :- at recogniuon of ad~cttistng does not affoct negactve product
c:sK, . . .'. ,..;G ; :992`, Fcctuuann ( 1993), Henke (1993) see above)
L S.3 ,v00 pcopie 1 8 N ears old or younger start smoking every day.
''o one can attest to the accuracy or inaccuracy of this statement.
s cascd c: a ctatisncai m,~ee; ,:stng 1975.1985 data collected araong adults 20- ~-cars old.
:,ese _... ..._c.s ,,., ... .:e~.e ...:o a:.count e:ther the connnued deciinc in youth s:: oktng
or tlie
oect ct' sn'.;,K r.e :. ... ,..... - ~~r,r.S:.s, %Lntch haNro tntensuied oser L,e past 8.ears
~rcent;on:
-..:..stra:e 'r,e .:.sppror-:z:eacss of aui model in evaluating today's stuokcng rates, consi.d.er
it ;,roJected s-ncrctn3 amcng adults tn 1990 would be 28 percent. A C:)C :eport and Lou
poll g~o'Aed that tr. 1 y90 scoicers represented 26% of t1u population. ~ t;at 2° o
c:eren cc rer:esen:s .1 ^ rcopie a 9tg~ntficant differencec
igarette use among L.S. ;.outh, after declining in the late 1970s, stabilized again in
the 1980s. According to reports on January 31, it rose in 1993.
cts: While the level of decline in the '80a was not as steep as in the mid- to late-' 70s, there
was still a siQnificant decline. In 1993, the percentage of high school seniors who have
ever tried a cigarette essentiAlly stayed the same at 61.9% versus 61.8% in 1992. It
would appear that among those trying smoking, there was a very slight increase in the
amount they smoked. Previous declines similar to the increases reported this year
have been characterized by E{HS as statistically insignificant. Certainly, any increase
-- insignificant or otheni9e -- has to be looked at within the context of the increased
usage of illegal substances reported for y outh in 1993. From 1980 to 1993, the overall
cigarette pattern shows:
Percent Fti:r 1.'sed. 12.8% decline
Lzs~in last 30 days 2.0% decline
pAL, 10.8% decline
1/2 + atl 23.8% decline

-4-
n: Smoking is the No. 1 problem among American youth.
T;te tobacco tndustrv agrees with t.de Surgeon General that % outh should not smoke, and
~'i actitiely pursuing programs to tlelp reduce youth smoking. The good news is that
_;; rogress has been made - -uth smoking incidence itias decl4ned in the last 15 years. In
~~irness, smoking is but cne :f several major issues today's young people must address.
~S i ~crstty ef ':: ~rgaa~ re~cr~s that a h:g.her p==tage of higii school seniers have
_sod a: c oi ;?'''' a.,)a be=n cn_-,c , 52 5? ") than nave tned smoking ~61.9%) in theu- lifetime.
:n Sc;,te.:,oe. : y93 , eponca that;
`9°'o ot cil i C-to-i 9, ear s ~d~ta ssv thev ;culd get a ha.ndgun u 1 wanted one.
~a~e 3c ca :r:o a pnvsica: t.g:.t ::, school,
~a~e carned a%%eapon to scnoet tnts scnool year,
::°o ha~e ceen t.^.:eateneo phystca,tv tn tne past 30 days,
~atie oeen sn;,: .n :ne past ~ear,
,.t so~:~eer,e e:se
rs .!O1 -es n .:.e 'weiiBc:ng of Amencan Y-uth, reieased b} the U S.
e:._._ ,...a as uxc:~ :o oc mu.rlerea and tv+!ce as llkelv to cot:untt
as :eenage:s ~rre,c iy!0
.,. . :,se e:7:-g Wr*es:ec t;a3 sosrea 30-fo'1d n tne same ttme pertod.
scrle;a cnm(: ssroro ~c.uiger than 2!
A_,,,_ ers t ~9293 acade:ntc yee.r) fcund that
;° c_ rs sre son..r s. a' east a 8 e%erage aamt,^,ed to some totzu of cluattng
Ct :'.. ma:es c._n aof a sexual assault; :'3 by another srudent
`,as ,. cs:cere~ 9 r,;cc
~ ouch smoke because thev do not realize the risks of their actions.
On the contrarv, ~outh orrestimate the health risks of smoking.
to sco^t s^:eking and . if anything, e,en exaggerate its
.
neattn e:?'r_:s. S:ate of Ce'.ifornta Lepaivr,cnt of Heaith Servtces, Request for
roposa: fc- ::.taccc ccnt:o; ::.ed:a ca.^ipatgr,, 9 I2'911
%',scus: t u-ke i n:~ crsitv a:.d ed:tor ot ao,rrne; of R~sk and Unccr ginN) has found that 16-
.0-21 ~ car citis tenC to oN ers:ate tr,e nsic of lung cancer from smoking even more than adults,
.4 ho aiso overstate tre^i. remate teenagers, nc says, overstate the risks more than male
teenagers 7ese findings scangiy :.ontradtct the models of individuals being lured into
smoking at an cariy age without a.ny cogiuzance of 11e nsks" ~Smokinct: \lakin¢ the Risky
D i: ,\V Kip Viscusi, `'Y- Oxford L'tuverytty Press, 19921
3=ch risclinoff (Carnegle `tellon 1:niverstry) reported in Ainericsn Psychologist (1993) on a
cornpanson of three groups to assess (heir a'bilities to;udge risks (including etgarettes) 86
cuddle-ciass tcens. their parcnts and 95 high-nsk teens frorn3uvetule facilitiu. He found that
overall teens cad the same ao ltty to judge nsks as adults, and that thty are no more apt to think
themselses tnsvlnerable kmong the reasons he speculated that teens engage in risky behaviors
~s that they see great benei:tS ir, the behnvior giving them status with peers.
HHS t~..~niversity of Vlichlgan) repons that 69.5% of hip~ school seruors say there is ''grcat
sk" tn smoking one or more packs of cigarettes a dav.

-5-
"CLpl19ti1'. Kids who start smoking cannot quit.
cts: Research as aell as common sense clearJv indicates otherwise.
.
,
n-moers indtcata that 6I.9% of high school seniors nave ever
sMoxed, '_9 Q0': 4ase sm=cc past 30 davs; iy 0% smoked daily, c.carly tndicating that
=uiP e.Yr~er1.T.Gnt ~ ~ sTck :8 , icr.out taxing it up.
~ e Ce ::ers ci n:scsse i:urd that 54% of 1Z-ta-i' year olds who smoked (b5 their
in past 30 days) said tl;ev ,tcwd not be stnoking a
car ;ater
-' 1 ,^:::::tar:1 ha~e cuit Wthout any asststancc i nere is no indication that
_5c sr,cuid 5c a iac;c; ,n anvone s aoilitv to quu if thcy rca.ko that dec:sion.
_._ e'c r~crc a,:,,.,;s S ~,c nsve euu smoking 'nearh 43 =iiion) than are currently
»tX
_-: s s _. _... _. _. _ e..n .. _ : ., -g ae.rc;s TVOaCCo Jt y l 0-~-+ . -7b 74 or 74 I -6996.
.
