Philip Morris
How Advertising Works: Competition in A Mature Market
Fields
- Type
- REPT, REPORT, OTHER
- Area
- NICOLI,DAVID/OFFICE
- Master ID
- 2046926829/6924
Related Documents:- 2046926829 Surgeon General Response
- 2046926830-6831 Ama Media Briefing
- 2046926832-6835 Clearing the Smokescreen Tobacco, Public Health and Public Policy
- 2046926836-6837 Passive Cigarette Smoke Found in Fetal Hair
- 2046926838-6840 Minors in Minority Neighborhoods Sold Single Cigarettes
- 2046926841-6842 First Two Weeks Crucial in Efforts to Quit Smoking
- 2046926843-6845 Tobacco Ads Worked Well to Get Young Girls to Smoke
- 2046926846-6847 Battle to Get America to Stop Smoking No Basis for Optimism
- 2046926848
- 2046926849
- 2046926850
- 2046926851
- 2046926852
- 2046926853
- 2046926854
- 2046926855
- 2046926856 TI Comments
- 2046926857-6858 Why Young People Begin Smoking
- 2046926859-6860 Incidence of Youth Smoking
- 2046926861-6862 Cigarette Industry Initiatives Against Youth Smoking
- 2046926863-6864 Cigarette Advertising and Youth Smoking
- 2046926865 Our Comments
- 2046926866-6869 Tobacco Products and the Myth of 'underregulation'
- 2046926870-6880 Tobacco Products and the Myth of 'underregulation'
- 2046926881-6883 Ets Talking Points
- 2046926884-6885 Study on Trace Nicotine Levels in Fetal Hair
- 2046926886-6888 Why Do Young People Begin Smoking?
- 2046926891-6895 International Experience with Cigarette Advertising Bans
- 2046926896-6898 Cigarette Advertising and 'targeting'
- 2046926899-6902 Promotional Activity by Cigarette Manufacturers
- 2046926903-6908 Preventing Youth Access to Tobacco Products
- 2046926909-6916 Social Issues Addiction
- 2046926917 RJR Comments
- 2046926918-6919 Response to the Surgeon General's 940000 Report
- 2046926920-6924 Fact Sheet Perceptions and Facts About Youth Smoking
- Request
- Stmn/R1-025
- Stmn/R1-072
- Stmn/R1-092
- Stmn/R1-093
- Stmn/R1-072
- Document File
- 2046926828/2046926925/Briefing Book - Response to Surgeon General's Report on Smoking Released on 000223 - TI, RJR Talking Point.
- Named Organization
- Council of Economic Advisors
- Litigation
- Stmn/Produced
- Site
- W6
- Date Loaded
- 05 Jun 1998
- UCSF Legacy ID
- pen65e00
Document Images
_ HOW ADVERTISING WORKS: COMPETITION IN A MATURE MARK .T
! Tobacco advertising does not cause people to smoke. As the
President's Council of Economic Advisors stated in its 1987
report to the President: "There is little evidence that
advertising results in additional smoking. As with many
products, [cigarette] advertising mainly shifts consumers
among brands.
The contention that advertising does influence people to smoke
overlooks the distinction between advertising in a"mature"
product and advertising in a"new" product market.
In a 'new product market, advertising, in the course of
promoting demand for particular brands, informs
potential consumers about and creates demand for the
product category. Potential consumers are unfamiliar
with the product category and have not formed an
attitude toward it.
.
In a mature ' market, consumers are familiar with and
have formed an attitude toward the product category.
Advertising speaks to those who have made a decision to
use the product category, promoting loyalty to the
advertised brand or seeking to persuade consumers to
switch brands.
Studies show that advertising in mature markets is not
significantly related to overall product demand, so advertising
restrictions and bans aimed at reducing smoking won't have
such an impact.
In fact, studies show that countries where tobacco advertising
is severely restricted or banned often have a greater influence
of smoking than countries that allow tobacco advertising.
As in any industry, the incentive for cigarette manufacturers to
advertise particular brands is substantial. Keeping or gaining a
single market-share point was worth over $450 million in sales
in this country in 199 1.
And every year, numerous smokers may switch brands. As
many as one in four smokers experiment with different brands
in the U.S. in any given year.

When proponents of cigarette advertising bans suggest that
advertising influences people to smoke, they are both
overestimating the power of advertising and underestimating
the intelligence and free will of consu mers.
Disseminating commercial messages does not guarantee that
they will be noticed: even when noticed, the messages will not
necessarily be retained; even when the message is memorable,
the brand will not necessarily be recalled; there is no guarantee
there was any interest in purchasing brand or product
category.
In addition, the antismoking counterarguments" are out there
and cannot be missed. The antitobacco point of view is one of
the most ~,idely disseminated consumer messages in the world.
Health warnings must be carried on tobacco product packages
and in tobacco advertising.
Basically, ad ban proposals are based on flawed assumptions --
that tobacco advertising influences people to begin smoking
and that instituting controls means smoking will decline.
.
~
~
~
~
. ~
C~o
~
